 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
Hi! The template I made features: - low-level discovery of all the graphics cards
- item prototypes for:
- fan speed
- total, free and used memory
- power draw in decaWatts (tens of Watts, so that it can fit in the graphs nicely)
- temperature
- utilization
- a graph prototype having the fan speed, power draw and temperature in one graph
- trigger prototypes set at different GPU temperatures
- a batch script for low-level discovery on Windows
- a BASH script for low-level discovery on Linux
Screenshots can be seen in my steemit post: https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@plambe/zabbix-template-for-multiple-nvidia-gpusAnd the template and scripts themselves are on github: https://github.com/plambe/zabbix-nvidia-smi-multi-gpuThis is essentially a multi-GPU rewrite of RichardKav's template, as found here: https://github.com/RichardKav/zabbix-nvidia-smi-integration/If you feel like donating: BTC: 165BPPrQSje6sUEaMCH9bFc35ioapjYZZh XMR: 49K7M4EDgqPCx7o7WBc9keEdNdcj3asdNbHhJ69wbovc1s5v4UctEBLH8bF1byknVDUAB3D7p7w7oYi B4yBuNBPjVWwYHDD |
|
|
|
That's something we want to add, there are several options: anonymous addresses or coin mixing? What do you think? CYC & anonymous transation? Dev what do you think about this?
I prefer mixing. It is a method that can be explained to someone who doesn't know anything about computers and that person can even speculate for themselves what the odds are for the transaction to be eavesdropped in full. In other words, given 10 mixers are used one after the other for each transaction, and given that 50% of the mixers are not honest, the chance is still less than 0.1% for the transaction to be recorded fully (0.5 to the power of 10 = 0.0009765625). It's a rock solid method that is not based on asymmetric cryptography, which is vulnerable in the long term from mathematical advancements. |
|
|
|
Somebody have working setting for 280X? I've got only rejects  Do you use the correct kernel (x11mod)? |
|
|
|
IRC doesn't even have working archive anymore. So it is probably just archaic and dying technology. It is not used in corporate world. It lost lots of users. It can be replaced with more advanced technologies. There are many reasons why many people are not familiar with IRC.
And the best one: anonymous coin uses certain technology for publishing its updates (IRC), but this technology doesn't work with some widely used working solution for anonymization (tor network)? Not every e-mail provider keeps archives and it's an old technology - is e-mail dying? The corporate world doesn't use bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency - is this an argument? What more advanced technologies are you referring to and which one of them is so widely accessible as to be possible to use it with telnet? Many people are not familiar with computers, I say we stop using computers then! As far as I am aware updates are published in this thread, but only when there is something to announce. For anybody that can't wait for an official announcement, there's IRC. I bet there are ways to join IRC through tor, probably one of the web-based clients will work. |
|
|
|
I am not trolling, I am not kidding. I was, and I still am, dead serious when I said that I have my sell orders at 0.025 for CPT. We'll see if my prediction comes true.
I have mine @ 0.026 since a few days already  |
|
|
|
Maybe the pumpers didn't expect this but by promoting "anonymity" they've attracted some completely new kind of people. My guess is that these people are well-educated, maybe they are even experts in their specific fields, they don't fall for marketing claims, they are wealthy and they don't depend on cryptoprofits (are quite indifferent to price) and they may even wholeheartedly support their ideals or political/economic ideas. Pumpers are just not used to deal with this kind of people. I think you are right about this kind of people. I won't flatter myself about education, expertise, etc., but I can say I'm into this and a few other coins only because of the supposed future anonymity, i.e. because of what I believe, my ideals. I don't really care if I lose my whole investment in all but one of those coins promising anonymity. If all of them eventually die it would be a pity, but I'll survive. I'm hodling. EDIT: I care about the price, just not that much. |
|
|
|
|
I've created a public p2pool node for cryptcoin. It's located in Southeastern Europe - Sofia, Bulgaria. The fee is 0.7%. I reserve the right to change it, though I don't plan to do so any time soon.
To connect your miners:
sgminer -k darkcoin -o stratum+tcp://crypt.kopame.com:8171 -u YourWalletAddress -p Anything
|
|
|
|
One more thing - here's a tcpdump ( 7z), if you're interested. EDIT: the p2pool is at 192.168.1.7, the proxy is at 192.168.1.4. EDIT2: here's the same kind of tcpdump ( 7z) log, but more readable. EDIT3: After reading up some more on the stratum protocol and some more tcpdumping classic and p2pool traffic, I added to p2pool's stratum.py function rpc_authorize "return True", which is passed to jsonrpc.py, which uses it to construct the JSON reply. This is not a solution for your proxy software in my opinion, because people will continue to use the standard p2pool source, not mine. The addition I'm talking about is on line 35 of the p2pool/bitcoin/stratum.py file. |
|
|
|
The problem is the P2Pool response to the authorize request. It returns null as result. It should return true or false. I have added a check for null result in the proxy, but the authorize request will still fail (since null is considered as false).
Does it work when your miner is directly connected to the P2Pool ?
Yes, my miners are mining at the same p2pool node without issues. Also - my miners use exactly the same username and password style when mining at p2pool - as a username they use a darkcoin address and the password doesn't matter. I double checked the username and it is correct, so even if p2pool validates darkcoin addresses (which I doubt, but don't know for sure) used as usernames, it should be ok. I also tried another darkcoin address as a username, still the same result. The p2pool node doesn't report any issues with stratum-proxy's worker, it only says it gives work to this worker. Here's the log: 2014-06-01 13:48:47.735404 New work for worker Xi3bEBfhgogwobNELiq5wiE8X8Eef5maFh! Difficulty: 0.033159 Share difficulty: 29.783877 Total block value: 5.015000 DRK including 6 transactions |
|
|
|
Hi, Here's the command I use to start the stratum-proxy: e:\Users\user\Downloads\stratum-proxy-0.2.0\stratum-proxy-0.2.0>"c:\Program Files (x86)\Java\jre7\bin\java.exe" -jar stratum-proxy.jar -h drk.kopame.com:7903 -u Xi3bEBfhgogwobNELiq5wiE8X8Eef5maFh -p 123 When I try to use it to connect to my darkcoin p2pool node, I get the following errors: 2014-06-01 00:33:39,041 ERROR [Pool-drk.kopame.com:7903-Thread]:strat.mining.stratum.proxy.pool.PoolConnection - Pool-drk.kopame.com:7903. JSON-RPC parsing e
rror with line: {"error": null, "jsonrpc": "2.0", "id": 2, "result": null}.
java.lang.NullPointerException
at strat.mining.stratum.proxy.pool.Pool.processAuthorizeResponse(Pool.java:406)
at strat.mining.stratum.proxy.pool.PoolConnection.onAuthorizeResponse(PoolConnection.java:120)
at strat.mining.stratum.proxy.network.StratumConnection.onResponseReceived(StratumConnection.java:281)
at strat.mining.stratum.proxy.network.StratumConnection.onLineRead(StratumConnection.java:222)
at strat.mining.stratum.proxy.network.StratumConnection.access$200(StratumConnection.java:54)
at strat.mining.stratum.proxy.network.StratumConnection$1.run(StratumConnection.java:151)
2014-06-01 00:33:39,043 INFO [Pool-drk.kopame.com:7903-Thread]:strat.mining.stratum.proxy.manager.StratumProxyManager - Set difficulty 0.039327938706819054
on pool drk.kopame.com:7903.
2014-06-01 00:33:39,047 INFO [Pool-drk.kopame.com:7903-Thread]:strat.mining.stratum.proxy.manager.StratumProxyManager - New block detected on pool drk.kopam
e.com:7903.
Jun 01, 2014 12:33:39 AM org.glassfish.jersey.server.ApplicationHandler initialize
INFO: Initiating Jersey application, version Jersey: 2.7 2014-03-12 18:11:31...
Jun 01, 2014 12:33:39 AM org.glassfish.grizzly.http.server.NetworkListener start
INFO: Started listener bound to [0.0.0.0:8888]
Jun 01, 2014 12:33:39 AM org.glassfish.grizzly.http.server.HttpServer start
INFO: [HttpServer] Started.
2014-06-01 00:34:01,684 INFO [Pool-drk.kopame.com:7903-Thread]:strat.mining.stratum.proxy.manager.StratumProxyManager - Set difficulty 0.041979390149169404
on pool drk.kopame.com:7903.
2014-06-01 00:34:01,698 INFO [Pool-drk.kopame.com:7903-Thread]:strat.mining.stratum.proxy.manager.StratumProxyManager - New block detected on pool drk.kopam
e.com:7903. And here's the error I get when I connect a miner to it: 2014-06-01 00:36:26,553 INFO [Thread-3]:strat.mining.stratum.proxy.manager.StratumProxyManager$1 - New connection on 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:3333 from /94.26.84.107
:41060.
2014-06-01 00:36:26,559 ERROR [/94.26.84.107:41060-Thread]:strat.mining.stratum.proxy.worker.WorkerConnection - No pool available for the connection /94.26.8
4.107:41060. Sending error and close the connection.
2014-06-01 00:36:26,563 INFO [/94.26.84.107:41060-Thread]:strat.mining.stratum.proxy.manager.StratumProxyManager - Worker connection /94.26.84.107:41060 clo
sed. 0 connections active on pool None. Cause: EOF on inputStream.
2014-06-01 00:36:26,602 INFO [Thread-3]:strat.mining.stratum.proxy.manager.StratumProxyManager$1 - New connection on 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:3333 from /94.26.84.107
:41061.
2014-06-01 00:36:26,613 ERROR [/94.26.84.107:41061-Thread]:strat.mining.stratum.proxy.worker.WorkerConnection - No pool available for the connection /94.26.8
4.107:41061. Sending error and close the connection.
2014-06-01 00:36:26,617 INFO [/94.26.84.107:41061-Thread]:strat.mining.stratum.proxy.manager.StratumProxyManager - Worker connection /94.26.84.107:41061 clo
sed. 0 connections active on pool None. Cause: EOF on inputStream. Can I get this to work with p2pool? EDIT: I got it to work with a classic pool, so I think the issue I'm experiencing is related only to p2pool nodes. |
|
|
|
|
