Is anyone having trouble with their A9 memory leaking? My memory usage slowly increases until it is fully used up and my machine crashes. Takes about 20h run-time to do this. I have been having to manually reset the device (or switch pools) from browser control center to clear memory (and prevent crash)... been pretty annoying. If it crashes from memory leakage, then I cannot access browser and have to physically go to device and reset.
|
|
|
Thanks, did not know that. The 7/18 file name is: b29+_20180718_055037.swu However, 7/18 firmware caused me the following issues: very slow to reach peak hash rate (~30 min), and caused many HW errors. 7/20 (7/06?) firmware resolved both of these issues for me. Are you getting the full 50k hashrate? Yes, I am averaging a little over 50k (~53k) w/ balanced profile setting.
|
|
|
Thanks, did not know that. The 7/18 file name is: b29+_20180718_055037.swu However, 7/18 firmware caused me the following issues: very slow to reach peak hash rate (~30 min), and caused many HW errors. 7/20 (7/06?) firmware resolved both of these issues for me.
|
|
|
Weird, I just checked and I'm also having the same problem. My previous installed firmware was from 07/18. But after installing today's 07/20 firmware, it is now saying I have 07/06 firmware installed... I'm guessing they will push out a new firmware to fix this soon.
I'm seeing the same thing. Installed the 7/20 firmware, but the system overview shows it as the 7/6 firmware. And when you go to "Check now" for Latest Firmware... it will show that you are out of date (with 7/6 firmware).
|
|
|
How are people's HW error rates? What is considered normal? Looking at Innosilicon's Miner Status page, my HW #'s seem to be around 5-10% of my "Accepted" #.
I am running on Balanced performance profile, and have latest firmware installed. If this is not normal are there any suggestions to lower my HW errors? Could it possibly vary based on the pool I am mining on (currently on Flypool)? Thanks in advance.
Just FYI, today's 7/20 firmware release seems to have fixed all my HW error issues. I am not getting them anymore. I could not manage to update the firmware. After correct seeming update it reboots and has still old firmware. Weird, I just checked and I'm also having the same problem. My previous installed firmware was from 07/18. But after installing today's 07/20 firmware, it is now saying I have 07/06 firmware installed... I'm guessing they will push out a new firmware to fix this soon. I never had a firmware from 07/18... Did it come with the new batch? 7/18 firmware was available on their support page: http://www.innosilicon.com/html/support_en/download.html
|
|
|
How are people's HW error rates? What is considered normal? Looking at Innosilicon's Miner Status page, my HW #'s seem to be around 5-10% of my "Accepted" #.
I am running on Balanced performance profile, and have latest firmware installed. If this is not normal are there any suggestions to lower my HW errors? Could it possibly vary based on the pool I am mining on (currently on Flypool)? Thanks in advance.
Just FYI, today's 7/20 firmware release seems to have fixed all my HW error issues. I am not getting them anymore. I could not manage to update the firmware. After correct seeming update it reboots and has still old firmware. Weird, I just checked and I'm also having the same problem. My previous installed firmware was from 07/18. But after installing today's 07/20 firmware, it is now saying I have 07/06 firmware installed... I'm guessing they will push out a new firmware to fix this soon.
|
|
|
How are people's HW error rates? What is considered normal? Looking at Innosilicon's Miner Status page, my HW #'s seem to be around 5-10% of my "Accepted" #.
I am running on Balanced performance profile, and have latest firmware installed. If this is not normal are there any suggestions to lower my HW errors? Could it possibly vary based on the pool I am mining on (currently on Flypool)? Thanks in advance.
Just FYI, today's 7/20 firmware release seems to have fixed all my HW error issues. I am not getting them anymore.
|
|
|
How are people's HW error rates? What is considered normal? Looking at Innosilicon's Miner Status page, my HW #'s seem to be around 5-10% of my "Accepted" #.
I am running on Balanced performance profile, and have latest firmware installed. If this is not normal are there any suggestions to lower my HW errors? Could it possibly vary based on the pool I am mining on (currently on Flypool)? Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
18EzEoxocxGsbH2teFdhwiehXcUQg1iLhh
|
|
|
Wow, someone just dropped a 140+ BTC insta-buy taking ETH up to 305k sat on polo.
|
|
|
Yes, buy ETH. Let's paint a picture: On Nov 17th, Ethereum's William Mougayar said 20-plus banks are testing on Ethereum ( http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/ethereums-william-mougayar-20-plus-banks-testing-blockchains-outside-consortium-model-1529080) Just now (Nov 19th), Mike Hearn of R3 (25 bank blockchain consortium) said on /r/bitcoin that R3 is looking at using Ethereum and NOT Bitcoin! Specifically, he said: - "It'd be a conflict of interest if there was any chance of banks adopting Bitcoin for the use cases they're looking at, things like moving fiat currencies around, managing post trade lifecycles, etc. But there is no such chance. The use cases they are looking at and requirements they have cannot be met with the Bitcoin protocol, it just doesn't have the things they need. They are actually spending a lot more time looking at Ethereum than Bitcoin, as it's more obvious how to apply it to their use cases. But even if Bitcoin had all the features banks needed for what they want to do, their volumes are such that they wouldn't fit on a crippled 1mb-only block chain. Bitcoin can barely handle its existing user base without running out of capacity. Dropping existing inter-bank transactions onto it would simply not work."
When someone asked Mike Hearn to elaborate specifically on his statement that "They are actually spending a lot more time looking at Ethereum than Bitcoin," his response was: - "This stuff isn't really a secret: https://twitter.com/annairrera/status/639065607338598400/photo/1
As an example, try sketching out how to model a bond lifecycle with Bitcoin. I tried it in 2012 for the videod talk I gave in London. It requires absurd acrobatics for even a very simplified sort of bond and when you get into the real thing, forget it. They are interested in Ethereum due to its more powerful scripting language (and, I suspect, its better reputation, as Ethereum has not yet been sullied by people using it for trading illegal things)." (Link to reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3tftas/mike_hearn_now_working_for_r3cv_blockchain/) Conclusions: 1. R3 / big banks are overlooking Bitcoin and instead opting for Ethereum. 2. Ethereum + R3 partnership all but confirmed[?] 3. Buy more ETH
|
|
|
Hey Everyone, Anyone know why there is not a normal ETH wallet out just yet ? or did i just missed it ? How do you all store your coins atm ? cause a exchange aint the way to go atm . Also did anyone ever counted the max coin amount ? or a approx of it? Kind regards, The GUI wallet called Mist is currently in beta stage. You have to be careful storing large amounts of Ether there now that the software it is beta. In the meantime, you can use the command line wallet called geth to store all your Ether as this is the one that it is being used right now because it is stable. Hope this helps. P.S. You could also make a ETH paper wallet Why does it matter if you store large amounts of ether in a beta release, so long as you keep backups of keystores?
|
|
|
...
Quit shilling here man. You're making yourself and Monero look bad.
|
|
|
Let's paint a picture: On Nov 17th, Ethereum's William Mougayar said 20-plus banks are testing on Ethereum ( http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/ethereums-william-mougayar-20-plus-banks-testing-blockchains-outside-consortium-model-1529080) Just now (Nov 19th), Mike Hearn of R3 (25 bank blockchain consortium) said on /r/bitcoin that R3 is looking at using Ethereum and NOT Bitcoin! Specifically, he said: - "It'd be a conflict of interest if there was any chance of banks adopting Bitcoin for the use cases they're looking at, things like moving fiat currencies around, managing post trade lifecycles, etc. But there is no such chance. The use cases they are looking at and requirements they have cannot be met with the Bitcoin protocol, it just doesn't have the things they need. They are actually spending a lot more time looking at Ethereum than Bitcoin, as it's more obvious how to apply it to their use cases. But even if Bitcoin had all the features banks needed for what they want to do, their volumes are such that they wouldn't fit on a crippled 1mb-only block chain. Bitcoin can barely handle its existing user base without running out of capacity. Dropping existing inter-bank transactions onto it would simply not work."
When someone asked Mike Hearn to elaborate specifically on his statement that "They are actually spending a lot more time looking at Ethereum than Bitcoin," his response was: - "This stuff isn't really a secret: https://twitter.com/annairrera/status/639065607338598400/photo/1
As an example, try sketching out how to model a bond lifecycle with Bitcoin. I tried it in 2012 for the videod talk I gave in London. It requires absurd acrobatics for even a very simplified sort of bond and when you get into the real thing, forget it. They are interested in Ethereum due to its more powerful scripting language (and, I suspect, its better reputation, as Ethereum has not yet been sullied by people using it for trading illegal things)." (Link to reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3tftas/mike_hearn_now_working_for_r3cv_blockchain/) Conclusions: 1. R3 / big banks are overlooking Bitcoin and instead opting for Ethereum. 2. Ethereum + R3 partnership all but confirmed[?] 3. Buy more ETH It almost feels like the momentum is turning away from Bitcoin and towards Ethereum.
|
|
|
Tomorrow's headline: "IBM acquires xbridge technology; becomes Blocknet-enabled."
|
|
|
Notice that nowhere in the CoinTelegraph article is there mentioned a 'partnership' between Ethereum and Blocknet. In fact, the article explicitly says that this is not a partnership in its current state. Also notice that George Hallam contributed to the content of the article as per the above quote from the CoinTelegraph article. There's nothing 'alleged' about this. It's happening.
|
|
|
Will Blocknet be coordinating the launch of their decentralized exchange to coincide with Ethereum's upcoming frontier launch in roughly 1.5 weeks?
|
|
|
Been following this project for awhile now.Exciting innovation indeed.
Agreed. If you haven't already, sign up to our Slack: https://blocknet.herokuapp.com/
|
|
|
HUGE news!! Let's not forget that Dan was recently made the head of Ethereum meetup's in Boston! These are truly exciting times for both Blocknet and Ethereum!
|
|
|
From Synechist: "Dan Metcalf (@atcsecure) will be hosting a Q&A here in Slack on Tuesday at 4pm GMT. (That's 11am EST, May 12th) Expect news and general excitement!" Anyone interested in taking part in tomorrow's Q&A and seeing what all the "buzz" is about, join our Slack!: https://blocknet.herokuapp.com/I'll be there! Q&A is in 50 minutes!
|
|
|
|