Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
|
I smell a 13 hour + round blurgh
20751 2013-11-06 18:45:28 7:48:00 Not bad, not bad
|
|
|
Slush pool page is down??
+1 Mining is working as expected.
|
|
|
Our luck is going down the drain
|
|
|
I've been offline now for 3 hours+ Failover to eclipse for now.
I had the same issue, but now my miners are working correctly. I had to restart bfgminer a few times, because the pool was timing out. 3rd try, it worked and I've been connected since.
|
|
|
Approx. cluster performance (30 min average): 173333.022 Ghash/s
|
|
|
I'm making progress here. Do I need two separate copies of BFGMiner on the hard drive to run 2 instances? What happens to config file if I run 2 instances from one copy?
You definitely need 2 separate copies in different folders.
|
|
|
Just to make you all feel a little bit better:
Next Projected difficulty: 275,075,241
+45.3%
+85,793,992
Quite amazing.
Oh God, please...
|
|
|
Suddenly all of my workers are reported as disconnected on the website, but bfgminer is happily hashing. What's going on?
|
|
|
'e-hug', and 'e-cuddle', accepted.
Initiating 'e-cuddle 2.013 protocol' <10> go to 20 if < Ü, else go to 30 <20> if hump is > than Ü, go to 40, else go to 10 <30> square root an apple pie 'like the movie' , initiate 'new-wave' protocol, go to 40 <40> initiate command 'sexy party' Remembers me of the good old Basic on C64
|
|
|
just curious, is anyone else having payout issues at the moment?
I've been over my min limit for awhile now (almost double it now), everything from the set default payout has been confirmed for awhile.
My quotes are low, but no 0 rewards.
|
|
|
10h10m im butthurt
No blocks found, makes me frown. 11:03:22 and counting...
|
|
|
I guess it's the KNC miners coming online. Most of them will leave as soon as they notice that the current round is 5+ hours (so far).
Shhhhhhhhhhhh...!
|
|
|
Well that's one way of looking at it - that Slush is forcing the increase with the updates I thing that he is waiting for some stable value to list, but with the constant increase in power it immediately becomes 'the minimum' instead of average, so maybe he should change it to 100+TH EDIT: WOW THAT WAS FAST! He changed it while i was typing, but my suggestion for 120+ is still valid (we are at 123Th now ) Nope, it was me changing reply title
|
|
|
Did someone else noticed that every time the thread title is updated to reflect the total speed, it jumps up quite a lot, just a bit after that. It was updated to 100TH and in few hours went to 120TH after a stable week of 90-100
Well, time to update the title SLUSH!!!
|
|
|
Wow, hashing power keeps increasing. My cut keeps decreasing.
Exciting and sad at the same time, isn't it? Exciting because the project goes on, media talk about it and even with the latest value drop after SR busting everything seems going fine. Sad because my hashrate is everyday less significant
|
|
|
Wow, hashing power keeps increasing. My cut keeps decreasing.
Exciting and sad at the same time, isn't it?
|
|
|
Sacrifice done.
Cross your fingers
|
|
|
|