That's a great initiative - every bit helps to support the LUNC burn and restore value to the ecosystem. 🔥

Just wanted to add that GreenFriendlyLabs also has a really solid faucet system in place. It's fast, reliable, and a great way to introduce new users to crypto responsibly. Definitely worth checking out alongside Dutchycorp!

just search for "greenfriendlylabs faucet"

I think a lot of good points have been made here, especially around Bitcoin dominance and how it reflects broader investor behavior. When BTC is surging and dominance is rising, it’s a clear sign that capital is consolidating into what’s seen as the “safe” bet — particularly as institutional and sovereign interest grows. It's not that altcoins have no potential, but right now the narrative and capital are heavily skewed toward Bitcoin.

That said, it’s too simplistic to say that all altcoins are trash or purely speculative. There are some solid layer-1 and layer-2 projects solving real problems, and if you zoom out, many of them tend to gain momentum after Bitcoin cools off. Timing and rotation matter.

I agree with those saying it’s about use case and staying power. Projects with real utility, developer traction, and strong communities can recover and outperform — but only if you’ve done your homework and are patient. Altseason isn’t dead, it's just on pause. Right now it’s a BTC-dominant cycle. But those cycles shift — they always have.

So yeah, hodl smart, not blind.

I get the skepticism around high-TPS chains like SUI, Aptos, and TON — especially when most TPS numbers are from controlled environments and don’t reflect real-world performance. That said, dismissing every newer chain as just a VC-backed cash grab feels overly cynical.

SUI, for example, launched later than Aptos but gained decent traction in TVL and user metrics. That doesn’t automatically make it “the future,” but it does show some progress. Also, SUI's use of Move for smart contracts is a legit innovation, even if it doesn’t solve all the problems in the space.

Yeah, most chains have growing pains, and many won’t survive long-term. But that’s part of the open innovation we’ve seen in crypto for over a decade now. Not every project needs to “kill” Ethereum or Solana to be relevant. Some might just carve out useful niches or help push the tech forward.

Interoperability is probably where things are headed anyway. So instead of this constant "X vs Y" mindset, maybe it's better to evaluate chains on actual adoption, developer activity, and what kind of problems they’re trying to solve — not just whether they had a presale.

Just my 2 sats.