I think the OP tried to make it look like this, but does know very well whats wrong.
I do not quite understand what you mean by that sentence.
What exactly is wrong in chatting with people when nobody ever complained that I asked for anything?
Your "Daist14" posts (that led to this discussion) are consistently moments apart.
You are not (previously) "chatting" as claimed, you are flying from thread to thread, 1 post and gone.
"chatting" implies continued response/debate. (please do not start "chatting" with your other accounts)
I had to move from thread to thread because when you are in a signature campaign, you try to cover as many sections as you possibly can and you can't tell me it's wrong to do so.
I got this quote from Meta.
Topic: Unofficial list of (official) Bitcointalk.org rules, guidelines, FAQ
18. Having multiple accounts and account sales are allowed, but account sales are discouraged.
I have not broken the rule on this forum by having multiple accounts. MPREP who is ALSO A STAFF has made this absolutely clear in Meta.
I did not buy the account since any mod can verify the password has never changed.
So why is Lauda picking this up?
Attacking someone for multiple accounts is AGAINST the official rules of this forum as stated by MPREP himself, please remove the negative trusts. I did not try to scam anyone.