Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
|
Hi Here4MyCoins, i'm wondering if you've double-checked the domain you're using. There are several phishing websites that mimic the original website with similar domain names and extensions, so it's essential to verify the domain name letter by letter. If you're unsure or have any concerns, it's possible that you may have inadvertently accessed a phishing website, which could be the root cause of this issue.
|
|
|
Also, you have contradicted yourself in a reply on another thread, which significantly undermines your reliability and credibility, as there are clear indicators of lying and fabricating claims. This can be seen here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5475616.msg63449564#msg63449564In this thread, the main focus revolves around the ongoing " Boomchange" fraud. Moreover, you have failed to contradict any of the numerous evidential points I have presented. Here are some specific questions that need addressing: 1. Can you provide the official license from entities like FinCEN or MSB for "Boomchange.com" and "Boomchange.io" to operate as a cryptocurrency exchange? 2. What is the physical office or headquarters address of "Boomchange"? 3. Why is "Boomchange" blocked and flagged as a phishing website by extensions like MetaMask? 4. Is "Boomchange" compliant with anti-money laundering (AML) regulations, as required by law? If so, can you provide proof of this compliance? 5. Is there any reliable official business registration for "Boomchange"? Where can it be found? 6. Why do all positive reviews on platforms like Trustpilot come from newly created accounts with only 1-2 reviews, exhibiting similar patterns? Conversely, verified negative reviews claim that you, the operator of Boomchange, flag them to make them disappear. Why did Trustpilot suspend "Boomchange.com" review page due to breaking guidelines? 7. Why does the "Terms of Use" page on "Boomchange.com" generate terms using AI that have no apparent relevance to the website? Several links, such as the refund policy, are either missing or not included. You can view an archived version of the page here: ( https://web.archive.org/web/20240106020937/https://boomchange.com/terms-of-use - Date: 1/5/2024) 8. Why have previous domain registrars and server hosting companies suspended "Boomchange.com" in the past? Also, why is there a second domain, "Boomchange.io", that now redirects to "Boomchange.com" as of 1/5/2024? 9. Why and how has "Scam-Alert.io" verified "Boomchange.com" as a scam? ( https://scam-alert.io/scam/bc1qgwx3z59thekwcmp92arrvf4s2yg4ystsr9k2tt) 10. In your response, you mentioned presenting evidence and proofs to counter my claims of malicious tactics employed by the scam platform "Boomchange", which you, "Jerayer", operate. However, you have failed to provide any confirmation or supporting evidence for your statements. When can we expect you to provide evidence for your false claims? It seems like "Jerayer", the operator of Boomchange, has become very silent for over a month already when I clearly pointed out indicators and evidence that "Boomchange.com" and "Boomchange.io" are scam fake crypto exchanges. There has been no explanation or response from Jerayer regarding these points. Meanwhile, the operator of Boomchange, known as "Jerayer" on BitcoinTalk, has changed the Bitcoin deposit address on the phishing website "Boomchange.com" to "bc1qv4rnhlx4fr9zn2cdklawjx429wr9nqhf7yf9uv" ( https://archive.is/BAtoR) and the Ethereum deposit address to "0x4d070f2380F60764E0f48725be03850afA3C0Ee2" ( https://archive.is/TKVsD). This is an attempt to hide traces of scam reports, making it difficult for potential victims to research the addresses. However, I will continue to expose and follow this case to protect people and reveal the fraudster.
|
|
|
This change has caused some issues, such as identifying and reporting phishing mixer websites that use a portion of the real mixer domain name in their phishing domain name. What's the point in knowing the exact phishing domain name? Just watch out, even if it's not on a list of phishing domains, it can still be a new one. Users now have to rely on other sources than Bitcointalk to find the real sites. As a rule of thumb: if you can post the mixer's URL, chances are it's a phishing site. But being word filtered still doesn't guarantee the site is real. Knowing the exact phishing domain name can be very useful for people or victims to research a specific website that might be phishing. They can find more details and references about it, such as on this forum. For example, they can find my thread and learn that a specific website domain is a scam and a phishing website. By conducting research, they can avoid falling victim to a specific phishing domain, which they might have wanted to use. For a skilled scammer, creating a fake site is just a few hours of work, with $20 for a domain and hosting, the phishing site is online very quickly. I don't know how it is possible to collect information about all such sites, I guess we don't even know about half of them. What if there is a new page that is not yet on the blacklist? As far as I know, there are currently around 15 "legitimate" mixers (maybe some more that I haven't heard of yet), while at the same time, I saw lists of phishing mixer sites with over 100 domains. Isn't it easier to remember those 15 pages or at least a couple of listing pages that only collect data from legal mixer services? The most important thing should be that people are educated enough to recognize whether the site is original or fake. Based on my research, the phishing domains that are highly ranked in search engines have been active online for months or even years. Upon checking the WhoIS information of these specific domains, it was found that the phishing websites that generate significant traffic are likely created by a single individual. These websites also pose the most risk to potential victims who are seeking such services. This risk is discussed in my thread on cryptocurrency mixer phishing scams here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5478625.0It is possible that individuals may be tempted to use the best-ranked or longest-active phishing websites, assuming they are legitimate. However, my thread highlights the deceptive nature of these websites, revealing them as scams. Many newcomers to this field may struggle to differentiate between legitimate and fraudulent mixers. In light of this, I believe my efforts to identify and expose fake mixers, especially the top-ranked phishing websites that attract the most traffic, are crucial in protecting people from falling victim to scams.
|
|
|
While I understand that mixers are being banned on the forum, I don't believe it was a good idea to change the names of all the former legitimate mixers to "[banned mixer]".
The thing is, you cannot post URL's of mixers in the forum, it will be automatically wordfiltered if you try to post it, but you can write the name of mixers, without posting a link that takes users to their websites. If you want to "report" or "identify" any mixer, just write the names of the mixer, without their URL's. The names of phishing domains are often very similar to the original domain websites, but with a different top-level domain (TLD). This can make it difficult for people or victims who want to research a specific phishing domain to find resources like my thread on this forum, which could provide them with more information, details and knowledge. However, the exact phishing domain is censored with "[banned mixer]", which I don't think is a good idea in this case. This change has caused some issues, such as identifying and reporting phishing mixer websites that use a portion of the real mixer domain name in their phishing domain name. What's the point in knowing the exact phishing domain name? Just watch out, even if it's not on a list of phishing domains, it can still be a new one. Users now have to rely on other sources than Bitcointalk to find the real sites. As a rule of thumb: if you can post the mixer's URL, chances are it's a phishing site. But being word filtered still doesn't guarantee the site is real. Knowing the exact phishing domain name can be very useful for people or victims to research a specific website that might be phishing. They can find more details and references about it, such as on this forum. For example, they can find my thread and learn that a specific website domain is a scam and a phishing website. By conducting research, they can avoid falling victim to a specific phishing domain, which they might have wanted to use.
|
|
|
Hello! While I understand that mixers are being banned on the forum, I don't believe it was a good idea to change the names of all the former legitimate mixers to "[banned mixer]". This change has caused some issues, such as identifying and reporting phishing mixer websites that use a portion of the real mixer domain name in their phishing domain name. An example of this can be found in my report here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5478625.0. My suggestion would be to keep the names clearly visible and not censored. As for the former mixer threads in the forum, they could simply be closed. Overall, I think this would be a more useful solution for the forum and better for its users.
|
|
|
Hey there, as of my check on 2/2/2024, the domain "kryptomixer.io" is being used as a phishing cloaked domain in search engines. When you click on this URL, it redirects you to "cryptomixer2.com", which is another bitcoin mixer phishing website. This website is a clone of the former legitimate service called "CryptoMixer". Based on my suspicions, I believe the fraudster responsible for this is from Russia. ~snip~
On that link, I only see a page without any content with the message "Website kryptomix.io is ready. The content is to be added" and no redirection to other pages. On some other browsers, a warning appears about a potentially dangerous page that has been blocked, which means that the reports on Google Safebrowsing were successful. As I previously stated, as of my check on 2/2/2024, the domain "kryptomixer.io" is being used as a phishing cloaked domain in search engines. This indicates that if someone clicks on "kryptomixer.io" through Google, they will be redirected to "cryptomixer2.com", which is another cloned bitcoin mixer phishing website. This is called cloaked search results, which is also not allowed on Google. However, the fraudster abuses this. "cryptomixer2.com" is currently suspended, which may be why "kryptomixer.io" is no longer appearing in the search results. However, if they modify the redirect on "kryptomixer.io", the website may reappear in Google. Although "cryptomixer2.com" is currently suspended, there is a possibility that "kryptomixer.io" will appear again in the search results in the future. This is because the domain and server are still active and online, and the fraudster may redirect users to another phishing website.
|
|
|
It is both shocking and disheartening to see that this fraudster has been able to continue scamming people around the world for years.
Have phishing links increased since December or have they been around for a while? Because I think the lack of discussion about mixers here is what makes it easy for scammers to show phishing links first when you use Google. Great effort Bitcoadvice but we can't do much, trying. There is a demand for privacy services and since the Chipmixer ban mixing services have boomed a lot. Thank you for your kind words. The phishing domains of fake cryptocurrency mixers have been in existence for several years at the top of search engines. Surprisingly, the individual I mentioned in my previous reply has managed to discover a method to get his phishing websites ranked at the top of search results. I suspect he achieved this using black hat methods or possibly employing unique, unknown techniques. Considering the value of such information, I believe there is a significant amount of money involved. The individuals behind this cryptocurrency phishing mixer network are not amateurs or newcomers; there is definitely an experienced individual orchestrating this operation.
|
|
|
When users click on this URL, they are redirected to "sinbadmixer.net", which is another fraudulent website posing as a bitcoin mixer. To make matters worse, this cloned website is pretending to be the legitimate service "Sinbad".
Sinbad mixer is no longer legitimate, nor does it exist. The service is closed and the domain is seized by authorities. I apologize for any confusion caused by my previous reply. To clarify, I should have referred to the service as a "former" legitimate one. Please disregard any misunderstanding from my previous reply, as I will be updating it accordingly. Based on my investigations, I strongly suspect that the individual behind this elaborate scam is from Russia. I think that this information is not crucial, because no matter where they come from, scammers are still scammers. I believe that the information provided is indeed crucial. It is important to gather information about the scammers, and these small steps could potentially aid in finding them. It is truly shocking to think that this fraudster has been able to continue scamming people around the world for over 5 years. It's crucial that people remain vigilant and cautious when encountering such websites, ensuring their safety and protecting their crypto assets. Somehow they persist, even in the face of many proven scams. The authorities prefer to deal with the control of registered businesses rather than those operating under the radar. I saw in the footer on this page ads from hosting provider ispmanager.com, if the site is hosted by them, maybe you should contact them and warn them about the nature of this user. Please note that "ispmanager.com" is a system similar to "cPanel" and is not responsible for hosting these websites.
|
|
|
Hey there, as of my check on 2/2/2024, the domain "kryptomixer.io" is being used as a phishing cloaked domain in search engines. When you click on this URL, it redirects you to "cryptomixer2.com", which is another bitcoin mixer phishing website. This website is a clone of the former legitimate service called "CryptoMixer". Based on my suspicions, I believe the fraudster responsible for this is from Russia. The scammer behind "kryptomixer.io" is the operator of a large network of cryptocurrency mixer phishing scam websites. This individual has already stolen millions of dollars, and you can see more detail of this in my thread where I mentioned the phishing domains. You can find the thread here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5478625Sadly, the domain "kryptomixer.io" is still active and online. They have changed their domain registrar to Nicenic, which is known as the most abused registrar according to Spamhaus ( https://www.spamhaus.org/statistics/registrars/). This choice of registrar makes it extremely difficult, if not impossible, to take the domain down. It is both shocking and disheartening to see that this fraudster has been able to continue scamming people around the world for years.
|
|
|
Hi there, I wanted to bring to your attention a concerning issue regarding the domain "veio.io". Starting from 2/2/2024, this domain has been used as a phishing cloaked domain in search engines. When users click on this URL, they are redirected to "sinbadmixer.net", which is another fraudulent website posing as a bitcoin mixer. To make matters worse, this cloned website is pretending to be the former legitimate service "Sinbad". Based on my investigations, I strongly suspect that the individual behind this elaborate scam is from Russia. This same scammer who previously operated "veio.io" is now part of a vast network of cryptomixer phishing scam websites such as "kryptomixer.io" ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5309843.0) & "cryptomixer.net". Shockingly, this fraudster has already managed to steal millions of dollars from unsuspecting victims. You can find more information on this topic, which also includes the "veio.io" phishing domain, as well as a list of other phishing domains, in my thread here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5478625 It is truly shocking to think that this fraudster has been able to continue scamming people around the world for over 5 years. It's crucial that people remain vigilant and cautious when encountering such websites, ensuring their safety and protecting their crypto assets.
|
|
|
OP, I love how there is no further proof provided after all the facts I've provided and I've caught you lying. The forum can read through this and confirm this is you. Firstly, here is proof provided in this thread that contradicts your statement, once again proving that you are lying. Additionally, you claim to have caught me lying, which is yet another lie fabricated by you, Support212, as I have consistently backed up my claims unlike you; it is evident to everyone reading this forum, and this might be the reason why domain registrars and MetaMask have blocked your websites. "i want to clarify that I have absolutely no association with the websites mentioned from "Ceytllle", and I consistently report phishing websites. It appears that someone, presumably in an attempt to harass me for exposing such malicious activities, is falsely attributing these websites to me" Those are your words. For the spectators, please read through this thread on Github and read OP's comments in this thread and let me know if it's not the same style of writing that is used. Also feel free to click on Bitcoadvices profile and look through past messages. It is you that owns the GitHub profile Jackofus80 and you've been spear heading this entire operation. https://metamask.io must be the company that compensates you on a volume basis for your efforts in bringing down some malicious companies and some business that dont know how to stand up for themselves. https://github.com/MetaMask/eth-phishing-detect/issues/14653Basically, you are plagiarizing my claims against other cyber crypto scammers that I exposed on BitcoinTalk, who also operate fraudulent cryptocurrency exchanges where evidence is provided in the threads I initiated, showcasing their "similar writing style". This merely indicates your lack of valid arguments. It should be noted that, like millions of other individuals, I have proficient English skills in my native language, and this doesn't prove that all these people are a single individual. If you believe otherwise, please provide clear evidence instead of fabricating nonsensical connections, like the claim of a "similar writing style." Unlike the scammers I exposed in other threads, my English is free of errors and typos. It is worth noting that these errors and typos were evident in their writing, and this was just one of the indicators I presented against them. You allege that I own the GitHub profile "Jackofus80", which is untrue as I have no association or connection to it. If you believe otherwise, please provide clear evidence instead of fabricating baseless connections without any reliable evidence. So my questions were:
Who has been phished? Give me real victims (Your excuse is that I deleted reviews)
Who has been frauded of money? I need real people, hash and Tx's (Your excuse is that I deleted reviews)
That's comedy son You asked, "Who has been phished?" and "Who has been defrauded of money?" To which I responded: I don't know, as I don't have access to your victims or any information regarding the number of victims affected by the "MyCoinChange" scam. It's worth noting that fraudsters often flag reviews and seek to delete negative content that could undermine their ongoing cryptocurrency scam, and not everyone is aware of platforms like this to report such incidents. Nevertheless, the most impactful action I can take is to expose the malicious and fraudulent activities associated with "MyCoinChange," as demonstrated here. You now claim, "Your excuse is that I deleted reviews", and "Your excuse is that I deleted reviews", both of which are lies, as proven in this thread. Perhaps it would be helpful for you to re-read what I wrote in response to better comprehend the situation. In short, since you have provided no proof and made baseless claims and provided no evidence I rest my case. Your proof is a medium blog and previous pictures on my website. You and your alias Jackofus80 on Github both have not provided a solution, a common theme even in the face of blind proof that the business is legitimate.
Further more, the audience knows who is legitimate. The man who's operating and can be found and contacted easily or the one who hides behind aliases and no one knows him or can see a picture of him. Keep trolling brother, I wish you a speedy recovery. You're very ill
I will keep continuing to market here. I appreciate the attention even though the actions you've taken are illegal which is why you're hiding your identity and ties around this malicious behavior.
You claim that I provided "no proof" and "baseless claims", which is another lie. The thread is full of evidence and backing for the claims I made, so I don't understand why you contradict yourself so strongly, even when there is proof available. Also, I need to clarify that "Jackofus80" is not my alias, and I don't have a GitHub account or any association or connection to the account mentioned, as I previously stated. If you believe otherwise, please provide reliable evidence to support your claim. You wrote, "Furthermore, the audience knows who is legitimate" and I fully agree with this statement. There is substantial evidence and a multitude of indicators proving that "MyCoinChange" is indeed a scam platform, evidenced by domain registrars and MetaMask blocking it to protect innocent people from falling victim to this fraud. OP coincidently didnt answer the NICENIC section, I know why but here is proof from their website that I'm speaking of: "Authorities reporting abuse must first have their provided credentials verified. Upon successful verification, a response will be made to the authorities by the most fitting to-the-case individual from the Nicenic.NET support team. Resolution of reported abuse by the authorities will depend on the scope and complexity of the investigation required. As part of domain investigation of illegal activity complaints , we may notify our customer and ask them to resolve the issue and may share your contact information so our customer can work with you directly to resolve the issue. Where our customers fail to comply with our policies, we reserve the right to take appropriate action."You can find this here: https://nicenic.net/customer/reportabuse.phpWhat happened OP, I thought you were serious about reporting scams and making the market a better place? Afraid to identify yourself or come to a resolution? OP is the ultimate troll and here to cripple businesses for his financial gain. You've made a fool of yourself in public forum. You responded to a question from "holydarkness" in your reply, not to me, and you claimed that "OP coincidentally didn't answer". It's quite astonishing. NICENIC is widely known for their lack of action against abused domains involved in crypto cybercrime, phishing, and similar activities. I even mentioned this in the following link: " https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5454622.msg63449698#msg63449698". Notably, NICENIC holds the top spot on Spamhaus's list of the most abused domain registrars worldwide, which can be verified here: " https://www.spamhaus.org/statistics/registrars/". It's worth mentioning that you chose this registrar for your new domains after your previous domain registrars promptly suspended your domains, as evidenced here: " https://www.whois.com/whois/mycoinchange.ai". These clear indicators point towards malicious and fraudulent activities associated with "MyCoinChange", given that you opted for the most abused domain registrar according to Spamhaus to run your websites. Furthermore, I conducted some research on your claims. You assert that you have a Canadian license and company. However, the domain registrant of "mycoinchange.ai" states that the "Registrant Contact" and "Administrative Contact" reside in, and are from, Bulgaria (BG), not Canada (CA). Once again, you have been exposed with undeniable evidence.
|
|
|
Correction: that post is talking about that the article is likely made with the purpose to promote this platform, as all signs point to it. I am not claiming or pointing out that they are somehow associated with fake crypto mixer. You discovered the writing on the Medium blog, which promoted several fake crypto mixer phishing websites that are clearly scams. The blog posts of the banned writer also mentioned "MyCoinChange", another indication of fraudulent activities. It is highly likely that the writer who advertised these phishing scam websites is either connected to "support212" or could even be the same person. [...] The business has 180 days to be registered. It was registered in September, 2023.
You claimed, "The business has 180 days to be registered. It was registered in September 2023," but this topic predates the registration of the business by several months, so essentially, you admit that you did not have a license or any similar authorization when you started these suspicious-looking websites, support212. Before making accusations and claiming things, please provide evidence as we have done against you and "MyCoinChange", as there is proof to back up the claims against the malicious website "MyCoinChange". I believe you misunderstood this part. He said the business has 180 days to be registered, it means his govt allows up to 180 days for a project to legalize themselves since they go public. And thus, them being registered in September 2023 still within this 180 days window. However... That's a completely different story if they've been launched since 2018 as their website claimed and only registered on September 2023. Got you, yes. All in all, it seems suspicious, and the statements of support212 somehow contradict themselves sometimes. ___ "I do not make false claims, and if you believe otherwise, prove me wrong, as the thread is filled with evidence that demonstrates your inaccuracies, "support212". Even other BitcoinTalk users, such as "holydarkness", have discovered that your websites are somehow associated with fake crypto mixer scam phishing websites, which can be seen here: " https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5459004.msg62524556#msg62524556"." OP provide proof that I have an affiliation with the other mixers. A blog is not evidence. This is a baseless claim. You cannot prove this as it does not exist. This is your evidence against me? The proof lies in the linked reply: the malicious writer of the suspended Medium blog posts actively promoted fraudulent scam websites, including crypto mixer phishing sites, alongside "MyCoinChange" in their blog posts, revealing evident malicious intent and a connection between the fraudulent writer and you, which you confirmed, as can be seen below in this reply. "This is, in fact, another falsehood because user "albon" exposed that these profile pictures belonged to normal private individuals, as proven here:"
Yes, I said I believe they were stock photos. Once I came to this forum and saw that it was not they were removed. This is not true, you wrote that: I figured that they were stock photos which are right to use. "Support212 claims that I am "blocking exchanges illegally", which is another lie as I am unable to block anything, so please provide proof that I have blocked your "exchanges illegally", as you have stated." You have blocked MyCoinChange with your work colleague AlexHerman1 on Github. You have violated the Code of conduct of https://metamask.ioMetamask's Github Code of Conduct: "I've gone through your Code Of Conduct, under the Enforcement Responsibilities it says "Community leaders have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that are not aligned to this Code of Conduct, and will communicate reasons for moderation decisions when appropriate." "We have not received a legitimate reason why the websites are being harassed it contradicts your pledge "We pledge to act and interact in ways that contribute to an open, welcoming, diverse, inclusive, and healthy community."I did not block anything and do not have access to MetaMask codes, nor do I have a GitHub account; you are making false claims, so if you are going to make such accusations, provide evidence or they are simply false and baseless accusations again. "as I have reported scams on this platform with evidence and indicators"
Where is a customer that has been scammed? Where is the malicious code on the platform? Which claims have you made besides pictures and text on the platform? Completely baseless claims to consider MyCoinChange a scam. I hope this is not your full time job, your terrible at it and on a power trip. Not every person is aware of these forums or knows how and where to report online crypto scams; additionally, many fraudsters flag reviews on reviewing platforms or block comments on social media channels to conceal negative experiences from people. The thread contains ample evidence and indicators, which can be read from my original post on page 1 down to this point. Moreover, I have real-life responsibilities and a busy schedule like everyone else; therefore, this is not a power trip, but rather a genuine attempt to caution others about the malicious and suspicious indicators surrounding "MyCoinChange" based on the information I have shared here. Support212, you created some videos with AI and are using them as evidence for what exactly? This is highly unprofessional and lacks any logical sense.
I'm glad you liked it. We will make higher quality videos with time. I'll be sure to leave in in this forum and tag you in it. Unprofessional? Now, that's comedy. This entire thread is unprofessional, not how business and changes happen. You did not answer the question; instead, you badmouthed this thread in an attempt to tactfully avoid giving answers to questions regarding "MyCoinChange" and what should serve as evidence for AI-generated videos. Additionally, you mention "PR" from your website, which essentially holds no significance as it can be purchased with money, so using this as proof of legitimacy is also malicious, from my perspective.
You admitted that the ChangeNow PR was legitimate. Did you change your mind? Calling changenow.io illegitimate now? Careful OP, you're walking on thin ice "ChangeNow.io" is a legitimate website, but I did not even mention this anywhere before as you wrote, "You admitted that the ChangeNow PR was legitimate.". Additionally, you are once again accusing me of something I never did before, and regarding the other PRs you linked, why did you write that they show legitimacy even if they can be bought with money? I have no association with any of the accounts in the linked GitHub link; this is not my case there. Before making accusations and claiming things, please provide evidence as we have done against you and "MyCoinChange", as there is proof to back up the claims against the malicious website "MyCoinChange".
Where is your proof of fraud and phishing domain? I've checked through the code, no viruses or malicious code, no customer who has come forward for 6 months that has been frauded: https://imgur.com/Fnp0Mho This thread is filled with evidence and indicators that "MyCoinChange" has acted maliciously and fraudulently in the past; one just needs to read through it and refrain from gaslighting others by claiming there is nothing malicious or that everything is fine. The code doesn't necessarily need to contain a "virus" or "malicious" code, as often a well-designed website can deceive people into unknowingly sending their hard-earned cryptocurrency to such suspicious platforms. Correction: that post is talking about that the article is likely made with the purpose to promote this platform, as all signs point to it. I am not claiming or pointing out that they are somehow associated with fake crypto mixer.
holydarkness has arrived at the right conclusion. It was a promotion blog done by someone whos no longer with the company. I dont understand how you concluded association through this post. Holydarkness discovered the writing on the Medium blog, which promoted several fake crypto mixer phishing websites that were clearly scams, and the blog posts of the banned writer also mentioned "MyCoinChange", another indication of fraudulent activities; thus, it is highly likely that the writer who advertised these phishing scam websites is either connected to "support212" or could even be the same person. Now, you claim that the banned Medium writer were originally associated with your company, indicating that you had clear association with fraudulent individuals who were active in crypto cybercrime, as they promoted your website "MyCoinChange" on the same "promotion blog" while they worked with you. I believe you misunderstood this part. He said the business has 180 days to be registered, it means his govt allows up to 180 days for a project to legalize themselves since they go public. And thus, them being registered in September 2023 still within this 180 days window.
This is correct. The website has to be registered within 180 days of inception. Which it was. Misunderstood again. I wonder how many business you have condemned with your "investigations"
I pass the torch to you and wait for these claims:
Who has been phished? Give me real victims
Who has been frauded of money? I need real people, hash and Tx's
Neither of these two claims exists and are baseless OP Who has been phished? I don't know, as I don't have access to your victims or any information regarding the number of victims affected by the "MyCoinChange" scam. It's worth noting that fraudsters often flag reviews and seek to delete negative content that could undermine their ongoing cryptocurrency scam, and not everyone is aware of platforms like this to report such incidents. Nevertheless, the most impactful action I can take is to expose the malicious and fraudulent activities associated with "MyCoinChange," as demonstrated here. ___ The account "@wilfredgrimes" on Medium even had a "MyCoinChange" Linktree link in their bio, which could potentially be your account too, especially considering your demonstrated disregard for "identity stretching". Additionally, all the articles are recent and no older than a month, suggesting the possibility of using AI to generate fabricated content against legitimate organizations and companies like BitcoinTalk and MetaMask, with the aim of defaming them for exposing or blocking "MyCoinChange" because of the clearly malicious activities associated with the platform. Once again, you fail to provide any substantial proof and instead resort to attempting to manipulate people through social engineering, which is quite outrageous.
|
|
|
This issue should have been done with, but OP has increased his attack after failing the first time. Do you condone Ddossing? https://bitcointalk.org has incentived OP to Ddos the business. "Support212" is accusing me of crimes such as "DDoS", which is completely unfounded as I have never engaged in such activities and will never do so, therefore, if you are going to make these accusations, provide evidence (which cannot exist as I have no involvement in such things). OP and the "community" took down two domains on false claims I do not make false claims, and if you believe otherwise, prove me wrong, as the thread is filled with evidence that demonstrates your inaccuracies, "support212". Even other BitcoinTalk users, such as "holydarkness", have discovered that your websites are somehow associated with fake crypto mixer scam phishing websites, which can be seen here: " https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5459004.msg62524556#msg62524556". I figured that they were stock photos which are right to use. Identity thief is a stretch, they were not on an official document. I can’t expect someone to be rational and an honest man that markets mixers and casinos. "I figured that they were stock photos which are right to use. Identity theft is a stretch, they were not on an official document," you stated, support212. This is, in fact, another falsehood because user "albon" exposed that these profile pictures belonged to normal private individuals, as proven here: " https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5459004.msg62517333#msg62517333". OP is blocking exchanges illegally
Support212 claims that I am "blocking exchanges illegally", which is another lie as I am unable to block anything, so please provide proof that I have blocked your "exchanges illegally", as you have stated. Lets focus on the real scammers it's OP
Support212 also wrote, "Let's focus on the real scammers, it's OP" which is a completely baseless projection of your own activities onto me, as I have reported scams on this platform with evidence and indicators, while you only make claims without any evidence to support your false accusations of me being a scammer. The primary focus of this thread is exposing the malicious activities of the "MyCoinChange" website. Support212, you created some videos with AI and are using them as evidence for what exactly? This is highly unprofessional and lacks any logical sense. Here are all the PR's and mentions that have been done, further more they are reputable brands in the industry:
Additionally, you mention "PR" from your website, which essentially holds no significance as it can be purchased with money, so using this as proof of legitimacy is also malicious, from my perspective. OP and the "community" took down two domains I have not blocked or suspended any domains; only the domain registrar has the power to do so. It appears that they suspended your domains due to violations of terms of service and policies, such as running a crypto scam or operating a fake crypto exchange, for example. The business has 180 days to be registered. It was registered in September, 2023.
You claimed, "The business has 180 days to be registered. It was registered in September 2023," but this topic predates the registration of the business by several months, so essentially, you admit that you did not have a license or any similar authorization when you started these suspicious-looking websites, support212. Before making accusations and claiming things, please provide evidence as we have done against you and "MyCoinChange", as there is proof to back up the claims against the malicious website "MyCoinChange".
|
|
|
I will now give a couple of the points that confirm that you are lying and slandering. You wrote in the topic: Here's an example link from another website I use: https://changenow.io/exchange/txs/96db7247b7c6e1This is exactly the same as link that you provided as evidence. Based on your message, it turns out that changenow.io is also a scam? I’m simply amazed at your logic, almost all the crypto exchange websites provide links that contain a hash similar to “96db7247b7c6e1”, which makes the links unique and which cannot be thought out from the outside. The scam platform "Boomchange" presents risks to users which I have pointed out, as it can be malicious and worth noticing due to its allowance of direct URL access to specific pages, potentially bypassing security measures and checks; this makes users vulnerable to attacks and manipulation of content and parameters, leading to unintended actions and deceptive transactions. Additionally, the scam site of Boomchange lacks proper context, increasing the risk of uninformed decisions and falling victim to this crypto scam website. One should not forget about the other circumstances surrounding "Boomchange" and the additional evidence that collectively paints a clear picture of this fraud. The information mentioned earlier is just one piece of the puzzle among many others, which I will address here. I'll continue. You just wrote a link to the wallet on etherscan.io, so what? Is this proof? When I click on this link, I don't see anything strange. And this is the maximum of your evidence base? I mentioned the cryptocurrency addresses associated with "Boomchange" in order to keep a record and potentially assist innocent victims of the scam in gathering more information. This, in turn, would make it easier for them to take legal action against this fraudulent activity by utilizing the information I have provided. I believe this should be self-evident to clear-thinking individuals. I'll continue. I checked, the domain is working fine and there is nothing in your link to whois.com regarding blocking, and it clearly says that the domain is “Registered On: 2022-03-07”. Where's the proof? You simply slander, write links, tell lies and think that no one will follow these links and understand that you are slandering. You also didn't think that someone would click on the links, write that you were lying and expose you. "Registered On:" simply indicates the first registration of the domain, nothing more. After your previous domain registrar suspended "Boomchange.com" you purchased another domain called "Boomchange.io" to continue running your fraudulent cryptocurrency exchange platform. Once "Boomchange.com" domain expired on the previous registrar, you reacquired it through another registrar called NICENIC, which is known for engaging in malicious activities and inaction. (You can read about this on the fraud reports page: https://fraud-reports.fandom.com/wiki/NICENIC). Subsequently, after the expiration of "Boomchange.com" on the previous domain registrar, you repurchased it when it became available on the NICENIC domain registrar. As of 1/5/2024, your original phishing domain, "Boomchange.com", is still active and you have set up a redirection from "Boomchange.io" to it. This is a common tactic employed by cybercriminals when their websites are suspended, as was the case with you and Boomchange, which is why there are currently two domains associated with this scam platform. What else is there to say? I gave 3 examples from your topic, which do not represent evidence in any way. This means that you are simply using malicious intent. And this is typical for you. I am writing this because I wasted time on your message and did not find any evidence.
I contradicted and explained your "3 examples" very clearly, demonstrating that any clear-thinking person with sense knows what is going on here. Your social engineering methods are futile. As I expose crypto scam platforms like "Boomchange", your inexplicable attempt to protect it, coupled with contradictory statements, proves that you are the real scammer with malicious intent. Also, you didn't address the other serious points that I pointed out previously, possibly because there is no answer for them - right? It's amusing to hear that those who expose scams are somehow the ones with malicious intent. This is the first time I've come across such an nonsense. Also, you have contradicted yourself in a reply on another thread, which significantly undermines your reliability and credibility, as there are clear indicators of lying and fabricating claims. This can be seen here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5475616.msg63449564#msg63449564In this thread, the main focus revolves around the ongoing " Boomchange" fraud. Moreover, you have failed to contradict any of the numerous evidential points I have presented. Here are some specific questions that need addressing: 1. Can you provide the official license from entities like FinCEN or MSB for "Boomchange.com" and "Boomchange.io" to operate as a cryptocurrency exchange? 2. What is the physical office or headquarters address of "Boomchange"? 3. Why is "Boomchange" blocked and flagged as a phishing website by extensions like MetaMask? 4. Is "Boomchange" compliant with anti-money laundering (AML) regulations, as required by law? If so, can you provide proof of this compliance? 5. Is there any reliable official business registration for "Boomchange"? Where can it be found? 6. Why do all positive reviews on platforms like Trustpilot come from newly created accounts with only 1-2 reviews, exhibiting similar patterns? Conversely, verified negative reviews claim that you, the operator of Boomchange, flag them to make them disappear. Why did Trustpilot suspend "Boomchange.com" review page due to breaking guidelines? 7. Why does the "Terms of Use" page on "Boomchange.com" generate terms using AI that have no apparent relevance to the website? Several links, such as the refund policy, are either missing or not included. You can view an archived version of the page here: ( https://web.archive.org/web/20240106020937/https://boomchange.com/terms-of-use - Date: 1/5/2024) 8. Why have previous domain registrars and server hosting companies suspended "Boomchange.com" in the past? Also, why is there a second domain, "Boomchange.io", that now redirects to "Boomchange.com" as of 1/5/2024? 9. Why and how has "Scam-Alert.io" verified "Boomchange.com" as a scam? ( https://scam-alert.io/scam/bc1qgwx3z59thekwcmp92arrvf4s2yg4ystsr9k2tt) 10. In your response, you mentioned presenting evidence and proofs to counter my claims of malicious tactics employed by the scam platform "Boomchange", which you, "Jerayer", operate. However, you have failed to provide any confirmation or supporting evidence for your statements. When can we expect you to provide evidence for your false claims? Given your extensive experience and knowledge of "Boomchange" and your role as the operator of this website, it is evident that you go to great lengths to protect the fake crypto exchange phishing website "Boomchange" across multiple platforms. Your intention is to deceive unsuspecting victims into believing its legitimacy and trick them into sending their hard-earned crypto money to you using social engineering methods like pretending to be a customer of "Boomchange", even though you are the actual operator. With that in mind, I believe you can provide answers and explanations to the questions above.
|
|
|
I have troubles with coinchangers.net website for crypto exchange. A month ago I found it and wanted to trade my ETH for BTC. I deposited 0.07 ETH and they blocked it claiming it is suspicious transaction or whatever. I did not think that people could be so cruel.
It has been a month and they refuse to return my funds back to my address. They said "we are investigating". I mean they are not there to investigate, they must refund the user if user requests that one. They deceived me.
Upon investigation, it has come to my attention that on 1/3/2024, you made a statement regarding your utilization of the mentioned websites for exchanging Ethereum (ETH) to Bitcoin (BTC) in early December 2023. However, your dissatisfaction with the outcome was evident in your response which can be found here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5475616.msg63436255#msg63436255 ( https://web.archive.org/web/20240106030129/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5475616.msg63436255#msg63436255) Ironically, you seemed to conveniently omit a prior incident that took place nearly a year ago on 4/28/2023, where you made a claim on GitHub that these exact websites scammed you out of 200 USDT. This claim can be substantiated through the following link: https://github.com/MetaMask/eth-phishing-detect/issues/12425#issue-1688854430 ( https://web.archive.org/web/20240106030319/https://github.com/MetaMask/eth-phishing-detect/issues/12425#issue-1688854430) This contradiction by "Jerayer" exposes his intent to engage in malicious behavior, such as slander, defamation, and harassment, rather than providing factual evidence or substantiated arguments. Your actions appear to be an effort to tarnish the reputation of individuals rather than engaging in honest discourse supported by valid arguments or evidence. More information regarding the user "Jerayer", who is the operator of the scam platform "Boomchange", can be found at this link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5454622.0 This individual persistently attempts to socially engineer people into visiting his fraudulent website and defames those who expose cryptocurrency phishing scams, like "icryptofbi" already has.
|
|
|
Of course have. Here is the link to his profile on GitHub: https://github.com/Yandex41I looked, they even deleted/blocked this profile already. On GitHub he wrote copies of messages from this forum 1 in 1 and also asked to exclude some of these domains from blacklists: 1. coinchangers.net 2. coinchanger.live 3. coinchanges.net 4. coin-changer.net 5. coinchanger.net In the Google archives there are still some pages on GitHub where the user Yandex41 participates and which 1 in 1 provides texts from this forum and inserts links from this forum that he himself (Bitcoadvice) wrote. Also on this forum (some examples: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5475616.0 , https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5479174.0 ), several topics talk about his connection with these scam domains. I didn’t come up with this connection out of myself. ----- Regarding personal data, I am only in favor of finding such people and bringing them to justice. Of course, I don’t know if they have an agreement with these users, or specifically what kind of violations there are, but I repeat, this is either a stupid marketing ploy, or perhaps a violation of the rights of other people. But since I don’t know the essence and there are no specific complaints from these individuals, I cannot call this site a scam. And in my opinion, scammers do not publicly admit their mistakes and do not speak honestly. So, now you are claiming that a profile on GitHub belongs to me, but I have no association or connection with it. However, when I tried to visit it, I received a 404 error. This profile you mentioned does not belong to me. I am still waiting for your evidence, "Jerayer". Additionally, I have no knowledge of the user you linked or what they wrote. You are essentially claiming that this profile belongs to me without any evidence, proof, connection, or association, which is truly absurd. It is also interesting and embarrassing that you are copying my texts and writing style to use against me, which clearly demonstrates your lack of originality. Furthermore, the BitcoinTalk threads you linked are simply a reaction to exposed scams by me. Similar to you, these scammers are trying to shift the blame onto others who exposed their fraudulent projects and are engaging in harassment and defamation. Just like "icryptofbi", you, "Jerayer", have no evidence or proof to support your claims. You have also adopted his method of harassing me by accusing me of having connections to sites that I have no association with. Of course, none of you have evidence or proof like I have against your scam projects. I understand that scammers like you, Jerayer, are frustrated because I am informing innocent people about these crypto scams and trying protecting them with this. I am able to expose these crypto scam phishing methods and share awareness with users on the BitcoinTalk forum, thereby preventing scammers like you from having any control over the situation. I hope that scammers like you will be held accountable for the damage you have caused. The websites you mentioned do not belong to me, and the GitHub account also does not belong to me. I, along with other users here like holydarkness, have asked for evidence to support your claims, but you have failed to provide any. Instead, you continue to make baseless and false accusations, while engaging in harassment and defamation against me for exposing your "Boomchange" crypto scam project which can be seen here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5454622.0It is intriguing that "Jerayer" is also defending the malicious tactics of "MyCoinChange" mentioned in these threads, which are clearly fraudulent and illegitimate. It seems that scammers like you two are able to understand and support each other's actions without even communicating directly.  Furthermore, it has come to my attention that on the date of 1/3/2024, you made a statement regarding your usage of the websites you mentioned. According to your statement, you claimed to have used these scam websites for exchanging Ethereum (ETH) to Bitcoin (BTC) in early December 2023. However, you expressed dissatisfaction with the outcome, which can be seen in the following reply from you: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5475616.msg63436255#msg63436255 ( https://web.archive.org/web/20240106030129/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5475616.msg63436255#msg63436255) Interestingly, it seems that you conveniently forgot about a previous incident that occurred almost a year ago on the same websites you mentioned, on 4/28/2023. On this date, on the platform GitHub, you made a claim that these same websites had scammed you out of 200 USDT. This information can be verified through the following link: https://github.com/MetaMask/eth-phishing-detect/issues/12425#issue-1688854430 ( https://web.archive.org/web/20240106030319/https://github.com/MetaMask/eth-phishing-detect/issues/12425#issue-1688854430) These instances clearly demonstrate the lack of credibility in your statements and claims. It appears that you used these scam websites again after previously falling victim to their fraudulent activities. Such actions contradict your claims and expose your attempt to engage in slander, defamation, and harassment towards others, as your statements and comments lack genuine experiences and are therefore unreliable due to their self-contradictory nature. It is crucial to consider these contradictory occurrences and evaluate the intentions behind your allegations. It seems clear that your actions are aimed at tarnishing the reputation of individuals and engaging in malicious behavior rather than presenting valid arguments or evidence.
|
|
|
You exposed yourself both on this forum and on GitHub. Even your GitHub account was deleted due to fraud. Now that you are changing domains every month, you have started to abandon your fake websites:
And I know for sure that these are your websites, and I also know for sure that you have fake cryptocurrency mixers and QR code generators. All your websites are deceiving people and doing SCAMS. You also cannot justify your words, you simply stupidly copy incomprehensible links and slander who is your competitor. But in this case, you are very mistaken, I am not your competitor, I just use these services. And you cannot prove your words, since you are not even able to come up with a normal lie.
"You have been exposed as a bot on both this forum and GitHub." If you claim this, then please present evidence. The only thing I see is your defense of the scam platform "Boomchange", wherein you engage in lying and fabricating positive comments to support your own fraudulent activities. It appears that you reply to every one of my threads wherein I expose crypto scam networks, such as yours "Boomchange" (Here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5454622.0), in an effort to discredit me and undermine my credibility. However, your attempts will not succeed as the evidence I possess clearly proves the validity and truthfulness of my statements. Additionally, I do not use GitHub as a user, so show me evidence of my supposed account, and if you can provide that, then show me evidence of its deletion before making false claims. I want to clarify that I have no association or connection with the websites you mentioned earlier. Just because I seek justice for victims of crypto scams doesn't make me a malicious person like you, "Jerayer". It seems that scammers often assume that others are scammers too, which is a psychological effect that appears to be affecting the malicious individual known as "Jerayer" in this case. This psychological effect, known as projection, occurs when scammers project their own deceitful behaviors and intentions onto others. Through their engagement in fraudulent activities, scammers often develop a distorted perception of reality, wherein they believe that everyone around them is engaged in similar dishonest actions. This misguided belief allows them to rationalize their unethical behavior and alleviate feelings of guilt or responsibility. Regarding your unsupported statement that I own fake cryptocurrency mixers and a QR code generator, this is yet another falsehood and an attempt to undermine my credibility and badmouth me in this forum. If you have evidence, please present it, as I have provided evidence linking you, "Jerayer", to the fraudulent activities of "Boomchange". See here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5454622.msg63443260#msg63443260In response to your accusation that I cannot justify my words and rely on incomprehensible links to slander my competitors, I must disagree. I have substantiated every word with evidence, unlike you, "Jerayer", who continuously makes baseless claims and spreads lies in an attempt to undermine my credibility. However, your tactics are ineffective as I can provide evidence for everything I post and reply, as evident in this thread. Furthermore, your mention of "slandering my competitor" makes no sense, as I am not engaged in competition with anyone, especially not in the realm of crypto scams where you seem to be involved. You responded by stating, "But in this case, you are very mistaken; I am not your competitor." It's intriguing that you differentiate between yourself and me as "competitor", hinting at your involvement in defending crypto scams you are associated with. Yet, you provide no evidence or proof to support your arguments. Don't you notice the inconsistency in your own statements? Lastly, you claim, "And you cannot prove your words, since you are not even capable of creating a coherent lie." Is this not a more fitting description of yourself? My words are backed by clear evidence and proof, unlike yours, which consist of baseless claims and falsehoods that I have effectively refuted. Here you can see more references in this regard: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5454622.msg63440802#msg63440802 , https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5454622.0
|
|
|
I looked at all the topics of this author, and i can say that this is another slander against a competitor. It seems that the owner of this website has provided 10 times more substantiated materials than the author of this topic.
It is clearly visible here that apart from empty words, the author did not write anything in the form of evidence. I do not exclude that 1 of the author’s topics may not be related to slander, but this particular topic is completely slander.
Uhh... you do aware that the owner of the site admitted that he "stretched the truth", use fake profile as their customer service, and have fake reviews? And the numbers they gave on their site are most likely "stretched truth" too. Even if the author of this thread did not provide evidence [though the evidence and findings regarding this site are quite abundant, given by many users who pitched in], there is a written statement by the owner of the site admitting his... stretched truth "Stretching the truth" does not mean scam. Of course, fake reviews are not good, but this does not mean that the website is fake. I use this website, however, they work very slowly, but they don’t scam people, unlike Bitcoadvice. But agree that when launching a website, almost everyone uses both exaggerated numbers and paid reviews to somehow promote their website in such a competitive environment. So, dear, there is no need to say that the owner of the website accepted the accusations of the author of the topic, but simply honestly admitted something else. Wait, roll back a bit, what scam does the OP do? And you seemed to forgot to justify the fact that they use fake photo for their live support. What's the good excuse for this? Certainly a project that's built in a good faith, no matter how new they are, will not try to fool people with fake photo? The individual known as "Jerayer" is associated with the crypto fake exchange scam phishing platform called "Boomchange" which I have exposed in the following topic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5454622.0 Furthermore, it is evident that "Jerayer" continues to promote the fraudulent website through social engineering tactics and unsubstantiated claims, as he has failed to address any valid points I raised regarding the fraudulent activities of "Boomchange" which can be seen here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5454622.msg63440802#msg63440802 , https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5454622.msg63443260#msg63443260Instead, he consistently resorts to blatant lies and deception, as can be observed in my thread where I have exposed him, which is truly absurd. Another method of social engineering employed by "Jerayer" is falsely accusing me of being associated with the websites he mentioned, as scammers often believe that their "competitors" are the ones exposing them, attempting to portray me as such because he assumes victims and those with good intentions don't seek justice, only their "competitors"; however, I have already made it clear that I have no association or connection to the mentioned websites and my sole intention is to expose scams whenever I have the opportunity to do so, unlike "Jerayer" who fails to provide any evidence or substantiation for his claims, as evidenced in this thread or the aforementioned ones I linked, unlike me, as I always back my assertions with clear evidence, highlighting the apparent difference as well as his evident attempt to promote the fraudulent cryptocurrency exchange platform "Boomchange" on this forum. Another point worth noting is that "Jerayer" consistently comments on every topic where I expose various cryptocurrency scam networks, attempting to defend the ones I have exposed and undermine my credibility, but his efforts are futile as I possess undeniable evidence, ultimately tarnishing Jerayer's own credibility; it appears that he has reached his limit and, in the end, the correctness will always prevail, revealing fraud for what it truly is.
|
|
|
Hey BitcoinTalk community, I have updated the main post about the "Boomchange" fraud with recent updates as I frequently track these scam networks, ensuring no trace is lost within the time I can spare between my work.
And for what reason are you worried right now? And why is there no hard and real evidence in your post? I will answer. Because you are simply writing the unsubstantiated messages without the real evidence to make it harder for your competitors to operate their services, that's all. But as you can see, nothing works out for you once again. This is ridiculous. "Jerayer", the operator of the fraudulent crypto exchange phishing platform "Boomchange", continues to harass individuals who exposed the scam, as evident in this case, while persistently defending it with fabricated and baseless claims. It is of utmost importance to promptly protect individuals from crypto scam schemes like the one operating under the name "Boomchange". By claiming that he sees me as a competitor, he inadvertently reveals his involvement in the cybercriminal crypto fraud scam scheme, operated by Jerayer, known as "Boomchange", while I have no personal association with any phishing or scam activities, but rather specialize in exposing and reporting them. Most scammers, like Jerayer, falsely assume that everyone is involved in scamming because they themselves partake in fraudulent activities, but it's crucial to clarify that I am not personally involved in phishing or scams; my sole focus is exposing and reporting them. This is despite the concrete evidence proving its fraudulent nature, such as being flagged by Microsoft and MetaMask as a phishing scam, the suspension of the "Boomchange" account on Trustpilot ( https://www.trustpilot.com/review/boomchange.com), and the absence of any legitimate company license or credentials for Boomchange. It is unequivocally a total scam and fake. In addition, substantial evidence within the main post further confirms that "Boomchange" is a cryptocurrency scam and fraudulent operation. Haha, you can’t even respond normally on the forum, you’re just copying messages from one topic to another. Websites I use: All of these sites are normal websites and I have never had any problems with them. They send money normally, unlike you. Perhaps sometimes the transaction is slowly, but this is not a reason to slander them. Have you ever thought about the fact that no one except you is complaining about these websites? Of course you thought about it, and you know that you achieved nothing with your slander. If I use these websites and leave reviews, this does not mean that I manage them. You are just used to spreading lies. But I wouldn't mind having such websites. But for now I’m limiting myself to just a simple exchange. Unlike you, I do not slander anyone or spread lies. You were unable to counter any of the evidence I presented, which clearly shows that Boomchange is a scam and fake cryptocurrency phishing exchange website. Instead, you are resorting to malicious tactics by attempting to promote your fraudulent website "Boomchange" through social engineering, inserting it amongst 3 real and reliable websites in a "ranking" here. It is evident to everyone that you have not addressed any of the points I raised and have resorted to blatant and ridiculous lies. The evidence that the website belongs to you is clear, as you openly admit to using the fraudulent website successfully for months, which is proven to be a scam and fake. The only reason for doing this is to promote your own scam and deceive more victims into sending money. This can be seen as an example in this link: https://github.com/MetaMask/eth-phishing-detect/issues/14661#issuecomment-1877514614In the referenced GitHub case, it is evident that despite another user on GitHub pointing out "Boomchange.com" as a scam, you persist in attempting to defend and socially engineer individuals into believing that the site is not fraudulent, despite clear evidence proving otherwise. Now, you are simply copying similar text to what I previously replied and responding with different words: If I use these websites and leave reviews, this does not mean that I manage them. indicating that you have no legitimate response and are resorting to embarrassingly copying my text here on this forum.
|
|
|
|