 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
One other thing I'm wondering about, is the website. On the same IP are 41 other websites.
Guys are always talking about server load, but have the website on a VM? I'm still not on the scam side, but this is a point which makes me thinking...
Any ideas (beside repeating scam, scam scam...)?
Cloudflare. I know, but what I'm interested in the things you connect to your answer. I don't know them, just that they have 160k websites hosted. I have myself a few websites in similar company in Germany, that means nothing. For me it only shows 42 sites are on one hardware. So do you know if this is a huge machine, or only a quadcore...you get what I mean? |
|
|
|
|
One other thing I'm wondering about, is the website. On the same IP are 41 other websites.
Guys are always talking about server load, but have the website on a VM? I'm still not on the scam side, but this is a point which makes me thinking...
Any ideas (beside repeating scam, scam scam...)?
|
|
|
|
p.s. I found info, that he is buying hardware in China. www.f2pool.com and ltc1btc.com are chinese pools, the two biggest LTC miners. Has anyone infos about them, or can read chineese (goole translator gave BS...)? Any info about the inner pool structures available? I can read chinese, what part do you want me to read? Thx, some friend already found some infos, like the internal blocklist of the pool. |
|
|
|
|
ok, so if we get both (or all) lists, we can make a short program to filter them to get the number.
Any useable source you know?
|
|
|
|
No, remember you still have to account for those miners who only mine Dogecoin and don't merge-mine.
Remember, it is one hash 'answer' sent to each of the merge-mined coin networks for every new hash cycle. So a single hashing cycle will show up for each of them, not be divided amongst them.
ok, got it. Is there anywhere some info available, how much is merge-mining, and how much is "native" mining? |
|
|
|
No, that is multi-mining and basically is the same as mining on three completely separate scrypt networks, which all have difference 'answers' to the hash.
With merged-mining the ASIC produces a 'hash' and 'presents' it to each of the coin networks it is merge-mining at. If it works in any of them, ka-ching, block reward!
So 300Mh/s merge-mining is 300MH/s for each coin network being merge-mined, as I said.
Ok, but this can't be right. In this moment LTC is at 1.11 Th/s and DOGE at 1.48 Th/s. Supposed you are right, it had to be the other way around...? Btw. in the one pool I found some big guys, so it's still possible (from this perspective) that it's scrypt.cc. So more to search.... |
|
|
|
For an individual mining machine this means mining at a given hash-rate and for that hashrate to be reported within each of the coin networks it is merge-mining. e.g. a 300MH/s scrypt miner which is merge-mining LTC,DOGE and SYS will show up as 300MH/s on LTC, 300MH/s on DOGE and 300MH/s on SYS.
Do you follow?
I try. But this would be a stupid calculation, but crypto currencies (and people behind) are not stupid... Is there somewhere a better kind of "official" definition to this? From my mind (I'm php developer now btw...), I would clearly expect 300MH/s which mines 3 coins are calculated as 100MH/s on each coin... |
|
|
|
You *do* realise the absurdity of what you are asking, right?
Sorry, it's not absurdity, it's just my own experience. So if you think this is absurdity, you are unexperienced, which is no problem, as 99,99% of all people are a bit naive... 
how does that change the facts that 850GH/s of scrypt-mining is clearly not down to scrypt.cc, as evidenced by the data I just posted?
I think the facts are not as clear as you may think. And this can have two reasons: 1. Maybe you did not ask all needed questions and did not follow all hints. 2. Maybe they are clear and you just explained it bad... I'm still searching.... and btw. I have the impresson your card is ok...  |
|
|
|
the total scrypt hashrate for LTC merge-mining is not Litecoin+Dogecoin+Syscoin
Thx for the link, but as I understood it, it's exactly in opposite. The hashrate is Litecoin+Dogecoin (see the table, it's added), and it would not make sense to be in one, but the payment is in both coins. I think in this point you misunderstood, or it is written wrong in the article (or my english is to poor...). 
he only needs to show evidence of the freshly mined blocks he'd be churning out each day. Apparently he can't do this either.
Yes, that's a good point, but still a difference between "can't do" and "don't want to". So it's a good point, but not a fact. This still leads me to the inner strcture of the pools. Any info about this? If I get no straight fact for the one or the other side, I can digg deeper and try to eliminate unclear points. At the end I maybe find clear straight facts... (And now pls. noone be attacked or pissed off of this): I think all know that Goldmann Sachs invested 50 million USD in Bitcoin business. So by this now the real big gangsters entered the room... Not only the UA "amateurs" are here now... (btw. I'm on GS's blacklists..., I know a bit of the game...). So one thing is a sure fact for me. If someone has a good business in any kind of money business, there will be for 100% sure people who got sent by GSs buddies to harm this business as much as possible. So who proofs me, that some here in forum are not "GS puppets"? No offense pls, but as i told you, I have more than one perspective to the topc... |
|
|
|
For scrypt.cc to be mining with 850GH of scrypt miners, in that there is literally only about 13GH/s of hashrate for the coins listed as being more profitable to mine than LTC at this time, it would mean that out of the above, they'd constitute 75% of the entire Litecoin network. There would be no point in them running it from a pool when 75% of the hashrate belonged to them because they'd be getting about 75% of all the mined blocks each day anyway. It would cost them money to be just a *really* powerful pool user because pools charge a percentage fee on earnings which could be avoided entirely simply by them running their own private pool if they really had 75% of the LTC hashrate.
Where did you get 75%? Last info I got was "23% of the mined coins" as info. And why you focus so strong on LTC? I got alraedy a few times that it's also DOGE and a 3rd one. As I wrote about, only 7 or 8 coins are big enough for this, and in two of them I found hash rate down ramps exactly fitting to the "energy shutdown" in May and also to the 850GH capacity. Combining this with an other coin which had not so a clear ramp, the numbers are perfect fitting. On the other side your's and other's arguments are also not nonsense. And I know people personally (known them before scrypt.cc...) who have good and high withdrawn. So for me there is still not a clear answer with facts. I had many businesses myself of very different kinds in the past. And if Marcelo realy has this good hardware and I would be in his place, I would also hide like hell. I developed myself "forbidden" tech in the past, and had to hide years from "nice industry people...", after they did all to crash my business. So you can expect I'm not naive, but I have more than one perspective on things. p.s. I found info, that he is buying hardware in China. www.f2pool.com and ltc1btc.com are chinese pools, the two biggest LTC miners. Has anyone infos about them, or can read chineese (goole translator gave BS...)? Any info about the inner pool structures available? |
|
|
|
Interesting.... Question: Is it possible that scypt.cc is using pools? So that you can not see the details of the minings? For example based on your link I checked this one: https://ghash.io/ with whois details. They are at same hoster (may mean nothing, I don't know this hoster, maybe has millons of websites hosted...). Any infos about this? I'm new to the topic... |
|
|
|
Sexcoin also dropped from 4.9GH/s to 667Mh/s
Yes, but first this drop was from a very short peak, and second it has only an exchange volume of 0.61 BTC / day. So you can mine your ass off with this, but you never bring it to BTC to pay out as rewards... |
|
|
|
Exchange volume really is not a statistic to go by. This does not indicate how many newly mined coins were sold on that day.
Yes that's right. But not the point for me. Independent from the newly mined coins, only the exchange volume can be handed out at Scrypt.CC. If you mine many, but can not exchange it, you can not pay rewards. So there are two borders, newly mined, and exchange rate.... |
|
|
|
|
@anthony27boo
thx, coinwarz is a nice site...
I checked some values, esp "Exchange Volume". And from the overall volume just a few (4-5) coins are big enough.
In Dogecoin and Litecoin I found at 11th May (when Scypt.cc got down...) two big drops of hashrate. This would fit, but do you know any way to find out why it droped, I mean if it were shut down of miners, or other reasons?
|
|
|
|
|
@anthony27boo:
Can you provide some links to the data?
Greetings
|
|
|
|
|
