In the past, Bitcoin gambling was huge, some even say it’s what made crypto popular in the first place. Instant bets, no banks, and privacy.
But now with KYC everywhere, BTC doesn’t really give that privacy edge anymore. Add the price swings, and stablecoins (USDT, USDC, etc.) start to look more practical for gamblers.
So what do you think - is Bitcoin still the king of crypto gambling, or have stablecoins already replaced it?
I haven't seen the stats but considering how many different coins we use and the mix of coins most casinos accept, BTC could still be the leader. Even if BTC is a high price token, its fees are still very low. The fees is mostly lower than USDT (ERC) and in line with BSC network. I'm using BTC to transact to and out of casinos and if you are using segwit address and can wait, the fees are not the issue. On other hand, a new popular form of transacting USDT, USDC are given from Arbitrum and Avalanche. Though many casinos still don't support them. Whatever be the stats, its always good to have many choices, specially fast transacting, low fees coins. Bitcoin was definitely the coin that helped push crypto gambling into the spotlight in the early days it had the perfect mix of instant payments global reach and a sense of privacy that traditional systems couldn’t match back then the idea of betting without banks or middlemen felt revolutionary but the landscape has changed a lot since those times. With kyc rules becoming standard across most platforms that privacy edge isn’t really there anymore and when you add bitcoin’s price volatility it becomes less ideal for gamblers who want stability no one wants to deposit for a game and then see their balance lose value before they even place a bet this is where stablecoins come in usdt usdc and others give gamblers exactly what they need predictable value and fast transfers on certain networks. Even so bitcoin hasn’t lost its presence it’s still widely accepted and trusted by casinos and gamblers alike for many users btc remains the default option simply because it’s familiar and its fees when using segwit addresses or batching transactions can be surprisingly low compared to erc20 usdt in fact on congested days usdt on ethereum can be way more expensive than btc. That said stablecoins are becoming the practical choice for a lot of people especially with the rise of faster cheaper chains like arbitrum avalanche tron or bsc the convenience of keeping balances stable while enjoying low transaction costs makes them attractive but adoption is still catching up not every casino has built support for them yet. So at this point it feels less about “btc vs stablecoins” and more about coexistence btc still. holds.symbolic and practical weight as the king of crypto gambling but stablecoins are carving out a strong space because they solve the volatility problem the future likely belongs to a mix where btc remains a cornerstone while stablecoins steadily grow as the preferred tool for everyday players
|
|
|
--.
I don't know what will happen in 2026, whether the situation will be better or more chaotic. What we're facing now is that all the work done by both civil servants, private sector employees, and ordinary citizens seems to be set in a pattern designed to keep the majority in a "Survival" position. In fact, employee salaries haven't increased much compared to the current situation, and for non-employees and casual laborers also like this. If this situation continues, it's like we're only working to live, not living off the fruits of our labor. In reality, they're working only to pay bills, not to improve their situation. There are two sides to this pressure that will typically arise in society. The first is more positive: the ambition to work harder if even just getting by isn't enough to cover increasing needs; they must work smarter and invest. The other is that they will think hard about stealing or engaging in bad behavior in their workplaces, whether it's corruption or other activities that involve casual work and serious income. The world will always remain a capitalist state, where those with the means of production and distribution will remain in position or power and there is no equality either so you just have to fight to escape the chains of any social status you find yourself in. Even though the odds seems to be against us never to reach them and the only thing we have is to making investments so we can keep going towards the social strata. The uncertainty about 2026 is real because no one can really say whether things will ease up or get more complicated what is clear now is that most people are stuck in a cycle where survival has become the standard the wages of employees aren’t rising in proportion to the cost of living and for those outside formal employment like casual workers the struggle is even sharper life feels like an endless loop of earning just enough to settle bills without any true improvement in living standards. When society reaches that point two types of reactions often emerge some people decide to push harder maybe by seeking better skills or smarter ways to work and invest even small consistent investments can eventually create a buffer against uncertainty but the other side is darker when pressure becomes unbearable some individuals may look for shortcuts or destructive alternatives corruption theft or unethical choices in workplaces grow out of that frustration it’s a direct result of survival mode overpowering long term thinking. Capitalism by nature sustains inequality those with control over resources and systems hold on to power while the rest try to climb up the ladder it’s not built on fairness it’s built on competition and access the odds don’t favor everyone equally so the only way out is personal strategy building resilience through skills knowledge and calculated risks like investment without those efforts the cycle keeps repeating generation after generation. Breaking free isn’t easy but survival alone can’t be the goal aiming for growth even if it’s small becomes the only path forward investing in yourself and in opportunities no matter how modest keeps the door open to escape that constant grind the reality may remain tough but those small actions create cracks in the walls of the survival trap and over time they can turn into real freedom.
|
|
|
Indeed they say that prevention is better than cure and anyone that is not sure of themselves in the gambling area should better stay away from gambling because you never know when you will get addicted to it, people that feel like they will get addicted to gambling the moment they start gambling are people that already know that they can't control their emotions and it's better safe than sorry. Anyone that is trying gambling for the first time should always prepare their minds to count losses too because don't expect to win all the time and one of the ways to prevent yourself from getting addicted to gambling is never to chase losses because once you do there's no going back.
No body gets addicted to gambling by mistake bro, it is basically the actions to inactions of a gambler that often lead them to either gambling and ending up addicted or gambling and never getting addicted, like I said on another comment I just posted on another thread a while ago, addiction to gambling isn't something that happens over night, it starts in a gradual process, comes in stage by stages until it gets to a stage where even the gambler him or herself does no longer need a person or a magician to tell him or her that he is addicted, he himself can see and know for sure that he has become addicted to gambling. So personally, I would say that most times, preventing addiction to gambling is as simple as making a decision, that is simply deciding not the fall victim to it and ensuring you never do. Addiction in gambling is rarely something that sneaks in all at once it builds slowly over time in stages a person may start with just a little play for fun maybe on weekends or during free time and in that stage it feels harmless then comes the next step where they begin to notice the thrill of winning or the sting of losing once those feelings get stronger it becomes easier to justify playing more often or betting slightly larger amounts the real danger comes when they start chasing losses convincing themselves that one more round or one more deposit will fix the situation from there it slowly turns into a cycle where self control gets weaker with every spin every hand or every roll of the dice until the habit finally crosses into full addiction. This is why prevention is so important especially for people who already know they have a hard time controlling their emotions if someone feels deep inside that they might get hooked easily then the best choice is not to open that door at all because once the pull begins it gets harder and harder to resist but for those who still want to try gambling the preparation has to be strong from the very beginning that means making up your mind before you start that you will treat any money spent as money gone and never expect constant wins it also means creating clear rules like a set budget and a set time limit and sticking to them no matter how tempting it is to go beyond them. Chasing losses is the single most dangerous path because once you decide to chase you’ve already handed control over to emotion rather than logic and that’s the exact point where gambling becomes addictive so preventing addiction is not about luck or fate it’s about conscious decisions deciding to stay disciplined deciding to walk away even when you feel you shouldn’t and deciding to treat gambling strictly as entertainment and nothing more when those decisions are kept strong a person can enjoy a game here and there without falling into a destructive cycle but the moment those boundaries are ignored the slope becomes slippery and the outcome is almost always regret.
|
|
|
Trading random coins is very risky.The possibility of losses is higher than the possibility of making profits. Most of these random coins usually move with hype. Once the hype goes down, it crashes. Some traders are usually taken unaware which results in severe losses.
What most traders do is to time these new listings and enter the market early, then exit the market before the hype dies. Mind you,this approach is not for greedy traders.
For leverage trading I think the risk is usually 1:1 in my perspective reason been that if it goes your way you will most definitely get huge profit and if it goes against you it will be same, personally I think it is gamble though, but leverage traders mostly use aggregators like coinglass to look at data like the open interests, volume of shorts on that coin and even liquidation on that coin and then they pick the coin and analyze and then enter the trade, it might look random but definitely some analysis was done on it, other can fundamentals which is very important, once a trader gets a fundamental on this coins they simply trade them, like I said it carries same weight of risk. If it is spot holding or trading though it is usually a fundamental thing like news about the coin that could either brings demand or even a bearish signal to the coin. But if you see people getting some certain tokens early like meme coins, don’t be too surprised this is usually the result of cabals, because most Altcoins have insiders who usually buy lower on DEX before many will see it on top exchanges Trading random coins is always a gamble because most of them are built purely on hype without solid fundamentals the cycle is almost predictable: hype pumps the price early traders cash out and then the crash wipes out everyone else who arrived late that’s why the chance of losing is usually higher than winning unless you time the entry and exit with precision. Getting in on a new listing early and leaving before the hype fades can work but only for disciplined traders who don’t get greedy it’s a quick strike strategy not something sustainable in the long run leverage trading on the other hand amplifies both outcomes if the market goes in your favor profits are huge but if it moves against you losses are equally heavy that’s why many call it gambling still skilled leverage traders rely on data like open interest, funding rates, or liquidation levels to stack the odds slightly in their favor it’s risky but not always random. Spot trading or holding tends to be driven by fundamentals news partnerships or market sentiment if a project has a strong foundation its price movement is less chaotic than pure hype coins but like you said in many altcoin launches insiders and cabals get the best entries long before the public does by the time the average trader sees it on a big exchange the early money has already positioned itself. So whether it’s hype coins, leverage, or spot the core truth is risk management random trading without strategy almost always ends badly but with clear rules discipline and understanding of how insiders and markets operate a trader can at least avoid being the one left holding the bag.
|
|
|
Hello fellas! Sorry to ask this silly question, but was somehow actually confused on the answer to give them while having a little chats with them. I and my friends were having a little discussion about gambling and I was asked what are the gambling site I do use to gamble, and do I gamble with cash or any other means?
I simply said I do uses crypto to gamble and they were like serious? Then I said yes and they asked how trusted are these gambling sites I said I as far as I know I have been using crypto to gamble and withdrawing my little winning. They now asked me does it mean that all gambling sites that accepts crypto are trusted and reliable? I said No! Then they said what are they characteristics of choosing a reliable cryptocurrency gambling site?
At first, I paused a moment and look at them calmly and said, from where I got those site it's a reliable place, but that doesn't mean all those gambling site you see running an advert are all guaranteed or trustworthy. Then I moved forward saying; you must check their ratings and also checks about their scam rate, how fast and quickly they could release your fund or credit your deposits. All these are what I said but was that wanting to hear from the community if there are any more input to share with them maybe when I am around them.
Please respond responsibly!
A trusted crypto gambling site should have a proper license and some kind of regulation from a known authority like curaçao or malta because this shows the platform is at least following certain rules and not operating completely in the dark when there is no license or regulation it becomes very easy for them to cheat players or disappear with funds without leaving any trace after that reputation is another key point one of the best ways to check is to look around forums like bitcointalk or reddit where players openly share their experiences if you see repeated stories about people not being able to withdraw or their accounts being locked after winning then that is already a clear warning sign to stay away from the platform. Fast deposits and withdrawals are another big test of reliability a good platform should process deposits almost instantly and withdrawals within a reasonable time frame if a site constantly delays or suddenly asks for strange verifications only when you try to take money out that usually means they are not reliable at all a trustworthy crypto gambling site will pay winnings quickly without creating excuses provably fair systems are also important these are tools where you can actually verify that the results of your bets were fair and not manipulated many crypto casinos use this as one of their strongest selling points and it adds extra confidence for players.
|
|
|
Till now, I want to believe that Solana is still a profitable coin one can invest in, because despite it fall, there's still hope for it in rising back again, which is one of the admiring features I'd liked about it, because it does not behave the way other projects do, instead, it's more accurately predictable as the volatility is over specific periods, going almost on the same pace as bitcoin market is moving.
Talking about Soluna is, of course, never-ending. I owned it during severe crash, when it was at $110, or at least 7.2 Sol. At that time, there were quite a lot of rumors that the price would fall again along with BTC's correction. I only held it for 10 days, then sold it. As a result, the price rebounded to almost the same height as before the lowest drop at that time. If BNB reaches over $1,000, I'm very optimistic that Soluna will catch up sooner or later. Many say that at the same time as BNB reached its 1,000 target yesterday, SOL's progress will be even faster. In the long term, this is still a good investment. Furthermore, SOL has its own technical advantages that are hard to match high TPS, low transaction fees, and Solana will remain the "Main Home" for meme coins on its network. It's natural for SOL to fall following the leader. What we don't want is for irresponsible competitors to deliberately create stupid rumors.About a price drop if it occurs at any time for example happen in the next few days, especially at the weekend. BTC price corrections are often frequent. Hopefully, it won't be severe, but it will be positive for BTC to jump to 150K. Solana really has shown resilience compared to many other projects every time it goes through a heavy correction people think it’s finished but then it bounces back with strength the fact that it tends to move in rhythm with bitcoin makes it feel more predictable compared to tokens that pump and dump on pure hype without fundamentals. Your example of buying around $110 and holding for only 10 days before the rebound shows how quick the swings can be sometimes Solana recovers faster than expected and missing just a short window can change the outcome completely that’s why patience often plays a bigger role than timing perfectly. The comparison with BNB also makes sense if BNB manages to push beyond $1,000 the market will naturally look at sol as the next candidate to play catch-up because it has its own strong ecosystem the high tps, cheap fees, and its status as the favorite home for meme coins keep user activity flowing even when prices are shaky that underlying demand is what gives solana its staying power. It’s also true that rumors and fear around weekends or corrections can shake weak hands but those dips often give bitcoin momentum to push even higher once it stabilizes if btc does aim toward $150k it’s hard to imagine sol not following along and making new highs of its own in the long run sol still looks like one of the altcoins with solid fundamentals and strong community energy.
|
|
|
Here, politicians are often well-connected or assertive, able to break through bureaucratic walls with their temperament. Or they're the children of prominent politicians.
In my country, children of politicians end up becoming politicians themselves and so the cycle of corrupt politicians end up continuing. These wealthy people launder their money or just spend their money through gambling without any guilt or conscience for whatever they are doing. The root of this problem is within the citizen itself for still voting the same politicians over and over despite knowing they are corrupt. Their vote can be easily purchased during elections that makes them blind on the real intention of this politician. These so called nepo babies are just the product of the cycle that will keep repeating until the citizen will change their perspective. I believe on this case, Government employee involved are not truly gambling rather laundering. It really captures the cycle that traps so many countries once politics turns into a family business it stops being about service and becomes about inheritance the “nepo baby” phenomenon just feeds the same corrupt culture over and over because power and money keep passing through the same hands without accountability. The sad part is like you said the citizens themselves sometimes keep the wheel spinning when votes are sold for a short-term favor or a small amount of cash the long-term cost is ignored this blindness to intention is exactly what corrupt politicians rely on they know many won’t question as long as something immediate is offered. As for gambling in these cases it’s rarely gambling in the true sense of the word it’s often a mask for laundering dirty money casinos and similar setups provide an easy channel to wash funds and make them look legitimate so it’s less about thrill or risk and more about converting corruption into something spendable without raising eyebrows. Breaking that cycle takes both political will and citizen awareness but real change usually starts when people value integrity more than short-term gain until then the same faces will keep rotating in and out and the system keeps feeding itself.
|
|
|
I'm not so obsessed. Bitcoin is currently facing criticism, which is quite reasonable despite all the advantages of the leading cryptocurrency. Firstly, it's becoming less centralized as people like Michael Saylor are buying it up, accumulating it into a single pool. Secondly, the number of Bitcoins could ultimately exceed 21 million. A central fork is theoretically possible when the community decides the time is right, and I'm sure it will happen, crashing Bitcoin's price.
You're saying it like holding a lot of bitcoin in one place is bad. What about exchanges? They accumulate bitcoin and centralize it in a single wallet. But to fork you actually need people to vote by moving to a different chain and prefer that chain. Usually these forks die because as they say people are inherently good and want everyone to profit. A fork would probably harm everyone and they know it, which is why coins lead by scammers like BSV will never succeed, despite the narrative being they're a better alternative. Bitcoin criticism is natural especially now that it’s matured into something much bigger than a small tech experiment the points you raised are fair but they look different when you zoom in on how the system actually works. Big buyers like Michael Saylor holding a large stash do create concentration but unlike an exchange where coins are custodial and could disappear in hacks or misuse saylor’s coins are still under private keys and traceable on-chain it’s centralization of ownership but not centralization of control because nobody else can move those coins unless he decides to it’s different from exchanges where millions of user deposits are sitting in one basket and subject to operational risk. As for the 21 million cap that’s almost sacred in bitcoin culture technically yes the code could be changed but it would need near-universal consensus and the community has shown many times it values scarcity above everything the moment a fork tries to inflate supply it loses the one thing that makes bitcoin unique credibility and that’s why such a fork would likely collapse in value forks already happened with btc/bch and later bsv and each time the fork coin became weaker while btc held dominance. So while the idea of forking to increase supply is possible in theory in practice it goes against the very reason people choose bitcoin in the first place forks only survive if they add value without breaking core principles that’s why btc continues to lead and forks that ignore fundamentals fade into irrelevance.
|
|
|
For some of us this might be a moment of reflection...
Many of us gamblers comes into the casino with different intentions, some visits for relaxation and fun, others for quick profits and others as a source of income(professional gambling).
We've seen some people who claimed to come gamble for fun and during the course of having fun they switched their intention from having fun to chasing profits.
We've also learned of those who came to chase little profits and things didn't go their way and they switch intention from chasing little profits to trying to recover their losses.
Some would say the desire to get more casino bonus enticed them and made them spend more time on the casino.
The list can keep going on....
My question is what do you think are the reasons people who come to the casino with an earlier intention have a switch to a different one? maybe as it's applicable to you and how well did it end for you?
Finally, what would you propose as a solution to help weak-willed gamblers maintain their motive on the casino without deviating situationally?
When people step into a casino with one intention and end up switching to another it often comes down to emotions mixed with environment the atmosphere is built to make you forget time and logic so even someone who just wanted to play casually for fun can suddenly feel drawn into the chase of “what if” moments small wins spark greed small losses spark the urge to recover and both can shift the original motive quickly. Bonuses and promotions add another layer they make you feel like you’re missing out if you don’t keep playing it becomes less about the original reason you came and more about not leaving empty handed or thinking you’re wasting an opportunity. To keep from falling into that trap one strong method is to set hard boundaries before playing not just a budget but also a clear purpose if it’s for fun then treat the money spent as an entertainment fee and accept it’s gone once used if it’s for profit then approach it like work with defined limits just like in risk management for trading another way is to step out once emotions get too loud because that’s the signal that the original intention is already at risk. Discipline is the real tool here and it needs to be set outside the casino not while sitting at the table or machine.
|
|
|
So, I want to ask over here to know the ways or technique you uses at home to reduce and save cost.
When the demands on a particular products are high the supply tend to be limited in some cases and the only way to save costs in this economy is cutting down low on some unnecessary things knowing fully well that the price of things are very high. And then this period what I understand is that there's much availability of foodstuffs in excess in my country and i think it's due to the little investment in agriculture, like some person's took it upon themselves to plant some foodstuffs that we can find in the markets and since the rate was much it has lessen the price of things in the market and this is one area every one needs to invest or look out for as well thus it'll reduce the hike in prices of goods and commodities. Family system is important for everyone and everyone is taking actions for saving the cost and many people are doing the things to avoid more bills . Electricity bills are big debt on the economy because these are not saving cost and its price should be low in the area in which we are living. Many people are doing the investments on solar penals because that is saving the cost of the family and many people are doing the investment on the D.C fans because cost of these fans is very low .Many people are doing the investments on the useless things and they are in debt because they are doing the investment on the Car or bike because these are taking out money from these people and giving nothing to these people. One of the simplest ways people save at home is just learning to separate needs from wants when prices go up it becomes easier to see what’s really important and what can be cut out small things like cooking at home instead of eating out buying in bulk when items are cheaper or sharing costs with neighbors for things like transportation all help stretch money further. You also mentioned food and that’s a big one agriculture really shows its value when local supply is strong growing even small things like vegetables in the backyard or in containers can help households cut down grocery costs and with excess in the market prices naturally drop so supporting or even joining in small scale farming is a smart way to fight inflation. Energy bills are usually one of the hardest to manage but this is where switching to more efficient options matters solar panels even though costly up front really cut down bills long term same with d.c. fans and energy-saving bulbs people sometimes underestimate how much these little switches save across years. On the other side like you said some people get stuck in debt because they buy cars or bikes that drain fuel money maintenance and insurance instead of helping them earn sometimes it’s better to invest in assets that either reduce daily expenses or bring back income.
|
|
|
I’ve been following the news here in the Philippines and honestly, things are heating up. The flood control scandal is all over the place, trillions of pesos allegedly stolen through ghost projects and substandard works. People are already mad, and the trust in government feels like it’s at an all-time low.
It got me thinking… if sites like Polymarket or other prediction markets open a line on whether the President will finish his term or not, I’d be interested to see the odds. Might even place a bet if the line looks good.
Of course, betting on politics is always tricky, anything can happen. But with the mood on the ground right now, I can’t help but wonder if there’s real value in a market like this.
So before I even think of putting money on it, I’d like to hear your thoughts. Do you think he’ll still manage to serve out the full term despite the scandals? Or is the pressure just going to get too heavy?
If you ask me i think he’ll probably still finish the term scandals like this are heavy and they really shake people’s trust but history shows leaders usually hang on unless the political elites themselves decide to cut ties the masses can get loud and angry but without the power players shifting their support it’s hard to push someone out and that’s the part most people forget real change at that level doesn’t just happen because of outrage it happens when those with influence see their own interests at risk. What i do see happening is that his grip gets weaker over time more compromises will be made more backroom deals will surface and you’ll probably see a handful of allies sacrificed to ease the tension throwing people under the bus is one of the oldest tricks in the book when the goal is survival scandals like this create fractures in the inner circle and he will likely spend the rest of the term just trying to keep the cracks from spreading too far. The pressure is real and every new headline chips away at his legitimacy but stepping down or being forced out feels unlikely unless something far bigger and more explosive stacks on top of this right now it looks more like a slow erosion than a sudden collapse so yeah the heat will keep building and people will stay angry but my bet is that he rides it out bruised battered and maybe even isolated yet still holding onto the position until the very end.
|
|
|
Substance abuse or not, a successful trader doesn't get to be asked the kind of substance they take or not take after a big return on investment and that's what makes substance abuse irrelevant to the discussion of trading. What matters is the decisions a trader make while trading and the results they get at the end of the day of which one who is wise enough would calculate the risk involved in such endeavor and either discipline themselves to reduce it, quit it in total or increase the volume of substance intake.
Trading involves risk management and of course risk management should include among others, the kind of substance traders take while making trading decisions as well as the amount spent on investment while trading, purchase of substance and future health implications.
Substance abuse or not when people look at a trader the first thing they see is the result if the trader just closed a big position with heavy profits nobody really cares to trace back what state of mind or what chemical influence might have been present the headlines always read about gains and percentages not about cups bottles or pills yet behind the scenes these things can shape decision making and sometimes people don’t realize it until it’s too late. Trading itself is like walking a line that stretches between focus and chaos and every choice made while standing on that line carries weight substances might give someone a temporary push of energy or confidence but they can also distort judgment increase emotional swings and create habits that eat away at discipline slowly if risk management is the heart of trading then anything that bends the mind belongs in that calculation too because poor health or dependency is a hidden liability waiting to surface. The part that often gets ignored is how the costs extend beyond the charts every dollar spent on substances is a dollar not compounding in an account every late night or lost hour of sleep is time not invested in studying patterns or preparing strategies the irony is that traders often obsess over tiny margins on price action but overlook the bigger margins lost when they weaken themselves with habits that drain their sharpness. So while profit might make substance use seem irrelevant on the outside a deeper look shows it is still tied to the whole ecosystem of trading the tools strategies money flow health habits everything connects and if one pillar collapses the rest can’t hold for long a trader who treats body and mind as part of their capital is the one who can keep building without watching their foundation rot away.
|
|
|
It was a personal decision on the side of the casino to honor these payments probably because they are within the position where they can afford to do so and have made and benefited enough from the gamblers in Romania. I'm pretty sure that the company has evaluated their chances of still remaining a credible casino if they refuse to honor such payments even it happened because of a glitch. The company must have considered that they stand to profit more in the future from gamblers honoring and playing games in their casino than refusing to pay gamblers who have won the certain amounts.
The fact that the casino has honored these payments will definitely increase their customer base and it will not belong for the company to recoup the losses that they've made from this glitch whilst keeping the operations running. It will be a different scenario if the company refuses to pay gamblers and then find out most of the gamblers who gambled on their platform no longer want to remain there. That would be a loss to them.
The company is losing the battle to win the war.
Honestly if both give me the same 100 a day right now i’d go for entrepreneurship cause at least it has room to grow and i can build something of my own a job feels safer and steady but it’s capped and it ties me down to someone else’s rules i’d listen to my parents cause they care but at the end i’d follow my own principles since i’m the one who has to live with the choice. With a job you know you’re secure you know money will come every week but you also know you won’t suddenly double or triple that without years of climbing up the ladder with entrepreneurship yeah it’s risky but the possibility of creating something bigger keeps me more motivated i’d rather take the chance now than regret later when i’m older and less willing to risk. For me it’s not just about the money it’s about the freedom to create and the chance to leave something behind that’s truly mine i think life is short and if i can try something bold while i have the energy and the time then it’s worth it even if i fail at least i’ll know i chose the path that felt right to me instead of just following the safer route because that’s what others wanted.
|
|
|
Before this bull run, there were diverse predictions about the price Bitcoin would reach. The most popular one was $100k and others also felt it would go above that amount. Bitcoin's ATH stands at $124,290.93.
In your own view, do you think Bitcoin performed below or above your expectations in this bull run?
It is very dependent on people entries and different people will different entries would feel different about the market. Like people who DCA bitcoin since 2023 and hold it till 2025, I believe that they would have gotten very good profit and would feel happlily. People who did not DCA but bought bitcoin around $15,000 or $20,000 would feel enough with profit now. Oppositely, people who about bitcoin around $100,000 or $110,000 would feel it's not enough and they expect Bitcoin price continues to rise to $150,000 or $200,000. From $15,000 to $117,000, the ROI is very good and it is only about 2 years and 8 months of holding. Bitcoin’s performance in this bull run really depends on where you entered and what your expectations were if you started accumulating during the long consolidation back in 2022–2023 with prices around $15k to $20k then hitting an all time high above $124k looks extraordinary that’s a life changing return in less than three years and for those investors the bull run clearly exceeded expectations. But for people who entered much later at $90k or $100k the story feels different they’re sitting on smaller gains or maybe even waiting to break even so naturally their outlook is shaped by hoping for $150k or even $200k targets when the market slows down after hype those late entries can feel frustrating. In a way bitcoin’s run above $124k is both above and below expectations above in the sense that the recovery from the lows was faster and stronger than many predicted but below in the sense that the most hyped predictions of $200k haven’t materialized (at least not yet). Overall the cycle has shown once again why patience and consistent buying strategies like DCA make more sense than chasing peaks the long term holders who stayed through the quiet years usually come out ahead while those who jump in at the height of optimism often end up waiting longer for the payoff.
|
|
|
2) Does that regret actually make you change the way you gamble, or do you just move on and keep playing? 3) Could it be that regret itself is part of the cycle that keeps us coming back to gamble?
Curious to hear your stories.
It is a different thing to say you will stop gambling and to say you will stop betting in a particular pattern or betting a particular team. I have seen gamblers who have vowed not to bet on a particular team because of their failing experience with the team. So I think a gambler who says he won't gamble again but goes back almost immediately to it is only being an irresponsible gambler but if you say it and after some months you try it out again, it is still fair than to jump on it just after few hours from the regret. However, the most that I have seen is gamblers not betting on some clubs because of their failure rate with the club, for example Manchester United  It is normal to feel regret in gambling because it is part of the game but after something, you can go back to it especially with some people who have the habit of gambling. Regret is almost built into gambling because no matter how much you win or lose there’s always that thought of “i could have done it differently” sometimes the regret pushes people to step back and change their approach but a lot of the time it just feeds back into the cycle they chase the next bet to undo the mistake or prove themselves right. What you said about gamblers avoiding specific teams or patterns is interesting it shows how regret doesn’t always stop gambling altogether it just shifts the behavior maybe someone swears off betting on manchester united because they’ve lost too many times but then they just redirect that same energy into another match or another strategy the habit continues the focus changes. The cycle works like this anticipation to action to result to regret to justification to new anticipation regret plays a role in keeping that wheel spinning because instead of breaking the cycle many gamblers turn it into a reason to try again only differently. Some people can laugh it off and move on others get trapped replaying their mistakes and doubling down the difference usually comes down to discipline and self control without it regret just becomes another step toward the next bet rather than a warning sign to slow down.
|
|
|
The year is almost over and Bitcoin is still going up and down which is understandable to me, but Bitcoin reaching $150k this year? I don't doubt it and I don't believe it either, I'm just relaxed with my fingers crossed while still holding on to my Bitcoin because anything is possible in the Bitcoin space and I'm waiting to see how it plays out at the end of the year. Since the new recorded ATH was at $124k I'm hoping that it would at least reach $130k before we think of seeing it at $150k next year, some people even predicted it at $200k $250k but I think that's extreme and they will be disappointed.
Bitcoin is a very volatile asset and that really makes it difficult to predict correctly what that price will be at any given time or period, investors can only speculate but still can’t predict exactly what the price will be. Yes, bitcoin have the potential to go above $150k and also it have the potential to go as low as $90k or even more lower. We as long term investors we can only live with the conviction that Bitcoin price will continue to go up even though it goes down at a particular point in time. Bitcoin always carries that unpredictability it can smash expectations in either direction in a very short time that’s why people throw out wild predictions like $200k or even $250k but the truth is no one can forecast it with certainty. Looking at the current range between the last ATH at $124k and possible support levels near $90k it makes more sense to think in steps than in leaps if it pushes past $130k it builds a new base for bigger moves later maybe $150k becomes realistic next year rather than in the final stretch of this one. The volatility is the double edged sword it’s what gives bitcoin the chance to multiply in value over time but also what makes short term predictions unreliable the only strategy that has consistently worked for long term investors is conviction combined with patience ride the waves instead of trying to time every crest and dip. In the end bitcoin’s story isn’t about whether it hits $150k this year or next it’s about the trajectory across years with supply halving cycles adoption growth and market demand pointing toward long term appreciation.
|
|
|
Aside from this personal experience, there are also lots of benefits gained from gambling, which can be read in this article: https://efirbet.com/en/benefits-of-gambling/To list them: - Gambling Makes Players Happier
- Improves Intelligence
- Helps With Getting to Know New People
- Helps Local Economies
- Gambling Helps People Have Fun
- Helps With Money
- Government Collects Taxes
- Casinos Create Jobs
- Reduces Stress
- Gambling Improves Concentration
Basically, that's garbage from a party interested in people betting heavily, the site that advertises itself as a “Trusted Bettor Advisor.” Much of what is said there is outright false: “helps with money”? “reduces stress”? What a load of crap. Some of what it says is true, such as that casinos create jobs, but that's often the best way to lie, mixing truths with lies. Gambling promotions often sound polished because they highlight only the parts that look beneficial while quietly burying or twisting the darker sides of the activity when an article lists things like “improves intelligence” “reduces stress” or “helps with money” it is using clever marketing language designed to make gambling feel safe even helpful in daily life but these points collapse quickly when compared with real outcomes. The truth is gambling can provide entertainment for people who set strict limits and treat it like paying for a movie or a night out at a concert the excitement and social aspect can feel rewarding in the moment but once the line is crossed into chasing wins or believing it will fix money problems the situation often spirals into debt anxiety and damaged relationships. Stress relief is one of the most misleading claims the thrill of a win may temporarily distract someone from their worries but the underlying odds ensure that consistent losses are more likely than wins over time the stress of losing money and the urge to recover it usually cause more mental strain than relief. On the economic side casinos and betting companies do create jobs and generate tax revenue but the benefits are often offset by the social costs addiction treatment programs family support services and lost productivity also burden communities this is why governments often walk a fine line between allowing gambling for revenue and trying to manage the damage it creates.
|
|
|
Both salary and profit are both rewards for actions. Think about it; salary is paid in most cases just twelve times a year, yes twelve times, profit on the other end can be earned any day, and any time of the year, off course a return on investment.
Salary can be seen as a quick fix, working and expecting to be paid mostly at the end of a given period. Another thought is; salary is mostly paid by profit earners.
A steady turnover of profit in most cases is as a result of consistent entrepreneurial effort.
The volume and impact of a salary and profit is incomparable with that of profit.
Plus what is reinvested from salary and profit is a big margin, it is more likely to reinvest a large chunk of profit, than that if a salary which is mostly used to pay accumulated bills.
Profit over salary, any time any day!
Salary and profit are both outcomes of effort but the way they shape life is very different salary is predictable and steady it shows up twelve times a year like you said and that predictability helps people plan their monthly expenses bills rent food and savings it offers a sense of security because you know when and how much is coming. Profit on the other hand is flexible and can happen any time it’s the result of entrepreneurial effort taking risks building systems and finding opportunities while it doesn’t come with the same certainty as salary it can grow without limit in theory the more successful the venture the larger the profit and unlike a fixed paycheck it isn’t capped by hours worked. Another key difference is reinvestment a salary is often stretched thin by recurring expenses leaving little to put back into growth profit however naturally pushes you to reinvest because you see the potential for scaling what worked once can be multiplied the cycle of reinvestment makes profit a stronger engine for wealth building. Salary keeps life stable profit builds wealth over time one is about security the other is about freedom depending on the season of life someone is in both have their place but for creating long term impact profit tends to outweigh salary.
|
|
|
I wonder if you had ever gambled because of what you saw from your horoscope or something similar? How did it end? Horoscopes and tarot readings will not help you win in gambling, but they can set a good mindset for how you will proceed in gambling, like if your horoscope says that the color green is a good color for you in any venture, it may not help you win in gambling, but at least you will feel good that you are wearing something that could attract luck, but you should not have an expectation that will eventually lead to gambling because no tarot or horoscope readers will tell you that will in gambling in a given day. These horoscopes should not be treated as a tool to help you win in gambling; they sometimes help you get a winning run, but it's never an established fact and can be considered a coincidence. Horoscopes and tarot readings carry a kind of mystery that makes people curious and sometimes hopeful when it comes to gambling the idea of being told that today is your lucky day or that a certain number or color will favor you can feel exciting and reassuring it can even reduce fear before placing a bet because it gives the illusion of control in a space where outcomes are mostly random. When someone acts on a horoscope prediction the outcome isn’t changed by the stars or the cards it is determined by probability and odds if a slot machine pays out or a dice roll lands on a number it happens because of chance not destiny yet what the horoscope does affect is the state of mind if you believe green brings luck and you wear it you feel more relaxed and positive that mindset can make you gamble with less anxiety and more enjoyment. But there is also a risk if the predictions are taken too seriously some gamblers end up chasing losses thinking the stars must turn things around for them soon they can fall into the trap of believing in a guaranteed win and that leads to over betting or ignoring limits in this sense horoscopes are harmless only if treated as fun or ritual not as a guide for financial decisions. So in the end horoscopes and tarot add a layer of personal comfort they might set a mood or boost confidence but they cannot change the math behind gambling at best they serve as a psychological cushion a little ritual that makes the experience feel lighter while the real results always depend on chance.
|
|
|
|