 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
|
who's gonna be the lucky one who mines the 1 millionth VRM?
|
|
|
|
It's very impressive with VRM coins. it's rocketing into the air and I get a big profits more 100% from this coin when I bought it at 0.00010669btc one week ago. Perhaps I'm a lucky person in this year.
Marketing hasn't even started yet, new updated wallets coming, more development in the future...dual chains with VeriCoin, anonymous decentralized exchange with VeriCoin, apps, staking and mining mobile wallets. Lots more to come  Wauw that sounds cool, mobile mining with my phone? The newest smartphones nowadays have more cpu power than the most desktops so why not? Do you know when the mobile mining would become available? They are working on it in house so it might be awhile but it's in the works It's too bad there isn't a way to allocate a disproportionate amount of VRM to mobile miners. Having mobile miners provides another level of decentralization and security, although I'm not sure people will do it much. I hope I'm wrong and it catches on. Speaking of keeping things cheap for mobile users -- I don't like the high fee percentage with Verium. Having to spend a big chunk of a VRM as a fee doesn't match the idea that you're using some valuable asset. I know it's not primarily designed for transactions, and currently the usd price isn't that high, but any way this can be lowered in the wallet? I don't think spending 0.2 of an asset to transfer it conveys that the thing will end up worth a lot. I think it's only with it if you are spending larger amounts of vrm i believe thats true as well. Damn , mobile would be sweet, i ya have old laptops that get less hash on minergate then my cell phone, so i think it could definitally work for VRM, cool  i should see about the requirements for GPU mining, or Effects you should see about that, get some nethash here, some volume! tho they could be waiting for other features. Its just a competitive time for CPU power heehee i am also quite interested in the idea, and mobile wallets in general, because i believe the best chance at mainstream integration is making the product as easy as possible to consume. and the idea of truly decentralized network with the everyday user contributing the majority of the hash rate, rather than specialized hardware or GPUs. all other details aside.. as long as the network is functional, the best wallet wins. |
|
|
|
|
when there are more people buying than selling
|
|
|
|
3 green candles in a row on the 1W chart on bittrex, that hasn't happened before.
here's a fun fact, if someone were to invest 2.3% of 10 million dollars of BTC in VRM, the price of one VRM would equal one BTC.
... ..
I can be that person if you demand my compensation i have now 13.7 million in crypto on coin base.... and also i am the one pumping dow waithing 3.4 k to flush.. i onw more than 1.2 million vrc... support and i can change your future.... ok, i officially demand it and i support it. i'll be watching for your 13.7 million to hit the VRM markets soon, thanks! also, you might want to look into getting a hardware wallet bruh.. |
|
|
|
3 green candles in a row on the 1W chart on bittrex, that hasn't happened before.
here's a fun fact, if someone were to invest 2.3% of 10 million dollars of BTC in VRM, the price of one VRM would equal one BTC.
... ..
Hmmm.. not followin your math there buddy... 2.3% of 10 mil is $230,000, that's about double the current cap. the current order book on bittrex totals 210 btc stopping at 1 BTC per VRM. 210 btc * approx 1100 usd= 231,000 / 10,000,000 = 2.3% i know the order book is full of shit, but, it is fun. |
|
|
|
|
3 green candles in a row on the 1W chart on bittrex, that hasn't happened before.
here's a fun fact, if someone were to invest 2.3% of 10 million dollars of BTC in VRM, the price of one VRM would equal one BTC.
... ..
|
|
|
|
Yes, the devs are fishy and the VRM ICO was just a pump and dump on new bagholders so they could exit VRC will be delisted from poloniex in the next round of delisting  vericoin has been around longer than 90 some percent of the coins on poloniex, there are plenty of newer coins with much lower volume, your comment/you is/are bullshit. |
|
|
|
The price is rising up but it has got a small volume . Dev needs to release some new plans to boost VRM up.
I'm holding some coins for long term and waiting for new actions from Dev.
Is there some place I can read about the idea of VRM? can't find much information about it take the lazy approach, instead of reading, listen to this thing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCo0JY9om-w&t=960s |
|
|
|
Imagine the heights Vericoin would have made of that rollback didn't occur!!!
Imagine if my aunt had a dick, she'd be my uncle. Mind blown!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! that is hilarious, im gonna steal that and use it in my day to day activities |
|
|
|
yeah genius, file a complaint with the fbi stating you got ripped off using bitcoin, that's a good idea, specially if you're still gacked out of your brain on the mountain of blow you just consumed. |
|
|
|
Nearly every single coin is down ATM because of bitcoin bull rally, except for some rare quick pnd (but with very low volume), so VRM is just following the global alt trend.
ETH is crashing, XMR and ETC are very low, LTC crashed, ZEC is crashing (also because the mining ramp-up just finished), DOGE is crashing... VRM maintaining itself would be extraordinary, but there's still no reason for it to do so.
Interesting fact is that bittrex daily volume this past few days is less than 1k BTC, which is very low for an exchange with a full dev team, and I don't know how they can survive with fees alone.
They have ~200 BTC markets and today for example, only half of them had the minimum 0.5 BTC.
It's very strange for them to want and try to delist so many coins when we're clearly in a very alt bearish market.
I mean, even VIA which recently had a major dev change is in danger of de-listing.
It's a shame they equal development quality with volume, especially for recent ones that could not prove themselves yet.
In the case of a coin that everybody wants to hoard for staking, thus having very low exchange volume, it's just stupid.
One would suppose that the exchange is currently in a difficult financial situation, and they're trying to cut a lot of operation cost by halving their alt market count in a way that put pressure on devs/communities.
But that may very well be a bad strategy, because if the only alts remaining are the high volume ones, those are probably also on poloniex, and why trade on bittrex if you can do it on poloniex with much higher volume.
Nevertheless if my calculations are correct we need around 3 BTC of volume in 2 days so I think we should all do some active trading now since for the moment we don't have anything better. I agree that Bittrex is not what it used to be and the more they keep this illogical practices the worst they will be, I wrote them in Slack that if you de-list 3 months old coins then how do they expect people to touch new assets when they will always have the risk of de-listing before even taking the time to accumulate, they are obviously in panic and trouble and me personally I will start avoiding Bittrex. Even if they actually de-list VRM, personally I don't sell, I never invest more than I can lose and the possibility to be added to Poloniex (let's not forget that the devs have good relationship with Polo and a good name in the crypto community) is making the potential risk/reward so huge that in my point of view it deserves it. People don't seem to understand that in order to gain you need to risk and it's better to risk a small % of your portfolio in very risky times (and look for up at 50 times your investment) than risk all of your BTC at a hot market or an ICO (looking to make a 10%). VRM in less than 20k is one of the biggest opportunities out there. Also the devs should be activated now, post something guys, say a word, many people deeply appreciate you but now everybody is waiting for a word. has anyone with development credentials even attempted to contact bittrex? it would not surprise me at all if nobody has even attempted. |
|
|
|
RIP VERIUM From Bittrex This market is in danger of de-listing due to low trade volume and lack of user interest. It may be removed on Friday, December 9th 2016 unless the average daily trade volume for the last 14 days exceeds 0.5 BTC. If you would like to keep the market listed, please encourage the development team to contact us at support@bittrex.com. If you have questions about the policy, please see https://bittrex.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/202583874. well shit.. i guess we're about to find out if this bird is gonna fly or smash into the ground |
|
|
|
|
bittrex now has a warning flag posted stating verium will be delisted one week from today. so, i guess that's game over.
|
|
|
|
|
i love you jayjay, even though you blocked me on twitter.
|
|
|
|
|
new vericoin wallet just released. verium wallet update soon?
|
|
|
|
|
does solo mining with the wallet work at all anymore?
it seems since the mining pool(s) the wallet will either crash or get stuck at syncing blocks and has not produced any verium.
|
|
|
|
where is devs? where is the promotion?  They talked to a marketing company last week. Working on the details. Devs are at work lol. an update regarding current developments, the price being a fraction of the ico buy in, solo mining essentially died -it was suppose to promote decentralization, instead half the mining is in a single pool, stuff like that. the name of the marketing company would also help, because if a phone call to jay jay to discuss twitter marketing is the latest verium news i'll be dumping immediately. i know people are busy but taking 10 minutes out of the day to assemble a twitter update makes a huge difference. |
|
|
|
yeah that's what humanity needs, more stupidity/ignorance.. why we're at it, lets all believe in some random made up God and start killing each other over which one is real..
i assume this is in response to me finding blocks while getting semi drunk on riding lawn mower? |
|
|
|
|
all this drama about pools and compiling.. i installed on some windows machines, clicked the thing to mine, and i get a block every couple days. maybe you people are too smart to mine verium, try drinking some cheap domestic beers while mowing your lawn.. it works.
|
|
|
|
pls tell me why you ppl mine vrm??
It's profitable to mine. That simple. what ?? lol how much you make in a day?? Enough to cover the cost of a couple of quality cups of coffee at work a day. That's enough for me, profit is profit. obviously the guy attacking this stuff is a cunt and likely has little man syndrome, like my neighbor's chihuahua that barks it's ass off everytime my 80lb hound calmly walks past. that said, i would like to know specific plans for growth and implementation. all i've heard so far is: a "viral marketing campaign" which frightens the hell out of me. there's SO MUCH MORE TO TALK ABOUT. i want to see more discussion of unique features of this coin solving real world problems via adjustable block rewards, scaling, increased decentralization through superior user experience, etc. so, this cunt actually gains credibility when responding to his barks with "you're on drugs", ...you're just barking at a chihuahua, be the hound. @veryveryviral is that you?? lol poor ppl invest on your shit coins lol no. actually i too have been openly critical of some of his efforts. i'm curious what motivates you. as far as i can tell you get off on the user interaction, which is a passive aggressive thing lonely people tend to do on the internet. maybe i'm wrong but you seem to pretend you're amused by your own comments as you anxiously wait for others to respond to your nonsense. i had a girlfriend in junior high that sent messages like this post breakup. if you are intending to help others by preventing them from investing in a "shit coin" you should probably be aware of the reactionary nature of your attempts, filling your comments with "lols", fifteen question marks and repeats of the same rhetoric is likely some of the most effective marketing that could be applied via text. that said, i feel the need to ask YOU dolores12, "@veryveryviral is that you?  " |
|
|
|
|
