this is the result of centuries of persecution & discrimination.

chickens have come home to roost.

want to stop this?

end poverty and extreme inequality.

I have a lot of disdain for Bush after he rigged the election for his brother,look at what that led to.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida_election_recount

and yes..He did rig it.
Even the FL Supreme court wanted a recount and the supervisor of elections had to step down.
The recount was overruled by US Supreme court.

Username : Ilirix

Thanks that is great promotion.

64Block_7HJeHt5Ev6WvNt7WyRvkoP

Username : Ilirixx

Cheers!

The distortion of the truth by the Israeli press for the purpose of propaganda is unprecedented and this exemplifies it.

Not sure we can blame the parents here. It looks like two people with mental disorders had an altercation. Both mental disorders may have had a parental influence factor, but how much would be hard to judge without more information.

Disrupting a funeral isn't freedom of speech.

If I took a boom box into a movie theater and held it over my head playing Taylor Swift at max volume during the film would that be free speech?

Jindal did the right thing by letting these ass-clowns know to take their freak-show elsewhere.

And if we're going to talk acts of censorship you know very well that the left wing has a bout a million mile lead on that whole endeavor.

Donald Trump is a kind of Cassius Clay/Mohamed Ali.

This former box champion was "the greatest" and he knew it and he proclaimed it to the four cardinal points with loud voice.

He had lots of followers who went crazy when Cassius Clay predicted that he will win the fight in the fourth round... and he did it. He was so good that he enjoyed the luxury to predict when he will Knock Out his opponent.

Of course, lots of people hated him as well, because his arrogant style of showing how good he was in this sport.

Donald Trump enjoys the privilege of being good in business, of being a great leader, of being charismatic, and of being powerful enough to open his mouth and say whatever he wants to say. In other words, he uses his freedom the best as he can.

You don't see the same with politicians who are practically hypocrites.

To tell the truth, many politicians are against illegal immigration, gay marriage and more, but they want to protect their political positions voting in favor of things that are against their will and the will of The People. They need the money of contributors who are mostly corrupt business people.

In this case, Donald Trump is his own boss, and this is his advantage over the rest of candidates.

While from the other contenders you will listen lies and false promises only, on the other hand from Donald Trump you will listen what he thinks is the best for the country. And as you can see, there is a huge difference between Donald Trump and the rest of candidates.

The DC Union Station was remodeled by a construction company in the times of Marion Barry, around the 70s-80s.. When the work was done and inspectors approved the remodeling, the company received the payment from the DC Treasury.

Right after the last penny was received, this company filled up for bankruptcy and changed its name. The location of the "new" company was the same. The construction equipment of the "new" company was the same. Most of the workers were the same. The same directors, the same offices, the same... the same.

But, the "new" company acquired a new logo, a new name, and this company was in business again.

After no more than a few months, it was found a structural problem in the DC Union Station and many claimed to "sue the construction company" which made the remodeling..

But, you can't sue a company that doesn't exist anymore. Lol.

This is a common trick that many companies do. You have no idea of how smart business people become to be in order to make more money right after a bankruptcy.

And, I think that this is how the name of Donald Trump was to become famous, when a scandal happened and his "former" company was involved. If you read his biography in Wikipedia, you will understand that he became more powerful right after each bankruptcy.

There are bankruptcies that happen when the lost is greater than the profit, and there are bankruptcies that happen in purpose, in order to avoid a court case, in order to create a bigger company, and so forth.

Correctomundo! He murdered in the name of the master race. Wasn't aware that murdering in the name of religion was so much worse than murdering in the cause of melanin content. Maybe I'm not on the true patriot mailing list.

How cursing is considered a big deal. Curse words are just words, and nobody needs to be sheltered from them. Though it seems like as the older generation dies off, this is improving.

How sexual things in the media are considered more serious than violence. Cutting a head off? PG-13, but showing a breast? You get an R rating now.

Did you? Perhaps that hearing aid battery needs to be replaced again...

Don't worry. I'll save us. I drive almost 50k miles/year and set my thermostat nice and low in the Summer. I also have a stockpile of incandescent bulbs.

Pelosi is the John McCain of the left. No one listens to that crazy knucklehead. She doesn't even know what she's saying.

They finally got the message that the south lost the war?

If you're going to take that attitude then what's the point of having this debate at all?



The fact that you disagree with my reasons doesn't mean I haven't given any. And just calling it "baloney" doesn't even come close to constituting a counterargument.

The Constitution simply does not require that preferences (or desires or whatever equivalent term you want to use) be treated equally. It's just not there, either in the text of the document, the history behind it, or judicial precedents that have been established up till now. You're free to try to come up with any evidence to the contrary.


Maybe if you can post where I said that, I can address it. But I'll just point out to you that if a state wanted to legislate that only same-sex unions would be recognized as "marriage", that wouldn't be discrimination against heterosexuals either, for the exact same reasons I mentioned.

No, prior to the ruling all states were holding everyone to the same standard. It's just that that standard wasn't equally in line with everyone's preferences.

I could just as easily say that the reason you like this ruling is that it suits your policy preference, whereas it wasn't being suited two days ago. And I'd be backing it up with exactly as much evidence as you've provided.


There's such a thing as misinterpretation also. Concepts that the courts elaborate have to have a basis in the Constitution. This one does not.



No, for reasons I explained. Those earlier laws treated people differently. As I've pointed out, the Court struck down this law because it doesn't accomodate preferences equally. Non-constitutional and dangerous precedent.

So I take it you agree that "preference" is not the same as "choice"? Then I guess we are on the same page after all.
My argument was against the Court inventing new legal concepts not found in the Constitution.

64Block_8hXYksysOMJcXeZCN66ibI