Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
Reply here with your wiki username and you will be given editor status without needing to pay the anti-spam fee. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) My username is Mazi, I'd like to get edit rights for the Wiki. Thanks.
|
|
|
Anyway, it will be great to trade the IOUs there without escrow. I am sure you can achieve a better price as selling a whole account. Can someone explain me, in listing the steps to do to offer my account with the gatehub on eth Hi, GateHub Fifth here. The orderbook is filling up slowly and first trades are starting to happen: https://www.ripplecharts.com/#/markets/REP:rckzVpTnKpP4TJ1puQe827bV3X4oYtdTP/BTC:rvYAfWj5gh67oV6fW32ZzP3Aw4Eubs59B?interval=30m&range=3d&type=candlestickTo sell your account on GateHub: - Create an account at http://wallet.gatehub.net/ and log in
- Connect the GateHub Fifth REP gateway (you'll see large buttons to do this)
- Request a REP account deposit - see below
- Create a Ripple Wallet on GateHub (if you don't have one already)
- Add trust for GateHub Fifth's REP (again a large visible button)
- When your REP is credited to your wallet, transfer it to the Ripple Wallet
- Click Trade and place sell orders. I suggest selling against Bitstamp's BTC for now.
This is from the About GateHub Fifth Help page: How do I deposit REP that I want to sell?All deposits involve manual handling and take up to 24 hours. Some deposits, especially Ethereum buy-in account deposits, may be processed faster (within one hour). The deposit process differs depending on whether your account was a Bitcoin buy-in or Ether buy-in. Depositing a Bitcoin buy-in REP accountTo transfer your Bitcoin buy-in Augur REP sale account to GateHub, you will be guided to send an e-mail to the Augur team, requesting to transfer the REP account to GateHub Fifth. When the Augur team has transferred the ownershipa and GateHub Fifth has successfully claimed the account, you will be credited REP IOUs on the Ripple network. Depositing an Ether buy-in REP accountTo transfer your Ethereum buy-in account to GateHub, you’ll need to confirm the transfer of the account by sending an Ethereum transaction (with a minuscule amount of ETH) from the Ethereum address that you used to buy REP in the presale. This transaction constitues your signed request to the Augur team to transfer the REP to GateHub Fifth instead of to you when Augur launches. ----- Sorry if this seems a bit complicated, but the GateHub team is working on making the process simpler. If there are further questions (I expect some especially if you're not familiar with Ripple) -- I'll answer them here, or you can contact us at fifth@gatehub.net. Thanks!
|
|
|
Was this ever addressed?
I've experience the same problem a few weeks ago, and a friend is experiencing this right now (his missing deposit still not credited to his account). The way Bitstamp handled the issue for me was to first ask me not to do such transactions; then they credited my account with missing bitcoins (that they had already received) after a week or so. They also never admitted it was their fault or apologized. I was quite disappointed with their response and actions.
|
|
|
I still can't decide who's the smart guy in this bet: Jim or I. You could say it's Jim: if he wins, Bitcoin will probably be mainstream, so worth a lot, so his win of 1 BTC will be large. If he loses, Bitcoin will probably have faded or not succeeded very much, so his 1 BTC loss will not be worth a lot. So he can gain a lot, and loose little -- almost a win-win for him. Or one could reason this way. If I loose, so a bitcoin-bling-wearing celebrity appears, Bitcoin will probably be mainstream, so do I loose 1 BTC, but my remaining coins are worth a lot, so overall I'm happy. If I win, well, that's obviously great -- what could be better than winning a bitcoin bet ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) So perhaps it's a Win-win--Win-win situation in any case ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Matija P.S. I wouldn't have made the bet today as now I think I'll probably loose; but no regrets -- bitcoin seems to be actually going mainstream and I'm quite happy (see above) ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) . I just hope to loose this as soon as possible...
|
|
|
Still a very long way util any non-geek wears stuff like this :]
|
|
|
I'm curious to see what the bling hardware wallet will look like.
What bling hardware? There will be none.
|
|
|
Would you guys like a third party escrow for this? Send the 1 BTC to a cold wallet made just for this bet. Each one sends 1 BTC, so the cold wallet will contain 2 BTC. Winner gets the private key or the amount is sent to his own wallet in 4 years.
We did consider a multisig transaction to store the funds for the duration of the bet (eg. 2-of-3 with Darwin the natural third party) but we decided against it -- I think because we wanted to avoid the need to store private keys for 4 years. It's still an option though as far as I'm concerned since I haven't tried multisig yet (or seen it used) and this seems a nice use case ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
At the Bitcoin 2013 conference on Sunday Matija Mazi (Mati) and I (Jim) agreed to a multi year Bitcoin bet and I wanted to go on the record about it.
The Bet Jim bets Mati 1 BTC that he can provide a photo from "one of those trashy celebrity magazines" of a celebrity wearing a blinged up Bitcoin hardware wallet.
The deadline for the bet was four years from when the bet was made. This is 3.30 PDT, 20th May 2017.
If Jim can provide such a photo before the deadline, Jim wins and Mati pays Jim 1 BTC. If Jim cannot provide such a photo before the deadline, Mati wins and Jim pays Mati 1 BTC.
Witness and referee Antonin Hildebrand ("Tonda") is both the witness and referee for this bet.
Rules Jim cannot make it happen by creating a blinged up hardware wallet and giving it to a celebrity. The definition of "one of those trashy celebrity magazines", "celebrity" and "blinged up" were left unspecified but we figured out we would know when it happened.
Thanks for inventing new nicks for me and Antonin, Jim ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Anyway, I am the other side of the bet and I confirm that the bet was the way Jim describes it above, with a small note: Antonin agreed to be the witness, but I'm not sure he agreed to his role as a referee. In any case, hopefully a referee won't be needed.
|
|
|
Hi, There are two other BIP32 implementations in Java that I know of. One is mine, here: https://code.google.com/r/matijamazi-bitcoinj/source/browse/?name=hdwIt contains the key derivation algorithm, some tests (I got the test vectors from the Armory code, and they originate from sipa) and a high-level implementation of the wallet structure as per spec (wallets, accounts, internal and external chains). I got this working with bitcoinj in MultiBit (created a wallet with several addresses from seed, put in some funds, deleted the keys, recreated the whole wallet from seed, spent the funds). But this was several months ago and I haven't had time to upgrade this to the new versions of bitcoinj/Multibit that have been since released. (But it should be easy since the code is practically independent of bitcoinj and completely independent of MultiBit.) Another implementation is Chris Rico's: https://code.google.com/r/chrisrico-bitcoinj-bip0032/source/detail?r=c273326f647f64295632fbbaf952d4f254ba6a1fSince BIP 32 is not final and I've seen some change suggestions that seem to make sense (to my lay brain), eg. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=19137.msg1411989#msg1411989 , and because I've been busy, I haven't continued working on this; but I wouldn't mind a push in that direction.
|
|
|
rwNqomndnosPyZzmw2kbrsQZFbnksMyDQ2
|
|
|
rfitr7nL7MX85LLKJce7E3ATQjSiyUPDfj
|
|
|
rhdAw3LiEfWWmSrbnZG3udsN7PoWKT56Qo
|
|
|
Nice, here's a euro for the Gartner hype cycle analogy ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) You seem to be the first one to have noticed it.
|
|
|
|