 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
Pyrin down for maintenance on TO wonder what that is about....
The problem was only short-term, it's been working again since yesterday |
|
|
|
|
Ladies and Gentlemen, please remain respectful and keep it Pyrin related.
If you don't trust us or you don't like what we're building, just move on.
Lets not fire the Karlsen vs Pyrin attitude, we wish Karlsen all the best. We focus on our own project.
|
|
|
|
Thanks for summarizing the issues with your chain. It's time you start working on the cleaning up the broken tech and regain the trust of people. Without trust no blockchain will survive. May be you are not a rugpull, and not as stupid as you sound. But based on the recent past and your illogical outbursts, it's difficult to make any other judgement.
I prefer devs who are neurotic because they are always looking for errors in their code. Always improving. A blockchain dev with character disorder is bound to fail. Pyrin devs are constantly blaming others for their short-comings. Fess-up, and do the right things for your miners and hodlers!
Pyrin Devs are building, they are rarely seen on socials, but they certainly don't blame anyone. Without trust no blockchain will survive. May be you are not a rugpull, and not as stupid as you sound. But based on the recent past and your illogical outbursts, it's difficult to make any other judgement.
Now we come together. Let us show what we're building, give us some time. |
|
|
|
I know what red blocks are. A large number of red block is not a good look for any chain. You never answer the concerns directly, and blame all your technical challenges on karlsen. I am aware that even after working for six months you guys were no ready for the mainnet, and the flawless launch of karlsen forced you to launch a half-baked product early. You have to stop blaming others for your incompetency. No one is going to believe you.
I am not the only one who has raised GPU and ASIC issue. There are posters on bitcointalk who have said similar issue. Someone was mining using GPU in the early days. If it had happened just once I would have assumed that devs were testing GPU miner. But the fact that PYI released a low performing GPU miner after the failed fork/eventual restart makes this think that the first was also deliberate. I mined using ASIC, and I knows a couple of other people who used ASICs.
Please stop hallucinating I am neither Lemis nor commanderante .
the flawless launch of karlsen I congratulate you, you managed to convince your community that there would be no premine. I am not the only one who has raised GPU and ASIC issue Agree, you and the 3 others from Karlsen who claimed they were ASIC mining Pyrin without showing their wallets. You wasting hours to your FUD campagne, but you are not able to show a single wallet (yours) to proof we are lying? I summarize, you claimed: - we faked the MEXC listing - we faked the fundraiser - you were ASIC mining Pyrin - we were GPU mining Pyrin before we released the GPU miner - we pre-mined 2 weeks - we were hiding that we had a bug and a network restart - 33% of pyrin blocks are orphaned blocks - we are banning people without reason AND ALL THAT WITHOUT A SINGLE PROOF? What makes you think someone takes you for granted? I am honest, I'm only answering you because you're helping me clean all the FUD and feeding our Bitcointalk algo. Sorry to disappoint you. I am neither Lemis nor commanderante . But I have to say, this was your biggest move so far. Since you misspelled both names, we'll assume you have no idea who I'm talking about. gorgeous, very smart. |
|
|
|
LOL. The first GPU preferential mine happened after the public launch on Nov. 24th. The ASICS were active during the first week of Dec. The hard fork happened around Dec.7th after which the chain was stalled for 24-48 hours. What does sharing one tweet of Dec. 1st prove? Why don't you share a verifiable minutely hash rate from Nov. 24 to Dev 12. This is the period during which dev. did most of their preferential mining.
33% of the PYI blocks are red blocks as compared to less than 2% for Kaspa and Karlsen. I have never seen a dev who failed even after he copied the code. I have a high convicton that MEXC will refuse to list PYI after they realize the low quality of PYI dev work.
Karlsen Team Member "Lemois" caught spreading lies again  |
|
|
|
LOL. The first GPU preferential mine happened after the public launch on Nov. 24th. The ASICS were active during the first week of Dec. The hard fork happened around Dec.7th after which the chain was stalled for 24-48 hours. What does sharing one tweet of Dec. 1st prove? Why don't you share a verifiable minutely hash rate from Nov. 24 to Dev 12. This is the period during which dev. did most of their preferential mining.
33% of the PYI blocks are red blocks as compared to less than 2% for Kaspa and Karlsen. I have never seen a dev who failed even after he copied the code. I have a high convicton that MEXC will refuse to list PYI after they realize the low quality of PYI dev work.
Aside from that. Shouldn't you Karlsen people stop your promotion tour and explain yourself? - you pre-mined Karlsen before there was a single source on your website, twitter, bitcointalk available. your Twitter was created AFTER you already mined Karlsen. One day after you created your Twitter: https://twitter.com/karlsennetwork/status/1725537081697407130. At that time there was not a single word on discord about mining and Bitcointalk came 1 week later. And there was no single source of information anywhere? Please explain. - why does your "whitepaper" not show anything about this premine? - why does your "whitepaper" consist of 80% false tokenomics, and the remaining 20% is general word explanations, but you can't find anything technical. - The same with your smart contract proposal, it is obvious that you do not bring the quality to develop smart contracts and are waiting to copy them from Pyrin or Karlsen - why are you so extremely frustrated with Pyrin? Is your marketing strategy to accuse Pyrin of your own scammy tactics to distract from Karlsen? |
|
|
|
LOL. The first GPU preferential mine happened after the public launch on Nov. 24th. The ASICS were active during the first week of Dec. The hard fork happened around Dec.7th after which the chain was stalled for 24-48 hours. What does sharing one tweet of Dec. 1st prove? Why don't you share a verifiable minutely hash rate from Nov. 24 to Dev 12. This is the period during which dev. did most of their preferential mining.
33% of the PYI blocks are red blocks as compared to less than 2% for Kaspa and Karlsen. I have never seen a dev who failed even after he copied the code. I have a high convicton that MEXC will refuse to list PYI after they realize the low quality of PYI dev work.
1. Pyrin public launch was Nov 22, 2023. 24th is false 2. "dev didn't release the GPU miner for the first few days" <- screenshots proofs that this is another one of your fantasies 3. "Why don't you share a verifiable minutely hash rate from Nov. 24 to Dev 12" lol, you seriously ask me to proof your claims? why dont you have any evidence for yours claims? FOR EXAMPLE: A SINGLE WALLET ADRESS 4. Orphaned Blocks (red blocks) could be part of the DAG and valid, but not necessarily leading to a reward for you if they weren't the first to be accepted as such. The transactions within these blocks are still part of the network's ledger. Time to gain some basic knowledge about Kaspa and Pyrin? Have a good day. |
|
|
|
They pulled this trick three times [1] When the dev didn't release the GPU miner for the first few days and cornered all the hash [2] When the ASICs were active for more than a week [3] After the restart the stock GPU miner was bad e.g. 1GH/s vs 22GH/s on 4090. So devs probably have mined two weeks worth of coin exclusively.
I'm happy that you're giving us a platform to refute all the baseless fud  Ok let's go: 1 week after we launched: Everything was public, all informations available. We already had a decent amount of people mining Pyrin, CPU only, Hashrate was low. Proof: https://twitter.com/pyrin_network/status/1730551279460532261NO GPU, NO ASIC. Hashrate would have been much higher. Commenaudin, you joined mid december. You did not even follow Pyrin at the beginning. This was too easy, give me another one. |
|
|
|
Thanks for sharing! Where is a similar analysis about why you restarted Pyrin? Why can't you accept that you started Pyrin because the initial algo was not ASIC resistant, and the hard fork failed to bring down the difficulty. The chain was stuck for two days, and you had to restart?
"The chain was stuck for two days, and you had to restart?" All Informations are available in Discord Announcement Channel. Everything was communicated. So now you claim we were hiding the Restart? "During the update, a bug brought the network down for a while." i wrote at the beginning of our conversation. |
|
|
|
MEXC only confirms the listing once they are ready, so that could explain why they refused to confirm the pyrin listing. If Linda is a MEXC official, she will also not confirm. When will you stop lying?!  Why was Pyrin forked just a few days after its release? Just accept that ASICS were active, and you fixed it, and since forked failed, you restarted it? Why is it so difficult to be transparent? I do not remember Bitcoin and Kaspa being restarted in the mainnet. Are you saying that urine is not in the mainnet? You haven't explained why GPU Miner was not released for days when there was clear evidence that someone(most probably a dev) was using GPU Miner. And you also haven't explained why the hash rate was so different between the dev GPU miner and Lolminer. Are your devs incompetent, or dishonest? - now you remember |
|
|
|
MEXC only confirms the listing once they are ready, so that could explain why they refused to confirm the pyrin listing. If Linda is a MEXC official, she will also not confirm. When will you stop lying?! Why was Pyrin forked just a few days after its release? Just accept that ASICS were active, and you fixed it, and since forked failed, you restarted it? Why is it so difficult to be transparent? I do not remember Bitcoin and Kaspa being restarted in the mainnet. Are you saying that urine is not in the mainnet? You haven't explained why GPU Miner was not released for days when there was clear evidence that someone(most probably a dev) was using GPU Miner. And you also haven't explained why the hash rate was so different between the dev GPU miner and Lolminer. Are your devs incompetent, or dishonest? 1. "I checked with MEXC, and they told me that they have never heard about the coin." If a MEXC official follows Pyrin, I suspect they have heard of Pyrin, right? Who is lying here? I can't speak for Linda, you said you checked with MEXC, so check with her. I can't do anything if she does not like to answer you. Just wait for the offical announcement, no? 2. If you have evidence that ASICS were mining, just share it here? There are many people who claim that they were ASIC mining. They have two things in common: a). they are part of the Karlsen project + b). they cannot share a wallet to prove it. It's would be so easy to prove, why don't you do it then? 3. I'm guessing you don't have a single proof of the GPU Miner, hashrate thing or of anything either? So what are we doing here? Let's get back to work instead of talking about fantasies? Why are you so obsessed with spreading nonsense about Pyrin? If you don't like Pyrin, just sell it, ignore it. move on. |
|
|
|
Who is Commenaudin you keep referring to?
Did you forget to take your anti-psyhotic meds, or are you dumb? Your stupid refusal is just another proof that pyrin is a rugpull. You guys have banned every one who asked difficult question, and tried to inform gullible pyrin miners about the impending rugpull. If ASICS were not active why did you restarted the chain? Do you have any proof that pyrin will be listed on MEXC? I checked with MEXC, and they told me that they have never heard about the coin. The joke is on the pyrins miners. You get pyrin when you breed kaspa and karlen and their child is born with developmental disorder.
1. False accusations are not the same as asking questions, I am happy to answer your questions 2. You were banned because you spread lies. For example the MEXC stuff. Go to our official Twitter. You see Linda (@LINDA_MEXC) from MEXC following Pyrin. Just text her and post the reply here. Note: She only follows projects that are or will be listed on MEXC. So i guess you are wrong, she heard of Pyrin. 3. Pyrin was forked to update the algo to blake3. During the update, a bug brought the network down for a while. The same thing has already happened with Bitcoin or Kaspa. Happens if you build on new grounds. I hope i could answer all your "difficult questions" |
|
|
|
No white paper. No github authors with names. 99%+ Kaspa code for everything, minus webpage. Basically changed the network, ports and genesis. Would been more impressive, if it was a man in the middle. Where you mine 'pyrin' that is really kas, you earn 'pyrin' they keep kas.
Next level lazy poop coin
Team is working hard to release its own explorer, own wallet, own smart contracts and further native innovations. Only the base layer is a kaspa fork. which is public communicated. But i guess, you already know. You should not use fresh accounts for fudding competing projects. |
|
|
|
|
Please post your Discord username. I will check for what reason you were banned.
I suspect that you repeatedly shilled Karlsen in general. You should have read the rules first.
“No shilling for other projects – We do not allow any advertising for other projects, communities or coins. Share your content in the off-topic channel if it offers real value (videos/art).”
|
|
|
|
$PYI$PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI$PYI$PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI$PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI$PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI$PYI $PYI $PYI$PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI$PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI$PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI $PYI https://www.pyrin.network/PYRIN is a fork of one of the most promising distributed ledger technologies of recent years, and we are proud to build on Kaspa's excellent work while introducing new innovations to extend the possibilities and benefits of blockDAG technology. We recognize the potential of Kaspa, are in dialogue with their Development Team and are leveraging this strong foundation and connection to introduce breakthrough improvements. PYRIN has a passionate research and development team from different well established DLT projects working hard to develop new features, scaling solutions and optimizations. A switch from Blake2b to Blake 3 demonstrates a performance boost through its speed and efficiency and prevents ASIC miners from dominating, promoting decentralized mining opportunities. Furthermore, PYRIN will implement a unique smart contract design and introduce PAIW, a groundbreaking POW combining AI algorithm. BLOCK EXPLORERhttps://explorer.pyrin.network/GITHUBhttps://github.com/Pyrinpyi/TWITTERhttps://twitter.com/pyrin_networkDISCORDhttp://discord.gg/gx5Ysu7Ub9 |
|
|
|
|
