 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
hashfaster.com seemed not to be working properly, hash now on tiny-pool.com - much better. |
|
|
|
The bittrex wallet is out of maintenance and I was able to withdraw to the QTUM core wallet with no issues. Kyle Is the qtum swap at bittrex complete?
Can we withdraw qtum in to the new wallet now?
I been searching for some confirmations online but couldn't find any so far.
Anyone knows?
|
|
|
|
@SteamOctane - Nor has mine from last night. 13h ago 326417.30843616 33903a058a521c988ab8c04933a6d3336216e5134c765fe0b34e02854a7eaeeb These payouts haven't hit my wallet yet @SteamOctane
26m ago 5399.28363292 c9875809d94778b5b5726b42a93701d5e6e2...
3h ago 8917.44392665 9a5fcfb61a1e93264dd955025f91d2ce0a6a...
6h ago 12386.04585879 c8977c7a542e49d5c3268fc3d11b217d64d4...
|
|
|
|
I'm pretty sure DUS3ep4K5eUZ9gVN3CT96kMnZToQpx4NUu is SteamOctane's pool. Hopefully he distributes them - while his pool was up I mined a good chunk of those shown in the explorer as in that address. I still have not received my payments from Steam Octane Pool and this normal
???d
|
|
|
|
Steam - check your PM's. Add my private pool to your list. yeah the balances are also missing the 1hr+ amounts... pool is also now showing 90 minutes last transaction need more power - yes a couple of more pools and a few less farms  We keep having to reindex to keep in sync so its loosing all the transaction since no other peer is keeping up.  |
|
|
|
What github repository is the current source? me to somehow. need to restart. btw why my share just like 0.07% while my speed around 40mh and pool speed around 90mh?
Pool speed was around 40Gh/s which one is work? this http://35.199.165.239 or this http://sopool.us/ ? Both. One is the main IP the other is the URL. |
|
|
|
|
Is anyone else have issues with their CUBE "falling off the network"?
It becomes unpingable from LAN (and you can not ssh or load http interface). Also Awesome Miner monitoring software shows it as Disconnected; that is how I initially noticed this was happening. It DOES however continue to mine.
I do not believe this is an issue with my local network, I have other miners (S9s, A4s, mini's, quads, A900s) and never had this problem with any of them before.
EDIT:: I assigned it a static IP and it has not dropped off the network for 48hours.
Mining4Bacon
|
|
|
|
Anyone know what kind of power plug the cube needs? In the picture it looks like a 2x3(6) plug VGA 12V connector found on MB power supplies but there is no documentation on their website describing what it requires and they aren't answering email questions at the moment.
specs say 75W for X11. other details in image linked.  scroll down on this page (source): http://www.baikalminer.com/product_view.php?ID=11EDIT: Sorry you didn't ask for power DRAW, you asked about power PLUG. Appears to be standard PCIe 6pin.  Folks should receive their items soon (maybe by Monday some?). Please someone confirm once in-hand. TY Kyle |
|
|
|
i wantr to ask, if there is a way to mine two coins simultaneously with a-900 giant, i want to divide the hash in two coin, i see there are two thread that cna mine, it should be possible in theory
If the software miner build on the Baikal allows you to enable/select specific ASIC boards, then yes, you should be able to run 2 instances of the mining software (manually) and choose what pool/coin to mine with each. Much like Claymore, EWBF, etc allow you to choose to enable specific GPU's. I believe the A900 has 2 x 450Mh boards. Kyle |
|
|
|
My guess is ... they are actually selling everything they get to big customers.
I do not believe they are selling any to big customers (or at least those big customers are not mining with them yet). Why do I believe that? Network-wide, the DASH X11 hashrate has not been climbing, it's actually down a bit this week from peak. If they were shipping miners and big customers were mining with them, one would expect to see that in the hashrate. BTW: This same argument holds true to debunk the suggestion that Baikal themselves were keeping the hardware and mining with it. mining4bacon |
|
|
|
http://cryptomining-blog.com/8526-mining-performance-of-gtx-1080-ti-with-ccminer-2-0-rc2/ So 7 of the GTX 1080 ti will pull close to 150 MH/s - but at 1750 watts JUST for the cards, figure close to 2KW for an entire single rig if you can get all 7 running on one rig. There's also the issue that the 1080 ti is ONLY available in founders edition (so far), at a significant premium on price, and VERY limited availability - and running the calculation for 7 or these on whattomine at the stated figures in the post show them LOSING MONEY if you have to pay more than 1c/kwh on your electric. On the other hand, this is actually PROFITABLE up to about 10c/kwh electric - but nowhere near as profitable as mining ETH would be on those cards, much less something they're GOOD at like lyra2r2. I wouldn't use the 1080's but rather the 1070's... You can pull about 420 S/s per card for zcash and for a 6 card rig you could get the wattage down to about 1000 in total if you configure it properly. ROI on one of these rigs would be 6-8 months dependent upon price but at least you can purchase all of the parts anytime you wish unlike with Baikal right now. I concur - 1070's are the sweet spot for power/hash/cost efficiency today; with only one except. AMD RX470/480 beat the 1070 for ETH/ETC ... 1070's win for pretty much every other GPU algo. Mining4Bacon |
|
|
|
|
Like any good portfolio, you shouldn't have all your eggs in one basket, currently my farm is split as follows: 108Th SHA265, 9.15Gh X11, 36 x 1070GTX's
w/cryptocoin holdings, 35% BTC, 40% ETH, 25% other ALTs
I recommend everyone diversity, this is no different than investing in stocks, precious metals, real estate, etc. Be smart, diversity and HODL!
Mining4Bacon
|
|
|
|
ETH or LBRY is more profitable atm anyway  (been months i haven't nvidia mined ETH, god it feels weird  ) @nvidia ETH - same! WTF Claymore8.1!!! last version I had used was 7.3 |
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately I missed your previous group buys, but you can count me in for 10-12 A900's if you are able to put another one together.
I already have several A900's and a couple mini's, looking to expand my farm. Great/solid miners. Thanks!
Kyle
|
|
|
|
Final result
6x1070 rig, 2650sols/s 145/590 @60% tdp, had to reduce OC a bit to be stable. solver 0 forced, the best so far. Multiple instance of the miner seems to make it unstable now, with 3 it's totally unstable, with 2, it's pretty stable, but don't get more sols than with 1 instance. so about 2/2.5% gain from 0.0.1b
Can I ask what 1070 cards you are using? Thanks Yes of course 6x EVGA GTX 1070 FTW, 60% TDP (about 110w per card, nvidia-smi, 830w @ wall) @m1n1ngP4d4w4n - may I ask - what motherboard/processor combo are you using to get (6) 1070's to run? I have had no luck with (6) card rigs. Thanks - pokeytex Man! Most miners use AsRock H81 Pro BTC or H97 Anniversary for 6 cards but most mobos with 6+ PCIE are good. Though some had problem on Z170 mobos... Nvidias (6) are easy even with Win 7. @nocab72 & @AzzAz - thank you for the information. I am running (2) Asus Crosshair V mobos with quad core AM3+ processors. I have (12) 1070's but could not get more than 5 to work per board. I am running Windows 10 Anniversary edition - 64bit. I would love to get them all humming on the same board. I use EVGA 1300 Watt Gold psu's. Have you tried adding one card at a time, let the OS associate/load the driver (so it is recognized properly in Device Manager), then power down, add next card, boot and repeat. ie. don't just slam all six cards in and pray ;-) When you get to the last 2 cards (5&6) - if the last card won't recognize, try swapping the PCIe slots for cards 5&6 - donno why it works but that is what I needed to do with 2 of my three setups to get them working with all 6. Once recognized - has been rock solid (except when I push the OC settings too far, lol). =) Kyle |
|
|
|
Final result
6x1070 rig, 2650sols/s 145/590 @60% tdp, had to reduce OC a bit to be stable. solver 0 forced, the best so far. Multiple instance of the miner seems to make it unstable now, with 3 it's totally unstable, with 2, it's pretty stable, but don't get more sols than with 1 instance. so about 2/2.5% gain from 0.0.1b
Can I ask what 1070 cards you are using? Thanks Yes of course 6x EVGA GTX 1070 FTW, 60% TDP (about 110w per card, nvidia-smi, 830w @ wall) @m1n1ngP4d4w4n - may I ask - what motherboard/processor combo are you using to get (6) 1070's to run? I have had no luck with (6) card rigs. Thanks - pokeytex I have 3 rigs with (6) 1070's, all cards are ASUS STRIX GTX 1070 OC. MB/PROC/RAM/PSU: Gigabyte Z97X-GAMING 7 / i5-4590 / EVGA 8GB DDR3-1600 4GBx2 / EVGA 1300 G2 Afterburner: +100 CORE / +620 MEM @ 100% TDP (my power is cheap) 450-470 Sol/s per card, seeing total Sol/s per rig at 2740-2780 Sol/s. MAJOR KUDOs @EWBF_ for improvements in 0.2.0b! Up a solid 10 Sol/s per card from 0.1.0b using solver 0! (1 and 2 are both slower for me) BTW: It is quite interesting to have 3 identical systems - 18 cards, all with the same OC settings, some cards want to scream and do upwards of 480 Sol/s while others are total slackers barely touching 460. All in relatively controlled environment, none exceeding 60C. Kyle |
|
|
|
|
