 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
As I see, there will be official Linux binary of 2.1.0.1 for ARM, but what about i386 and amd64? With last release I had to compile by myself. Will it be the same with the new release?
|
|
|
|
I meant this announcement: a hint for regulary reader of our ANN thread
wallet 2.1 release will be in a few days
and together with the release we will have a interesting promotion
where to take advantage of it u need to have at least 1000 DMD
maybe if u not there yet it time now to gather at least 1000 DMD
before we release the promotion details over multiple channels
which could in fact create some competition for cheap DMD
Should those 1000 DMD be in one coin pile? I switched to 24/7 minting and my coin piles are now broken into smaller ones /around 100 DMD/ If I have to make payment to myself to join them into 1000 DMD piles, I'll lose coinage. |
|
|
|
|
And no one is concerned to explain what's this all about 24/7 activity and 1000 DMD bonus?
|
|
|
|
I've got a strange feeling, at first, question about 24/7 active wallets... The next announce was about 1000 DMD minimum amount to get some bonuses  It's weird, but I smell some kind of masternode implementation here... |
|
|
|
|
Selling up to 1.5M Siacoin - 0.145 BTC/M
|
|
|
|
|
The greatest part of dump at yobit.net from the beginning has been made by multipool minig DRZ. And it was yaamp.com
Droidz was most profitable coin on qubit algo from the very start and yaamp has been mining it.
I hope the things will stabilize now with reduction of blockreward and keeping the network hashrate/difficulty at high level.
Putting high buy support was pointless.
|
|
|
|
Yes, i solved the problem with missing obj/tor directory by myself - it's a common issue with other coins too. I'm talking about the following part of memarea.c #define MEMAREA_ALIGN SIZEOF_VOID_P
#if MEMAREA_ALIGN == 4
#define MEMAREA_ALIGN_MASK 3lu
#elif MEMAREA_ALIGN == 8
#define MEMAREA_ALIGN_MASK 7lu
#else
#error "void* is neither 4 nor 8 bytes long. I don't know how to align stuff."
#endif
For some reason on my 32-bit distro MEMAREA_ALIGN is 8 so MEMAREA_ALIGN_MASK is 7lu. I have to manually hardcode 3lu there so the wallet doesn't crash. Disclaimer: I'm a truly noob C programmer  |
|
|
|
|
I had an issue while trying to built Elektrond in 32-bit linux environment, but finally made it run without crashing. I had to manually change a line of code in /src/tor/memarea.c
Question to the dev - is it possible bittrex have the same problem and that's the reason they don't list this coin?
|
|
|
|
|
Is it safe at the moment to withdraw coins from the pool?
|
|
|
|
How can you determine whether the blockchain forked?
The pool ekn.suprnova.cc and the blockexplorer are on different block height. I can connect to the chain perfectly fine with my wallet. Sucks though, this means that all the coins mined so far are worth nothing because supernova doesn't have the correct wallet installed.
I think the fork occurred near block#6000, but how to be sure... Everything mined prior to that fork is fine. |
|
|
|
|
My personal wallet has had problem while been started also, but after deleting everything in ..\AppData\Roaming\Elektron (except wallet.dat of course) is fine and in sync with the same blockchain as explorer.elektronwallet.com
|
|
|
|
|
The blockchain forked
ekn.suprnova.cc is on different blockchain than that of explorer.elektronwallet.com
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously, there is a bot, running at the exchange. I've tried to place a buy order, slightly over the current highest buy order, and into few seconds, my order was passed with new one...
|
|
|
|
|
верьте в "прекрасное далеко не будь ко мне жестоко"
|
|
|
|
|
I want to give c-cex.com their deserved appreciation about the work they've done from the very beginning. I've got some issues with one particular transaction, but after communicating with support and sending a ticket, everything went smoothly. Great job guys!
|
|
|
|
I'm pool mining at the moment with ~4GH/s. Still waiting to receive first SFR to make a donation Why so many orphaned blocks? |
|
|
|
What about external Blake256 miner, so mining to be possible outside the wallet? Is there any chance or possibility to be released such thing in near future at all? I even don't insist on gpu-miner  , cpu-miner would do as well because if such miner is available the posbility of pool-mining is much better than the current solo-wallet-mining. So let me get this straight. There are people instamining on Blake and nobody gives a shit? I make 30 coins per day with 1kwh of power and I should just resign and keep on doing it while these assholes mine for free? Yeah I'm pretty angry too but someone has the skill to modify blake miner, so of course he deserves to instamine this for a while. Stop mining this if you think it is unprofitable and switch to others algos. I stop mine 2 days ago when I saw someone with the blake miner. Do you have rough estimates of current Net Hashrate behind SFR Blake mining? I don't have enough initial data to be definitely sure if someone is gpu-minig this algo at the current Diff. The only thing I can declare is that with i5 2500K @ 4.2 GHz I have the following:
{
"blocks" : 129268,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"pow_algo_id" : 4,
"pow_algo" : "blake",
"difficulty" : 54.78441463,
"difficulty_sha256d" : 308634.89838019,
"difficulty_scrypt" : 11.42804984,
"difficulty_groestl" : 80.22378746,
"difficulty_x11" : 32.37008138,
"difficulty_blake" : 54.78441463,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 2312029,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
or 2.3 MH/s if I can see it right 2 or 3 days ago this was enough to hit a block every 1 to 2 hours Now, if I'm lucky, this means one block for 24h So, network has is >~ 1.2GH In theory, someone could hire and run the wallet... but thats doubtful Why does everybody think the Blake algo is being instamined? A single r9 290 will mine at more than 2.5 times the current network hashrate for Blake if that 1.2Gh figure is accurate. Regardless of fact, that Blake implementation in SFR is maybe twice as complex, in terms of calculation time, than that in blakecoin, I agree that current mining is pure CPU |
|
|
|
What about external Blake256 miner, so mining to be possible outside the wallet? Is there any chance or possibility to be released such thing in near future at all? I even don't insist on gpu-miner , cpu-miner would do as well because if such miner is available the posbility of pool-mining is much better than the current solo-wallet-mining. So let me get this straight. There are people instamining on Blake and nobody gives a shit? I make 30 coins per day with 1kwh of power and I should just resign and keep on doing it while these assholes mine for free? Yeah I'm pretty angry too but someone has the skill to modify blake miner, so of course he deserves to instamine this for a while. Stop mining this if you think it is unprofitable and switch to others algos. I stop mine 2 days ago when I saw someone with the blake miner. Do you have rough estimates of current Net Hashrate behind SFR Blake mining? I don't have enough initial data to be definitely sure if someone is gpu-minig this algo at the current Diff. The only thing I can declare is that with i5 2500K @ 4.2 GHz I have the following:
{
"blocks" : 129268,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"pow_algo_id" : 4,
"pow_algo" : "blake",
"difficulty" : 54.78441463,
"difficulty_sha256d" : 308634.89838019,
"difficulty_scrypt" : 11.42804984,
"difficulty_groestl" : 80.22378746,
"difficulty_x11" : 32.37008138,
"difficulty_blake" : 54.78441463,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 2312029,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
or 2.3 MH/s if I can see it right 2 or 3 days ago this was enough to hit a block every 1 to 2 hours Now, if I'm lucky, this means one block for 24h |
|
|
|
What about external Blake256 miner, so mining to be possible outside the wallet? Is there any chance or possibility to be released such thing in near future at all? I even don't insist on gpu-miner , cpu-miner would do as well because if such miner is available the posbility of pool-mining is much better than the current solo-wallet-mining. |
|
|
|
|
