 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
Anybody have a current list of updated pools? So far I have, Official SuchPool And recently Coinmine + various p2pools (details in the thread). Any others? What if some pools doesn't update? is there any enforcement for them? sorry for this noob question. Not yet. Currently pools must update so masternodes get paid. This is already underway. Furthermore, the blocks that the network thinks should be rejected are currently being recorded in the logs. Once the logs check out (i.e. there are no bugs), enforcement HARDFORK will be switched on remotely by Evan. This is stage two of the launch. The good thing is that you DON'T need to update again to be ready for the enforcement HARDFORK and masternode payments will not need to be stopped for any reason. CORRECTED ! Dont minimize the bug in this coin ! Masternode or how to become a mining pool getting fee for mined block and all of that for only 1000drk LOL. That's costly and risky for a pool... Its all about this because your coin is not anonymous,no asic proof(fpga). Its a old scam coin with old tech... |
|
|
|
I believe that this is often the case with true innovation. It's hard to pave the way with a new idea and often a lot of problems rise during the process. It's good though, and a sign that one is on to something important and stable. One could also argue that a lot of darks competition is likely to want dark to fail and maybe they've bought masternodes with the intention to create issues. I would have done the same thing if I was them. But it's good with some resistance from the other communities. It's proof that they fear dark which just means that they deep down inside know that Evan is on to something here  OH MY GOD !!  You say that somebody can bought a masternode and modify the code to steal coin and fork the network ?!! |
|
|
|
Today the masternode payments fork went into effect. The fork went off without issue and the network looks very healthy, but it appears there is some issue with pools voting for the wrong masternodes. This is causing payments to not go through as they should.
The fix is rather simple and can be done without a hard fork. After the pools update to the fixed version, the payments will begin to go through.
We’re currently working on a resolution and will provide the new version soon (probably by tomorrow, hopefully in a few hours).
Thanks,
The Darkcoin Team Pools need to update to the fixed version [01:51] <evan82> http://pastebin.com/QmbM8dPH[01:51] <evan82> I found the problem :-) [01:51] <evan82> It's actually rather simple to fix [01:51] <tifozi> ahem [01:52] <evan82> anyone care to guess from the paste? I'm curious [01:52] <tifozi> checking [01:52] <tifozi> badVote [01:53] <evan82> Both votes have the same hash, but they have different votes [01:53] <evan82> er both blocks* [01:54] <evan82> Two blocks are solved at nearly the same moment on the network, both are propogated and accepted by the network. In the current implementation both blocks have the same hash, but in these blocks there's some discrepency about who to vote for. [01:54] <evan82> In one block the miner votes for 88802 and 88803, in the other the miner abstains from voting. When the next block is solved it's based on of one of the older blocks, so half of the network beleives the miner cheated and rejects the block causing a fork. [01:54] <GNULinuxGuy> nice  [01:54] <evan82> The solution to this is rather simple. Any changes to the votes need to also change the hash of the block. The network must not think these two blocks are the same. [01:54] <tifozi> How come we didnt see this in testnet [01:54] <tifozi> seems rather simple problem [01:55] <tifozi> what in mainnet causes it [01:55] <evan82> Not sure. No one noticed. [01:55] <qqr> race conditions are hard to witness Its going to take one more month for what you call "simple problem" ? |
|
|
|
XC is a dead coin that was pumped and dumped by people looking to make a quick buck that missed the Darkcoin train. Don't mistake p/d'ers chasing a quick buck for innovation. Fuck they can't even come up with their own branding! Darkcoin didn't simple copy paste the another coin's code and launch "AnothercoinsAlgocoin". Then turn around and talk shit about the originalcoins devs. In fact, I haven't personally witnessed any of the DRK devs degrade another coins development team; In fact, it's quite the opposite.. They've been working with other developers from other coins which is how the crypto community should ACTUALLY be functioning - not against each other.
Any person that goes into another coin's thread and spreads bullshit to promote his or her coin is trash. Same goes to any coin developer - if you need to talk shit about a coin you copied to make up for its lack of innovation it translates into you and your coin project are trash.
Chaeplin,AlexGR,ilodin... all over the XC thread spreading fud, your community have created a thread for bash XC community "XC unmoderated" where you promote your darkfork !!! Please.... Delete this thread that you have created and after you can speak !
Just curious has XC figured out how to handle people that reprogram their wallet to steal the coins ?
So no XC promoter answered this, I will just presume that this issue still persists then. Current Rev 1.5 uses trusted transactions. Multisig is an easy implementation and will fix this. This is set for the first week in July, knowing dan though, it will be earlier. Could you please people discuss your coin in its thread ? It is embarrassing now. Search for the XC unmoderated thread in announcement and you will understand... ... ... ... You want a moderated thread ? |
|
|
|
Can we please stop talking about XC? That shitcoin has its own thread, make use of it.
Are the trolls in need of another tweet ? It's not going to correct your flawed code on masternode...
Just curious has XC figured out how to handle people that reprogram their wallet to steal the coins ?
So no XC promoter answered this, I will just presume that this issue still persists then. Do it yourself wallet and xnode that get payed is public... |
|
|
|
Judging by the fact XC is up 10% since DRK forked looks like a few of the fanclub are realising... XC is a superior coin with a much superior dev.
So when your coin was going down as Cryptcoin was going up, and you were panicking about what was going on with Crypt and why were people buying it instead of "superior XC" what did that mean for XC? That Mindfox is better and "superior" to Dan? These superiority stuff is bullshit. Satoshi = brilliant guy that invented TRUSTLESS transactions which solved a decades old problem, not through a "trust learning algo" but through proof of work. Nobody disputes this. XC = a coin that is "superior" because it goes back to trusted transactions, taking people back to the original problem that should have already been solved. Apparently XC's dev should have also written a paper on why Satoshi is a fool and why we should all have trusted transactions instead of trustless. He is after all the superior dev of all altcoins. You obviously don't keep up with the times. XC will be trustless with multi-sig in Rev 2. Any other arguments? You said you have the superior coin, when it used TRUSTED transactions. I don't need to make any other argument, you just made a fool of yourself. All this superiority talk I hear from day one. Dan makes a centralized mixer "wowwwwwwwwww we did more than DRK did in months"... just for making a centralized mixer, lol. Then he makes the "decentralized" trusted mixers that lost coins and you are like "WOOOOWWWWW FIRST WORKING ANON", lol. Now you are telling me, ok I'm not really superior, but one day I will be. It's june 20th 2014. I've heard about the NSA-proof Rev 2.0 for over a month when it was supposed to be delivered in 2-3 weeks. => https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=600706.msg6932856#msg6932856...and we haven't even solved the issue of trusted transactions. So, instead of being here and being happy for the problems of others, go back and solve your own problems. It's more productive. No dude. Your the one making a fool out of yourself. Rev 2 was given a timeline for the first week in July. Dan hasn't missed a deadline yet, unlike Evan who sets deadlines months in advance and still fails to deliver. Rev 2 will use trustless multisig. Please explain how these will be trusted transactions? Owww wait. You can't. And also, I'm not telling you XC will be superior. I'm telling you XC is superior now. Even Chaplin admitted that DRK won't even be close to XCs level of anonymity until RC4. XC has a 1BTC bounty for finding a link, nobody has broken it yet. XC has accomplished in six weeks what DRK couldn't do in six months. Imagine how far ahead its going to be in four months when your RC4 is finally released? XC isn't that X11 coin? The X11 that was written by the lead dev of Darkcoin? Hmm sounds like they've accomplished quite a bit. They've cloned DRK and named their coin after the algo that Evan wrote.  X11 is the name of the chained proof-of-work (PoW) algorithm that was introduced in Darkcoin (launched January 18th, 2014). It was probably inspired by the chained-hashing approach of Quark, adding further “depth” and complexity by increasing the number of hashes, yet it differs from Quark in that the rounds of hashes are determined a priori instead of having some hashes being randomly picked.
The X11 algorithm uses multiple rounds of 11 different hashes (blake, bmw, groestl, jh, keccak, skein, luffa, cubehash, shavite, simd, echo), thus making it one of the safest and more sophisticated cryptographic hashes in use by modern cryptocurrencies. Algorithm X11 : Copy of quark and many different hashes... XC is on POS right now XC code has been peer reviewed by known dev in crypto , its unique ! OK.. coinjoin anyone ? |
|
|
|
Judging by the fact XC is up 10% since DRK forked looks like a few of the fanclub are realising... XC is a superior coin with a much superior dev.
So when your coin was going down as Cryptcoin was going up, and you were panicking about what was going on with Crypt and why were people buying it instead of "superior XC" what did that mean for XC? That Mindfox is better and "superior" to Dan? These superiority stuff is bullshit. Satoshi = brilliant guy that invented TRUSTLESS transactions which solved a decades old problem, not through a "trust learning algo" but through proof of work. Nobody disputes this. XC = a coin that is "superior" because it goes back to trusted transactions, taking people back to the original problem that should have already been solved. Apparently XC's dev should have also written a paper on why Satoshi is a fool and why we should all have trusted transactions instead of trustless. He is after all the superior dev of all altcoins. You obviously don't keep up with the times. XC will be trustless with multi-sig in Rev 2. Any other arguments? You said you have the superior coin, when it used TRUSTED transactions. I don't need to make any other argument, you just made a fool of yourself. All this superiority talk I hear from day one. Dan makes a centralized mixer "wowwwwwwwwww we did more than DRK did in months"... just for making a centralized mixer, lol. Then he makes the "decentralized" trusted mixers that lost coins and you are like "WOOOOWWWWW FIRST WORKING ANON", lol. Now you are telling me, ok I'm not really superior, but one day I will be. It's june 20th 2014. I've heard about the NSA-proof Rev 2.0 for over a month when it was supposed to be delivered in 2-3 weeks. => https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=600706.msg6932856#msg6932856...and we haven't even solved the issue of trusted transactions. So, instead of being here and being happy for the problems of others, go back and solve your own problems. It's more productive. You want that i search in the XC thread where you was happily bashing XC dev ? you and your buddies talking shit about something that is working ! And now you are crying that they do same thing about real problem on your flawed design ...? what a shame ! |
|
|
|
LOL this guy is completely ignored ! what a community... |
|
|
|
|
FORKED AGAIN !
This improvised team of developer is unable to release a stable version after months, it's time to sell to investors if they do not want to lose money!
|
|
|
|
|
Evan can you unplug exchange before the crash ?
|
|
|
|
|
You must get a patent on "DarkFork" !
How to f*ck investor !
|
|
|
|
|
There is a big need in privacy and not only on crypto currency.
Nobody have review the darksend code and the masternode system , think about flawed SSL certificat used by authorities for year...
Keep the good work with integrist of the dark hole and your short vision of the privacy tech.
You can dump your coin now its not going to go over 0.025 a second time !
|
|
|
|
When you are going to see "Dark"coin on a merchant, you can be sure that something illegal is behind and with the false centralized anon tech behind , its going to be a treasure for anti criminal organisation.
English lessons are in order: Thesaurus Legend
Adj. 1. centralized - drawn toward a center or brought under the control of a central authority; "centralized control of emergency relief efforts"; "centralized government"
centralised
decentralised, decentralized - withdrawn from a center or place of concentration; especially having power or function dispersed from a central to local authorities; "a decentralized school administration"
Coins with a central mixer = centralized. Example Fedoracoin, XC in its first implementation, coins using an exchange for laundering etc. All of these examples use a centralized mixer or laundering service. Coins where there can be a thousand nodes, setup by the very users of the network (all over the world) to process transactions are not "center". The function is distributed / dispersed and is hence DEcentralized. Centralized = the authorities can go to one place and shut the one and only central mixer down. Decentralized = the authorities need to take down hundreds / thousands of nodes all over the globe. Decentralized ? You speak about amazon server where the majority of the masternode are registered ? its centralized and you have no physical acces if something go wrong , easy way for authorities. Personal server with 10000$ on it ? Maintenance ? security of data ? ISP ?... I dont speak about Tor its already in the hand of nsa ! For something really decentralized you need not thousand but billion of node each with minimal maintenance and easy to set up ! How many masternode are up right now ? 300 ? 80% on amazon server ? Its a really bad joke... |
|
|
|
|
When you are going to see "Dark"coin on a merchant, you can be sure that something illegal is behind and with the false centralized anon tech behind , its going to be a treasure for anti criminal organisation.
|
|
|
|
|
DRK IS NOT A SCAM !
INSTAMINE DONT EXIST !
THE HUMANS COME FROM ADAM AND EVE !
Lets the pump going on !
I want to be RICH !
|
|
|
|
|
