 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 »
|
my cpu can generate $10 per day with other things
if that were possible, there would be no stock on cpus. |
|
|
|
Whats up with this transfer fee on XHV?? Block Reward: 24.8499 Transfer Fee: 8.5935 <---- THIS Pool Fee: 0.00 Governence Fee: 1.2420 This is from https://cryptoknight.cc/haven/Compare to luckypool  |
|
|
|
Whats up with this transfer fee on XHV?? Block Reward: 24.8499 Transfer Fee: 8.5935 <---- THIS Pool Fee: 0.00 Governence Fee: 1.2420  This is from https://cryptoknight.cc/haven/ |
|
|
|
@dallase
Hmm, that's surprising. Will look into it as soon as I can find some time.
More often than not after a "connection was closed by the pool" event it picks right back up. [2018-09-21 09:08:05] Pool lux.pickaxe.pro share accepted.
[2018-09-21 09:08:07] Pool lux.pickaxe.pro received new job. (job_id: 530)
[2018-09-21 09:08:09] Stats GPU 0 - phi2: 5.558Mh/s (5.550Mh/s)
[2018-09-21 09:08:15] Pool lux.pickaxe.pro connection was closed by the pool.
[2018-09-21 09:08:18] Pool lux.pickaxe.pro successfully subscribed.
[2018-09-21 09:08:20] Pool lux.pickaxe.pro authorization succeeded.
[2018-09-21 09:08:20] Pool lux.pickaxe.pro set difficulty to 1.000000
[2018-09-21 09:08:20] Pool lux.pickaxe.pro extranonce subscribe succeeded.
[2018-09-21 09:08:23] Pool lux.pickaxe.pro received new job. (job_id: 52f)
[2018-09-21 09:08:27] Pool lux.pickaxe.pro share accepted.
[2018-09-21 09:08:30] Pool lux.pickaxe.pro received new job. (job_id: 530)
[2018-09-21 09:08:30] Pool lux.pickaxe.pro share accepted.
[2018-09-21 09:08:30] Pool lux.pickaxe.pro share accepted.
So I'm not sure what happens when it does not like the log I showed earlier. I've seen it happen 3 times now. |
|
|
|
If the connection to the pool is lost, it never reconnects... [2018-09-18 15:58:22] Stats GPU 0 - phi2: 5.262Mh/s (5.254Mh/s)
[2018-09-18 15:58:26] Pool lux.pickaxe.pro share accepted.
[2018-09-18 15:58:34] Pool lux.pickaxe.pro share accepted.
[2018-09-18 15:58:35] Pool lux.pickaxe.pro share accepted.
[2018-09-18 15:58:36] Pool lux.pickaxe.pro connection was closed by the pool.
[2018-09-18 15:59:22] Stats GPU 0 - phi2: 1.258Mh/s (5.205Mh/s)
[2018-09-18 16:00:22] Stats GPU 0 - phi2: 0.000Mh/s (5.140Mh/s)
[2018-09-18 16:01:22] Stats GPU 0 - phi2: 0.000Mh/s (5.078Mh/s)
[2018-09-18 16:02:22] Stats GPU 0 - phi2: 0.000Mh/s (5.016Mh/s)
[2018-09-18 16:03:22] Stats GPU 0 - phi2: 0.000Mh/s (4.957Mh/s)
[2018-09-18 16:04:22] Stats GPU 0 - phi2: 0.000Mh/s (4.898Mh/s)
|
|
|
|
|
Its summer, and its too hot to run these cards.
They were used sporadically to mine monero. Less than 6 months old.
They are reference XFX, 8gb samsung memory. Vega 56 and Vega 64 bios loaded, just flip the dip switch.
You can check my ebay feedback under
same nick. I accept most crypto.
PM me an offer if you are interested.
|
|
|
|
|
On cryptonight-heavy
rx570: 710
rx580: 800
On monero7, i get
rx570: 950
rx580: 1025
|
|
|
|
getting 24% rejected shares on nicehash with the claymore miner v7 any ideas ?
You have to run 11.3 with -pow7 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=638915.0[edit] wait, why the hell are you mining xmr right now. you need to wait a few days for difficulty to re-adjust. |
|
|
|
|
Last 25 blocks took 7 hours
Previous 25 blocks took 40 minutes.
IF you are moving any XMR right now, you may be waiting a while for it.
|
|
|
|
The monero POW v7 changes started at block 1546000 and we are at 1546024 now so that already happened. I don't know about any monero-wanna-be coins that may have forked off at that point or may be forking off later.
I hope we see some difficulty adjustment before 1546144, this is pretty slow... So far though the difficulty hasn't really budged. In fact it has actually crept upwards a bit which is not helping.
block 1546024 took 1hr 26m, 2s to solve! but your right, at this rate, difficulty drop will take days. how long does it take to create new asic and start again... seems like an arms race that monero is gonna lose. |
|
|
|
Looks like 2 * 15 sec, not 15 minutes. lead dev fail. |
|
|
|
Any information to do it without windoz' ?  6x vega56 on linux, running ethminer w/ Mesa Clover OCL. You can get 39-41mh/s depending on your memclock. Those 6 I have from 1043 to 1083 right now, just testing accept/stale rates to make sure I'm not missing out by running up the clocks. Total TDP is ~1150. You can see the hash rates based on memclocks below.
# clocks
3: 1083Mhz *
7: 1107Mhz *
3: 1083Mhz *
7: 1107Mhz *
3: 1063Mhz *
7: 1107Mhz *
3: 1063Mhz *
7: 1107Mhz *
3: 1043Mhz *
7: 1107Mhz *
3: 1043Mhz *
7: 1107Mhz *
# rates
GPU #0
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
m 12:43:51|ethminer| Speed 40.37 Mh/s gpu/0 40.37 [A590+6:R0+0:F0] Time: 20:59
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GPU #1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
m 12:43:56|ethminer| Speed 40.29 Mh/s gpu/0 40.29 [A74+1:R0+0:F0] Time: 02:52
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GPU #2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
m 12:43:55|ethminer| Speed 40.04 Mh/s gpu/0 40.04 [A598+5:R0+0:F0] Time: 20:59
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GPU #3
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
m 12:43:53|ethminer| Speed 40.04 Mh/s gpu/0 40.04 [A570+4:R0+0:F0] Time: 21:01
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GPU #4
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
m 12:43:56|ethminer| Speed 38.80 Mh/s gpu/0 38.80 [A562+5:R0+0:F0] Time: 21:01
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GPU #5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
m 12:43:53|ethminer| Speed 39.15 Mh/s gpu/0 39.15 [A88+1:R0+0:F0] Time: 02:51
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
and wattage @ 875mv cores... # gfx
GFX Clocks and Power:
1083 MHz (MCLK)
1107 MHz (SCLK)
1138 MHz (PSTATE_SCLK)
800 MHz (PSTATE_MCLK)
875 mV (VDDGFX)
132.0 W (average GPU)
--
GFX Clocks and Power:
1083 MHz (MCLK)
1107 MHz (SCLK)
1138 MHz (PSTATE_SCLK)
800 MHz (PSTATE_MCLK)
875 mV (VDDGFX)
131.0 W (average GPU)
--
GFX Clocks and Power:
1063 MHz (MCLK)
1107 MHz (SCLK)
1138 MHz (PSTATE_SCLK)
800 MHz (PSTATE_MCLK)
875 mV (VDDGFX)
135.0 W (average GPU)
--
GFX Clocks and Power:
1063 MHz (MCLK)
1107 MHz (SCLK)
1138 MHz (PSTATE_SCLK)
800 MHz (PSTATE_MCLK)
875 mV (VDDGFX)
139.0 W (average GPU)
--
GFX Clocks and Power:
1043 MHz (MCLK)
1107 MHz (SCLK)
1138 MHz (PSTATE_SCLK)
800 MHz (PSTATE_MCLK)
875 mV (VDDGFX)
125.0 W (average GPU)
--
GFX Clocks and Power:
1043 MHz (MCLK)
1107 MHz (SCLK)
1138 MHz (PSTATE_SCLK)
800 MHz (PSTATE_MCLK)
875 mV (VDDGFX)
125.0 W (average GPU)
Running nightly kernel, mesa 18, ethminer 0.15.0-dev, etc etc etc... |
|
|
|
Hi
Using mkxminer on linux, and it fails to start with the error "failed to load shared libraries: libOpenCL.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory"
Using 6 rx570s and all other miners work fine (claymore eth, claymore zec, sgminer (all algos), xmr-stak) and more
Any ideas why it is not working? I have located the file manually (was in amd app sdk) and can copy it to any location if needed.
Thanks
I tired to get this working today on simplemining OS and was also not successful. I think mkxminer documentation says its 32bit only. Mkxminer documentation? Do you have a link for that? Readme file Hmm says tested on 32bit. Hopefully will work with 64bit. Did you get the same error as me? 32bit compile doesnt work for me on Ubuntu 16.04.03 x86_64. # ./mkxminer ./mkxminer: error while loading shared libraries: libOpenCL.so.1: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64 |
|
|
|
Currently using a Z170A MSI M5 board. Guess it's back to MC to try a Z270 board.
I used the Z170A M5 for my two linux/470/570 rigs. Works flawlessly. But for VEGA was reading it's really finniky with boards. So I broke down and bought the slitghty more expensive (even more so on Amazon) Asrock H110 Pro+ board. I only need 4 of the 13 slots, but people reporting good results for Vega (even though the reviews people complain about it a lot). Yes I have several of the M5's and they work amazing for 8 570s. Thank you for this. It's available same day shipping for me. It'll be here this afternoon. In the meantime I grabbed THREE different boards from MC to try them out as well. How are you getting on with the new boards, dude? Expecting my Onda D1800 any day now, can't wait to start inflicting myself the pain of trying to get 6 Vegas to hash...  Each of the 3 have their own problems not allowing them to work correctly. My "same day shipping" order from Amazon never arrived  Any time I add 6th GPU to a ASROCK Z270 Killer/SLI, windows BSOD. +4g, -audio, -wifi, -serial, -pptp... Not enough PCI lanes I guess. I even tried to shut down unused usb ports. Going to try PCI-e switch, and also M2/riser to see if I can bogart those pci lanes. |
|
|
|
Not all gpu are made equal. some of them need more voltage and can sustain lower frequencies. you need to adapt.
I agree. I found it easiest to flash my 56's to 64's, then start with core 1300mhz 925mv w/ 965mhz mem and tweak from there. I had an XFX that couldnt clock 1000 mem. |
|
|
|
{ "index" : 0, "intensity" : 2016, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false },
{ "index" : 0, "intensity" : 1700, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false },
Are these Vega 56 or 64? When I was using Stak on my 56s, I had my second thread worksize at 1600. I might suggest testing out CastXMR, even if just long enough to rule out a configuration issue versus a system issue. Hmm, I have 5 vega 56s running no problem on a 64GB SSD. Virt size is 32GB, and I have 16GB of physical. Getting 1800+ on ea Interesting. What's your physical RAM usage when you have a workload? You prompted me to look at my own system, and I am noticing that with 4 GPUs, my VirtMem commit is only 32GB... maybe we only need 8GB Virtual per card? Edit: Actually I'm even more confused. Maybe I'm doing something wrong, but following this guide to check my pagefile usage reveals 0 actual use. I wonder how we got here to thinking that we needed a high Virtual Memory counter for things to work properly. Its probl from the time where we thought you would need lots or RAM to properly use HBCC. And now that it doesnt matter how much ram you have, since HBCC has nothing to do with vegas hashrate. I also had ["cl out of host memory"] error when my page file was managed by windows. I set pagefile at 32000 and no more errors. I'm not saying 32GB is right or wrong, I just picked it because thats about all I had to work with on a 64GB SSD. And that cleared up that message. |
|
|
|
Holy cow 16 per VEGA? I think I set like 40 at the moment for 2 but I'll check. Now I'm on trying to get the second one to work..
On a dedicated mining rig, that's easily done with a 128GB M.2 chip, like my favorite <$60 ADATA. It's only 118GB usable, but after Windows itself, and setting my VirtMem to 80GB (adding a 5th GPU this week), I still have 7 GB left. You'd have to be a little creative (stripping out Windows components) to get enough for 6, I suppose, but I'm sure it could be done. Of course, the 256GB is only $90 (and traditional SSDs are $80, but I really love the compact 'package' by using M.2). Hasn't fixed my problem sadly. Have the Virtual Memory set to 48GB with 3 Vegas. Set my threads to: { "index" : 0, "intensity" : 2016, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false }, { "index" : 0, "intensity" : 1700, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false }, { "index" : 1, "intensity" : 2016, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false }, { "index" : 1, "intensity" : 1700, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false }, { "index" : 2, "intensity" : 2016, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false }, { "index" : 2, "intensity" : 1700, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false } And am getting "cl out of host memory" errors.  Hmm, I have 5 vega 56s running no problem on a 64GB SSD. Virt size is 32GB, and I have 16GB of physical. Getting 1800+ on ea |
|
|
|
|
