[ANN] [SFR] SaffronCoin | Latest Version - 1.4.2/2.6.2 | Mandatory Wallet Update

[Adatrader]

Someone desperately want to decrease the price. 

..and I keep buying! 

[1715484301]

1715484301

[1715484301]

1715484301

[1715484301]

1715484301

[1715484301]

1715484301

[1715484301]

1715484301

[McHammer]

are there plans for anonymity? sms send ?
sth innovative except x11+blake?

[saffroncoin]

are there plans for anonymity? sms send ?
sth innovative except x11+blake?

Anonymity yes. Also we are currently working on a chat system.

[saffroncoin]

Our Press Release got published on Reuters!

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/06/16/idUSnGNX5pX5mZ+1c9+GNW20140616

[vipin.khatri20]

Our Press Release got published on Reuters!

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/06/16/idUSnGNX5pX5mZ+1c9+GNW20140616

Wow thats a big achievement. Congrats

[MBonev]

What about external Blake256 miner, so mining to be possible outside the wallet? Is there any chance or possibility to be released such thing in near future at all?
I even don't insist on gpu-miner , cpu-miner would do as well because if such miner is available the posbility of pool-mining is much better than the current solo-wallet-mining.

[nairotearP]

What about external Blake256 miner, so mining to be possible outside the wallet? Is there any chance or possibility to be released such thing in near future at all?
I even don't insist on gpu-miner , cpu-miner would do as well because if such miner is available the posbility of pool-mining is much better than the current solo-wallet-mining.

So let me get this straight.

There are people instamining on Blake and nobody gives a shit?

I make 30 coins per day with 1kwh of power and I should just resign and keep on doing it while these assholes mine for free?

[AizenSou]

What about external Blake256 miner, so mining to be possible outside the wallet? Is there any chance or possibility to be released such thing in near future at all?
I even don't insist on gpu-miner , cpu-miner would do as well because if such miner is available the posbility of pool-mining is much better than the current solo-wallet-mining.

So let me get this straight.

There are people instamining on Blake and nobody gives a shit?

I make 30 coins per day with 1kwh of power and I should just resign and keep on doing it while these assholes mine for free?

Yeah I'm pretty angry too but someone has the skill to modify blake miner, so of course he deserves to instamine this for a while. Stop mining this if you think it is unprofitable and switch to others algos. I stop mine 2 days ago when I saw someone with the blake miner.

[MBonev]

What about external Blake256 miner, so mining to be possible outside the wallet? Is there any chance or possibility to be released such thing in near future at all?
I even don't insist on gpu-miner , cpu-miner would do as well because if such miner is available the posbility of pool-mining is much better than the current solo-wallet-mining.

So let me get this straight.

There are people instamining on Blake and nobody gives a shit?

I make 30 coins per day with 1kwh of power and I should just resign and keep on doing it while these assholes mine for free?

Yeah I'm pretty angry too but someone has the skill to modify blake miner, so of course he deserves to instamine this for a while. Stop mining this if you think it is unprofitable and switch to others algos. I stop mine 2 days ago when I saw someone with the blake miner.

Do you have rough estimates of current Net Hashrate behind SFR Blake mining? I don't have enough initial data to be definitely sure if someone is gpu-minig this algo at the current Diff. The only thing I can declare is that with i5 2500K @ 4.2 GHz I have the following:

Code:

{
"blocks" : 129268,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"pow_algo_id" : 4,
"pow_algo" : "blake",
"difficulty" : 54.78441463,
"difficulty_sha256d" : 308634.89838019,
"difficulty_scrypt" : 11.42804984,
"difficulty_groestl" : 80.22378746,
"difficulty_x11" : 32.37008138,
"difficulty_blake" : 54.78441463,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 2312029,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}

or 2.3 MH/s if I can see it right
2 or 3 days ago this was enough to hit a block every 1 to 2 hours
Now, if I'm lucky, this means one block for 24h

[mishax1]

List it. vote. https://poloniex.com/coinRequest

[saffroncoin]

Modifying our Chat System, I am pleased to announce that we are working on SFRMS - SaffronMessagingService.

You can receive SMS and Email whenever a transaction occurs on your Wallet! Your wallet does not need to be open to get these notifications. You just to verify your wallet once with your mobile/email and get alerts!

We will also couple this with sending chat messages as well as files.

We will be pushing out a Beta Update in a few days.

[Coin_Viking]

We are proposing 2 types of chats for our upcoming chat addition to the multi-tasking wallet :

1. Registered Chat - For this you would need to login with a username and pass. The benefit is you can add contacts to your list if they have registered. You can view a chat history. You can chat with multiple contacts at once.

2. Unregistered Chat - No registration, you only need to provide a username. Just input another user's username who you would like to chat with if that user is online. You can only have 1 chat per session. Useful if you only want to send a direct message to someone.

OR

3. Include Both and ask the user to choose.


We will be using the cool Windows 8 chat styles.

This system will be powered by node.js.

Please give your views.

 

Looked at the comments from the other members and I agree with the 3rd option being the most favorable.
  
My reasoning is that if both can be used the following should be done: have the no1 option as the "main" mode and use the second feature just like web browsers give you the option to use the "stealth mode". Call it "extra privacy mode" or something to that effect as it would just be a point to point enhanced privacy/anon and encrypted msg between two people. If this feature can even have self terminating messages ala snapchat (msgs delete themselves after a set amount of time after being received that would only reinforce this feature). This strategy offers the best of both worlds and shows that saffron is always thinking of how best to serve an empower its users.

The main client would behave as people have come to expect messaging system to, with all the pre-requisite features, the second good for those whom prefer a more privacy centric approach. That said, these features and the initial social component that will be introed will be the start of the backbone (well one of.. the main one being naturally the blockchain itself lol) of future multi-platform clients that I've mentioned in IRC and to the devs. Essentially, the future from saffron and where I see it evolving to, as a long term goal, is for achieving interoperable multi-platform clients that don't solely rely on desktop computers etc but that move into the mobile sphere with applications that offer chat/social and banking all in one. In doing so, it will further reduce barriers or friction for the mass markets to adopt. Making saffroncoin a product that as simple to use as downloading any chat or banking app to your phone. That will be the game changer for crypto.

[restless]

What about external Blake256 miner, so mining to be possible outside the wallet? Is there any chance or possibility to be released such thing in near future at all?
I even don't insist on gpu-miner , cpu-miner would do as well because if such miner is available the posbility of pool-mining is much better than the current solo-wallet-mining.

So let me get this straight.

There are people instamining on Blake and nobody gives a shit?

I make 30 coins per day with 1kwh of power and I should just resign and keep on doing it while these assholes mine for free?

Yeah I'm pretty angry too but someone has the skill to modify blake miner, so of course he deserves to instamine this for a while. Stop mining this if you think it is unprofitable and switch to others algos. I stop mine 2 days ago when I saw someone with the blake miner.

Do you have rough estimates of current Net Hashrate behind SFR Blake mining? I don't have enough initial data to be definitely sure if someone is gpu-minig this algo at the current Diff. The only thing I can declare is that with i5 2500K @ 4.2 GHz I have the following:

Code:

{
"blocks" : 129268,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"pow_algo_id" : 4,
"pow_algo" : "blake",
"difficulty" : 54.78441463,
"difficulty_sha256d" : 308634.89838019,
"difficulty_scrypt" : 11.42804984,
"difficulty_groestl" : 80.22378746,
"difficulty_x11" : 32.37008138,
"difficulty_blake" : 54.78441463,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 2312029,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}

or 2.3 MH/s if I can see it right
2 or 3 days ago this was enough to hit a block every 1 to 2 hours
Now, if I'm lucky, this means one block for 24h

So, network has is >~ 1.2GH
In theory, someone could hire and run the wallet... but thats doubtful

[hal7]

Where can I buy SFR?

[SquidsIn]

What about external Blake256 miner, so mining to be possible outside the wallet? Is there any chance or possibility to be released such thing in near future at all?
I even don't insist on gpu-miner , cpu-miner would do as well because if such miner is available the posbility of pool-mining is much better than the current solo-wallet-mining.

So let me get this straight.

There are people instamining on Blake and nobody gives a shit?

I make 30 coins per day with 1kwh of power and I should just resign and keep on doing it while these assholes mine for free?

Yeah I'm pretty angry too but someone has the skill to modify blake miner, so of course he deserves to instamine this for a while. Stop mining this if you think it is unprofitable and switch to others algos. I stop mine 2 days ago when I saw someone with the blake miner.

Do you have rough estimates of current Net Hashrate behind SFR Blake mining? I don't have enough initial data to be definitely sure if someone is gpu-minig this algo at the current Diff. The only thing I can declare is that with i5 2500K @ 4.2 GHz I have the following:

Code:

{
"blocks" : 129268,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"pow_algo_id" : 4,
"pow_algo" : "blake",
"difficulty" : 54.78441463,
"difficulty_sha256d" : 308634.89838019,
"difficulty_scrypt" : 11.42804984,
"difficulty_groestl" : 80.22378746,
"difficulty_x11" : 32.37008138,
"difficulty_blake" : 54.78441463,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 2312029,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}

or 2.3 MH/s if I can see it right
2 or 3 days ago this was enough to hit a block every 1 to 2 hours
Now, if I'm lucky, this means one block for 24h

So, network has is >~ 1.2GH
In theory, someone could hire and run the wallet... but thats doubtful

Why does everybody think the Blake algo is being instamined?

A single r9 290 will mine at more than 2.5 times the current network hashrate for Blake if that 1.2Gh figure is accurate.

[saffroncoin]

Where can I buy SFR?

https://www.bittrex.com/Market/?MarketName=BTC-SFR

Please check the ANN thread on the first page. All details are present.

[hal7]

Found it, thanks.

131 on MintPal vote page..
What about poloniex?

[MBonev]

What about external Blake256 miner, so mining to be possible outside the wallet? Is there any chance or possibility to be released such thing in near future at all?
I even don't insist on gpu-miner , cpu-miner would do as well because if such miner is available the posbility of pool-mining is much better than the current solo-wallet-mining.

So let me get this straight.

There are people instamining on Blake and nobody gives a shit?

I make 30 coins per day with 1kwh of power and I should just resign and keep on doing it while these assholes mine for free?

Yeah I'm pretty angry too but someone has the skill to modify blake miner, so of course he deserves to instamine this for a while. Stop mining this if you think it is unprofitable and switch to others algos. I stop mine 2 days ago when I saw someone with the blake miner.

Do you have rough estimates of current Net Hashrate behind SFR Blake mining? I don't have enough initial data to be definitely sure if someone is gpu-minig this algo at the current Diff. The only thing I can declare is that with i5 2500K @ 4.2 GHz I have the following:

Code:

{
"blocks" : 129268,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"pow_algo_id" : 4,
"pow_algo" : "blake",
"difficulty" : 54.78441463,
"difficulty_sha256d" : 308634.89838019,
"difficulty_scrypt" : 11.42804984,
"difficulty_groestl" : 80.22378746,
"difficulty_x11" : 32.37008138,
"difficulty_blake" : 54.78441463,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 2312029,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}

or 2.3 MH/s if I can see it right
2 or 3 days ago this was enough to hit a block every 1 to 2 hours
Now, if I'm lucky, this means one block for 24h

So, network has is >~ 1.2GH
In theory, someone could hire and run the wallet... but thats doubtful

Why does everybody think the Blake algo is being instamined?

A single r9 290 will mine at more than 2.5 times the current network hashrate for Blake if that 1.2Gh figure is accurate.

Regardless of fact, that Blake implementation in SFR is maybe twice as complex, in terms of calculation time, than that in blakecoin, I agree that current mining is pure CPU

[saffroncoin]

Found it, thanks.

131 on MintPal vote page..
What about poloniex?

Contacted. Hopefully they would add soon.

[restless]

Why does everybody think the Blake algo is being instamined?

A single r9 290 will mine at more than 2.5 times the current network hashrate for Blake if that 1.2Gh figure is accurate.

Its an estimation. And how do you know the hasrate of 290 on sfr-version of blake? Please share the GPU miner with us
At this difficulty wallet-mining is pointless unless one has botnet running the wallet... Even then, mining cryptonight will be order of magnitude more profitable.