Latest posts of: Borsht

Show Posts
Pages: [1]

on: August 19, 2014, 05:03:47 PM

I posted my volt mod results @ http://www.techunboxed.com/2014/08/gaw-miners-fury-mods-voltage-mod.html the short story is about a 14% increase in hash rate over a reasonable overclock of a stock fury but a 23% increase in power consumption.

on: August 05, 2014, 04:37:06 PM

stock under 350 - 5-7% errors is quite normal. heat sinks and paste under 350 - 5-7% seems to be the norm as well. obviously there are going to be outliers. 350 is an arbitrary number. i haven't tested 351, etc., but 354 shows more errors... around 9% with or without improved cooling.

on: August 05, 2014, 03:49:48 PM

Quote from: Ktulu1 on August 04, 2014, 10:50:53 PM Quote from: bosondehiggs on August 03, 2014, 11:32:06 PM 4-5% is a normal error rate for a fury not 9% 9% you need to improve the cooling. @381mhz i have 1.6Mh/s and less than 5% and very stable. Fresh air is the key. Exactly right. If you're running above about 350 and getting that many errors (9%), I would guess that you're running out of juice. Need more volts. i added heat sinks to he ASICs and better thermal compound and found that the hash rate, errors, and rejects didn't show any improvement under 350. over 350 the ASICs are starving for power. i just posted the wright up @ http://www.techunboxed.com/2014/07/gaw-miners-fury-power-supply-mod.html

on: July 20, 2014, 01:05:32 AM

I did some testing with the stock psu vs. an atx psu. short story: no effect on hash rate or hard errors, etc. multiple furys use less power with one atx psu vs. several stock psu. if you want to read the whole write up... http://www.techunboxed.com/2014/07/gaw-miners-fury-power-supply-mod.html let me know what you think.

on: July 15, 2014, 09:12:01 PM

I posted this on hashtrader. posting it here too. edit: sorry, black widow review http://www.techunboxed.com/2014/07/gaw-miners-black-widow-review.html

on: July 10, 2014, 02:23:24 PM

Quote from: argovian on July 10, 2014, 02:17:25 PM Quote from: Borsht on July 10, 2014, 02:16:11 PM Has anyone received tracking or ship notifications for Batch 1 yet? I know it's only 10:00 am EST, but... anyone? Looks like B1 got pushed to the 14th. I was just looking for that data also. (watch this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671189.0 ) Ouch! Much thanks argovian.

on: July 10, 2014, 02:16:11 PM

Has anyone received tracking or ship notifications for Batch 1 yet? I know it's only 10:00 am EST, but... anyone?

on: July 07, 2014, 11:34:06 AM

Quote from: altcoiner15 on July 05, 2014, 08:17:30 AM LTC will surpass BTC in the same way that Mark Sanchez will surpass Peyton Manning yeah ltc will be bigger than btc when a team looses the superbowl in the first play of the game. oh, wait. um...

on: July 07, 2014, 11:25:41 AM

apollo 13: "gentlemen, we just lost the moon." i'm forced to start pruning my doge reserves.

on: July 07, 2014, 11:16:34 AM

Quote from: guytechie on July 07, 2014, 10:25:43 AM Is the LOT/MEOW situation going to get any better? I still have lots of these. even though there are no buy orders on Cryptsy for MEOW, i've been able to put in sell orders for 1 satoshi and have them filled. cryptsy has an active LOT/LTC market. so you should be able to trade LOT for LTC.

on: June 26, 2014, 02:39:55 PM

thebotnet, thanks.

on: June 26, 2014, 01:39:51 PM

Quote from: thebotnet on June 26, 2014, 01:18:34 PM This is my 3 week 4 Furys running BFG-Miner 4.2.2 on clevermining.com with vardiff for 2 days with each Fury on a separate instance. Code: bfgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://us.clevermining.com:3333 -u MyAddress -p x --zeus-cc 6 --zeus-clk 340 -S zeus:\\.\COM3 --no-submit-stale thebotnet, what's your pool side hash rate for these? what happens when you run them all on the same instance of BFGminer?

on: June 05, 2014, 06:32:53 PM

I haven't had a Gridseed USB Mini come in the little white box since mid April.

Pages: [1]