<m3eeeee> wats with the bad actor fud at btct is this a legit concern
<
•MrRGnome> It IS a legitimate concern, in much less alarmist terms.
<•MrRGnome>
Block Escrow however solves any concern involved here, we identified the issues in testing and
a solutions was developed<alcor> I don't think PoSA transactions are accessable by nodes - balance never changes
<r00tback> MrRGnome, i think no one can do any bad thing right now . but when posa is open source without blockescrow there will be bad actor .
<alcor> It's not as if a node could spend cloak coins that are in transition
<•MrRGnome> The week long release of the closed source PoSA v1 is in no way a risk to people cloak coins, and the release came with a healthy disclaimer saying everything you just heard me say - which is where this fear and fud is coming from, a misinturpreting of the consiquences of the limited time
without a block escrow system in place<•MrRGnome> r00tback,
Block Escrow makes bad acting impossible withotu controlling over 51% of the network
Yeah, Everybody sell! So you can fill the trolls/fudders orders. Sounds like a great idea.
yes 1 dev say/promise gimmick
block escrow (POSA v2 unknown ETA) solve bad actor and solution developed but you can bet if they had a
functional "block escrow" they would release it. otherwise
devs like/dont mind you guy taking risk with POSA testnet v1 say a lot about devs
idiots
Show Posts
