any plans to add DSX exchange?

Don't hope yourself with empty promises from MT.
how they could send cards if they do not show any terms and fees for new card provider?

actually, they do not have new card provider and don't get in soon.
Usually it's a long process and you can see on other EMI who were lost cards because of work with crypto - almost nobody recover card.
And few ones who do it (wirex, spectrocoin, etc) spend almost year for it.

Just go to another EMI who could give you a card, instead of listen infinite promises from support that is actually useless.

The owners of this bot are scammers.
They are originally created signals group altcointrader.co which took money and dissapeared.
After it they are created this bot and asked to move here, just before leaving original group.

Despite the fact this bot is useless, everyone need to be aware of using it, because owners are make fraud.
So, again:
DONT USE IT OR YOU WILL TOP UP LIST OF 400+ PEOPLE WHO WAS AFFECT BY THIS FRAUD

А как вы обоснуете деятельность для фискалов будучи ФЛП при выводе денег из крипты?
Т.к. отправитель денег будет биржа, она вам не даст ни инвойс, ни договор под ваш вид деятельности.
А соотвественно и первичной документации правильной для фискалов не будет.
В этом случае, наличие ФЛП так такового от обычного физ лица не отличается: деньги пришли(возможно), налоги за них заплатить вроде как и можно, а произвести доказательство их легальности из-за отсутствия первичной документацией не выйдет.

is it medirectbank provide account opening for non BE residents? On the online form, it seems to me that you need to be BE resident to open account here.

is it any plan to add wex exchange (ex btc-e) support to cat?

polo added additional protection against ddos which require captcha checking before logic. it affect all bots as well.
you could use proxy or vpn for avoid login problem or ask Sampey to implement captcha checking on polo with cat.

First of all not all have lost money now. Its a wrong assumption, as well many other wrong assumption in this thread. But its a different topic.

About cat.
In this case also 1-1.5% profit by cat is not fair too, because it absolutelly not cover what going on the next.

But stop, why do you even tell fair or no?
With manual trading i out of btc, and using short trading to have profin even on bear market. Cat can do from design? Yes, for sure. Is it actually do it? Yep, With big complexity.
So, if you review this as a piece of software that do something- its great. But primary goal to follow trading algo of user, not the powerfull part of cat.

If you talk exactly about BTC/USD or USD/BTC markets, in almost all cases this means that actual market is USD/BTC on crypto exchange.
Which means you are trading with assets called BTC by using currency USD. This information CAT grabs from the exchange directly on API level.

In the crypto exchanges, some misspelling, and some incorrect information present. But mostly all of them mean that you trade and get profit in USD.
For example, bitstamp on all titles show BTC/USD, but in fact on tradeview, on API level, etc it's act like a USD/BTC.
I think in this case we could only ask Sampey to make a preference option, where the market pair could be swapped and calculated depending on user request. For example, if user want USD/BTC - everything is calculating with USD gain, with 'swap' enabled option CAT would start with BTC gain calculation.
Technically it's a depend on CAT's implementation: it would be hard or easy do this.
But my expectation that CAT is not ready for this feature and Sampey will deny such request.

Just to be honest, few questions:
1. What is a percentage of profit with CAT that you are used from the time you buy it? It seems to me that is negative because of loss during dump of coins.
In my opinion - the value of the bot it's a not how great it could harvest coins during pump and bull's time, but in the ability to save it during dump.
It's a major problem of all trading software and I don't see big difference with competitors here.
So, literally saying it's a pretty branded car which is looks good, but very hard to drive, because it have great engine and no breaks;)

2. What products for trading you are compared to? Because how good or bad product it's a just relative to some other products.
Saying that something great or not great without comparing it's a nothing.
Support from Sampey is great, okay, but other products with well-defined documentation even don't require such support .
So, from the service point of view support it's great, but from product point of view it's a just covering of bad documentation:).
You asked support for same questions: logs, setting, preferences, losing money during trading, questions about algo, etc.
I asked about exactly same questions, every other user asked about exactly same questions. So, this question need to be covered in documentation, one time for all users. Not more.
But it's a Sampeys decision to change 'good documentation' to something called 'good support' that cover 'bad documentation'.  Your view about this that it's a pretty good feature, but my view that it's a shiny wrap of a bad thing.

Will you be happy if your car breaks down everytime, but you still have a good 24/7 phone call support who could help you with on-field repair?  I prefer car  that just don't breaks down so often.


3. When you talk about all these pros of software, do you really think that CAT is really possible to maintain with the unlimited number of computers? Because I think it's a not truth, because as you said before - CAT requires a lot of attention for each market. So, to be honest, it's a only 'marketing view' that in theory you could setup any number of markets. It real world you will be limited to the number of your hands that could control CAT 24/7.  So just don't need to tell unlimited, because it's practically not possible and don't have sense with current CAT.

I prefer not to declare what CAT is not really because from the Sampeys documentation or from your review for new users it looks like a 'money machine'.
In fact it absolutely does not. It requires a lot of time to learn, setup, maintain to have continuous profit and cover loss. And this note for some reason is hidden from the top view by showing nice wrapper about tons of features and great support. My strict opinion - Not fair to the customer.

I have "always working paremeter" setup which will give you profit for all time exchange is working.  Without any matter what is going on the market.
It need worked cat, working exchange and at least some trading volume on the market and of course some money for trade.
Single shortage of it - low-profit level which only up to few percent of the portfolio at a month.
So it exists for sure

About universal parameters - I believe if instead of just rejecting his question you give him answers like I wrote in above message - he will agree. Its normal.
But you fall into extremes, with short answer: no examples.
It's a like a coming to shop, viewing price for item but no chance to see or test it and don't have any specs.
As a customer, I absolutely agree with him that before purchase it is normal to get some specific number/details/test period that allow to verify product.

Great feedbacks(that you mention) it's a nothing.
It's a only view of other people.
If you look to sport car, you can get tons of feedbacks that toyota is great, but is absolutely nothing comparing to porsche.
If you know what I mean;)



You could insert statistics grabber to your application and see that it's a wrong.
I could give you 100% confidence that 90% of boxes inside the application is just for tick that such feature is present.
But it didn't do anything useful about trading and giving more or less profits.
It's a good that you follow user request, but I think you also know that many times users just don't know what they need:)
Now it's a exact same situation - a lot of features change the behavior of application, but it's a nothing to the trading algorithm. It's a like a button "I want pizza" in the    
rudder of your car. Someone (lest say 1 person from 1000) could use it once per year, but it still useless thing and naturally should be done by different things.



You need to have the balance between coding/testing/docs/support.
It's a natural way of any software product, no matter you are alone or team, it's a hobby or full time project.
I think spending some hours to increase the quality of manual will save a lot of more time during support.
Personally, I use not only your product in crypto world. Almost all are hobby projects.
But projects with great documentation even don't require me to ask anything at support. It's a real life fact.

I am agree with winnway.
Lack of good examples for settings it's a big problem of cat.

For example you could look to the gunbot docs with charts on market and description of what and how it work.
But there absolutely nothing in cat docs about it.
Simple describing of each input box useless, for sure.
 90% of settings users are not used, just because those such of settings don't need in 99% time of trading.

I would suggest, that 3 examples of cat settings would cover most of time for mostly all of users.

1. Example for pumping/growing/bull market.
Show typical chart of pumping market (for example btc/usd at last half of year), show setting that allows to make gains in this market and show approximate gain for the portfolio in this case.

2. Example for dumping/bearish market.
Show typical chart of dumping market (for example btc/usd or eth/usb at last month), show setting that allows to make gains in this market and show approximate gain for the portfolio in this case.

3. Example for flat/low volatility market.
Show typical chart of low volatility market (for example usd/eur or some kind of btc/doge in last year). Do the same as before.

Just for this setting you could show chart like this :
https://www.coinigy.com/s/i/59677e86909fc/
Green arrow - buy orders, red - sell orders.
It's what my cat done in last few days in one of markets.
For this style of flat trading you need to set low limit, the high limit for pings, gain level for pongs, ping/pong step level, etc. Nothing hard, but as a template allow to cover any flat market.

So, for 80% of all time, you just could change preset for some market depend on it state and continue have profits instead of thinking on what need to be changed in settings.
It's a peace-of-cake comparing to the time hours spending for product development, but help the users a lot.

Example with TillKoeln when he setup 891 markets for catch big pump in low volatile coins it's a relly such weak example of cat usage as an automatical trading so I even don't want to hear such stories. It's a not сonceived algo, just a hope for big pump and gain because of it.  Nothing better that manual buy of same coins, plate limit sell orders and wait when they completed. nothing about automatical trading.

Good trader don't require big pumps to make profit, it just need any kind of volatility for make gain. I believe winnway wants to inform this in his original questions.

Wirex,
please see at ticket #91534.
Waiting for a few days without answer.

the couple more:

6. improve load/save market by additionally saving statistics. Also during load, do restore of statistics and gains from cvs. It would allow having continuous statistics of the bot. not only local run.

7. redesign static ping pong mode.
instead of having buy X, sell Y value, you could have value for delta, for example in %.
So the logic of buy/sell pong prices will be calculated from the ping price and delta.
When pong is completed, price changes using delta and make ping price again.
This will allow to create ladder-style orders.
For example will be next sequence:
- delta 10%
- user create static ping for buy at 100.
- cat created pong at 100+10%, sell it.
after ping-pong, cat use (pong price - 10%) for create ping order at price 100.
Actual math will be not (pong - delta), but the (pong/((delta/100)+1)). It's just technical details, not so important.
So, in fact, loop for all ping pongs will be 100 - 110 - 100 - 110 - 100 ..., same as with current static mode, if you define 100 and 110
But at the same time at same market you could create with this delta orders at levels 80+10%, 90+10%, 110+10%, etc.
Also, dynamic orders could be more flexible here with such logic.

One thing that as I understand, when value is coming to the pool, you do not track pong. So, implementation of original ping price calculation could be tricky. In this case, a shortcut that avoids placing to the pool could help.

Here is a list for issues and improvements that could be done with cat:
1. delete older logs during the running of the cat, but not only during start-up.
Many users use VPS, VM, dedicated machines with limited resources. With long time run CAT at many markets use a lot of disk space, which could to cause a problem. Making thread inside application that will just periodically run cleaning routines will do the work.

2. UI dialogs for Save/Load market/order is not very well designed.
It would be good in dialogs for load and save will have the caption with exact action that was selected (not a 'Select', but for example 'Save Market Orders'). If you misclick at UI, you could verify with dialog name this.

Second it's a default filters for save/load files. Since we work with xml files I suppose need to use it as default filter for file selection. And as a option *.* if user use other extension.


3. Load market/order didn't load correctly values to the pool. I.e. if you run cat with some value in pool, save market/order, restart cat, load market/order pool value will be 0. If users algo is based on limiting ping order it is effectively stop algo from working at all.


3. Orders & Trades -> Ping Trade table usually come with error during editing values inside there. For example, you have 2 orders in Ping Trade, and want to edit both of them. Usually, work only first one, the second one showed error with null pointer exception. Editing pings orders and pongs orders could cause to same errors too, but it's a mostly when you edit order in the time when it fired in market. It seems to me, logic of working with editings of orders is not safely designed.

4. UI part with presets work. When you load market/orders from the file, 'presets' combo box show 'Default Dynamic' instead of 'Current Running'. it confuses.

5. Columns in the spreadsheets of the gains are not aligned to the width of data inside each column.
For example column "Start Trade" will have only 4 chars, but it have width same to the Cumulative Gain, which could be millions of value or Timestamp that is not fit well to the default width of column


6. improve load/save market by additionally saving statistics. Also during load, do restore of statistics and gains from cvs. It would allow to have continuous statistics of the bot. not only local run.

Hm, are you serious? How the 90% of GUI desktop applications correctly runs at any resolution and screens if there is no solution?

You actually have a lot of solutions for fix.
Instead of do in JFrameCAT
this.setSize(1500, 900);

you can do
1. this.setExtendedState(JFrame.MAXIMIZED_BOTH);

2. or define constants for size much lower than current one

3. or detect screen size and limit JFrameCAT by screen size if it NOT high.

4. use command line attributes for define custom frame size.

Or the real good solution here is start CAT with dimension what was used in the previous run. So, each start of CAT don't require to resize frame.
In this case, if user have many monitors and instances of CAT, he could 1 time do cascade view setup depend on how he like and use this setting forever.

All solutions above (except last one, which is really good design view step) it's a couple lines of code which are literally required a couple of minutes to do.

Sure, if i ask about this problem.

Coz you on windows.
Different OS not everytime allow resize or move with top frame border. So your workaround dont help here.

just set resolution of screen to the for example 1024x768 and run cat

what is the status of issue when CAT starting on low-resolution screen(like less than 1600x1050)?
It not fit in screen and depend on OS there could be a chance that minimize/maximize icons are not accessible.