[∞ YH] US/EU/AU solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining 311 blocks solved!

[Teemops]

Hello folks, sorry for perhaps bothering..
Just a short question.
In eusolo pool, I get more or stronger changes in hashrate, is this normal?
My S9 works smooth at around 17 th/s (braiins os)
I chose the "higher port". Do I need to readjust some settings?

Thank you so much.

Frank

[-ck]

Hello folks, sorry for perhaps bothering..
Just a short question.
In eusolo pool, I get more or stronger changes in hashrate, is this normal?
My S9 works smooth at around 17 th/s (braiins os)
I chose the "higher port". Do I need to readjust some settings?

Thank you so much.

Frank

The high port is for rentals, so don't use that.

[Teemops]

Hello ck,
the 4334 is not ok? I mean, it works.. I am finding shares..
Thanks.

Regards, Frank

[Nexus9090]

Hello ck,
the 4334 is not ok? I mean, it works.. I am finding shares..
Thanks.

Regards, Frank

As -CK said, you need to be on the other port 3333 for lower hash rate equipment 17TH/s will require a much lower difficulty to return shares regularly enough for a stable hash rate to be shown on the stats page.

Port 4334 is for high performance systems and rentals >1PH/s


Use port 3333 things will be better for you.

[Teemops]

Thanks, Nexus and ck 👍🏾

[4matic]

Hello ck,
the 4334 is not ok? I mean, it works.. I am finding shares..
Thanks.

Regards, Frank

As -CK said, you need to be on the other port 3333 for lower hash rate equipment 17TH/s will require a much lower difficulty to return shares regularly enough for a stable hash rate to be shown on the stats page.

Port 4334 is for high performance systems and rentals >1PH/s


Use port 3333 things will be better for you.

hi!

If i have 1.2 phs (9 asics), better 4334 or 3333?

[-ck]

Hello ck,
the 4334 is not ok? I mean, it works.. I am finding shares..
Thanks.

Regards, Frank

As -CK said, you need to be on the other port 3333 for lower hash rate equipment 17TH/s will require a much lower difficulty to return shares regularly enough for a stable hash rate to be shown on the stats page.

Port 4334 is for high performance systems and rentals >1PH/s


Use port 3333 things will be better for you.

hi!

If i have 1.2 phs (9 asics), better 4334 or 3333?

Let me make this clearer: 4334 is ONLY for rentals.

[4matic]

Let me make this clearer: 4334 is ONLY for rentals.

Got it! Thank you!

[SeaBits]

There is another blockparty going on this Saturday via https://upendo.rigly.io/pages/dashboard

Let's catch that block!

Awake from a deep sleep but.... another "Block Party" this Saturday (Aug. 30th 2025) hosted by https://upendo.rigly.io/pages/dashboard

Current party stats at the time of this post:

Projected Hashrate: 122,276 TH/s

1 in 220 'party odds'

----

Stats to back this up:

Party Hashrate: 122276.00 TH/s
Network hashrate: 1010.85 EH/s

Chance per hour: 1 in 1,378 chance / 6 hours = 1 in ~229 chance

----

Option one: Buy hashrate | Option 2: Bring-your-own Miner (Alliance Miners) - more info here: https://upendo.rigly.io/learn/upendo

Now we send up a prayer to Satoshi...

[eb66]

Is there any history of the results of these "party"?

They seem legit, I did talk to the founder of that website, and she does seem legit. I did suggest to them to reach out to someone trusted here to do some sort of escrow so that forum members and they can collaborate in block parties. I think CK is a good option (not sure if he's willing to do that but he's trusted by both parties), Willi is a perfect candidate for that (will be hard for them to trust him since they don't know much about the forum)

[--]

Yes, the site seems legitimate to me, I don't question that.

I think it would be interesting to have a history of how previous partys were, how many participants, how much hash, whether they won any blocks or not. Knowing this could provide greater motivation for more investment or participants.

Hey, Evan here -- I'm one of the founders of Rigly, we run the Upendo block party.

Totally up for a collab with CK and/or Willi. It was Willi's parties that inspired Upendo.
Please hit me up in DM or hello@rigly.io.

We run the party every 2 weeks and post a party recap to Nostr - how much hashrate, best difficulty reached, number of party miners etc.

I'll see about getting a running history up on the site, that's a good idea.

We don't yet have a history of successfully mined blocks. I get that it's a leap of trust. That's why I made the minimum buy in 1 TH/s for 15 sats.
That's a low bar for entry!

And over time, as more people join, the odds get better and we'll soon have a history of mined blocks with payouts.

We mine on CK Pool for max visibility, so it's easy to verify the hash is real: https://solostats.ckpool.org/users/3Gk1GfP3bHA6M2ZzK5mHdqbWN1iNsqAenH

Next party is in 2 days, check us out: https://upendo.xyz aka https://upendo.rigly.io

[philipma1957]

I am not sure how I can help out. The issue is you are new.

3.125 btc is  well over 300,000 usd.


It is not that  buying a share  is cheap which is a cool thing that you offer 1th  as the minimum.


But if you hit a block the 3.125 btc goes right to you address and none of us know you at all.

I can recall 2 pools running off with full blocks.

MMPOOL.org run off with 200k in coin. when a block got hit.

and he ran a clean pool for years.

there was another guy who ran off with a 25 coin block in 2016 or so.

I would offer one of my addresses since I am vetted and well know but USA is a mofo and if we hit a block I could run into legal issues paying a big player over $10,000 in coin.

Not sure what I can offer to help.

[joker_josue]

We run the party every 2 weeks and post a party recap to Nostr - how much hashrate, best difficulty reached, number of party miners etc.

I'll see about getting a running history up on the site, that's a good idea.

We don't yet have a history of successfully mined blocks. I get that it's a leap of trust. That's why I made the minimum buy in 1 TH/s for 15 sats.
That's a low bar for entry!

And over time, as more people join, the odds get better and we'll soon have a history of mined blocks with payouts.

Evan, thanks for your feedback!

I think what @philipma1957 said is somewhat true. Being new or little-known can make it harder to gain the trust to attract more participants or participants with higher hashrate.

I don't know if there is another way to create parties that generates more trust and helps to popularize them. Would it be feasible to return a small percentage of the amount paid by participants at the end of the party? This might boost trust. Of course, it doesn't mean that when the bloco wins, it will do this, but it might convey greater credibility, I don't know. What do you think @philipma1957?

But, really, the statistics from the sites - even if no party has won a bloco so far - would be very interesting and useful.

Have you ever considered opening a thread here on the forum about the parties? It could be really interesting and create engagement with the BitcoinTalk community.

[eb66]

We run the party every 2 weeks and post a party recap to Nostr - how much hashrate, best difficulty reached, number of party miners etc.

I'll see about getting a running history up on the site, that's a good idea.

We don't yet have a history of successfully mined blocks. I get that it's a leap of trust. That's why I made the minimum buy in 1 TH/s for 15 sats.
That's a low bar for entry!

And over time, as more people join, the odds get better and we'll soon have a history of mined blocks with payouts.

Evan, thanks for your feedback!

I think what @philipma1957 said is somewhat true. Being new or little-known can make it harder to gain the trust to attract more participants or participants with higher hashrate.

I don't know if there is another way to create parties that generates more trust and helps to popularize them. Would it be feasible to return a small percentage of the amount paid by participants at the end of the party? This might boost trust. Of course, it doesn't mean that when the bloco wins, it will do this, but it might convey greater credibility, I don't know. What do you think @philipma1957?

But, really, the statistics from the sites - even if no party has won a bloco so far - would be very interesting and useful.

Have you ever considered opening a thread here on the forum about the parties? It could be really interesting and create engagement with the BitcoinTalk community.

Interesting, yes I do see your point.

Thinking aloud, we could do a 2:3 multisig for the mining escrow with CK, Willi, or others on the forum here..

Then when we do hit a block, it takes 2 parties to sign out the TX to all the payout addresses..

Maybe that's doable?
Have any block parties been done on BitcoinTalk using this approach?

In the meantime, I'll get some historic info on upendo.xyz and start an open thread. That's a great idea.

[-ck]

I highly recommend using a 2:3 multisig. However I don't have the time to be part of one, and obviously some fee to the other parties taking responsibility would be appropriate.

[mikeywith]

Thinking aloud, we could do a 2:3 multisig for the mining escrow with CK, Willi, or others on the forum here..

A multisig is certainly the only way where distribution is cryptographically enforced unless CK is willing to alter the pool code so that both addresses (yours and ours) are included in the coinbase and the rewards are distributed based on work.

And for the record, I did talk to Heather (one of Rigly founders), and she does approve that Evan, aka eb66 is her partner. I can't see beyond my PC screen, but I do think these folks are genuine; the amount of work they put in doesn't suggest that they are planning a scam. Obviously, "Never trust, always verify," but I am saying this so that Willi and the rest of the forum members take eb66 seriously and engage in conversation.

As for rigly folks, obviously, the first step would be to verify that Willi's account is still operated by the same person (ask him to sign a message from one of his known/stacked addresses); if that checks out, rest assured that Willi is to be trusted given his history on the forum.

Another member I would recommend to be part of the multisig would be philipma1957.

BTW, Willi hasn't visited the thread for so long, maybe reach out to him via PM?

[netsrac78]

Hey, are there any problems with eusolo? I’m not getting any statistics displayed. Now I switched to solo and immediately got statistics displayed.

[-ck]

Hey, are there any problems with eusolo? I’m not getting any statistics displayed. Now I switched to solo and immediately got statistics displayed.

Everything fine as far as I can see. Might be a routing issue from you to the pool.

[blockhilltop]

I think a Block is in the air for the US pool - pool luck is currently at 99.9% and we've been racing there: all the pool hashrates are over 450PH (7D, 1D all the way to 15min). Plus the big rental is going live in a few hours..

Good luck everyone, hope someone hits today!

[botor123]

I think a Block is in the air for the US pool - pool luck is currently at 99.9% and we've been racing there: all the pool hashrates are over 450PH (7D, 1D all the way to 15min). Plus the big rental is going live in a few hours..

Good luck everyone, hope someone hits today!

hi. where you can see pool luck?

[mahdi1370999]

Hello everyone I have 15 m30++ 110th devices connected to the proxy. What number should I set the difficulty for each device?