Bitcoin Forum
May 30, 2024, 06:34:58 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: October 02, 2014, 01:38:37 AM
Really don't understand people coming up with 10 days, 11 days etc.  It was to start 3 days after the 20th which means it would have started on the 23rd.  We're now on day 8, not 10 or 11.  Jeez.

Day 11 since his supposed claim that we had 3 days...

So whether or not BCX is claiming 22 days from his 3 day warning or not is unclear. But all in all we can say we are not "dead" as he claimed anyone holding XMR would be after his 72 hour warning.

You are smart, thats why he is mad
He hopped for totally crash few days after his severe warning of steal wallet was public,

close to the deadline = nothing worse for a coin

If someone take the bet will be spend at least 200 BTC to buy the hash and do 50% over attack and win the bet, any coin can die like this

sorry english.
2  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: October 02, 2014, 01:15:54 AM
Show us the equations...

I already did.

...show us the proof...

The onus is to on the attacked to insure they are safe and disprove, not on me to go develop the attack that is claimed. The BTC I was offered in a bounty had no requirement for me to show how to attack private keys. Per agreements in the private messages with Risto and the developers, I only had to show an attack on the anonymity for which they don't already have mitigation in place. I did the private key investigation for free. I was just trying to think about possibilities.

So then you are just a whore, Sorry. Even BCX has more dignity at least he is not asking for a ransom and just want CHEAP CHEAP Monero.
3  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: October 02, 2014, 12:55:00 AM
He cant do anything with Private keys: http://lab.monero.cc/pubs/multiple_equations_attack.pdf

You haven't read my posts carefully. That whitepaper did not address all of the possible simultaneous equations.

I am not playing any good cop role. I am just attempting to be rational and objective. You don't even have reading comprehension skills, therefor you can't be rational. Or the causation could be the latter causes the former.

I don't think you are qualified to judge whether the effort and insights I did were valuable or not. Perhaps you won't know for 11 more days. Or it might even take longer than that to determine the value.

Show us the equations, show us the proof, you cant because you are just talk like your master BCX.
4  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: October 02, 2014, 12:42:08 AM
Have the developers been able to account for the increased hashrate to be sure the increase isn't controlled by BCX?

Afaics conceptually, the decentralized checkpoints would not prevent BCX from stealing wallets if he had an attack on the private keys of the genre I was exploring upthread. If he can take over the chain from a checkpoint forward, the he can see transactions before they are added to the chain, thus if the private key could be cracked, he could double spend the transaction, discarding the original transaction and putting one on the block which pays to himself.

Upthread we never showed a way to crack the private keys. All I showed was an idea of how to potentially identify which public key in the ring is the sender in some cases. And from that, I noted it makes some more simultaneous equations available for the private key. Whether those simultaneous equations can be solved faster than factoring a public key is not known to me. If someone knows, afaics they haven't told us in this thread.

If it is difficult to speculate about BCX's motivations. It seems he is either bluffing to save his reputation, or perhaps he is attempting to instill some humility in the altcoin space. I dunno.

P.S. If I don't reply, it doesn't mean I am ignoring. I may have not come back to read yet.

I'm just sick to death of cunts like you who seemingly have no problem with fucking around with the investments of innocents.

So I'm washing my hands with it and leaving it up to the law. As far as I know the police are also in contact with Poloniex and exchanging data.

So goodbye and a big fuck you.

Hey take your fully insured fiat with training wheels which the government will be soon shoving up your bankrupted a$$.

Technological attacks are fair play and it is the only way we can be sure crypto-currency is robust and resilient.

There was no prospectus guaranteeing your investments. If the technology allows your digital units to be transferred, it is your responsibility to know that and not invest if you don't like the risk.

Once you ask the government to regulate crypto-currency, then the entire point of crypto-currency is lost. So this space is not for you. Go back to fiat.

You fucking nut, I'm sicking of reading you in silence for all these weeks.

Its because of you he is running with the history for this long, he even named his fake attack with your name a pages back

Good cop / Bad cop as proposed by someone before

Didn't you take enough bitcoin from the people for nothing? Fuck Off here already

He cant do anything with Private keys: http://lab.monero.cc/pubs/multiple_equations_attack.pdf

Now Shut up.
5  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: October 01, 2014, 11:34:48 PM
I know for a fact
BCX is mad he coudn't crash Monero like he wanted. He will milk the fear for as long as he can.
6  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: October 01, 2014, 11:27:52 PM
Of course you haven't, you are a Moron, let alone discover an exploit on real code.


I always get a laugh out of your newbie accounts too fearful of BCX to post under your primary names LOL


~BCX~

Who in the world would fear you !??

I have no other accounts on this cesspit, I'm just someone that knows too much about you foryour own good.

Keep playing big, thats all you can do "LOL"
7  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: October 01, 2014, 11:16:44 PM
Going on 10 and 11 days and still nothing from BCX of actual substance concerning the supposed "exploit" and "attack"?

Gee what a surprise...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

The XMR price is so low, the hash rate is so high. Does it indicate something like active attack is going on?

I don't think so.

I called it as I saw it that BCX was just hott air when it came to an actual legitimate exploit to the XMR protocol. Look at his history of "attacking" Litecoin in 2012. Not much different outcome.


I said 22 days for it to come through, this is day 11.

Do numbers confuse you?

So if you're so sure then why don't you put up the 500 BTC and take the BCX challenge?

You definitely have the funds.

Let's throw some more skin in the arena too shall we.

Take the challenge and as well let's throw our accounts into the mix too.

The winner takes all, 500 BTC and each other's account.


So if you decline consider yourself PWND by BCX, STFU and anything you say from this point is pretty much invalid.

(Where's Spoetnik and his GW Bush eating a cat meme when you need it)


You talk the talk, can you walk the walk?



~BCX~

You said repeatedly that you had no interest in attacking Monero.

You said there was an exploit involving the ring signatures that would allow you to empty peoples wallets.  Your current TW seems not to be related to that.

You said that the results of the TW would start to be seen in 2 days.  You then provided proof of that happening that was not proof.

Then you said 22 days.

So please excuse us if we are confused.


Time will tell won't it?

@Xing,

Interesting, haven't thought of that reason to "punk out" and not take the challenge but you do have a point.

I don't have to spend 900 BTC on hashpower.




~BCX~

Of course you haven't, you are a Moron, let alone discover an exploit on real code.
8  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: October 01, 2014, 10:58:13 PM
Going on 10 and 11 days and still nothing from BCX of actual substance concerning the supposed "exploit" and "attack"?

Gee what a surprise...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

The XMR price is so low, the hash rate is so high. Does it indicate something like active attack is going on?

I don't think so.

I called it as I saw it that BCX was just hott air when it came to an actual legitimate exploit to the XMR protocol. Look at his history of "attacking" Litecoin in 2012. Not much different outcome.


I said 22 days for it to come through, this is day 11.

Do numbers confuse you?

So if you're so sure then why don't you put up the 500 BTC and take the BCX challenge?

You definitely have the funds.

Let's throw some more skin in the arena too shall we.

Take the challenge and as well let's throw our accounts into the mix too.

The winner takes all, 500 BTC and each other's account.


So if you decline consider yourself PWND by BCX, STFU and anything you say from this point is pretty much invalid.

(Where's Spoetnik and his GW Bush eating a cat meme when you need it)


You talk the talk, can you walk the walk?



~BCX~

No one believes you

You are just BullShit and hot air

You won't crash Monero market with more lies

No one is going to put 500 BTC on a bet so you can expend 900 BTC to buy hashpower and do a 51% attack and "walk away" with 100 BTC

You are going to jail.
9  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Moneroman88 = BitcoinEXpress? on: September 28, 2014, 02:05:04 PM
Well... I don't know about you lightweights but I've tracked BCX to an address in Southern England. Anyone else able to replicate this?

We do.  Kiss
10  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Unveiling the truth over the major Monero scam on: September 28, 2014, 01:58:38 PM
And the volume is very suspicious...
How can you have 150 BTC on Polo and 5-10 BTC on Mintpal?

It's just not possible unless whales are gaming the Polo book...
And Polo has gone all-in on CN coins so is that volume real?Huh

Don't be intentionally ignorant (or trolling). I demonstrated earlier in this thread with actual data that volume concentration on one exchange is normal and other coins have more concentration. Also hitbtc has decent xmr volume or did at one point.

i detect very butthurt monero cryptonote-clone-'developer' whoz investment has shrunk extremely who now face issue that most ppl r aware of monero being nothing but a little scam that failed

poor u smooth Cry Cry Cry

~CfA~

My investment in Monero is minimal.
I mined and sold early at a profit and kept a little. So no, it is impossible for my investment to shrink extremely. I'm certainly not one of the idiots who bought on the mintpal pump. Misinformed again I'm afraid cfa.


Interesting.

That is why you want to play arround with Monero current emission? If you are not invested on Monero, are not a capable developer, What the Fuck are
you doing on the "Team", maybe you should GTFO.
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!