Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
Hi,I found after my pool's XMR wallet&daemon upgrade to 0.8.8.3,the pool's payments module can not work as well as before:
while pool payout reward XMR to miners,will always get a failure with a message:"Transaction was rejected by daemon" or "not enough outputs to mix".
Dev,can you give me some helps?
Have you increased your tx fee to 0.1 XMR for payments? thanks a lot!
|
|
|
Hi,I found after my pool's XMR wallet&daemon upgrade to 0.8.8.3,the pool's payments module can not work as well as before:
while pool payout reward XMR to miners,will always get a failure with a message:"Transaction was rejected by daemon" or "not enough outputs to mix".
Dev,can you give me some helps?
|
|
|
I can't successly compile wallet&bitmonerod from github source code now. following is information by make : rio@i2f14fd0fZ0a40Z:~/bitmonero/bitmonero$ git pull Already up-to-date. rio@i2f14fd0fZ0a40Z:~/bitmonero/bitmonero$ make mkdir -p build/release cd build/release && cmake -D CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release ../.. -- Found Git: /usr/bin/git -- Configuring done -- Generating done -- Build files have been written to: /home/rio/bitmonero/bitmonero/build/release cd build/release && make make[1]: Entering directory `/home/rio/bitmonero/bitmonero/build/release' make[2]: Entering directory `/home/rio/bitmonero/bitmonero/build/release' make[3]: Entering directory `/home/rio/bitmonero/bitmonero/build/release' make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/rio/bitmonero/bitmonero/build/release' make[3]: Entering directory `/home/rio/bitmonero/bitmonero/build/release' fatal: No names found, cannot describe anything. CMake Warning at src/version.cmake:3 (message): Cannot determine current revision. Make sure that you are building either from a Git working tree or from a source archive.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/rio/bitmonero/bitmonero/build/release' [ 0%] Built target version make[3]: Entering directory `/home/rio/bitmonero/bitmonero/build/release' make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/rio/bitmonero/bitmonero/build/release' make[3]: Entering directory `/home/rio/bitmonero/bitmonero/build/release' [ 1%] Building C object external/miniupnpc/CMakeFiles/upnpc-static.dir/igd_desc_parse.c.o cc1: error: -Werror=maybe-uninitialized: no option -Wmaybe-uninitialized cc1: error: unrecognized command line option ?std=c11? make[3]: *** [external/miniupnpc/CMakeFiles/upnpc-static.dir/igd_desc_parse.c.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/rio/bitmonero/bitmonero/build/release' make[2]: *** [external/miniupnpc/CMakeFiles/upnpc-static.dir/all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/rio/bitmonero/bitmonero/build/release' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/rio/bitmonero/bitmonero/build/release' make: *** [build-release] Error 2 rio@i2f14fd0fZ0a40Z:~/bitmonero/bitmonero$
anyone had encountered that and found a solution? who can give some help for me?I got fix solution,share it for all : upgrade gcc4.6 to gcc4.8,all things be right now!
|
|
|
I can't successly compile wallet&bitmonerod from github source code now. following is information by make : rio@i2f14fd0fZ0a40Z:~/bitmonero/bitmonero$ git pull Already up-to-date. rio@i2f14fd0fZ0a40Z:~/bitmonero/bitmonero$ make mkdir -p build/release cd build/release && cmake -D CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release ../.. -- Found Git: /usr/bin/git -- Configuring done -- Generating done -- Build files have been written to: /home/rio/bitmonero/bitmonero/build/release cd build/release && make make[1]: Entering directory `/home/rio/bitmonero/bitmonero/build/release' make[2]: Entering directory `/home/rio/bitmonero/bitmonero/build/release' make[3]: Entering directory `/home/rio/bitmonero/bitmonero/build/release' make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/rio/bitmonero/bitmonero/build/release' make[3]: Entering directory `/home/rio/bitmonero/bitmonero/build/release' fatal: No names found, cannot describe anything. CMake Warning at src/version.cmake:3 (message): Cannot determine current revision. Make sure that you are building either from a Git working tree or from a source archive.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/rio/bitmonero/bitmonero/build/release' [ 0%] Built target version make[3]: Entering directory `/home/rio/bitmonero/bitmonero/build/release' make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/rio/bitmonero/bitmonero/build/release' make[3]: Entering directory `/home/rio/bitmonero/bitmonero/build/release' [ 1%] Building C object external/miniupnpc/CMakeFiles/upnpc-static.dir/igd_desc_parse.c.o cc1: error: -Werror=maybe-uninitialized: no option -Wmaybe-uninitialized cc1: error: unrecognized command line option ?std=c11? make[3]: *** [external/miniupnpc/CMakeFiles/upnpc-static.dir/igd_desc_parse.c.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/rio/bitmonero/bitmonero/build/release' make[2]: *** [external/miniupnpc/CMakeFiles/upnpc-static.dir/all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/rio/bitmonero/bitmonero/build/release' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/rio/bitmonero/bitmonero/build/release' make: *** [build-release] Error 2 rio@i2f14fd0fZ0a40Z:~/bitmonero/bitmonero$
anyone had encountered that and found a solution? who can give some help for me?
|
|
|
Sorry to interrupt all the misery - don't worry I'm feeling it too ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) But I've been trying to figure out what FRAC's main problem was. I'm thinking now that the 1 month core PoW phase in which the majority of the coins were produced was way too short. Once we switched over to slingshield (which otherwise went brilliantly), there were no new coins coming in. Investors had bought up all the supply and so nobody was able to trade, and that has effectively killed everything. So I would suggest the only real way to get the coin back on track would be to increase the coin cap to something like 10 mil, mined over the next year. Any thoughts? .. other than "ded" ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) I tend to agree with you but would make it something like more 9M more coins with a reward scaled over something like 20 years. good idea! it's always need more people join & more time to observe how it works,when we wanna a coin to be successed.
|
|
|
donate 1000.01 LOL to : LbJVhibdxTfp627RB9HYehmY9gVVJzguHH , Hope it is helpful for LOL&CSO ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) .
|
|
|
The LOL's wallet source on github.com was deleted by dev,everybody never had seen that? Anyone have a copy of LOL's wallet source for some devs continue to do anything on the LOL coin?
|
|
|
Everyone needs to know, only transactions can make the prices rise, it's keep low and low ,because everybody are all holding FRAC,no transaction happend.
|
|
|
I haven't given up on this coin as I haven't given up on Earlz. But I'm not going to run up the price at all until people stop selling at this price point.
If Earlz and company release new code or a new roadmap, that can of course change immediately.
Just bought most of that 8k wall. Thanks to whoever sold that. I'll take more at this price if you want.
Nice words. I don´t understand why people sell FRAC so cheap like this, 1M coins only, they must be crazy... Investors aren't selling FRAC... we are buying more at extremely good value The difficulty has increased significantly and miners are suppressing the price by dumping at a trickle rate Also know of two whales who are intentionally suppressing the price ![Lips sealed](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/lipsrsealed.gif) LOL and I am Buda. ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) This coin is 100% DEAD, can you read that? I'll be more clear: D-E-A-D...6k satoshis...LOL Whales hahahah....suppressing price....fucking bullshit theory, are you Forrest Gump related? This coin should be named FailureCoin, that's the thruth. 6k satoshis is does not matter. but 24hours volume only just about 0.6BTC is looks like a serious trouble about FRAC in fact. ![Cry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cry.gif)
|
|
|
Initiate a <71% attack to test the robustness of Slingshield algorithm, is the only way to detonate the FRAC price, I think. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Have anyone could do it?
|
|
|
Claymore, do you plan to support dashcoin?
Yes, I will release update with new coins support in a day. Sir, Could you make a X64 version CPU miner can run on Windows server 2003 X64 platform? I trying run NsCpuCNMiner64.exe on Win 2003 Server x64 R2 platform,it's shown a message like this "NsCpuCNMiner64.exe is not a valid Win32 application" then crashed,please help. NsCpuCNMiner32.exe can run on win 2003 server x64,but it's sad that only got a so slowly hashrate.
|
|
|
我建了个XMR 中文矿池 (低费率0.5%): http://112.124.35.168 全中文界面XMR矿池,服务器运行在中国杭州 挖矿示例: minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://112.124.35.168:7777 -u YOUR_WALLET_ADDRESS -p x
对于在大陆地区的朋友挖XMR来说,本地矿池是最好的选择,因为这样可以保持连接迅速和挖矿稳定。 请大家多多支持。
|
|
|
I constructed a XMR mining pool in china : http://112.124.35.168 a really chinese pool run at china Example: minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://112.124.35.168:3333 -u YOUR_WALLET_ADDRESS -p x
It's good choice for miners from mainland of china to connecting and mining.
|
|
|
I found a XMR mining pool in china : http://112.124.35.168 a chinese pool run at china It's good for miners from china to connecting and mining.
|
|
|
hi,dear Dev, have anyone told to u about XMR daemon bitmonerod had need change to auto save blockchain? It's a serious trouble for update all block once on Linux platform when system have low memory than 2GB,system always kill bitmonerod at it's take large block unsaved,can u help us fix this,and keep wallet deamon stable running?
|
|
|
Dear LOL supporters and investors, We are sorry to inform you that we received an email from paralegal of Riot game and we were asked to shut down all services including topbot, bettingbot, skin shop and ggwp.co. We are now still talking to Riot game to see if there's any solution for this. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F7JmhMFj.png&t=663&c=a8ajieHvQRv1Ew) Perhaps, this is a good thing, someone told us tort. This shows that we are very influential now. We need only a small change to adapt to the relevant laws, it will be a better coins.
|
|
|
I have a question about FRAC's Slingshield:
Why not still offers a high reward in the stage of Slingshield, to attract miners to keep NetworkHashes, and protect the safety of the FRAC network ? Otherwise, what is the meaning of Slingshield? In the Low networkhashes environment, Is there any difference between 51% and 71% attack?
The question may be a bit stupid, but still hope DEV can modify about it,because I think Slingshield is a nice and important feature,it will make FRAC better than all other altcoins,isn't it?
I means let's change to "more total coins,longer time for mining" mode.
|
|
|
My wallet on win32 can't sync blocks now,it alway show sync at 28 hours ago,anyone have the same matter?
|
|
|
|