 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
Hi Atheistcoin, I compiled a list with users and pools that did not upgrade (still on 1.0.0.0 as I type!) and thus caused your fork ... do you have any use for this? I can send it in PM? I guess dumping IPs and addresses here might be taking it to far  It's very sad to see one of the few new alt-coins that is not scamming almost die because of lack of investment of it's users and pools. It almost looks like people prefer scams with fake (pre-)ANNs nowaday, what a shame! I wish you guys the best of luck, I hope you survive this dip, I belief (hahaha) in this coin (or rather, the dev, code looks good), and if I can do anything to help you guys out, do not hesitate to ask! |
|
|
|
Oh wow, I was expecting yet another horrible IRC update, already got my arrows out and was inspecting the github. I've seen many lately, all sucky clones from the same buggy implementation. But this actually works ... albeit a bit strange with the unified PM tab ... but that's probably just a matter of getting used to! New reward-scheme not bad either, assuming you guys will deliver more updates. Looks like this is still mineable too (low diff and nethash atm). Oh well, I am in for a bit  |
|
|
|
|
Lol, so now you start making unfounded accusations at my address?
I stopped, but I am willing to pick the glove up again if you start spreading falsehoods.
You are confusing accounts, you might want to read the username ... I did not personally attack anyone who did not call me a liar or dickhead first nor did I post that picture ... BTCmods will be able to confirm that. So good luck reporting me, I did nothing wrong, I only exposed your non-existent coding skills, and that, my friend, is most likely welcomed by most of the community, not looked down upon..
And you are apparently assuming C is the only language worth learning, let me wake you from that dream, there is a plethora of them.
However, I have to agree with you that the person who posted that picture went much too far, I also noticed the Github profile but chose not to disclose that information because it was nasty, I could've but I did not, you now pointing at me is not such a smart move if you want me to leave you muck on.
P.S.
And don't tell lies about Github doing something wrong, that account was used to push, don't make me explain how the record and history keeping of git works and why actual devs love it so much, there is however no proof whatsoever that person was involved with anything else then the initial push.
|
|
|
|
[sarcasm]Oh wow, you did such a good job! [/sarcasm] Again showing off your non-existant skills I see! You made me go LOL! Changing: # windows:BOOST_LIB_SUFFIX = -mgw48-mt-s-1_550 for # BOOST_LIB_SUFFIX = -mgw48-mt-s-1_550 does nothing You just showed again you don't really understand what you are doing, since apparently you don't even know that lines starting with '# ' (note the whitespace after the #) are comments and not executed >< But I am really gonna stop now ... otherwise you might manage to make your skills look legit due to my pointers  Have fun! Buhbye! # Windows specific compilation parameters. Thanks to Marada for the tip.
windows:BOOST_LIB_SUFFIX=-mgw48-mt-s-1_55
windows:BOOST_INCLUDE_PATH=C:/deps/boost_1_55_0
windows:BOOST_LIB_PATH=C:/deps/boost_1_55_0/stage/lib
windows:BDB_INCLUDE_PATH=C:/deps/db-4.8.30.NC/build_unix
windows:BDB_LIB_PATH=C:/deps/db-4.8.30.NC/build_unix
windows:OPENSSL_INCLUDE_PATH=C:/deps/openssl-1.0.1g/include
windows:OPENSSL_LIB_PATH=C:/deps/openssl-1.0.1g
windows:MINIUPNPC_INCLUDE_PATH=C:/deps
windows:LIBPNG_INCLUDE_PATH=C:/deps/libpng-1.6.9
windows:LIBPNG_LIB_PATH=C:/deps/libpng-1.6.9/.libs
windows:MINIUPNPC_LIB_PATH=C:/deps/miniupnpc
windows:QRENCODE_INCLUDE_PATH=C:/deps/qrencode-3.4.3
windows:QRENCODE_LIB_PATH=C:/deps/qrencode-3.4.3/.libs You just showed again you don't really understand what you are doing, since apparently you don't even know that lines starting with '# ' (note the whitespace after the #) are comments and not executed >< theres no comment on that line and they already replied to you about that exact part of the code, at the same time they pushed the last commit. go outside and get some fresh air, please. Hey fuckhead, I am not making up lies, you are being retarded, learn to read a fucking git commit history, you dumbass! https://github.com/glyphcoin/glyphcoin/commit/96c59b570590066174a8c41b23fa0d1725405bb1Line 421/422 Incredible how stupid this lot is ... retards of the week! Not only do you nubs not know how to code, but you don't understand git either... so sad.. It's a good thing being stupid does not hurt, huh, else you would be in constant agony. |
|
|
|
[sarcasm]Oh wow, you did such a good job! [/sarcasm] Again showing off your non-existant skills I see! You made me go LOL! Changing: # windows:BOOST_LIB_SUFFIX = -mgw48-mt-s-1_550 for # BOOST_LIB_SUFFIX = -mgw48-mt-s-1_550 does nothing You just showed again you don't really understand what you are doing, since apparently you don't even know that lines starting with '# ' (note the whitespace after the #) are comments and not executed >< But I am really gonna stop now ... otherwise you might manage to make your skills look legit due to my pointers Have fun! Buhbye! |
|
|
|
Hahaha ... I would be extremely surprised if you even wrote 1 line of code or bring an update ... all you showed so far is extreme lack of skill and knowledge
Either way .... I have done my part ... what you do with the information I provided is up to you lot ..
More members have been added to dev team since launch. Again, thanks for the heads up and free code audit, even if you felt the need to bring it with hate and FUD. We updated within a couple hours of you pointing this out. The original 'dev' claims he missed it because the code still worked properly. However, the pszTimestamp and nonce and other information was properly modified. If you see anything else sloppy please let us know! Github is properly updated with all fixes. https://github.com/glyphcoin/glyphcoinAlso we have compiled a new windows wallet: https://mega.co.nz/#!VElQGaQZ!Bk97CXTHOw91dHt2bulBBx0kAZVD7Hq9Kf9tJcKBs9IWe will be adding custom theme and features soon, and more announcements are coming. Lol .. doing more replaces to mask the fuckups of the first set of replaces is not a fix, a fix would require actual code to be written ;P This still does not make you a dev ... show us some code you wrote which is unique to your implementation, then you are a dev. I'll give you one thing though, you are good at this scamming thing, great responses, I could use someone like you on my team With all these Fry's it must be like taking candy from a baby!  |
|
|
|
Name: ScamExposer
Posts: 4
Activity: 1
Position: Newbie
Date Registered: Today at 08:17:28 AM lol funny you decided to register a new account and FUD a coin that is rising. Your argument is pretty nonsensical, coins are still cheap just buy GTFO of the thread you shithead, let the dev provide his update. You should stop trying to smear coins in a self-righteous attempt to save the "noobs" coin cloning is not a abstract in the altcoin community, nor is the 'error' which you so kindly bolded for us to see a critical mistake, a change will be pushed to correct any flaws in copying the dev said. Coin is rising, its leading % increase on a solid exchange and an is update coming, sounds like someone sold to me at 850 satoshi  Drop dead you knucklehead, you are obviously affiliated with these scammers by defending a 5 minute search and replace job .... I will torch this scam as much as I want ... truth hurts huh! We will see who is right in a few hours when this suposed update is coming from people who don't even know how to read C, let alone write it. We will see who has the last laugh! This really wansn't the worst coin and dev I have to do with. Yes, there were some minor bugs, but I have to notice unlike many other clones: 1) sources were released and possible to compile from the launch time, 2) DEV responds and does the fixes, seems to be interested. These two things need to be appreciated. @ ScamExposer: Look around, there are many really worse coins. Whenever you see the issue - post it, but give at least few hours so devs could react. If only you are honest. . Here is the problem, apparently cloning a git (5 sec) and running a search and replace (also 5 sec and this one was even poorly executed, case senstive would have been better) qualifies someone to be called a dev? I can tell you this is incredibly offensive to actual devs, who painstakingly work days and days to implement a new feature .. (I happen to be one, I have been coding for 31 years). How can you trust someone who has shown no skill (rather a lack thereof) to deliver on promises of new features? And yes, there are many more coins who deserve a good torching. But if were to expose all it would become a day job, and I already have one of those, being developer and all. Also we would be left with like 10 coins tbh Either way .... I have done my part ... what you do with the information I provided is up to you lot .. I am out .. back to actual developing. |
|
|
|
Name: ScamExposer
Posts: 4
Activity: 1
Position: Newbie
Date Registered: Today at 08:17:28 AM lol funny you decided to register a new account and FUD a coin that is rising. Your argument is pretty nonsensical, coins are still cheap just buy GTFO of the thread you shithead, let the dev provide his update. You should stop trying to smear coins in a self-righteous attempt to save the "noobs" coin cloning is not a abstract in the altcoin community, nor is the 'error' which you so kindly bolded for us to see a critical mistake, a change will be pushed to correct any flaws in copying the dev said. Coin is rising, its leading % increase on a solid exchange and an is update coming, sounds like someone sold to me at 850 satoshi Drop dead you knucklehead, you are obviously affiliated with these scammers by defending a 5 minute search and replace job .... I will torch this scam as much as I want ... truth hurts huh! We will see who is right in a few hours when this suposed update is coming from people who don't even know how to read C, let alone write it. We will see who has the last laugh! |
|
|
|
ScamExposer where you been this whole time? It's about time someone like you shows up on these threads, seperating the wheat from the chaff! Popcorn ready.
I was busy learning C and understanding how this cryptothing works, and in the process of doing so I found that at least 90% of all the alts is just a search and replace job by dumbasses who don't know the first thing about coding. // ppcoin: if responsible for sync-checkpoint send it if (pfrom && !CSyncCheckpoint::str GLYPHerPrivKey.empty()) Checkpoints::SendSyncCheckpoint(Checkpoints::AutoSelectSyncCheckpoint()); where: if (pfrom && !CSyncCheckpoint::str GLYPHerPrivKey.empty()) should obviously be: if (pfrom && !CSyncCheckpoint::str masterPrivKey.empty()) thats what you get when you just search and replace or: case BTC: return QString("GLYPH"); case mBTC: return QString("mSUM"); case uBTC: return QString::fromUtf8("μSUM"); default: return QString("  "); etc. This is so utterly stupid it is amazing. How people expect this 'dev' to deliver anything is beyond me ... if you can't even search and replace right, or read C, how on earth will you add new features? Thanks for noticing those problems. I'm surprised you havent mentioned the fact that the png image in the wallet is far too big and makes the transaction history unreadable. The original dev was new at this, but he has had some serious family health problems and has been gone AFK. We liked the name and some of his ideas, and the project is transitioning to a new team of devs. We will update this within a few hours. Feel free to FUD as you please, we appreciate the attention. Hahaha ... I would be extremely surprised if you even wrote 1 line of code or bring an update ... all you showed so far is extreme lack of skill and knowledge .. but hey .. in a few hours your pockets will be filled with scammed BTC and it won't matter anymore, huh? Rats like you make me sick .... you are destroying cryptocoins for the world, while they have so much potential if the 'dev' actually knows how to code (like Evan of DRK for example). Calling the facts and proof I showed that you are a retard who doesnt even know how to code FUD just proofs my point even more.. And yes I made a new account ... why would I want to taint my good one with talking to retards like you guys?? DERP ! Have fun being scammed noobs! |
|
|
|
|
What I find most hilarious is the talk about a 'dev team'.... like 5 minutes of search and replace requires a team.
Maybe they are holding eachothers dicks or something, I don't know ...
|
|
|
|
ScamExposer where you been this whole time? It's about time someone like you shows up on these threads, seperating the wheat from the chaff! Popcorn ready.
I was busy learning C and understanding how this cryptothing works, and in the process of doing so I found that at least 90% of all the alts is just a search and replace job by dumbasses who don't know the first thing about coding. // ppcoin: if responsible for sync-checkpoint send it if (pfrom && !CSyncCheckpoint::str GLYPHerPrivKey.empty()) Checkpoints::SendSyncCheckpoint(Checkpoints::AutoSelectSyncCheckpoint()); where: if (pfrom && !CSyncCheckpoint::str GLYPHerPrivKey.empty()) should obviously be: if (pfrom && !CSyncCheckpoint::str masterPrivKey.empty()) thats what you get when you just search and replace or: case BTC: return QString("GLYPH"); case mBTC: return QString("mSUM"); case uBTC: return QString::fromUtf8("μSUM"); default: return QString(" "); etc. This is so utterly stupid it is amazing. How people expect this 'dev' to deliver anything is beyond me ... if you can't even search and replace right, or read C, how on earth will you add new features? |
|
|
|
Wahahaha Cloning MASTIFF and replacing all MAST for GLYPH in your source makes you look retarded, master became GLYPHer etc, apparently you guys are such good devs (LOL!! Just in case you guys are so stupid you don't get this either, I am being sarcastic!) you don't even know to search and replace case-sensitive. Also you might wanna correct the bitcoinunits so it doesn't say mSUM etc. OMG, this is such a botch-job, it's hilarious! Good luck scamming all the sheep on Twatter! talking about clone here? really? every coin is a clone of something else in this place, mastiff make no difference, not for defending glyph or what but your argument is stupid... Lol .. my argument is not stupid, you however obviously are since you cant even interpretate English right.I am not talking about it being a clone. You might wanna check the code, nimrod .. I am talking about the dev being so retarded he could not even search and replace right or change the units from mSUM to mGLYPH ... but hey, go ahead and trust this obvious scam which was mashed together in 5 minutes ... whatever floats your boat, dumbass! Have fun burying this under even more nonsense! |
|
|
|
Wahahaha Cloning MASTIFF and replacing all MAST for GLYPH in your source makes you look retarded, master became GLYPHer etc, apparently you guys are such good devs (LOL!! Just in case you guys are so stupid you don't get this either, I am being sarcastic!) you don't even know to search and replace case-sensitive. Also you might wanna correct the bitcoinunits so it doesn't say mSUM etc. OMG, this is such a botch-job, it's hilarious! Good luck scamming all the sheep on Twatter! |
|
|
|
|
