Show Posts
|
Pages: [1]
|
Hi to everybody,
can somebody please provide a link to all mandatory legal informations like company name, place of registration, executive directors etc.?
Thanks & regards
I think this information is best to ask the team itself or look in white paper, I think there should be such an item That's exactly the question - Who is the team? There are no mandatory legal informations at all, the websites name is registered in Panama and they ask for private keys on the webwallet. Does that ring some bells?
|
|
|
Hi to everybody,
can somebody please provide a link to all mandatory legal informations like company name, place of registration, executive directors etc.?
Thanks & regards
|
|
|
Lol, yes, just had a discussion with my lawyers, there are no patents pending.
I put up a rescue fund contract with adjustable ownership.
So do not ask for the address.
Cheers, mates!
|
|
|
Just wanted to say that i appreciate your way, Parker, to get back to a true, maybe to technical, discussion. Including Gleb (i never talked to him before) as a warning instance in, let's say in ICO deserts.
Nothing personal, definetly nothing, but we have to cope with a new quality of hacking, trolling whatever.
And if i'm the first that keeps the light up for a good idea under heavy storms, then i am.
Again, this idea is to smart to get burried by bought trolls that try to buy time for competitors.
I literally give a fuck who wins in this childish battle. I know i will try to put this idea into real world.
Very quickly.
Got that, trolls?
regards,
Hydro
|
|
|
@Gleb: Yes, i "activated" my old account, and of course didn't remember that password since, yesterday. I read all the insults and anything you've been offended with. I absoluty understand your anger - But as Parker does, we might try put this discussion back to non personal tracks.
The point is, i've had this idea some years ago but i failed to program a multi mobile OS client / proxy that does "hidden" calls on behalf of an app.
The only OS that might, technically, allow hidden calls is Android. No way with Apple, or, at those times, Blackberry. Or Windows mobiles.
And anyway, i've been working with, how they call it, "masternodes", in projects, especially Genesys related, that simply have some whatever 100 sim cards attached and might do the proxy function even without mobile gateways. But only 100's - Thoses are billion gateways to call our old school parents on landline. So to say.
IF ziber is a scam, and i will NEVER predict right now wether it is or not, those guys have / had a interesting idea.
And guess what, if thoses trolls and hackers succeed, let's pick up that and buy the patents (if those naive dudes even did that) and relaunch it. Without ICO, trolls, hackers and other social bullshit. A pure, clean disrupting project. Gleb, i count on you ;-)
The tricky way to catch providers at their weakest point with giving free calls within their network - just to attract more customers - is, well, nice.
Let's see where this is some weeks later,
regards,
Hydro
|
|
|
And Dudes from Ziber, if you ever read this and are true, call the, yeees, centralized ICANN to just top-down block all DNS requests to ziber.io
|
|
|
Btw, did somebody check the vita of "Ziber" here?
I'll bet it's in no way related to Ziber.
|
|
|
Wow, we see an epic fight trolls and hackers vs. a brilliant idea.
Who ever wins, the idea will stay.
And i promise as a 47 dude that planned VoIP networks all over the world, the idea is brilliant and will - stay.
I can't imagine that all thoses fairs, that, well, pre-alpha-Client was a foundation for a scam?
As i wrote earlier, then that is the biggest scam - regarding efforts - of all times.
And then, they even deserve my funds.
regards,
Hydro
|
|
|
"Dear partners, we are restoring control over the ziber, everything is fine."
- some minutes ago on facebook
Maybe i'm too naive, but IF it is, that would have been the biggest scam, regarding efforts on Ziber side, ever - And even then they would deserve my funds, lol
|
|
|
Looks like Version 0.2.4 crashes after startup with
Assertion failed: rc == 0 || zmq_errno () == ETERM, file zsockopt.c, line 976
on machines having the previous host/port error now...
|
|
|
@extremal:
Can you please tell me why i just get this with silentarmy version? I asked and ask but never get answer...
Connecting to frontend: coinsforall.io:6668 ... ERROR: invalid hostname and/or port.
Getting always this error with all your versions..somehow you never responds to that bug.
As stated 4-5times earlier if i use the zcashgpuclient.exe it works. So something is wrong with the parsing..or do i need to enter something different?
Sounds like a conf file have you checked it carefully or changed anything in it? 1 space off will mess ya up lol server = "coinsforall.io";port = "6668";# Your ZCASH payout addressaddress = "t1xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";# etc. I don't think its a bug.... if it were, more of us using W7 64 and 8 (yuk) would be seeing same issue It actually is. We see that on several, especially the faster, miners. If you set "Instances" to "1" in the config, it is gone. I would put this on a timing issue when opening the sockets for both instances. Meanwhile, you still can start 2 instances manually again...
|
|
|
Can you check why hashrate is not reported to etc nanopool?
|
|
|
@Claymore: May it be possible to implement a "-tteth", like an automatic "-li" vs. GPU maximum temperature, feature (like "-ttdcr" for eth)? This would be great for maxing out the eth rate in volatile temperature enviroments...
regards,
Gösta
|
|
|
@Claymore: First of all: GREAT work. We can see avr. gains around 10% on our 295x2 cards. One little thing left - Your miner only gives temp stats for 1 GPU per card only, therefore can't stop if set max. temp is reached on a non-monitored GPU. We played around with all various parameters with no success. Can you check that? Will provide any help if requested... Thanks and regards, Tender
I don't have 295 card so I cannot check it easily. Have you disabled CrossFire? Usually it helps if ADL finds one card instead of two. Crossfire is disabled, even with one card only it does not see the second GPU temp. Same with 390x2, probably all Dual-GPU cards, can somebody confirm? Does someone use Dual-GPU cards & can confirm that the miner only sees the temp of the first GPU per card? regards, Tender
|
|
|
@Claymore: First of all: GREAT work. We can see avr. gains around 10% on our 295x2 cards. One little thing left - Your miner only gives temp stats for 1 GPU per card only, therefore can't stop if set max. temp is reached on a non-monitored GPU. We played around with all various parameters with no success. Can you check that? Will provide any help if requested... Thanks and regards, Tender
I don't have 295 card so I cannot check it easily. Have you disabled CrossFire? Usually it helps if ADL finds one card instead of two. Crossfire is disabled, even with one card only it does not see the second GPU temp. Same with 390x2, probably all Dual-GPU cards, can somebody confirm?
|
|
|
@Claymore:
First of all: GREAT work. We can see avr. gains around 10% on our 295x2 cards.
One little thing left - Your miner only gives temp stats for 1 GPU per card only, therefore can't stop if set max. temp is reached on a non-monitored GPU. We played around with all various parameters with no success.
Can you check that? Will provide any help if requested...
Thanks and regards,
Tender
|
|
|
Hi,
it's said that the "... Default share difficulty = 512. You can set difficulty with d=xxx as your miner password..."
But whatever i enter as my worker password, neither in cgminer nor on the website, difficulty is always set to 8192 (shown as 8.19k in cgminer, line 5).
What's wrong?
regards,
Tender
|
|
|
|