Hi there, we are a new service that evaluates coins. GIS technologies are particularly interesting to me. When will the full ANN be out? Best of luck with thisI wouls really like to see happen

Hi guys,

Developer verification for [MARYJ] MaryJaneCoin is up on Alt.Report. Our first passing grade!

http://alt.report/developer-verification

It's really great to see someone provide their real name and a video of themselves talking about their coin, etc. Not many coin developers are willing to do this.

We believe developers can only be verified by public knowledge. Other services will accept payment to keep the developers identities private, yet claim to have verified the developer as a real person. This logic doesn't make sense to us because, for the public, there is no way to know who the developer is (and therefore no idea who you are investing in). In the past, scam artists have gotten around this by tricking them with a fake ID. Once it is reported that they have been scammed by a fake ID it's too late. Investors have lost money and on top of that, the scam developers have paid to keep their information private anyway. We will not take part in this type of verification. We would like the community to verify our developers.

Our verification is based on 1 simple fact: whether they are anonymous or not. In no way are we grading the quality of a coin (different section for that). We are simply providing anonymity information. There is no scale on how verified a developer is. They are either open to the public (pass) or they want to hide their identities (fail). You are either one or the other, you can't be "in-between".

Great work MARYJ!

Hi,

Yes we do this verification for free. We are helping people DYOR. Users are able to easily and quickly see if a developer is anonymous to the public or not. In this case the GlowShares developer is anonymous.

We can do one for BTC too (however the site is really all about altcoins). I will message you when its ready.

Cheers,

p.s. thanks to everyone that is supporting our growing cause and your kind words

Hello everyone,

We believe developers can only be verified by public knowledge. Other services will accept payment to keep the developers identities private, yet claim to have verified the developer as a real person. This logic doesn't make sense to us because, for the public, there is no way to know who the developer is (and therefore no idea who you are investing in). In this sense, developer verification is useless to the public because you are meant to trust that 1 person has verified this. In the past, scam artists have gotten around this by tricking this 1 person with a fake ID. Once it is reported that they have been scammed by a fake ID it's too late. Investors have lost money and on top of that, the scam developers have paid to keep their information private anyway. So who side is the POD on? Typically these other services will remove the verification from their website like it never happened. We will not take part in this type of verification. We would like the community to verify our developers.

Our verification is based on 1 simple fact: whether they are anonymous or not. In no way are we grading the quality of a coin (different section for that). We are simply providing anonymity information. There is no scale on how verified a developer is. They are either open to the public (pass) or they want to hide their identities (fail). You are either one or the other, you can't be "in-between".

That being said, Developer Verification for GlowShares [GSX] is up on our site. Please let us know what you guys think:

http://alt.report/developer-verification

Cheers

CryptoAsian is paid off to hide people's identities. We are meant to just trust him that he did the verification.

We believe developers can only be verified by public knowledge. Other services will accept payment to keep the developers identities private, yet claim to have verified the developer as a real person. This logic doesn't make sense to us because, for the public, there is no way to know who the developer is (and therefore no idea who you are investing in). In this sense, developer verification is useless to the public because you are meant to trust that 1 person has verified this. In the past, scam artists have gotten around this by tricking this 1 person with a fake ID. Once it is reported that they have been scammed by a fake ID it's too late. Investors have lost money and on top of that, the scam developers have paid to keep their information private anyway. So who side is the POD on? Typically these other services will remove the verification from their website like it never happened. We will not take part in this type of verification. We would like the community to verify our developers.

Our verification is based on 1 simple fact: whether they are anonymous or not. In no way are we grading the quality of a coin. We are simply providing anonymity information. There is no scale on how verified a developer is. They are either open to the public (pass) or they want to hide their identities (fail). You are either one or the other, you can't be "in-between".

That being said, Developer Verification for Utility Coin is up on our site. Please let us know what you guys think:

http://alt.report/developer-verification

Cheers

New review for GANJA coin!

http://alt.report/altcoins/item/263-ganja-ganja-coin-anonymous-ico-developers-have-disappeared

Hi,

New article for your coin http://alt.report/altcoins/item/263-ganja-ganja-coin-anonymous-ico-developers-have-disappeared