 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 »
|
|
69000 btc wallet open... sha hash extension attack does work?
|
|
|
|
|
looks like the majority of these wallets are forged from exposed public keys
in the distant past, some obvious fakes from coinbases like block #1
|
|
|
|
|
is losing all those decimal places the answer? perhaps the wallet software will be less clunky than Bitcoin Core - shouldn't be too difficult... if they can avoid the need to decide on transaction fees... get it wrong with Bitcoin and it can take 30 hours or 30 days to send...
|
|
|
|
|
is there or will there be a compelling reason to use electroneum (etn) over any other token?
|
|
|
|
|
if it's "British-developed" and legit why are they selling in USD?
|
|
|
|
|
but can they solve the basic problem that Bitcoin 1.0 is flawed - it acts like an international bank with branches everywhere but for purely political reasons only processes transactions individually through a single open teller window in Mongolia on tuesdays...
|
|
|
|
Why are you embedding your referral link if you hate them? 
Mining Sweden was always fishy to me. It never fell under the criteria of a true cloud mining farm. Someone claiming to be called "Tommy" with no last name and allegedly from Sweden? Garza is that you? |
|
|
|
|
lack of scaling to 2MB now mean bitcoin price is plunging
just at the time it needs to make up for the reward drop in 49 days
|
|
|
|
|
it seems Antminer S9 is indeed coming soon, but no details yet
|
|
|
|
|
if you are going to do that you might as well make block times more reasonable around 1 minutes, dump 99.999% of the PoW and make it efficient, return mining to CPU only, etc... a simple XOR checksum would do, etc, etc...
|
|
|
|
headers only mining is dangerous and could result in loss of many blocks, if any one of the "headers only" blocks turns out to be fake null headers or orphaned later but it's good enough for now  |
|
|
|
it seems Bitcoin Core BS whatever won't be seeing any more updates before July 2017 because the developers are too lazy to get around to it |
|
|
|
|
bitcoincorestream whatever isn't going anywhere, literally "The date will be the difficult part. Informed opinions range from July 2017 is "too little, too late", to, July 2017 is "minimum safe dist" a bunch of comedians...
|
|
|
|
|
perhaps we should return mining to individual wallets and eliminate chinese pools by replacing PoW with something energy efficient and more importantly 1cpu=1vote rather than the current "union block voting"
|
|
|
|
|
we already know we can't trust Block$tream so where's the issue - switch to classic
|
|
|
|
This is so rich: CTOVision Innovations August 2015 – Present (3 months) Greater Los Angeles AreaWorking with some of the most talented people I have ever met, while leading technical development and R&D. Fresh, new and different. http://www.visioninnovations.net/Contact Vision Innovations Inc 40 Sarasota Center Blvd Suite 105 Sarasota, Florida 34240 HAHAHAHA! Good catch! LMAO: www.visioninnovations.net/"Vision Innovations Inc is one of Florida's most innovative and successful marketing and advertising firms located in the Sarasota Area" Marketing & Advertising.  Not exactly 5th Avenue NY: http://www.rofo.com/building/FL/Sarasota/40-Sarasota-Center-Blvd-177627.html HAHAHAHAHAHA LA must be an internship.  learning to use godaddy website builder? |
|
|
|
Remember CEX.io? Presumably one of the "legit" cloud mining businesses. Got a bit tangled in their own thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=318010.msg11958998#msg11958998Some highlights: - Displayed a fake TrustPilot score on their home page. Then replaced it with another fake "satisfaction" number.
- Insists to have never claimed to own mining hardware. Despite posts showing archived information about purchasing ASICs, data center pictures etc.
- As soon as some criticism appeared in their thread some very happy users started posting positive reviews.
I've never been a big fan of CEX but never thought they would go full Garza. All they need to do now is get one of those hyperflux controllers. I seem to remember they tended to collapse the GH/s price everytime they needed money |
|
|
|
I did not realize it was 3T on 1 KW. That is more impressive then I thought it was. I could have seen them wanting to sell out of S4+ before releasing them if those specs are close.
But with S4+ sold out. I'm not sure what they are really waiting for. I think the silence still means a good chance they will not end up doing this.
not wanting to grow the network unnecessarily? |
|
|
|
|
hashingspace offers a hash pool "HASHPOOL - Highest Paying and Most User Friendly Public and Private Pools" - does josh claim copyright infringement and get our money back?
|
|
|
|
does anyone know what happened to the 2,400 btc mined to GAW setup address 1KQxLLQNxgn2upd4TtGbtiRdm3f5UWC9k8? "It's the one that GAW gives out in their instructions for how to setup your miner. Interesting this stuff." |
|
|
|
|
