So i've finally gathered a bit of time here and there to compare DSTM and Bminer on my system.

And i have to agree with cryptoyes, ive officially switched back to DSTM, and heres why. (These stats are only my finding and nothing else, take it as you will.)
Also, i used NiceHash for the awesome hashrate charting they have.

Lets get things rolling with bminer, as i've caught up on the thread it seems there is more things that need to be addressed other than the hashrate, but i'm not here for that, i'm just concerned about how many solutions my machine can output as i'm sure the rest of us are.
Now i don't have a farm or even a big rig to put behind this, so for my test ive used a 980 and a 1070ti.

Lets start with the console report of the sols/s, for the 980 it reads about 340 and for the 1070ti it reads 550 steady for the most part.
For a grand total of 890 give or take a few.
I ran this test for about 34 hours before I just shut it down and called it quits. (Originally planned 48 hours like I had done for DSTM)
And here's the pool side stats.


Now for my DSTM findings
The console reports an average of about 330.2 for the 980 and 530.0 for the 1070ti. (Give or take a couple sols/s on each at any given time but DSTMS average rate is pretty awesome.)
Now that totals a slightly less, but none the less, 860 sols/s average.
As noted above, this average is based on a 48 hour run time.
and the pool side stats once again.


Again, take this with a grain of salt as it is only my test, in my machines environment. You may or may not get better or worse results with these miners than I did. This is just what i have found.
Sure both miners averages fluctuated up and down compared to their own reporting but over a day and a half of averages should give a pretty accurate number in my opinion and is enough for me.
But do with this as you will! Thanks for actually taking the time to read my efforts!

Now that's sketchy! Still drawing and hashing away but no output?
Does a program usually still continue to run under full load when it occurs an internal error or is there something else happening here?
I'd like to see what realbminer thinks.

Going on the theory Satoshi is still alive, Satoshi most likely stopped communicating when they seen Bitcoin really starting to take off, and moving any of the tokens people associate with the creator would be risky because i'm sure they would love those private keys, if they do exists still and weren't destroyed. The anonymity of Satoshi is key to their survival, or else i'm sure they would be public lol
That's just my two cents! 
I don't really have any links to any articles on a theory to post but I love this whole topic and the conversation behind it!

try -help instead, alternately one page back is a couple lines you can copy paste to get you the list of commands.

Will do!
So far the miner reports 550 sols/s and nvidia inspector says about 133 watts, which seems to be on par with the slight increase on my previous 340 average, bu time to look at the data in detail.


edit:


bminer.exe -uri stratum://TDartDDD.workername:x@us-east.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com:17023 -api 127.0.0.1:1880
pause

edit 2:


Ooooh, I see what your getting at now, that is definitely beyond me, but if I experience something like that ill be sure to report!

Just try adding a pause command after the arguments in your .bat file.

bminer -ArgumnentsHere -AndHere
pause


Edit:
run this for help with a list of available commands, pretty self explanatory lol

bminer -help
pause

Going to run some multi hour benchmarks on my 1070ti and my 980 individually on the competitive miners and hopefully put my mind at ease with these huge fluctuations and massive dips pool side.

Great work with the miner!
I've noticed the rejected shares go down drastically to about 1.2% on my machine anyways.
Pool side the hash rate looks sporadic, so its really hard to tell which miner averages a better over all rate.
I've got my 1070ti at about 550 sols/s and my 980 at about 330.
Compared to other miners I notice about 15-20 sols/s more between both cards, i'm enjoying it!

I've also encountered the legacy -> new account conversion. Conveniently locking up all my funds as well, I also tried to do basic verification which failed instantly due to a typo I suppose, if its even going to work at all. (My hopes are small for Bittrex now) Meanwhile support wont reset the basic verification and is trying to force the enhanced verification on me, and not just resetting my basic verification. Maybe completing the enhanced verification would be justified had I wish to stay with the platform, but all I want is my small but worthwhile funds made from mining back and sent to my hardware wallet.
But this is just too much to ask.
Hope everything works out for those who have been fucked by Bittrrex.
Decentralized platforms are going to take off.

No problem, great to see new things evolving so rapidly. Especially things like this, the medical cannabis industry needs a large scale business that can provide good consistent quality to medicinal users.
Id love to help out any way I can, i'll definatly partake in the ico.

Great updates and great work!

Definitely watching this! It sounds great to me, as a Canadian Cannabis user lol
Good luck!

Just tested it out on my GTX 980 and on default settings it getting about 20 sols.
Great work on the miner! Super speedy work