Bitcointalk Username: poodle63
BSC (Bep20) Wallet Address: 0xaCa2d60d001bEf91Fed759A63BD7599DDE67751f

PSG does it well by giving a good farewell gift for mbappe. The won against lyon has been also completing mbappe's journey in the french league. This is also his last match of him with PSG for the last season.



It was an easy bet for me given PSG's desire for giving Mbappe the last momentum of him to get the trophy with PSG before he leaves the club. Good bye, mbappe. One of the top players in the French league has decided to take on a new challenge in another league and most likely in La Liga.

Still waiting for Real Madrid to officially announce him as a new player. Perhaps it may not happen in days. We are getting closer to the opening of summer transfer season

Milan will be torn between selling him to Al Hilal and keeping him if there will be a very big offer for the club to get him. 175 million is not a little sum of money considering it's worth a few players, it can also be used to help the club's financial. It's fairly similar to Mbappe's price when PSG acquired him from Lyon and it's only having 5 millions gap. It should be mentioned that Saudi Arabia will not be as aggressive as it was last season. The disappointing attendance figures will discourage Saudi Arabia from recklessly investing large sums of money again but it's clearly stated saudi would still invest in the potential player who has big name. Leao probably one of these names.
The club must not be so dumb as to repeat last season's blunder. They are just targeting players that are absolutely required by the team.


Al hilal has great striker and midfielder like mitrovic and savic. The club is only lack good winger. I remind you tonally's story about how acmilan was always threatening him to push him leave from the club and join in the newcastle.
The same thing can happen to the acmilan soon.

Sometimes, i think that if laporta was the main causing for barcelona's financial problem. This is what i have got it from the article below.

https://www.football-espana.net/2024/05/27/xavi-hernandez-wanted-to-ship-out-4-6-barcelona-players-this-summer-multiple-reports

Disagreements between xavi and laporta has become the main causes of laporta sack xavi from barcelona. Xavi has been requesting the management to sell the 4 players above mentioned by the article but laporta refused it. I totally agree with what xavi did consider the lewandowkis is getting older, felix's performance was so average.
Cancelo is good but club will not able to extend his loan from manchester city without making him as a permanent transfer. Vitor roque is not as good as what i thought.

Xavi wants to get rid all of them but laporta doesn't even agree with him said that they are still contributing a lot to the club. IMO, xavi tried to give more chance for barcelona's academic player to perform in the la liga. This decision may be also helping barcelona to leave from the financial struggle.
Laporta understood it wrong. No doubt that he sacks xavi who are having different perspective about those players.

It has been reported by daily mail's reporter on his X. Pep will be step down as a coach in the next summer when his contract will be running out with manchester city. There is still one season left for him to coaching city. I was also reading if there would probably some candidates to be signed by city as pep's replacement.

These candidates are

- Xabi alonso (leverkusen)
- Michel (Girona) still a part of city football group.
- Naglesmann

It's still too early to talk about this but i think that those name make sense caused by they are having similar method in coaching the club like pep guardiola. Michel can be migrated from girona to the manchester city easily.

everything has advantage and disadvantage I guess with deflation it also strengthen conversion rate but as you said might have bad effect also.
its good if salary increase also align with the inflation so that the money can be inflating but our purchasing power won't gone in vain.
since our economic entirely depends on the circulation of the money, hopefully such thing can happen.
otherwise with the reduced purchasing power for middle class and the lower class people based on income rate, then the poverty gap will be even higher than it is right now.
definitely not an easy way to solve but there should be an effort to be put into solving this.

even increasing minimum salary is not really a solution to be honest, once government increases the salary by significant amount the price went up, inflation uncontrolled.
the best way is just to make quantity of commodities and food increases more than right now.
thats the difficult thing since doing that means more investment to the various sector that gonna requires massive resources.
regardless I agree that current salary increase just too small compared to inflation this causes purchasing power to plummet significantly.
if this goes on, people will eventually find themselves in situation where they could hardly afford monthly needs with current salary.

its liability when we have lying around and not using it for productive purpose though, but if the price went up, i'd call it an investment, after all it increases in term of value regardless of maintenance fee and so on.
but to be fair, having a farmable land is far advantageous if we are talking about country side, i always have that mind to buy a land somewhere in the countryside for agricultural purpose, with the helps of current technology the yield would multiply, with being landlord the rent price can be increased but occasionally not too frequently.
but when we are talking about yield, it can be multipled depends on our utilization.
but its undeniable that being a landlord in a city, is definitely a good business, otherwise the city won't get populated so much with places for rent.

the current staking campaign probably just to hold off selling pressure from the people.
as already reflected from the market people are dumping the coin the staking program will at least reduce that effect to some extent but never a long term solution eventually the selling pressure gonna be even bigger since staking means there's more money to be in the circulation.
but for people who are abundant in capital its good opportunity, but honestly staking not coin never sit right with me with the volatility and all.
I just better off to invest or stake in other coin at this point, the one that gone sponsored by tier 1 venture capital.
finding opportunity elsewhere seems more interesting, not to mention that second distribution of rewards in most of project usually disappointing.

solana can raise its market cap to that level if bitcoin also doubles or triples with current price, since solana market cap relatively small thats right there's always chance, after all nothing impossible.
like how solana gained 20x to its bearish price that tanked so hard it reached disappointing price of $2 but it climbs back up again to hundred dollars.
but as optimistic as i am, i just don't have the feeling to bet my money and waiting for another 20x to a coin that has already experiencing 20x.
don't we think that if a coin already reached that high maybe the path going forward in the future gonna be more difficult.
there are many coins that gonna compete with it, starting with that modular blockchain coin called celestia, dynamic blockchain of dymension and so on.

diversifying meme coin does make sense but if you take into account the volatility, then it is even more urgent, the diversification example that you wrote below seems a lot more safer than just
putting the whole 1k to just one meme coin, who knows some of the meme coin you mentioned below by profit alone could surpass the profit from putting entire 1k into just one meme coin knowing that some of meme coin you mentione have lower market capital.

yeah the craziness of meme coin volatility makes it more logical to just diversify it, some of these meme coin have behaviour of suiddenly shooting up in prices.
making diversifying a lot more worth it, since its different thing altogether if compared with altcoin investment.

It is preferable to wait for the formal statement from Manchester United and i think we are getting even closer to it. Ten Hag has won and brought United to the Europa League as his least impressive achievement this season and this may be also giving good impressiont to the INEOS to keep him for another season. I doubt Ineos will try to fire him after he handed Manchester United a trophy and europa league spot this season. INEOS has a plan for rebuilding the club again along with him.

I have a feeling that United will try to involve Ten Hag in the project. We may be seeing the future of Manchester United. The last time i have heard united has prepared small amounts of money for ten hag.
This may be increasing significantly after united has been successfully winning a trophy this season instead of getting trophyless like arsenal.

So, let's wait for some surprises to come soon. Im still expecting something big to happen in united's squad.

https://www.bavarianfootballworks.com/2024/5/26/24163892/bayern-munich-manchester-united-fc-barcelona-de-jong-real-madrid-chelsea-juventus-musiala-messi-kane

You will not be concerned about that. Bayern Munich may join the race to grab him and de jong will have some choices to decide. De Jong is good enough, and United isn't the only team interested in him. The final decision about his transfer has not been made by united. It's too early to talk about him this time. United can do a U-turn, as the club is said to be interested in signing Olise. United may potentially adjust its priorities for signings during the summer transfer season and de jong may be also excluded from the list.
Ineos and Ten Hag have agreed to revamp the club but the budget will become the main problem here to overhaul the club. It will begin with recruiting talented players to play for the club soon. De Jong's future is still undetermined but i hope he will able to decide it asap following the summer transfer season is gonna be open soon.

It's because Barcelona is still struggling to decide whether to sell him during the summer transfer window and it soudns pathetic to see that with the bad financial condition and barcelona tried to keep him before.


It's not yet determined. Give united some times. Im sure they will announce it soon whether to pursue him to join in the club.

Ancellotti has an exceptional level of accuracy in winning UCL and im not even doubting his capability in winning the next UCL trophy for him against dortmund. I don't even doubt Real Madrid will win the last game against Dortmund considering dortmund is ez team to beat. It's not comparable to the real madrid. That being said, it makes no difference what approach Terzic planned to face madrid. there will be no problem with this. Real Madrid will own the game against dortmund soon.
I still believe Madrid will dominate ball possession versus Dortmund. Dortmund can aim to imitate Gasperini's method against Madrid. I meant that the city used heavy press man-to-man marking in the first leg but the only problem whether dortmund's players can equal to the real madrid..

It effectively prevented Madrid from scoring a lot in the first leg. We'll see what strategy Ancellotti uses soon. I'm expecting Real Madrid will also try to deploy highpress in conjunction with a man-to-man marking plan.
I meant that Dortmund's players are not as good individually as those of Real Madrid.

It appears that PSG is now interested in working with Silva after seeing his performance in manchester city is very consistent. The club is still attempting to maintain its interest at this time after it was failed in the UCL and enrique has a plan to rebuild his club even better. Given PSG's failure in the UCL last season, it is also encouraging the club to use its available funds that would be used to extend mbappe's contract to recruit a good player to strengthen its squad, one of this plan to buy silave from manchester city. Silva's price is not that expensive and i think PSG can even afford easily. Bernardo Silave has won the EPL six times. It has proven how consistent silva is now.
Nothing concrete about silva's final decision regarding his future. He can stay even longer or leave from city at the summer transfer season. his price was 50m.PSG is attempting to acquire him from the city because Silva's release clause will be activated during the summer transfer window but im not sure whether silva will agree to join in PSG. It's all silva's decision to leave or stay in manchester city.

https://www.90min.com/talkingtransfers/psg-maintain-interest-bernardo-silva-man-city

Im not sure if silva will be interesting to play in the PSG. I have heard that he has been interesting to join in the barcelona but it seems like that this will not be real. Barcelona sackes xavi and sign hansi flick as a new appoint for the club.
Im feeling silva will be staying for another season in manchester city. He has been on the right place.

or just find the best insurance there is where it could cover most of your problems and at the same time having emergency fund I think its the best way to face whatever problem may arise.
the insurance helps cut down expenses that gets covered by the insurance company, all the while you still have some money left, the disadvantage though, it gonna take up quite a big share of your monthly salary.
definitely not affordable for most of people but its indeed the safest option there is.

other than that, try to earn money as much as you can, work hard, get higher position with better salary, then you're set even then you're more likely gonna need insurance.
but sometime you should be selective, not all insurance are good, some of them are plain trickery.
most of the time anyway, having emergency fund can do, that if you can figure out how much expenses usually gonna be spent for emergency situation like being sick.

that does seem to be the case but if you think about it again, when back then where money still doesn't exist, people hoarding all kinds of stuff, the kingdom hoarding golds to pay their expenses, the other hoarding food so that they can exchange it to gold, its actually the same, its just that since money exist, which happen to be a tool of exchange, then all the attention shifted into it.
its basically the same thing that we have been doing since thousand years ago its just with different tools so I see no problem here.
but yeah, nowaday can't live comfortably without sufficient money everything requires money, the people that can earn a lot will be the winner and have high status.
thats why its advisable to just try to find a way to make wealth even though its overall not an easy ones, but what other choice we have.

it depends on the job of course it the entire job can be done from remote working I think there's nothing wrong from it, personally I'm on the favour of working remote, no need to have higher carbon foot print traveling just to do the same exact thing that can be done from home, its overall the more efficient way to work and also to save the planet if you know it can also reduce gas needed for transportation meaning it will reduce our overall expenses.
from his opinion you can see from elon perspective that he probably feels wasting money on people that work from home.
but honestly if job is done then it should be okay, i don't understand with these big companies that demands more just for the sake of demanding, maybe the higher ups will feel a lot more productive seeing their employees working together in one place while in reality it absolutely is unnecessary.

its the all time high price reached by bitcoin in every bullrun that matters from my honest opinion, we can disregard the volatilty at the mean time because it only mattes when people are trading or investing with short term time it's not gonna be that meaningful for us that aimed higher price with holding long term these volatility at best just a decoration.
so i'm not really worried about whether or not the price of bitcoin gonna reach that high from the data of past all time high and how much percent it climbed up every time.
like you said, bitcoin could reach more than that, most people still don't believe it, but bitcoin can always make surpise price surge.
for good holders that have been holding since many ages ago, they even have set a higher target with the price around millions until they finally cashed out their investment.

to be fair if price has been soaring too high its probably time for correction thats why its not recommended to buy at peak but its also a good way to figure out whether there gonna be correction.
so there's certainly a way to figure out the correction but its not really sure way to figure out that though, the prediction can be a miss.
the market instead going up even higher then we lost opportunity to hold for even longer but if we still making profit i think we good.
for example current market price surge causing bitcoin to hit $71k then it went down again because correction is needed a pump that always continous can only happen when we truly in the biggest bullrun ever.
for now we are still in the early stages.