The difficulty chart stopped working. It's been stuck for a week now. I hope it gets fixed because I really like the way the difficulty is illustrated on this site.

Ya I've been watching her for a while and like the way she explains things. She does a good job. Maybe the community knows someone who has the gift to gab and highlight some of digibyte's features.

Thing is she gets paid to do that and so does a lot of people working in the dash community.

Hello Digibyte,

We need people like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrIul2OGsQE to promote our DGB

After submitting for example Digibyte.co https://www.google.com/webmasters/ it is possible to set a preferred domain with or without www. (https://digibyte.co or https://www.digibyte.co ). Also GWC is giving alerts automatically from very imporant issues!

If the chosen preferred domain is https://www.digibyte.co , all other duplicate home pages (for example  https://digibyte.co/ http://digibyte.co/ http://www.digibyte.co/ ) can be redirected with a 301 to the chosen preffered domain https://www.digibyte.co , to let Google know what the original page is.

Search engines don't know which version(s) to include/exclude from their indices
Search engines don't know whether to direct the link metrics (trust, authority, anchor text, link juice, etc.) to one page, or keep it separated between multiple versions
Search engines don't know which version(s) to rank for query results
When duplicate content is present, site owners suffer rankings and traffic losses, and search engines provide less relevant results.

The rel canonical tag is pointing to link rel="canonical" href="/home-1"/> which goes wrong if i see that google is indexing 4 different domains :  https://www.google.nl/?gws_rd=ssl#q=https:%2F%2Fdigibyte.co%2Fhome-1 so Google think now there are 5 home pages all with the same content. With Screamingfrog it is possible to search for all duplicate content automatically and i will run soon when have more time a rapport.

Here a very good article about this very important issue! https://moz.com/learn/seo/duplicate-content


For alle the Digibyte sites it is also very important that the sites are running fast https://moz.com/learn/seo/page-speed. I just found out that this can be improved https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdigibyte.co%2F&tab=mobile and https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdigibyte.co%2F&tab=desktop

More details : https://tools.pingdom.com/#!/OrUTM/https://digibyte.co/ and some great articles : https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2010/04/using-site-speed-in-web-search-ranking.html and https://moz.com/learn/seo/page-speed

And for Digibytegameing : https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdigibytegaming.com%2F&tab=mobile and https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdigibytegaming.com%2F&tab=desktop

https://tools.pingdom.com/#!/hKarM/https://digibytegaming.com/

http://searchengineland.com/google-says-page-speed-ranking-factor-use-mobile-page-speed-mobile-sites-upcoming-months-250874

A fast site is these days is so important and this will certainly bring improvements!


And a very good tool is also which gives a great information about the seo of a page in this case  :  https://www.woorank.com/en/www/digibyte.co

High impact : Track users and activity with Analytics and Webmaster Tools (Google webmaster for sure )
High impact : Configure your domain redirects from non-original pages versions as described earlier.

Here the descritpion from Woorank : Search engines do not like pages which duplicate large amounts of content on the same website, which can happen when the same page, due to Web configuration or CMS issues, is shown in different URLs.

A common scenario for this issue is found when the non-www and the www version of your site both feature your content. For example, when www.domain.com and domain.com show the home page information.

You should pick either version to show your site content and use 301 redirects to refer from the non-original page versions to the original ones, making show you only show each page through one URL.
A 301 Redirect should be used to refer from the non-original URLs to the original ones.

If you are creating other subdomains, use relevant keywords and avoid duplicate content. Check if your homepage is correctly redirecting to the original URL version with the WWW Resolve criteria under the SEO section in your WooRank Reviews.

With the free web developers tool it is possible to see from every page the h-tags (after installing the webdeveloper tool you can click on "view document outline" to see if the h-tags are well placed or not. https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/web-developer/bfbameneiokkgbdmiekhjnmfkcnldhhm  (For home Digibyte.co no important h1 tag is used.

<h1>(Missing heading)
<h2>(Missing heading)
<h3>(Missing heading)
<h4>Get Started Today

<h4>Are you a developer?

<h2>Main navigation
<h2>Business hour
<h2>Wecome to DigiByte
<h3>(Missing heading)
<h4>Security

<h4>Transparency

<h4>Efficiency

<h2>DigiByte Development In Progress
<h2>DigiByte Applications
<h2>DigiByte Blockchain Potential
<h3>(Missing heading)
<h4>Core Protocol

<h4>FinTech

<h4>Internet of Things

<h4>Cybersecurity

<h4>Document Validation

<h4>Trade Finance

<h2>About DigiByte
<h2>Link Footer
<h2>Contribute Today

Digibytegaming.com  : The quick link "" Tips ""is linking to the homepage and not yet to the 'tips' page.


[/quote]
Good point FPTR. It's basic web dev stuff. But not everyone knows. Hope the DEV takes your suggestions seriously.

Wow didn't want to cause this much talk over a simple request to the dev to include mining instructions for DGB on the digibyte.co website.
Well maybe I wasn't clear.

DEV please put solo mining instructions on http://digibyte.co New people hitting the site won't know how easy it is. Most coins fail at instructions for mining. We should not.

Jumbley knows I was working on a document for mining instructions but I gave up because the structure wasn't professional enough, or so I thought.

Also 5% fee on digihash.co is too much. Especially when we have sites like cryptopia with 0% fee.

I've been solomining for months but cryptopia is great with no fees for withdraw so why not? I may go back to solo too but who cares...

When I was a noob I wish there were instructions on the site instead of drilling through thread after thread for updated info.

Mining there now... Wow! Cool site

Jumbley... so smart

Is mining Digibyte a secret?

I don't understand why the main site has no info about how to mine.

Maybe it's there but it's in santa clause style or something...?  

Psst hey webmaster you forgot the most interesting part... How to generate Digibyte

There's no info for new potential miners that need to know what port to use ect;

Take the how to part from many threads back and copy paste to the site.

Can't find it? My point exactly.

edit: one of the things I look at for a new coin is how to mine it

Oh that's not much. I used a 25ghs one time and have won a block so you could after much time with 4ghs

I've made a million dgb with 3 monarchs at 2.6th.
DGB is easy to win blocks!

You should see New block detected on the network and Network difficulty changed to "numbers"
And when you find a block you will see Block Solved for pool 0!

yup! Me too

I get the same error. It's nothing important and doesn't affect solo mining with bfgminer

Agreed 

Ya it seems to be due to confirmation time, is what I get from that video.

Double spend on bitcoin? Merchants beware. Is this possible in DGB? Probably not since it is so fast at confirming.

https://youtu.be/ysVCU1b-UBA

I GOT IT!!! I had to write python2 instead of just python. LOL!

Any p2pool nodes in US that's closer? My stales are pretty bad on http://p2p.hashpool.eu:5014

OK thanks for your effort I think I'll go back to solo mining

OK did that but same error
I ran ./run_p2pool.py --give-author 0 --net digibyteSha --bitcoind-rpc-port 14022 --bitcoind-p2p-port 12024 digibyterpc mypw
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "run_p2pool.py", line 3, in <module>
    from p2pool import main
  File "/home/twebit/p2pool/p2pool/__init__.py", line 43
    except Exception, e:
                    ^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax