|
Only just spotted your thread, I had similar problems when I first got a BitAxe Gamma.
I found if you have port forwarding set-up on a network to act as a bridge between local subnets it doesn't propagate correctly so only ever shows the loading page.
Also had problems accessing it via a proxy, same results only ever shows the loading page.
I fixed my problems simply by putting the BitAxe on the same LAN as my FTTP router and the accessing it from the same network so my Laptop and BitAxe on the same LAN, no proxy or port forwarding.
Seems like you may have had a similar issue.
|
|
|
|
-snip-
is it really possible to mine Bitcoin using an Android phone?
-snip-
There's a simple answer to this. NO!Even the fastest GPU and Desktop computers are incapable of mining BTC Anyone claiming they can mine BTC on a phone or low powered Microcontroller is selling you nothing but a scam. If you're serious about wanting to mine BTC the easiest way is to get an entry level ASIC miner such as a Gekko Science compac F or one of the many BitAxe devices like the BitAxe Gamma Entry level these days needs to ideally have performance in excess of 1TerraHash per second. Please read this thread:- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2415854.msg24714338#msg24714338And this one : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4636521.0 |
|
|
|
You're most welcome, but you also have the community support to thank for keeping the pool running with donations during the couple of years where very few blocks were being solved. The pool celebrated 11 years of operation this August 31st.
Belated happy birthday CKPool  |
|
|
|
The current block payout reward for a solo block is BTC3.125 + fees which are variable. Take off the 2% for the pool reward then run the result through one of the many price conversion sites. https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=btc+price&ia=cryptocurrency
Ignoring the value of fees and the pool cost at the time of writing BTC3.125 would be worth $361,552.34 Mining solo the chance at 473TH/s of finding a block is:- Chance per block: 1 in 2,132,748 Chance per day: 1 in 14,811 Time estimate: 41 years for odds use this:- https://solochance.com/You can see the value of past blocks here:- https://mempool.space/ |
|
|
|
|
They're not engaging in constructive criticism instead just delete anything you post on their threads, generally suspicious activity.
Flag supported.
|
|
|
|
Nice congratulations |
|
|
|
It's all about your network setup and why would you add such proxy in your setup? Of course it brings more to latency.
In Whatsminer settings there ain't things you can do to make latency better.
I aggregated with a power proxy. And I set the difficulty of each device to 262,000 without rejection. Is that okay? please help me  Anything you stick in the way of your miner and the pool will only ever increase latency it will never decrease it. I've no idea why you would put a proxy in the way, it makes no sense. In terms of network infrastructure, your miner should ideally be connected directly by wire to your internet gateway/router equipment. Don't use WiFi or WiFi repeaters unless you've no other option. After that you have zero control over the network infrastructure and the latency between you and the pool is just purely down to the physical route between your gateway and the pool server over the internet. Are you using the best ckpool server for your location? Configuration: Miners in The Americas: Point your miner to: stratum+tcp://solo.ckpool.org:3333 Graphical statistics can be found at http://solostats.ckpool.orgMiners in Europe and Africa region: Point your miner to: stratum+tcp://eusolo.ckpool.org:3333 Graphical statistics can be found at http://eusolostats.ckpool.orgMiners in Oceania region: Point your miner to: stratum+tcp://ausolo.ckpool.org:3333 Graphical statistics can be found at http://ausolostats.ckpool.orgckproxy stratum proxy (for linux). Ckpool code is available here: https://bitbucket.org/ckolivas/ckpoolYes, all very well. But why would you need to use it?  Just connect your miners directly to the pool. |
|
|
|
It's all about your network setup and why would you add such proxy in your setup? Of course it brings more to latency.
In Whatsminer settings there ain't things you can do to make latency better.
I aggregated with a power proxy. And I set the difficulty of each device to 262,000 without rejection. Is that okay? please help me Anything you stick in the way of your miner and the pool will only ever increase latency it will never decrease it. I've no idea why you would put a proxy in the way, it makes no sense. In terms of network infrastructure, your miner should ideally be connected directly by wire to your internet gateway/router equipment. Don't use WiFi or WiFi repeaters unless you've no other option. After that you have zero control over the network infrastructure and the latency between you and the pool is just purely down to the physical route between your gateway and the pool server over the internet. Are you using the best ckpool server for your location? Configuration: Miners in The Americas: Point your miner to: stratum+tcp://solo.ckpool.org:3333 Graphical statistics can be found at http://solostats.ckpool.orgMiners in Europe and Africa region: Point your miner to: stratum+tcp://eusolo.ckpool.org:3333 Graphical statistics can be found at http://eusolostats.ckpool.orgMiners in Oceania region: Point your miner to: stratum+tcp://ausolo.ckpool.org:3333 Graphical statistics can be found at http://ausolostats.ckpool.org |
|
|
|
years of industry experience Yet this is the first time you've posted here!? Thanks but no thanks, there's just one too many "NEO" new pools popping up with no credibility and ZERO history. Why would anyone trust their hard earned hash-rate to a noob pool?  Not exactly what you would call a shining example of a recent history eh!? Over a year since your pool reported. |
|
|
|
What kind of USB hub are you running them from, does it have capacity to run 3 devices at the same time typically you need a USB hub that'll do 2.5-3Amps per port for the CompacF to run reliably. See this table  I'm using the Gekkoscience 8 Port USB Hub 2.0, which successfully runs 3 sticks in the past. I can't tell from the cgminer logging if the problem is with the sticks, usb hub, or configuration. This can be seen in my screenshots.  Try a different hub with just one stick at a time. I suspect your hub may be faulty. |
|
|
|
here you can see the result in the output file
Thank you. I think you must have a better heat-sink than is fitted on my BitAxe Gamma. My temps seem to be 5-10C more than yours. |
|
|
|
Hello all, for some bitaxe user here, maybe the tuning script is nice to know. https://github.com/mrv777/Bitaxe-Hashrate-Benchmark/you can auto tune the speed parameter to the best value. Standard Usage Run the benchmark tool by providing your Bitaxe's IP address: python bitaxe_hashrate_benchmark.py <bitaxe_ip> Optional parameters: -v, --voltage: Initial voltage in mV (default: 1150) -f, --frequency: Initial frequency in MHz (default: 500) Example: python bitaxe_hashrate_benchmark.py 192.168.2.29 -v 1175 -f 775 try it out, i moved my bitaxe gamma from 1.2 to 1.6 THs Best regards, Willi Hi Willi, What was the impact on the thermal performance by doing this? I've noticed even small variation in the voltage and frequency can make a big difference to the temperatures |
|
|
|
Congratulations to massive new rental miner bc1q~4kzx for solving the 306th solo block at solo.ckpool.org! [2025-09-01 02:48:56.360] Possible block solve diff 475434506010404.812500 !
[2025-09-01 02:48:56.431] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2025-09-01 02:48:56.434] Solved and confirmed block 912632 by bc1qh63yugquzjvdd9qn3fwsd6asgfzlh7s8sv4kzx.FH
[2025-09-01 02:48:56.434] User bc1qh63yugquzjvdd9qn3fwsd6asgfzlh7s8sv4kzx:{"hashrate1m": "61.9P", "hashrate5m": "18.6P", "hashrate1hr": "1.71P", "hashrate1d": "155T", "hashrate7d": "472T", "shares": 2590244944463, "authorised": 1686335063}
[2025-09-01 02:48:56.434] Worker bc1qh63yugquzjvdd9qn3fwsd6asgfzlh7s8sv4kzx.FH:{"hashrate1m": "61.9P", "hashrate5m": "18.6P", "hashrate1hr": "1.71P", "hashrate1d": "155T", "hashrate7d": "461T"}
[2025-09-01 02:48:56.448] Block solved after 147102310200318 shares at 113.4% diff
Congratulations again! Getting quite regular this. Good luck all. |
|
|
|
Hello everyone I have 15 m30++ 110th devices connected to the proxy. What number should I set the difficulty for each device?
It shouldn't matter as I believe the pool will adjust to suite your rate but if you need a default difficulty 2.5*GH/s is a good guide so around 275,000 for each @ 110TH/s. |
|
|
|
I'm having trouble figuring out why my three sticks won't initialize and I've posted a few screenshots if someone could help. My boot script has always worked before: sudo ./cgminer -o stratum+tcp://solo.ckpool.org:3333 -u xxx -p x --suggest-diff 442 --gekko-compacf-freq 425 --gekko-mine2 --gekko-tune2 85 --gekko-start-freq 350 Thank you    What kind of USB hub are you running them from, does it have capacity to run 3 devices at the same time typically you need a USB hub that'll do 2.5-3Amps per port for the CompacF to run reliably. See this table |
|
|
|
Hello ck,
the 4334 is not ok? I mean, it works.. I am finding shares..
Thanks.
Regards, Frank
As -CK said, you need to be on the other port 3333 for lower hash rate equipment 17TH/s will require a much lower difficulty to return shares regularly enough for a stable hash rate to be shown on the stats page. Port 4334 is for high performance systems and rentals >1PH/s Use port 3333 things will be better for you. |
|
|
|
Congratulations to miner bc1q~nwsgdw0wfh4trqal69fz with 9PH for solving the 305th solo block at solo.ckpool.org! A miner of this size has about a 1 in 800 chance of solving a block per day. [2025-08-17 10:19:46.991] Possible block solve diff 342913087948669.125000 !
[2025-08-17 10:19:47.087] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2025-08-17 10:19:47.088] Solved and confirmed block 910440 by bc1qhgfpg54q8u0qnq8cyzvtpwhzm7z4g0wk8hpq60nwsgdw0wfh4trqal69fz.52BE1957C966
[2025-08-17 10:19:47.088] User bc1qhgfpg54q8u0qnq8cyzvtpwhzm7z4g0wk8hpq60nwsgdw0wfh4trqal69fz:{"hashrate1m": "9.18P", "hashrate5m": "9.16P", "hashrate1hr": "9.2P", "hashrate1d": "7.15P", "hashrate7d": "1.92P", "shares": 306446076609, "authorised": 1755277406}
[2025-08-17 10:19:47.088] Worker bc1qhgfpg54q8u0qnq8cyzvtpwhzm7z4g0wk8hpq60nwsgdw0wfh4trqal69fz.52BE1957C966:{"hashrate1m": "125T", "hashrate5m": "127T", "hashrate1hr": "111T", "hashrate1d": "85.7T", "hashrate7d": "23T"}
[2025-08-17 10:19:47.095] Block solved after 80320634207461 shares at 62.1% diff
Congrats to the miner and -ck another one for the win! Mine on!! |
|
|
|
Hi -ck
Is eusolo.ckpool.org running OK at present, I've been unable to connect all morning.
Thanks
G.
All seems fine as far as I can see. Thanks, I've fixed it. Seems my FTTP router was having a bad day. |
|
|
|
|
Hi -ck
Is eusolo.ckpool.org running OK at present, I've been unable to connect all morning.
Thanks
G.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
