 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
he said a while back (before growth) that he had .1 seed
You sir are mistaken... and wrong as usual. I have never posted if I do or not have any SEED. I don't believe it is of any relevance since I have explained, many times already, that my "interest" in this project is related to the fact that the entire dev team of PINK has thrown out any credibility the may have had for supporting, promoting and sponsoring this debacle, as well as tainted in an irreparable way, the good name of PINK, in which I hold a modest investment. So let me get this right. You are holding your "modest investment" of pink, solely based on the credibility and reputation of the devs.... which by the way is "tainted and irrepairable" and simply "thrown out" the window. So then Im assuming you are still holding on to them because of the technology developed for pink? Surely that cannot be true... you yourself think they are unnecessary and should've just let it be. But what about the code? Gasp! We did not come forth openly until it we were "caught" by jyap that is was a "hack job/copy/paste" (that you so often repeat like a broken record in every post  ) of Novacoin. Surely, this is unacceptable right? I mean... all the people in the dev team knew all along from even before the take over that it was a novacoin "hack job/copy/paste" (i love repeating that too... makes me feel all informed like  And charity? Pfft... you dont seem to think there's any "focus" on that these days right? And its also "the gambling coin" or something right? A phrase you coined and insist its now popularly known by that new name, yet cant for the life of me find anyone (other than you) referring to it like that. So then since you are all facts and logic and high school math n stuff, there really is no incentive to be invested in pink right? I know you mentioned something about your exit from pink as imminent or something of the sort. Seriously... how long do we have to wait? You don't think pink is going to "get better" or something do you? Your posts definitely is a testament to that. So what then? Is it a means to justify your presence here? Each time someone asks what your intentions are, you conveniently parrot your "modest investment" of pink, and connect that as "reason" here... pretending like as if you are making up your mind to judge the quality of the devs to protect your "modest investment". Of late, I'm noticing you clinging on to meaningless phrases like "supporting, promoting and sponsoring" and repeating them like those brainwashing tapes playing in loop. "Supporting" and "promoting" is more or less the same when it comes to the small world of alt coins. I know it can mean something completely different outside that world. I just cant figure out what the whole "sponsoring" is all about. Are you saying we're paying cryptzo to continue developments for the coin? If that makes sense to you, please elaborate. If it doesnt, do give the source where you came across such info. If its a theory, why are you conveniently not mentioning that and passing it off as facts? You, after all "call it as it is" I believe. It is completely pointless to pretend that you would "get this right". I have already shown you proof, copy/pasted from this forum, of the vocal desertions from Pink of at least one poster. Fact enough for you of the "tainting" of PINK because of the "sponsorship, support and promotion" of SEED by the Pink dev team? Of course not. I would need and official declaration by the United Nations, the ONU and the European Counsel to that effect... and you would still cling to the silence from the Soviet Union and China... and even if they would also sign, you would cling to Japan. Or North Korea. There's a significant difference between "Supporting" and "Promoting" in this small world too. Of course you need clarification. Gladly: "Supporting" would be the equivalent to tell people something like "hey guys, a personal friend of one of our devs, sumyge, is launching a new coin and we believe you could be interested. We support the project and will invest in it". Or words to that effect. "Promoting": Is telling the same things ... constantly or frequently. Since you seem to have some comprehension difficulties -or lack of vocabulary, or both- I will add that "sponsoring" is, besides the former two, being actually involved in the project, "helping" as it were, in whatever capacity ... including acting as the escrow in the ICO. I hope this clarifies enough the language shortcomings in your understanding. Now for my involvement in PINK, I have been involved since Danny revamped it as something quite different of what it is now. I have explained to you, many times already, that I am a trader and that I have been trading PINK for months. But I also wrote both THE WALL of SHAME and THE WALL OF HONOR. And, in my limited research, I haven't found yet any other coin -other that the PINK that Danny revamped, in the beginning, NOT the current one by any stretch of imagination- deserving its listing in THE WALL OF HONOR. Such inclusion means, for whatever it is worth, my recommendation. And my credibility. And I put very high marks on those. So, independently of what my position is at the moment in Pink, I have the self-imposed obligation of telling the people that read THE WALL OF HONOR that the current PINK is something very different that the PINK I listed there and that remains the ONLY one ever listed. I know that for you this would be difficult to understand, for it has to do with integrity and honesty, but it is all there's to it. Edit to add: Oh and that ends my communication with you at any level, by the way. I would not stoop to your level or that of that thing above you in the posting scale. To each his own. lol... this is how politicians avoid good questions. say a lot but make sure to not answer anything  barber for next president!! |
|
|
|
he said a while back (before growth) that he had .1 seed
You sir are mistaken... and wrong as usual. I have never posted if I do or not have any SEED. I don't believe it is of any relevance since I have explained, many times already, that my "interest" in this project is related to the fact that the entire dev team of PINK has thrown out any credibility the may have had for supporting, promoting and sponsoring this debacle, as well as tainted in an irreparable way, the good name of PINK, in which I hold a modest investment. So let me get this right. You are holding your "modest investment" of pink, solely based on the credibility and reputation of the devs.... which by the way is "tainted and irrepairable" and simply "thrown out" the window. So then Im assuming you are still holding on to them because of the technology developed for pink? Surely that cannot be true... you yourself think they are unnecessary and should've just let it be. But what about the code? Gasp! We did not come forth openly until it we were "caught" by jyap that is was a "hack job/copy/paste" (that you so often repeat like a broken record in every post ) of Novacoin. Surely, this is unacceptable right? I mean... all the people in the dev team knew all along from even before the take over that it was a novacoin "hack job/copy/paste" (i love repeating that too... makes me feel all informed like And charity? Pfft... you dont seem to think there's any "focus" on that these days right? And its also "the gambling coin" or something right? A phrase you coined and insist its now popularly known by that new name, yet cant for the life of me find anyone (other than you) referring to it like that. So then since you are all facts and logic and high school math n stuff, there really is no incentive to be invested in pink right? I know you mentioned something about your exit from pink as imminent or something of the sort. Seriously... how long do we have to wait? You don't think pink is going to "get better" or something do you? Your posts definitely is a testament to that. So what then? Is it a means to justify your presence here? Each time someone asks what your intentions are, you conveniently parrot your "modest investment" of pink, and connect that as "reason" here... pretending like as if you are making up your mind to judge the quality of the devs to protect your "modest investment". Of late, I'm noticing you clinging on to meaningless phrases like "supporting, promoting and sponsoring" and repeating them like those brainwashing tapes playing in loop. "Supporting" and "promoting" is more or less the same when it comes to the small world of alt coins. I know it can mean something completely different outside that world. I just cant figure out what the whole "sponsoring" is all about. Are you saying we're paying cryptzo to continue developments for the coin? If that makes sense to you, please elaborate. If it doesnt, do give the source where you came across such info. If its a theory, why are you conveniently not mentioning that and passing it off as facts? You, after all "call it as it is" I believe. u are giving too much credit man. pigs cannot look up you kno. the neck does not allow them to see the sky  |
|
|
|
Yay DEVs back!!
Ok so moving forward does anyone have any ideas for the dev on how to make a future for the coin? real comments only please, dont need the 2 fudders BS, if everyone puts their heads together and help out with some ideas so the dev doesn't have to think about everything by himself, the guts and work so far is good as most would have run by now and dumped the whole project after the ups and downs. It looks like the whole thing is back on track and working now.
So i would start with a few simple ideas:
1. get on more exchanges
2. we can use twitter accounts to spread the word and exchange troll boxes
3. Dont put up sell walls under cutting the price, if most agree to hold at a certain price that be good, say no lower than we its trading at now 0.006 or there about
4. make simple fun photo shop pics for seed and post them here and twitter
5. Talk it up now and in the future
Could we back the coin with real seeds? as in seed is very cheap could the coin become a seed bank in real life? you can buy seed in any country for bugger all depending on the seed?
Could we back and buy seed and use it for good eg: donations for 3rd world shit holes?
Do a logo contest
Anyway the more ideas the better
Beef
Thank you, this is just the sort of thing I need. More exchanges could help, but getting on bittrex was key. If there was higher volume this might be a big deal, but right now there's not a lot of incentive to trade. This should change near the end of the week as the coin finds its floor;) Twitter is an excellent way to spread the word through social media. For a lot of people Twitter is their go to place for information, and as new coins trend people there really start to take interest;) Completely agree all the rest would be great as well;) Obviously some of the things on the agenda are Mac Wallet (we'd have one by now, but my dev pc took a dump last week. I'm actually doing everything with my laptop now. No I didn't lose any code.), android wallet, etc. I'm planning to completely overhaul the UI design for *user friendliness*. Yes that means I'm not going for resource heavy bling, or awkward custom bordered wallets. I want easy to use. In the long term (6+ months) maybe doing something cool for people that missed this growth period. Celebrate with a 10% growth day or something. I don't know. Depends on the community sentiment for the idea. I'm going to go back and make the shadowcoin messaging system easier to use and more intuitive (it does work, after all) and fix the stealth address issue, providing the a reasonable option for anonymous sending and receiving. Something I really want to get into, but wont happen for quite some time in light of all the issues that we have previously faced, is redesigning how the blockchain is stored and managed across the network so that it isn't just so heavy on storage resources, and for compatability purposes, I'd look to have both versions fully compatible with eachother and able to run side by side. Another thing I want to do is look into eliminating change addresses as the default, and instead make transaction change feed back into the address it came from, similar to what happens when coins stake (they get sent to their originating address). This design would make wallet portability and backups much more dependable and allow coins stored on paper wallets to send only a portion of their coins at a time. I'm also looking at things like 2FA, USB authentication (to allow the option of unlocking your wallet by, say, plugging a usb stick that has a special key on it, or your mobile phone), and multi-option authentication, so you could possibly set your wallet to only unlock with both a password and a usb key, or even set both, but only require one or the other. Obviously each would have its advantages and disadvantages, but I like providing options, and not everyone likes having to use a password to unlock their wallet. Another thing I'd like to add is the ability to share coins with other devices that you own. For example - suppose you could go to your main wallet on your PC, and set up an address in it called 'Mobile Phone', and any coins you sent to that address still remained in your primary wallet, but were also accessible from your mobile phone. And what if all you had to do in order to load that wallet onto your phone was to load it via a qr code that you could only access once you had properly authenticated? Building up funds for an exchange buywall that functions the same way, or similar to how it was described in the ICO is something else I'm heavily contemplating. The possibility of backing the coin with resources that have stable value (I like the idea of seeds!) is awesome I think. I'm also very charitably minded, but I believe we need to build value for seed before we can build resources that we can afford to donate to charity. Like my grandfather always told me growing up, you have to be able to take care of yourself before you can take anyone else. I have lots of ideas that I plan on working on. I'm going to spend the next day or so putting some serious thought into how long they would take for me to implement, test, and introduce through a reasonable alpha-beta-release cycle. I plan on having a Roadmap together for everyone to look at on Tuesday or Wednesday. All suggestions are welcome, and I'm happy to take them on board. At the end of the day my primary expertise is in development and customer service. I'm not a big advertising guru, nor do I have much experience in design or multimedia. Having a logo contest sounds like a great idea, I love contests;) Can you setup a wallet for donations cryptzo? and post the address, i would put some in for sure and i am sure others that are after longer term growth might add to it, even if we get a small amount it could fund say a logo contest to start, what do you guys think? Maybe, but if I did it would most certainly be after growth. Sounds good, i knocked a logo up in a few seconds, its easy enough and the right logo will help a lot, again this is just for ideas people might have an a very quick example,  I thought the tree with the roots n stuff was the logo. jus assumed it was cuz the wallet opens with that tree. is not bad tho. reminds me of the big fish movie poster   |
|
|
|
Approximately 60 blocks per hour!
Now #12400, growth stage until 20100: 7700 blocks more / 60 bph / 24 hours a day = 5.35 or little more than 5 days of stake.
As more people stake, the blocks go faster? I've heard of blocks taking time, etc. being mentioned in other threads. Is that when no one stakes? Can any tech guru clarify? |
|
|
|
There have been many opportunities to both buy low, 0.07/coin and sell high, anywhere from 0.15 and above. The information about age stacking came out in plenty of time for those who wanted to get out to do so.
The problem is that since you released the info so late. If I decided to sell, moved my coins to bittrex and sold, by the time I sold them all I would have CRASHED the market. (there has been almost NO buy support the last day). Every once in a while a decent buy wall has popped up, but by the time you move the seed to bittrex someone else would have taken your sell. Then you are REALLY fucked as you just moved your coins and they wont be mature in time for growth... So no, there wasnt "plenty of time" unless you wanted to take a HUGE chance. And those who moved took that chance right? |
|
|
|
So looking at the rich list you have essentially given 4-5 people control of about 25% of the total coin supply if they play their cards properly and more if others don't.
I normally try to stay positive but find this information very disappointing.
Come on... give him a break. The information is all there on the OP. It is not his job to spell out all the possible outcomes of every possible strategy. That's the whole point; for the people to figure out the best method themselves. You could sell your seeds on the second day (while everyone is staking, and hardly any sellers), then buy on the 4th day for real cheap and stake everything you bought for 3 days. For all you know, the guy staking till the 7th day will have a lot of coins, without any buyers on the market. And those trends (if any) are visible from far for the trained eye. No way is someone going to stake to get 25% of the coin supply, for an overall net loss. |
|
|
|
Recouped.
So 67 Seed were bought in the ICO. And now there are a total of roughly 600 out there. It means that 85 % of the coins were acquired at a cost of ZERO, right? And still the coin is roughly traded at 20% below the ICO price?
I guess miracles do still happen...
But they, for sure, don't last.
Its never a ZERO cost, a lot of people rented miners at substantial cost and with the pools forking and going down the cost to mine went up. Even If you bought the equipment you still have the equipment cost and cost to run. It is actually less than ZERO... in many cases. As you know there are people who rent miners and, obviously, those which are not rented are either collecting dust in the shelves or are put to mine things like SEED. For those the cost is less than zero for they derive profits from the rental business. Individuals doing the renting are very, very few I'm quite sure. Like I said, I am flabbergasted with the price holding here and not having gone yet at least 20 times lower... Watching it now with very special interest. fuck, u mental or somthng? get your 2$ ADHD ass back to iconicxperts bed for that reach around you been hinting at. Or get whooped at the pink thread as usual. Or better yet, join obamacare. just keep your wannabe insights on mining and trading out of here. folks might misunderstand you for being important or something! |
|
|
|
Have any decisions been made on the direction we're to go here? Has a timeline been laid out?
Lots of good and great ideas have been flowing in, and I'm still in the process of shifting it all through. I'll form 2-3 proposals (with options) and then submit them for the community for final comments. The upcoming IRC meeting will probably play quite a big part in the process so please stay tuned for information on when the meeting will be held. I've still been insanely busy setting up Altcoin.Center, which is why there's been this period of apparent silence. However, processing has been going on all the time and I'm pretty sure the results will be worth the wait.  As of now, I'm leaning towards the idea (by fartbags) of a combined DOPE + DOGE + LTC mining. Just need to investigate the technical side a bit further. Anonymous chat is on top of the todo list. Coin mixing / anonymization is the part that is still partially an open question. It's a must feature of course, but there are many good alternatives regarding how it could be implemented, and the comparison between them isn't quite straight-forward. The only thing I can say for sure is that it can not and will not be dependent on any central servers or anything alike. Looking forward to the IRC meeting! =) Yours, Jyri Pinkcoin has anon transactions in their wallet. But it not open source and they charge a fee get it implement on another coin wallet. They havent mentioned any rates in their ANN page. I dont understand the whitepaper either... flowcharts and all.... but it works somehow. Maybe your coders can take a look at it and they will understand how to recreate one for dope as well? |
|
|
|
if you guys are commited
would be nice to see POD
The ICO is handled by the pinkcoin team devs. That in my opinion is better than an exchange even. Those devs are all known to public (check their page). Their reputation is solid. Excited to buy my .2 BTC of seeds! The idea is brilliant cryptzo. I'm so glad you didn't ninja launch |
|
|
|
|
How are you tracking the change in signatures?
|
|
|
|
|
Is there an x15 vs x13 vs x11 comparison anywhere? for current consumption, hash rate output etc? I can't find any good info anywhere. Wondering if anyone here has any info to share.
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a difference between the block explorer and the crawler?
|
|
|
|
|
Is there any way to cut the size of block chain? any online wallet services for crypto note?
|
|
|
|
Hi, was the website made by freelance? can you pass the contact info please. It looks great |
|
|
|
|
As a vendor, are the prices updated live? Would there be a feature where the buyer can pay in Cloak and the seller set parameters to auto trade them to BTC? Also, how is the marketplace going to deal with returns generally?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi how you got listed on BTC38. was there someone you contacted?
|
|
|
|
|
