 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
Are people in this thread being sarcastic, or is what ATL holders look like? ATL is down 95% of its ICO price. That isn't good by any measure. The bounty ratio is mostly responsible for this.
|
|
|
|
i am ok with that. but want to understand why bounty hunters need to pass kyc to be approved to recieve the rest of bounty tokens. 7 months without kyc already passed. They explained on Telegram that KYC will be required because Atlant project is all about transparency and if you want to participate (run node, buy property, escrow, etc.) then you have to be fully verified and that is why they ask bounty hunters to do this. I don't understand this because the platform is not working and there is no scheduled date for launch any time soon so why this requirement now? We have already received payments a few times without KYC so isn't required for sure. Just don't like how they play games with us all the time. We were treated like investors only until ICO end. Just after when they got our money this sentiment changed and new regulations popped up like postponed and finally not delivered original roadmap, delayed bounty distribution, payout in 18 months, no to changing hacked addresses, and now KYC. Let's wait and look what will be next. Despite all this, the price keeps going down each day. and what if somebody will not pass kyc? what will happed with the rest of this guy's bouty? team will keep it in their pockets? I think so. If you would be not able to pass KYC your bounty will be gone in the team pockets. If this has to happen then would be better if they send all these tokens gathered from failed KYC to some charity. Only then there will be no accusations that they do it only for tokens because is obvious that quite a view of bounty hunters will not be able to pass KYC. I can't ask on Telegram questions because I am in "only read" mode and additionally Atlant doesn't allow bounty discussion there. When people ask about KYC for bounty hunters Atlant managers put warnings on them or even ban and tell to ask this questions in the bounty thread which is hilarious because there is nobody from the team active and supporting or answer questions. yes i read it. they postig that bonty questions allowed only here, but they are know better than us that here is no any respond. Yeah, this thread along with other ICO threads are a ghost town. Everybody is into Telegram these days. Conveniently the places where they can ban people that ask too many questions. |
|
|
|
|
Mods deleted my post, so I'll form it as a question, rather than the objective statement it was:
How exactly is a wallet or exchange being able to accept an ERC20 token (such at ATL) considered a partnership? Wallets can add tokens with or without permission of the project. Why do the ATL market these things as "partnerships".
|
|
|
|
|
>We can set Atlant apart as the solid and promising one.
LOL, I couldnt imagine thinking this. The team and project is a mess. The are either malicious liars or grossly ignorant.
|
|
|
|
|
ATL and other icos like it are prime cases for regulation against any project that uses bounties. Regulatory agencies like the SEC will eventually view these like ponzi schemes. In the real world, you need to be licensed before you recommend stock picks to investors. You would be committing a felony by getting compensated from any company you recommend. ATL was literally built on paying bounty hunters to shill the project to investors. So much so that bounty hunters have more tokens than actual paying investors. The optics of this are not great to regulators or future investors. Because of this, there is no way ATL will ever get any type of licensing in the United States (I'm sure they realize this).
|
|
|
|
|
This token will continue to fall. No one in their right mind will stumble upon this project and invest when they realize that this coin is majority owned by bounty hunters waiting to dump. The team gave the finger to actual investors while pampering bounty hunters that changed their signature to Atlant for a month. Bounty hunters do nothing to promote the project once their payout is locked in. This project will likely fail.
|
|
|
|
|
Look at lendingclub... there is clearly a market for the middle-ground between active and passive investing.
|
|
|
|
|
LOL, who are all these people that sold at a loss no even a week in? Yes, the devs are completely stupid for changing the ICO details in the middle of it, but it's hard to tell how deep that incompetence runs. Bought one ETH worth of ATL, and after the devs dishonesty with the ICO, I just wrote it off as 300$ down the drain, but why would you sell it for pennies on the dollar?
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, I contributed to the pre-sale. I just wanted to confirm that I will receive tokens after the ICO? I thought I would receive an intermediary token before which would be converted to ATL, but have not received... Please advise?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, just found out about this site and I am very excited for it. I was a huge fan of inTrade and have been waiting for a BTC replacement. Following up on the above comment, will you only be entertaining markets which have a set close date? I understand the difficulty in settling markets with a "floating" close, but excluding them will cut out many potentially popular ones. Is there any chance you will be including them going forward? Such markets which were present on inTrade or follow the inTrade spirit (most with "floating" close dates):
- North Korean military action market/Kim Jong-Un leadership market
- Edward Snowden/Julian Assange asylum market
- Global Warming market
- Extra-terrestrial market
- Iran/US conflict market
- Bashaar Assad presidency market
|
|
|
|
|
Created this account last year, but just getting around to activating it now... Should have logged in every time I lurked to get rid of the 4 hour wait...
|
|
|
|
Reporting in  |
|
|
|
|
