SCAM - mycoinchange.io / mycoinchange.net (.co , .ai) - Fake Crypto Exchange

[support212]

.

[Jerayer]

I looked at all the topics of this author, and i can say that this is another slander against a competitor. It seems that the owner of this website has provided 10 times more substantiated materials than the author of this topic.

It is clearly visible here that apart from empty words, the author did not write anything in the form of evidence. I do not exclude that 1 of the author’s topics may not be related to slander, but this particular topic is completely slander.

[Bitcoadvice]

I looked at all the topics of this author, and i can say that this is another slander against a competitor. It seems that the owner of this website has provided 10 times more substantiated materials than the author of this topic.

It is clearly visible here that apart from empty words, the author did not write anything in the form of evidence. I do not exclude that 1 of the author’s topics may not be related to slander, but this particular topic is completely slander.

I report cryptocurrency scam network schemes, including yours, which has also fallen under it under the name "Boomchange" (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5454622.0).

Despite you considering me as a competitor, I am merely exposing crypto scams on BitcoinTalk. Not everyone who exposes crypto scams, including myself, is involved in them like you, Jerayer.
You have exposed yourself by confirming that you operate a fraudulent crypto scam exchange. Each of my threads contains substantial evidence, so I recommend that you read the thread thoroughly before posting baseless and untrue replies.

[holydarkness]

I looked at all the topics of this author, and i can say that this is another slander against a competitor. It seems that the owner of this website has provided 10 times more substantiated materials than the author of this topic.

It is clearly visible here that apart from empty words, the author did not write anything in the form of evidence. I do not exclude that 1 of the author’s topics may not be related to slander, but this particular topic is completely slander.

Uhh... you do aware that the owner of the site admitted that he "stretched the truth", use fake profile as their customer service, and have fake reviews? And the numbers they gave on their site are most likely "stretched truth" too. Even if the author of this thread did not provide evidence [though the evidence and findings regarding this site are quite abundant, given by many users who pitched in], there is a written statement by the owner of the site admitting his... stretched truth

[Jerayer]

I looked at all the topics of this author, and i can say that this is another slander against a competitor. It seems that the owner of this website has provided 10 times more substantiated materials than the author of this topic.

It is clearly visible here that apart from empty words, the author did not write anything in the form of evidence. I do not exclude that 1 of the author’s topics may not be related to slander, but this particular topic is completely slander.

I report cryptocurrency scam network schemes, including yours, which has also fallen under it under the name "Boomchange" (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5454622.0).

Despite you considering me as a competitor, I am merely exposing crypto scams on BitcoinTalk. Not everyone who exposes crypto scams, including myself, is involved in them like you, Jerayer.
You have exposed yourself by confirming that you operate a fraudulent crypto scam exchange. Each of my threads contains substantial evidence, so I recommend that you read the thread thoroughly before posting baseless and untrue replies.

Firstly, I use this service and other currency exchange services, but do not manage them. Secondly, do you have evidence that I control them? Or are you an empty talker and talk everywhere without evidence? You haven't written any worthwhile evidence in this topic. You only think that this proves fraud, since you are very close to fraud. Slander is a type of fraud.

Your websites prove that you are scamming:

1. coinchangers.net
2. coinchanger.live
3. coinchanges.net
4. coin-changer.net
5. coinchanger.net

I looked at all the topics of this author, and i can say that this is another slander against a competitor. It seems that the owner of this website has provided 10 times more substantiated materials than the author of this topic.

It is clearly visible here that apart from empty words, the author did not write anything in the form of evidence. I do not exclude that 1 of the author’s topics may not be related to slander, but this particular topic is completely slander.

Uhh... you do aware that the owner of the site admitted that he "stretched the truth", use fake profile as their customer service, and have fake reviews? And the numbers they gave on their site are most likely "stretched truth" too. Even if the author of this thread did not provide evidence [though the evidence and findings regarding this site are quite abundant, given by many users who pitched in], there is a written statement by the owner of the site admitting his... stretched truth

"Stretching the truth" does not mean scam. Of course, fake reviews are not good, but this does not mean that the website is fake. I use this website, however, they work very slowly, but they don’t scam people, unlike Bitcoadvice. But agree that when launching a website, almost everyone uses both exaggerated numbers and paid reviews to somehow promote their website in such a competitive environment. So, dear, there is no need to say that the owner of the website accepted the accusations of the author of the topic, but simply honestly admitted something else.

[holydarkness]

I looked at all the topics of this author, and i can say that this is another slander against a competitor. It seems that the owner of this website has provided 10 times more substantiated materials than the author of this topic.

It is clearly visible here that apart from empty words, the author did not write anything in the form of evidence. I do not exclude that 1 of the author’s topics may not be related to slander, but this particular topic is completely slander.

Uhh... you do aware that the owner of the site admitted that he "stretched the truth", use fake profile as their customer service, and have fake reviews? And the numbers they gave on their site are most likely "stretched truth" too. Even if the author of this thread did not provide evidence [though the evidence and findings regarding this site are quite abundant, given by many users who pitched in], there is a written statement by the owner of the site admitting his... stretched truth

"Stretching the truth" does not mean scam. Of course, fake reviews are not good, but this does not mean that the website is fake. I use this website, however, they work very slowly, but they don’t scam people, unlike Bitcoadvice. But agree that when launching a website, almost everyone uses both exaggerated numbers and paid reviews to somehow promote their website in such a competitive environment. So, dear, there is no need to say that the owner of the website accepted the accusations of the author of the topic, but simply honestly admitted something else.

Wait, roll back a bit, what scam does the OP do? And you seemed to forgot to justify the fact that they use fake photo for their live support. What's the good excuse for this? Certainly a project that's built in a good faith, no matter how new they are, will not try to fool people with fake photo?

[Jerayer]

I looked at all the topics of this author, and i can say that this is another slander against a competitor. It seems that the owner of this website has provided 10 times more substantiated materials than the author of this topic.

It is clearly visible here that apart from empty words, the author did not write anything in the form of evidence. I do not exclude that 1 of the author’s topics may not be related to slander, but this particular topic is completely slander.

Uhh... you do aware that the owner of the site admitted that he "stretched the truth", use fake profile as their customer service, and have fake reviews? And the numbers they gave on their site are most likely "stretched truth" too. Even if the author of this thread did not provide evidence [though the evidence and findings regarding this site are quite abundant, given by many users who pitched in], there is a written statement by the owner of the site admitting his... stretched truth

"Stretching the truth" does not mean scam. Of course, fake reviews are not good, but this does not mean that the website is fake. I use this website, however, they work very slowly, but they don’t scam people, unlike Bitcoadvice. But agree that when launching a website, almost everyone uses both exaggerated numbers and paid reviews to somehow promote their website in such a competitive environment. So, dear, there is no need to say that the owner of the website accepted the accusations of the author of the topic, but simply honestly admitted something else.

Wait, roll back a bit, what scam does the OP do? And you seemed to forgot to justify the fact that they use fake photo for their live support. What's the good excuse for this? Certainly a project that's built in a good faith, no matter how new they are, will not try to fool people with fake photo?

Bitcoadvice (OP) has the following websites through which he commits fraud:

1. coinchangers.net
2. coinchanger.live
3. coinchanges.net
4. coin-changer.net
5. coinchanger.net

I can confidently say that he opened and manages all these sites, he is deceiving people, and he is trying to close all new cryptocurrency exchange websites so that as many people as possible use his websites and become victims. That is, all new websites reduce its profits through a fraud scheme.

In terms of fake support photos, of course, this is very bad for user relations, I do not deny this. I understand, of course, that this is dishonest, but with all due respect, this does not make the website fake, as the author wrote in the topic. I think it's a stupid marketing ploy, but it's not a scam. The author of the article himself is involved in fraud and thinks that all the business people are like him. Try to understand that if a person replaces photographs of support workers, then he should be called in other words, and not a scammer. If this causes inconvenience to someone, then let them write and ask for real photos, and there is no need to call them a scammer.

[Bitcoadvice]

I looked at all the topics of this author, and i can say that this is another slander against a competitor. It seems that the owner of this website has provided 10 times more substantiated materials than the author of this topic.

It is clearly visible here that apart from empty words, the author did not write anything in the form of evidence. I do not exclude that 1 of the author’s topics may not be related to slander, but this particular topic is completely slander.

Uhh... you do aware that the owner of the site admitted that he "stretched the truth", use fake profile as their customer service, and have fake reviews? And the numbers they gave on their site are most likely "stretched truth" too. Even if the author of this thread did not provide evidence [though the evidence and findings regarding this site are quite abundant, given by many users who pitched in], there is a written statement by the owner of the site admitting his... stretched truth

"Stretching the truth" does not mean scam. Of course, fake reviews are not good, but this does not mean that the website is fake. I use this website, however, they work very slowly, but they don’t scam people, unlike Bitcoadvice. But agree that when launching a website, almost everyone uses both exaggerated numbers and paid reviews to somehow promote their website in such a competitive environment. So, dear, there is no need to say that the owner of the website accepted the accusations of the author of the topic, but simply honestly admitted something else.

Wait, roll back a bit, what scam does the OP do? And you seemed to forgot to justify the fact that they use fake photo for their live support. What's the good excuse for this? Certainly a project that's built in a good faith, no matter how new they are, will not try to fool people with fake photo?

The individual known as "Jerayer" is associated with the crypto fake exchange scam phishing platform called "Boomchange" which I have exposed in the following topic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5454622.0

Furthermore, it is evident that "Jerayer" continues to promote the fraudulent website through social engineering tactics and unsubstantiated claims, as he has failed to address any valid points I raised regarding the fraudulent activities of "Boomchange" which can be seen here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5454622.msg63440802#msg63440802 , https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5454622.msg63443260#msg63443260

Instead, he consistently resorts to blatant lies and deception, as can be observed in my thread where I have exposed him, which is truly absurd.

Another method of social engineering employed by "Jerayer" is falsely accusing me of being associated with the websites he mentioned, as scammers often believe that their "competitors" are the ones exposing them, attempting to portray me as such because he assumes victims and those with good intentions don't seek justice, only their "competitors"; however, I have already made it clear that I have no association or connection to the mentioned websites and my sole intention is to expose scams whenever I have the opportunity to do so, unlike "Jerayer" who fails to provide any evidence or substantiation for his claims, as evidenced in this thread or the aforementioned ones I linked, unlike me, as I always back my assertions with clear evidence, highlighting the apparent difference as well as his evident attempt to promote the fraudulent cryptocurrency exchange platform "Boomchange" on this forum.

Another point worth noting is that "Jerayer" consistently comments on every topic where I expose various cryptocurrency scam networks, attempting to defend the ones I have exposed and undermine my credibility, but his efforts are futile as I possess undeniable evidence, ultimately tarnishing Jerayer's own credibility; it appears that he has reached his limit and, in the end, the correctness will always prevail, revealing fraud for what it truly is.

[holydarkness]

Bitcoadvice (OP) has the following websites through which he commits fraud:

1. coinchangers.net
2. coinchanger.live
3. coinchanges.net
4. coin-changer.net
5. coinchanger.net

I can confidently say that he opened and manages all these sites, he is deceiving people, and he is trying to close all new cryptocurrency exchange websites so that as many people as possible use his websites and become victims. That is, all new websites reduce its profits through a fraud scheme.

This is interesting, I just took a glance here and there, so I can't be sure I grasp the whole situation, but I believe you have something as an evidence to back up this claim? Otherwise, I think it's... slander.

In terms of fake support photos, of course, this is very bad for user relations, I do not deny this. I understand, of course, that this is dishonest, but with all due respect, this does not make the website fake, as the author wrote in the topic. I think it's a stupid marketing ploy, but it's not a scam. The author of the article himself is involved in fraud and thinks that all the business people are like him. Try to understand that if a person replaces photographs of support workers, then he should be called in other words, and not a scammer. If this causes inconvenience to someone, then let them write and ask for real photos, and there is no need to call them a scammer.

What does it make the website and the owner, then? An identity thief? I think there is a law prohibiting people using other people's credential as their own?

[Jerayer]

Bitcoadvice (OP) has the following websites through which he commits fraud:

1. coinchangers.net
2. coinchanger.live
3. coinchanges.net
4. coin-changer.net
5. coinchanger.net

I can confidently say that he opened and manages all these sites, he is deceiving people, and he is trying to close all new cryptocurrency exchange websites so that as many people as possible use his websites and become victims. That is, all new websites reduce its profits through a fraud scheme.

This is interesting, I just took a glance here and there, so I can't be sure I grasp the whole situation, but I believe you have something as an evidence to back up this claim? Otherwise, I think it's... slander.

In terms of fake support photos, of course, this is very bad for user relations, I do not deny this. I understand, of course, that this is dishonest, but with all due respect, this does not make the website fake, as the author wrote in the topic. I think it's a stupid marketing ploy, but it's not a scam. The author of the article himself is involved in fraud and thinks that all the business people are like him. Try to understand that if a person replaces photographs of support workers, then he should be called in other words, and not a scammer. If this causes inconvenience to someone, then let them write and ask for real photos, and there is no need to call them a scammer.

What does it make the website and the owner, then? An identity thief? I think there is a law prohibiting people using other people's credential as their own?

Of course have. Here is the link to his profile on GitHub: https://github.com/Yandex41

I looked, they even deleted/blocked this profile already. On GitHub he wrote copies of messages from this forum 1 in 1 and also asked to exclude some of these domains from blacklists:

1. coinchangers.net
2. coinchanger.live
3. coinchanges.net
4. coin-changer.net
5. coinchanger.net

In the Google archives there are still some pages on GitHub where the user Yandex41 participates and which 1 in 1 provides texts from this forum and inserts links from this forum that he himself (Bitcoadvice) wrote.

Also on this forum (some examples: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5475616.0 , https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5479174.0 ), several topics talk about his connection with these scam domains. I didn’t come up with this connection out of myself.

-----

Regarding personal data, I am only in favor of finding such people and bringing them to justice. Of course, I don’t know if they have an agreement with these users, or specifically what kind of violations there are, but I repeat, this is either a stupid marketing ploy, or perhaps a violation of the rights of other people. But since I don’t know the essence and there are no specific complaints from these individuals, I cannot call this site a scam.
And in my opinion, scammers do not publicly admit their mistakes and do not speak honestly.

[Bitcoadvice]

Of course have. Here is the link to his profile on GitHub: https://github.com/Yandex41

I looked, they even deleted/blocked this profile already. On GitHub he wrote copies of messages from this forum 1 in 1 and also asked to exclude some of these domains from blacklists:

1. coinchangers.net
2. coinchanger.live
3. coinchanges.net
4. coin-changer.net
5. coinchanger.net

In the Google archives there are still some pages on GitHub where the user Yandex41 participates and which 1 in 1 provides texts from this forum and inserts links from this forum that he himself (Bitcoadvice) wrote.

Also on this forum (some examples: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5475616.0 , https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5479174.0 ), several topics talk about his connection with these scam domains. I didn’t come up with this connection out of myself.

-----

Regarding personal data, I am only in favor of finding such people and bringing them to justice. Of course, I don’t know if they have an agreement with these users, or specifically what kind of violations there are, but I repeat, this is either a stupid marketing ploy, or perhaps a violation of the rights of other people. But since I don’t know the essence and there are no specific complaints from these individuals, I cannot call this site a scam.
And in my opinion, scammers do not publicly admit their mistakes and do not speak honestly.

So, now you are claiming that a profile on GitHub belongs to me, but I have no association or connection with it. However, when I tried to visit it, I received a 404 error.
This profile you mentioned does not belong to me.
I am still waiting for your evidence, "Jerayer". Additionally, I have no knowledge of the user you linked or what they wrote.
You are essentially claiming that this profile belongs to me without any evidence, proof, connection, or association, which is truly absurd.

It is also interesting and embarrassing that you are copying my texts and writing style to use against me, which clearly demonstrates your lack of originality.

Furthermore, the BitcoinTalk threads you linked are simply a reaction to exposed scams by me. Similar to you, these scammers are trying to shift the blame onto others who exposed their fraudulent projects and are engaging in harassment and defamation. Just like "icryptofbi", you, "Jerayer", have no evidence or proof to support your claims.
You have also adopted his method of harassing me by accusing me of having connections to sites that I have no association with. Of course, none of you have evidence or proof like I have against your scam projects. I understand that scammers like you, Jerayer, are frustrated because I am informing innocent people about these crypto scams and trying protecting them with this. I am able to expose these crypto scam phishing methods and share awareness with users on the BitcoinTalk forum, thereby preventing scammers like you from having any control over the situation.
I hope that scammers like you will be held accountable for the damage you have caused.

The websites you mentioned do not belong to me, and the GitHub account also does not belong to me. I, along with other users here like holydarkness, have asked for evidence to support your claims, but you have failed to provide any. Instead, you continue to make baseless and false accusations, while engaging in harassment and defamation against me for exposing your "Boomchange" crypto scam project which can be seen here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5454622.0

It is intriguing that "Jerayer" is also defending the malicious tactics of "MyCoinChange" mentioned in these threads, which are clearly fraudulent and illegitimate. It seems that scammers like you two are able to understand and support each other's actions without even communicating directly.  

Furthermore, it has come to my attention that on the date of 1/3/2024, you made a statement regarding your usage of the websites you mentioned. According to your statement, you claimed to have used these scam websites for exchanging Ethereum (ETH) to Bitcoin (BTC) in early December 2023. However, you expressed dissatisfaction with the outcome, which can be seen in the following reply from you: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5475616.msg63436255#msg63436255 (https://web.archive.org/web/20240106030129/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5475616.msg63436255#msg63436255)

Interestingly, it seems that you conveniently forgot about a previous incident that occurred almost a year ago on the same websites you mentioned, on 4/28/2023. On this date, on the platform GitHub, you made a claim that these same websites had scammed you out of 200 USDT. This information can be verified through the following link: https://github.com/MetaMask/eth-phishing-detect/issues/12425#issue-1688854430 (https://web.archive.org/web/20240106030319/https://github.com/MetaMask/eth-phishing-detect/issues/12425#issue-1688854430)

These instances clearly demonstrate the lack of credibility in your statements and claims.
It appears that you used these scam websites again after previously falling victim to their fraudulent activities.
Such actions contradict your claims and expose your attempt to engage in slander, defamation, and harassment towards others, as your statements and comments lack genuine experiences and are therefore unreliable due to their self-contradictory nature.

It is crucial to consider these contradictory occurrences and evaluate the intentions behind your allegations. It seems clear that your actions are aimed at tarnishing the reputation of individuals and engaging in malicious behavior rather than presenting valid arguments or evidence.

[support212]

.

[support212]

.

[support212]

.

[holydarkness]

Holydarkness, stretching the truth does not mean it’s a scam. Your powers of deduction are very skewed. Bad marketing, I can agree but not malicious. Jerayer was right about this statement.

Holy darkness, after this forum was posted, I took it as constructive criticism and removed all issues and let go of all creators that were posting on medium that OP had an issue with. This issue should have been done with, but OP has increased his attack after failing the first time. Do you condone Ddossing? https://bitcointalk.org has incentived OP to Ddos the business. Is this action not illegal?

The pictures that were used were random templates procured by devs but has been removed. I figured that they were stock photos which are right to use. Identity thief is a stretch, they were not on an official document. I can’t expect someone to be rational and an honest man that markets mixers and casinos.

It's stretching the truth, exagerrating numbers, fake reviews, and fake profile pictures that lead me to believe the practice is shady, or at the very least, should be approached with cautions. Are you not agree that if a business tried to sell themselves with such criteria is questionable?

Do you mind to perhaps explain this? Two years? It's a real review? All of those reviews are real?



Or perhaps answer to my previously unanswered question about the numbers that's used to be in your website?

[...]
Last, I also understand correctly that these numbers are also "slightly stretched"?

Also, about the live support that's now removed, you previously stated as below, does that mean up to this second you still doesn't have anyone to handle support? So who exactly will answer your customers when they reached to your platform for help?

[...] The pictures of the support staff and some reviews will be replaced with real personal once I've acquired them, the ones on the website currently are there temporarily. [...]

As for DDOS, the forum incentivized OP to do this? You have proof of it? That the forum encourage OP to do so?

[support212]

.

[holydarkness]

The point went completely over your head. It's ok, I'll explain again. What you're saying is bad marketing, I agree. But the system works and every transaction has been processed and support has been provided for every customer.

As I said in my message above I took the OP as constructive criticism and fixed the website. I didn't realize it would be so triggering to one forum that we would still be talking about it 6 months from now. You guys are very emotional even in the face of proof that the business is legitimate. I understand hate comes from below and wish you guys well.

Oh? The business is legitimate? As in registered and licensed? I can't find this information on your website. Can you perhaps provide that information? That'll gives some sort of assurance.

You truly havent done your homework or even been on the platforms to know there are many ways to get help! Theres email support for mycoinchange.co and mycoinchange.ai, there is a ticket system built in to mycoinchange.co and a chat system for mycoinchange.ai.

The question being asked here is that six months ago you said you'll find support staff with real picture once you acquire them, and now they're blank. If I may simplify the question, are you the only one working on this platform? You handle everything, including support, etc.?

Allow me to ask another, how long has this project running? When did it start, exactly?

Lets focus on the real scammers it's OP, this forum and the following that are preventing me from conducting business at my complete potential:

https://metamask.io
https://www.opera.com/
https://coinbase.com

"As for DDOS, the forum incentivized OP to do this? You have proof of it? That the forum encourage OP to do so?"


Absolutely, this forum has incentivized to have posts about my business consistently since inception. A simple message for changes would have been fine and all of this wouldnt have been necessary. I've been placed on a block list by https://metamask.io to make my website appear as fraudulent. The Ddos, hacking, exploiting, spamming attacks stemmed since this post went up. The https://bitcointalk.org mob has been encouraged to take the business down. The real victim here is my business.

Holydarkness you didnt comment on all the positives and legitimate proof that I submitted for the "community" are we focusing on the right things? I stand by my statement, your powers of deduction are very skewed

Isn't that what I am currently doing? Looking into the statement you made about this forum incentivize OP to attack you in form of DDoS? And now, hacking, exploiting, and spamming too. Do you mind to provide the proof of it? That the forum encourage OP and/or are behind those attacks?

[support212]

.

[support212]

.

[holydarkness]

Did you read what I sent a few messages above?
[...]
   ◦   FINTRAC recognizes mycoinchange.co and mycoinchange.ai as a covered:
https://imgur.com/rj69OFb

Ahh... yes, I must have missed it. My mistake and I apologize for that. I am looking for that registration number in your website, not realizing it's provided here. The image given by above link, though, is invalid. Perhaps reupload them? Try talkimg.

And again I asked, how long has your platform been around? Your license said it's formalized on September 2023? And how about that team situation? It's also left unexplained.

"Isn't that what I am currently doing? Looking into the statement you made about this forum incentivize OP to attack you in form of DDoS? And now, hacking, exploiting, and spamming too. Do you mind to provide the proof of it? That the forum encourage OP and/or are behind those attacks?"

I also replied to this in my previous messages. Smoking too much weed perhaps? Illiterate? or a troll? Come get on a video call with me and lets read together.

Hmm... still can't find an explanation where the forum encourage and incentivize OP to attack your site in form of DDoS, hacking, exploiting, and spamming. Perhaps you don't mind to provide explanation backed by evidence about it again?

Your clearly not reading what I've been writing and come back more emotional than ever. Do me a favor. Everything about me is public. How about an introduction . What's your first and last name?

While your at it, can you introduce your friend, the OP's first and last name as well?

Thanks,

Mark Gillani

You sure you're not the one coming back with more emotion here? I check mine and it's fine. So far, I think I did not write anything offensive or showing negative emotion like anger or disdain on this thread, sceptical perhaps, but that'll be because your platform utilize... "bad marketing".

On the other side, you're asking to doxx me and OP. Want to revise that request, perhaps? And reflect to yourself while you're at it? "Smoking too much weed perhaps? Illiterate? or a troll? Come get on a video call with me and lets read together." I think this shows more emotion than I've ever been on this thread?