Guys, i`m from Russia and that`s not very cool. Our government often invent new and new taxes. Our RUB felt down to 50% of its 2013 year price. We have a lot of problem inside the country - the biggest one is corruption.
None of these are unique to your country. These problems persist in most of the third world nations. And regarding the currency, you must also remember that the exchange rate of the RUR increased by almost 30% during the last 12 months and currently it is doing pretty good. But I agree that corruption is making life intolerable in Russia. I think those are global problems. Even the 'mighty' Dollar lost 15% in past 2 years when it was close to parity with Euro. This is the way to make us poorer and work harder - just to survive. |
|
|
|
|
Hi,
What us your opinion on QTUM? I have few QTUM bought few month back @ 5 bucks.
It is time to drop it and make some profit or they can climb the mountain?
|
|
|
|
I also cant withdrawal tokens from https://www.ico365.com. They didnt reply me by official channels too. I think that Qtum Team have to send them official request to clear situation what happens with our tokens already before the official statement of China's Central Bank about Initial Coin Offerings prohibition fully agree! Devs, ask them hot questions and post here their answers, we want to know when we will get our money! |
|
|
|
-snip-
I know a scam when I see one, and Qtum is not a scam  Nice try digging through my old posts, that shows how desperate you are to find something, yet you got nothing! PS: Please try to lower the level of vulgarity in your posts, I don't know what you are trying to achieve by being so vulgar! |
|
|
|
Gleb Krampus' usual nonsense and vulgarity.
Everyone should believe this troll, and dismiss the respected media outlets! Do you expect us to believe paid media. Fuck you man! Sorry but Qtum isnt the first to do this trick You prefer to believe Gleb Krampus Look at the amount of media reporting this, you cannot bribe that much people, think about it! |
|
|
|
Gleb Krampus' usual nonsense and vulgarity.
Everyone should believe this troll, and dismiss the respected media outlets! |
|
|
|
Lol @ stackoverflow playing the race card. Is that really all you have left now? Please show one instance of me being racist, I guarantee you will find none in all of my post history.
I'm talking about glebby's posts! Now tell me some of his posts are not racist! |
|
|
|
This is turning into quite a racist thread pretty quickly.
Are there no moderators here?
Disgusting community.
Disgusting community indeed. But why would this be a surprise? Why would you ever expect a wholesome community to form around a scam  Let's take a closer look at the qtum "community" here. It consists entirely of the qtum team, stackoverflow, BTCspace, their sockpuppet/shill accounts, and you (who I'm giving the benefit of the doubt and going to believe you might actually be just an innocent investor). The rest of us here are just here to try and warn unsuspecting people about this project and call the team out for their excessive shadiness and lack of basic transparency. So don't be surprised if things are a bit unruly in here. There is no real motivation or incentive for me to behave in a cordial manner when dealing with a scam and its purveyors. Qtum and its supporters ought to have more incentive to behave better, why they choose not to IDK it's almost like they don't actually care about the community here  Nothing justifies racism  Id rather choose a racist than people who wants to scam millions of $ for their own benefit. Where is that bitcoin address hmmm i cant find it. You and/or others calling this a scam does not make it so AFAIK no one got scammed here, it's all in your heads. As for you supporting racism, it's just disgusting. |
|
|
|
This is turning into quite a racist thread pretty quickly.
Are there no moderators here?
Disgusting community.
Disgusting community indeed. But why would this be a surprise? Why would you ever expect a wholesome community to form around a scam Let's take a closer look at the qtum "community" here. It consists entirely of the qtum team, stackoverflow, BTCspace, their sockpuppet/shill accounts, and you (who I'm giving the benefit of the doubt and going to believe you might actually be just an innocent investor). The rest of us here are just here to try and warn unsuspecting people about this project and call the team out for their excessive shadiness and lack of basic transparency. So don't be surprised if things are a bit unruly in here. There is no real motivation or incentive for me to behave in a cordial manner when dealing with a scam and its purveyors. Qtum and its supporters ought to have more incentive to behave better, why they choose not to IDK it's almost like they don't actually care about the community here Nothing justifies racism |
|
|
|
This is turning into quite a racist thread pretty quickly.
Are there no moderators here?
Disgusting community.
Yes I already reported racist posts by glebby the troll, unfortunately he's going on and on without any moderation, this is a self moderated thread, but unfortunately Qtum team is being too kind with him. I think he crossed too many red lines now! |
|
|
|
when the first few articles came out about Qtum, then their interests waned, waned even more during the ICO ... glebby daily dose of BS
That's the bitcoin graph you fucking idiot.
It was not me this time |
|
|
|
Glebby talking to himself now Someone living by that river better call 911!At least I more homies on this thread than you do, for I don't see many echoing your sentiment excepting Newbies posting exclusively here, most likely Team Qtum's shill accounts. Gleb and I are homies now thanks to the battle scars of the Legends Room. I get nervous when Gleb shows up on a thread. He's one of those guys that makes me most happy by never making an appearance. I warned him we'd cross paths again soon... I just didn't think it would be 30 minutes later. Vlad said virtually the same thing when I first visited his "Twins" thread. He was like "OH FUCK!" lol If glebby is an example of a legend member here these days, then this place is done! I miss the real legends like Sunny King and other real crypto geniuses. Maybe glebby's title should be changed to legendary troll to be more accurate |
|
|
|
Glebby talking to himself now Someone living by that river better call 911! |
|
|
|
And remember everybody this is a quote from stackoverflow: ""the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies" And as we all know qtum is the one who declared a successful ICO, and I am only denying that  So according to stackoverflow himself I don't have to provide any proof to deny it, they are the ones that need to provide proof to confirm it. The proof is the numerous exchanges which witnessed the success |
|
|
|
Name calling again? That's all you got! Is that all I got, or are you just retarded? Because if you knew how to read you would notice there is more there than just name calling in my post. On the other-hand, all you have are these pathetic attempts to deflect. Whatever, as you already said youself: the burden of proof lies on qtum. They haven't provided it. Therefore, the ICO must have been a complete failure. SAD! You wish! I don't need to wish, it is evident based on the logic you outlined yourself. Not my words, yours. Sorry the ICO was such a failure. How is that a failure when all the exchanges were sold out as they announced? You think they're lying? prove it! |
|
|
|
Name calling again? That's all you got! Is that all I got, or are you just retarded? Because if you knew how to read you would notice there is more there than just name calling in my post. On the other-hand, all you have are these pathetic attempts to deflect. Whatever, as you already said youself: the burden of proof lies on qtum. They haven't provided it. Therefore, the ICO must have been a complete failure. SAD! You wish! |
|
|
|
Ok I'm sick of arguing with a bunch of clowns who think they are smart This forum has turned into a landfill of incompetent trolls! do your worst. Oh wait you already did These are your own words bud, so if you are arguing against them you are arguing against yourself: "the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies"
"the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies"
I don't think I am smart, those are your own words- you're the smart one!  Unless you are arguing against yourself, in which case that isn't very smart... I'm just ecstatic that you finally agree that the burden of proof is on qtum who has declared they raised over 15 milion USD but provided absolutely zero proof to support that. And that the burden does not lie on me since I am simply denying that claim. This means you are going to help me pressure them for this proof, right? Really looking forward to you asking qtum to provide the proof now that you admit it is their responsibility! Glad you are on our side for once! Or do you want to admit you are a lying hypocrite? Which will it be? You can't weasel your way out this time, those are your own goddamn words.I was referring to your accusation that this project is a scam, the burden of proof for this is on you! As for the funds, the exchanges have collected them, that's proof enough for me. Now if you accuse these exchanges of being in bed with the team and falsifying information, you know what you need to do: provide proof. I think it's useless at this point to try and discuss with you, it seems paranoia have gotten the best of you. Thanks for admitting you are a lying hypocrite. You can't apply your logic of "the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies" only when it suits you but not when it doesn't. That makes you a hypocrite, plain and simple. No matter how hard you try you can't deny it, those are your own words. And again, they are the ones declaring a successful ICO, I am denying that. So according to your own statement they are the ones that bear the burden of proof. The problem with you is you want to pick what proof you want, and only accept that. This is not how it works!
Success of the ICO have been confirmed by exchanges data, you cannot deny that.LOL show me the "data" you speak of. There is only one type of data that can serve as evidence and that is the data on the blockchain. That is exactly what I am asking for, the data- the addresses which show proof of the funds. It's so simple. Just how dumb are you? How dumb do you think observers to this thread are? Name calling again? That's all you got! |
|
|
|
Ok I'm sick of arguing with a bunch of clowns who think they are smart This forum has turned into a landfill of incompetent trolls! do your worst. Oh wait you already did These are your own words bud, so if you are arguing against them you are arguing against yourself: "the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies"
"the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies"
I don't think I am smart, those are your own words- you're the smart one! Unless you are arguing against yourself, in which case that isn't very smart... I'm just ecstatic that you finally agree that the burden of proof is on qtum who has declared they raised over 15 milion USD but provided absolutely zero proof to support that. And that the burden does not lie on me since I am simply denying that claim. This means you are going to help me pressure them for this proof, right? Really looking forward to you asking qtum to provide the proof now that you admit it is their responsibility! Glad you are on our side for once! Or do you want to admit you are a lying hypocrite? Which will it be? You can't weasel your way out this time, those are your own goddamn words.I was referring to your accusation that this project is a scam, the burden of proof for this is on you! As for the funds, the exchanges have collected them, that's proof enough for me. Now if you accuse these exchanges of being in bed with the team and falsifying information, you know what you need to do: provide proof. I think it's useless at this point to try and discuss with you, it seems paranoia have gotten the best of you. Thanks for admitting you are a lying hypocrite. You can't apply your logic of "the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies" only when it suits you but not when it doesn't. That makes you a hypocrite, plain and simple. No matter how hard you try you can't deny it, those are your own words. And again, they are the ones declaring a successful ICO, I am denying that. So according to your own statement they are the ones that bear the burden of proof. The problem with you is you want to pick what proof you want, and only accept that. This is not how it works! Success of the ICO have been confirmed by exchanges data, you cannot deny that. |
|
|
|
I will say right away that I do not belong to the camp of supporters of Qtum, as well as to the camp of its opponents. For the most part, I'm only interested in the technological component of this project. And, having got acquainted with the raw source code that the development team posted on github, I can clearly see that the work is being performed (or was done earlier).
It's hard for me to say that developers implement the full range of planned features and capabilities, but even some of them make the project interesting not only from the investment point of view.
Finally someone pointing out something positive about the project, beware, you might be called a shill for stating your opinion |
|
|
|
Ok I'm sick of arguing with a bunch of clowns who think they are smart This forum has turned into a landfill of incompetent trolls! do your worst. Oh wait you already did These are your own words bud, so if you are arguing against them you are arguing against yourself: "the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies"
"the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies"
I don't think I am smart, those are your own words- you're the smart one! Unless you are arguing against yourself, in which case that isn't very smart... I'm just ecstatic that you finally agree that the burden of proof is on qtum who has declared they raised over 15 milion USD but provided absolutely zero proof to support that. And that the burden does not lie on me since I am simply denying that claim. This means you are going to help me pressure them for this proof, right? Really looking forward to you asking qtum to provide the proof now that you admit it is their responsibility! Glad you are on our side for once! Or do you want to admit you are a lying hypocrite? Which will it be? You can't weasel your way out this time, those are your own goddamn words.I was referring to your accusation that this project is a scam, the burden of proof for this is on you! As for the funds, the exchanges have collected them, that's proof enough for me. Now if you accuse these exchanges of being in bed with the team and falsifying information, you know what you need to do: provide proof. I think it's useless at this point to try and discuss with you, it seems paranoia have gotten the best of you. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
