|
I tested the site with .1 BTC, then .25 BTC as the minimum observed xfer and nothing showed in paypal, no response from support email, advertised numbers are dead. He has until end of business day today to return .35 BTC to source address or he netsol DNS is gone and his domain too, and 'not good' for him.
05/30/2016 BTC 0.25000000 Completed
Address: 1PypQkN7h81jSuKjJEaS2YXVf27PiPrmn
TxId: acbf62e2f6fc41bf9f3d7d63fc09e923f096840962c83477ef9df0be1f52ddf5
05/30/2016 BTC 0.10000000 Completed
Address: 1PypQkN7h81jSuKjJEaS2YXVf27PiPrmn
TxId: eed4e6f46242ade342da4092c891a2b5ac83af42798fa23cd9e3af98312a37d7
|
|
|
|
Happy new year guys. I'm back from Holiday and ready to continue working on the coin.
The new features that I've been working on have required lots of risky changes to the KHC protocol so, more developer testing is required before I can release a version with all these changes.
But, for the mean time, I'm preparing a Wallet version 0.70 that will only contain important bug fixes. I'm planning to release this version after block 150,000 gets mined in the next few weeks.
Also, since most of the problems with KHC have been related to the PID algorithm to calculate the difficulty re-target time every 100 blocks, I'm seriously considering getting rid of the PID algo altogether and switch to a more standard approach to calculate the diff. Don't get me wrong, the PID algorithm was a pretty neat addition to the crypto-world but, in my opinion (and after a lot of pain debugging every possible corner case), the PID algo has only added unnecessary complexity with no apparent benefits to the KHC protocol.
Finally, about the cgminer getting stuck issue. I began experienced the same problem after I reinstalled Windows on one of my miners so, I'm going to debug what's going on.
Good to see you have returned, I might have a few ideas in terms of what might be a great path for the coin. The banksters have really screwed the pooch this time and that might prove to be a great opportunity for a 'PennyWeight' defined currency that has taken security to the next level by a capable programmer. Wouldn't it be nice to have a currency that is versatile, not fiat and isn't managed by people that have watched too many Pinky and the Brain cartoons? World commerce is at a standstill right now, it is about the time for torches and pitchforks, the world needs a solution and not another Ponzi scheme built by banksters that to date have gotten a free lunch playing God whilst relieving the people of their gold putting them in debt so they can come after everything. Edit: The major dependency of the blockchain is that it is run over the internet which presently has a kill switch, here's a thought: Run enhanced BTC protocol using 4G/5G wireless protocols over distance friendly ULF HAM. The only thing better is not having it under control of a bunch of crook banksters corrupting governments, religion and commerce. WORE |
|
|
|
Any news about KHC?  No news is good news  I'm working on a new feature for the Android Wallet that I hope it is going to help make KHC more popular. But, I'm not giving out anymore details today.  After that, I'm going to work on enhancing KHC to handle the multiple region codes that are available today as one big 'happy' multi-blockchain coin. The goal here is to increase the Transaction Per Seconds (TPS) to match or exceed Paypal, VISA or Mastercard. This is a lot of work so, don't expect this new feature to be available on the next release. Other than that, the coin has been very stable. Wallets work fine but, unfortunately there aren't too many people mining the coin anymore.  Need to get those other wallets to cover IOS, Windows Mobile. POS integration for Aloha/Maitre'D/Micros and other popular titles would put KHC over the top when it came to next gen coin. |
|
|
|
Nice job wr104, works well but would be good to be able to exit the app to conserve phone resources and the 'safety' gui is white text on background. |
|
|
|
Speaking of forks, I was mining for a while within the last month and had over 10K coins just vaporize. Now I beat my cards pretty hard to get that, is this a fork that was recently discovered by the current build of BTC wallet? I do know that this has that built into it to self correct. Some insight or maybe an explanation would be the shit! Any ideas? </kindofdigruntled>
I see no evidence of a fork in the logs I'm looking right now. I'll check more logs once I get home from work. How many Wallets are missing coins? Have you looked at the logs yet? Is there a block number that you suspect a fork happened? The evidence of a fork in the network is a long list of Orphan Blocks when the Wallet isn't downloading the blockchain (it is normal to see Orphan blocks when the Wallet is catching up with the network). I deleted logs and local copy of the database trying to get them back a couple times, even tried earlier versions of my wallet.dat file, never came back so not really sure what happened. Have you tried reindexing? I got them back, I think there was an error on my NTFS volume, also I had tried to d/l the blockchain in the middle of the night, not many connections to it and I didn't verify that I got the entire blockchain. |
|
|
|
Speaking of forks, I was mining for a while within the last month and had over 10K coins just vaporize. Now I beat my cards pretty hard to get that, is this a fork that was recently discovered by the current build of BTC wallet? I do know that this has that built into it to self correct. Some insight or maybe an explanation would be the shit! Any ideas? </kindofdigruntled>
I see no evidence of a fork in the logs I'm looking right now. I'll check more logs once I get home from work. How many Wallets are missing coins? Have you looked at the logs yet? Is there a block number that you suspect a fork happened? The evidence of a fork in the network is a long list of Orphan Blocks when the Wallet isn't downloading the blockchain (it is normal to see Orphan blocks when the Wallet is catching up with the network). I deleted logs and local copy of the database trying to get them back a couple times, even tried earlier versions of my wallet.dat file, never came back so not really sure what happened. |
|
|
|
Just a quick update about the Android Wallet.
I'm getting closer to have a public BETA version. I'm able to send/receive KHCs in the TestNet but, there are still few bugs that I need to take care of before I can make it available.
Is that android wallet a brand new one? It is based on the BTC Wallet for Android by Bitfynd ( https://github.com/bitfynd/bitfynd-wallet-android) which is nothing but a fork of the Andreas Schildbach official Android Wallet for Bitcoin. The reason I used this fork was that Bitfynd transformed the project from Eclipse IDE format to Android Studio IDE format. And I like Android Studio better. Speaking of forks, I was mining for a while within the last month and had over 10K coins just vaporize. Now I beat my cards pretty hard to get that, is this a fork that was recently discovered by the current build of BTC wallet? I do know that this has that built into it to self correct. Some insight or maybe an explanation would be the shit! Any ideas? </kindofdigruntled> |
|
|
|
what's the status of android wallet development? It is finally coming along. Porting the existing BTC wallets to support all the KHC features (320bit hashes, ed25519 signatures, etc) has been harder than what I originally expected. Hey man! I hope things are going well and not to poke a stick or anything but KHC is trading at 60-80 sats and doing so under the new more power hungry algo, that would be <100. I happen to be single for a while now and biting my fingernails is not exactly an attractive habit, dude please, for the love of... err... self... if you have a wallet on the mobile side close please beta test it. There ain't shit out there that can compete with the algo, gotta strut some of ur stuff man. |
|
|
|
Both hashrate and difficulty are now steadily increasing.
I'm checking the logs and I don't see indications of a fork or other network related issues. I'm wondering if there was an issue with the pool.
They probably upgraded. |
|
|
|
KHC price is low today because, like with every other new coin these days, KHC went through that infamous initial period where "dumpers" came just to mine few thousands of coins to then dump them into the Exchanges for a quick profit.
But, KHC is not just another altcoin. It has truly unique features no other coin offers. And I mean true features, not gimmicks or those hilarious PR stunts offering get-rich-quick schemes.
The main focus of KHC is to be a currency where inflation remains under control and to keep its network and user-base secure. I'm fully committed to continue developing KHC.
We need to develop more quickly! When will there be more regions than region #0? I'm thinking regions would equate to countries to be respective to exchange rates. But he's got to get the coin off the ground first, pretty sure he is working on cross platform wallets since the algo change went through quite well. This coin can hold big promise in the long run not only being able to host international exchange within the wallet, but being resistant to ASIC mining, and in general not issued by the fed or some other banking industry that is obviously outside the public's scope of trust. |
|
|
|
April Fools Joke? Nope just obvious shitecoin pump move Gavin: After he tested several candidates, he settled with a new one called KSHAKE that is used by a new altcoin called KryptoHash.
Read the source, it is not really a shitcoin. Regardless of this being April fools or not, there is some thought put into the algo on KHC when it comes to being asic resistant. People that would be against this are likely those that hold uber hash power pointed at BTC. March 31, 2015, 08:06:46 PM was the time stamp on the post. |
|
|
|
So the take-away here is stay away from the pump & dump KryptoHash. Got it  Or perhaps wr104 is up to the asic challenge after the second implementation of his algo. |
|
|
|
Now see I told ya, KHC is BTC 2.0!  Awesome work on the algo wr104! |
|
|
|
What does AMD280X parameter
? How fast?
154k unless you use the --cl-opt-disable in the batch or "cl-opt-disable" : true, in the conf, in that case there is a huge performance gain however you must watch your heat dissipation as it tends to get hot real quick and your VRM's should not be run at or over 120C. |
|
|
|
Dev,please speed up development,BTC price is picking up and the market is recorvering. KHC is gona to the moon~ Lets not put the cart before the horse, the best innovation and the best work is never performed under pressure of being rushed. On top of that this coin needs to mature past the 50k block mark where the new algo kicks in. |
|
|
|
It's time for KHC to get listed on a mainstream exchange. With the new algo in place there are wallets being created for more platforms. The transition in the blockchain has not yet occurred so expect to see those after that happens. Then more exchanges make sense. |
|
|
|
This coin seems stuck here.  Hmm... Did you try to jiggle the machine or press the coin return button? Sometimes that will cause the coin to be returned in the coin dispenser.  |
|
|
|
Taking control of the wallet.dat file with a web wallet is certain to start the NSA and other authorities salivating. Why add anonymity code to a decentralized market if it is not so anonymous on the market side after all? |
|
|
|
So does the v2 cl work on current v1 algo? |
|
|
|
coin has potential different feature than others
True, is a tall wish list. However will destroy the fed paper dollars that were killed off by the evolving copy machine. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
