Show Posts
.........Nubbins and I both agreed that ANACS does not break the chain since they left my possession (ANACS is obviously a trusted source).
Nubbins have been talking shit about ANACS for years, he say that they cannot be trusted.
Example:
http://bitcoinstats.com/irc/bitcoin-otc/logs/2013/12/31
Quote from: Nubbins
(c) i don't trust ANACS enough
The chain is broken as soon as the coin is in custody of someone not able to sign and extend the chain.
By your logic nubbins never got a valid coin then. Did the mail person get included in the chain? Unless he drove and got them chain is broken? ANACS is more trusted with coins than anyone here. We almost need a clear set of rules to follow for this or a standard created. Paging nubbins...
Yes. The chain is broken as soon as the coin leave Mike.
Let's be real here. The PGP scheme is invented by Nubbins: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=268965.0
Mike addressed the problem by issuing digital signed PDF (not the same as PGP): https://casascius.wordpress.com/2013/04/28/i-am-taking-orders-again/
The scans can be used "to aid in establishing their authenticity".
Nubbins PGP signature on top is not needed.
