Hi, please don't kill me if that's a stupid question:

I'm looking at the chart and I noticed something off with the volume indicator.

Maybe it's an issue with TradingView indicator/change of methodology... Anyone knows?

Is Volume low? (That's BTC volume, not USD)

https://i.imgur.com/wwIL6ON.png

I don't think that's the best line of thought. Of course, it might be the most likely one. If Satoshi was not a three-letter agency, he doesn't necessarily need to be dead.  

The maximum supply of 21 million might be related to the blocks, but what if he actually wanted it to be 20 million? Would that be too foolish?  Instead of building an entirely different use case, one could simply stick with the original idea and implement a supply control of 1 million, effectively "burning" the excess.  

If that's not the case, a suicide is highly probable in the event of losing the keys, for instance.  

Determining the true identity of Satoshi Nakamoto with absolute certainty is impossible.  While various theories exist, we cannot definitively assert who he is—or whether he represents a group of individuals. 

In my view, the documentary presents compelling arguments within its context and portrays Peter Todd in a noteworthy manner.  However, I believe it is unlikely that he is Satoshi.  The arguments supporting this claim are strong within the proposed framework.  Yet, when we analyse the narrative in a strictly linear fashion, Todd may indeed appear to be the genuine Satoshi Nakamoto.  However, we must recognise that such an approach overlooks the broader context.  Ignoring external factors is not a viable way to assess the situation. 

I, for example, could be Satoshi, since I decided to write this in British English using double spaces.  If one considers only this fact, it may indeed raise suspicions about my identity. 

But it is indeed suspicious that Peter was reacting so oddly when confronted in that manner.  Why would he lie about his ability to code in C++?  I also think that the argument the narrator uses is somewhat valid; how and why would Peter remember that post so clearly in his mind? 

One thing I dislike is that the documentary mentions Peter's emails to Adam back in 2001, but it does not explore this aspect at any given moment.  Perhaps it didn't contain anything interesting. 

Determinar la verdadera identidad de Satoshi Nakamoto con absoluta certeza es una tarea imposible.  Aunque existen diversas teorías, no podemos afirmar de manera definitiva quién es él, ni si representa a un grupo de individuos.

En mi opinión, el documental presenta argumentos convincentes en su contexto y retrata a Peter Todd de manera notable.  Sin embargo, considero que es poco probable que él sea Satoshi.  Los argumentos que sustentan esta afirmación son sólidos dentro del marco propuesto.  Al analizar la narrativa de manera estrictamente lineal, Todd puede, de hecho, parecer el auténtico Satoshi Nakamoto.  Aun así, debemos reconocer que tal enfoque omite el contexto más amplio.  Ignorar factores externos no constituye un método viable para evaluar la situación.