Bitcoin Forum
November 04, 2024, 01:45:13 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
1  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Bitcoin Core 0.10.2.0 x64 on Win 8.1 crashing on: July 02, 2015, 12:48:44 PM
...
2  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: November 06, 2013, 08:08:13 PM
I smell a 13 hour + round blurgh

20751    2013-11-06 18:45:28    7:48:00
Not bad, not bad  Lips sealed
3  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: November 06, 2013, 03:28:33 PM
Slush pool page is down??

+1
Mining is working as expected.
4  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: October 29, 2013, 07:14:29 PM
Our luck is going down the drain  Cry
5  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: October 25, 2013, 07:38:27 PM
I've been offline now for 3 hours+
Failover to eclipse for now.

I had the same issue, but now my miners are working correctly.
I had to restart bfgminer a few times, because the pool was timing out.
3rd try, it worked and I've been connected since.
6  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: October 16, 2013, 05:42:21 PM
Approx. cluster performance (30 min average):   173333.022 Ghash/s
7  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: October 14, 2013, 06:28:40 AM
I'm making progress here. Do I need two separate copies of BFGMiner on the hard drive to run 2 instances? What happens to config file if I run 2 instances from one copy?

You definitely need 2 separate copies in different folders.
8  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: October 13, 2013, 09:14:48 AM
Just to make you all feel a little bit better:

Next Projected difficulty: 275,075,241

+45.3%

+85,793,992

Quite amazing.


Oh God, please...
9  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: October 11, 2013, 09:27:16 PM
Suddenly all of my workers are reported as disconnected on the website, but bfgminer is happily hashing.
What's going on?
10  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: October 11, 2013, 10:59:44 AM
'e-hug', and  'e-cuddle', accepted.

Initiating 'e-cuddle 2.013 protocol'

<10> go to 20 if < Ü, else go to 30
<20> if hump is > than Ü, go to 40, else go to 10
<30> square root an apple pie 'like the movie' , initiate 'new-wave' protocol, go to 40
<40> initiate command 'sexy party'

Remembers me of the good old Basic on C64
11  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: October 11, 2013, 10:28:38 AM
just curious, is anyone else having payout issues at the moment?

I've been over my min limit for awhile now (almost double it now), everything from the set default payout has been confirmed for awhile.

My quotes are low, but no 0 rewards.
12  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: October 09, 2013, 07:33:25 PM
10h10m im butthurt

No blocks found, makes me frown.   Cry

11:03:22 and counting...
13  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: October 08, 2013, 06:41:32 PM
I guess it's the KNC miners coming online. Most of them will leave as soon as they notice that the current round is 5+ hours (so far).


Shhhhhhhhhhhh...!
14  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [120 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: October 08, 2013, 05:54:11 PM
Well that's one way of looking at it - that Slush is forcing the increase with the updates Smiley
I thing that he is waiting for some stable value to list, but with the constant increase in power it immediately becomes 'the minimum' instead of average, so maybe he should change it to 100+TH

EDIT: WOW THAT WAS FAST!
 He changed it while i was typing, but my suggestion for 120+ is still valid (we are at 123Th now Smiley )

Nope, it was me changing reply title Tongue
15  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [120 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: October 08, 2013, 05:36:10 PM
Did someone else noticed that every time the thread title is updated to reflect the total speed, it jumps up quite a lot, just a bit after that.
It was updated to 100TH and in few hours went to 120TH after a stable week of 90-100

Well, time to update the title Smiley
SLUSH!!!
16  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [65000 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: October 07, 2013, 05:15:35 PM
Wow, hashing power keeps increasing.  My cut keeps decreasing. 

Exciting and sad at the same time, isn't it?

Exciting because the project goes on, media talk about it and even with the latest value drop after SR busting everything seems going fine.
Sad because my hashrate is everyday less significant Sad
17  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [65000 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: October 07, 2013, 02:32:47 PM
Wow, hashing power keeps increasing.  My cut keeps decreasing. 

Exciting and sad at the same time, isn't it?
18  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [65000 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: October 07, 2013, 09:51:45 AM
Aaaaaaaaaand we're back!
19  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [65000 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: October 01, 2013, 09:39:06 AM
Still offline ATM
20  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [65000 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: September 28, 2013, 07:25:25 PM
Sacrifice done.

Cross your fingers
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!