 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
Now only 2 choices: At least you still can dump for few satoshis, while there are some buy orders left Or you can pray   What about just wait until the development has progressed? Are you really not aware of the potential, or are you just trying to fud to get more cheap ATMS before the next steps on the road map have been completed? From Discord, yesterday evening: fixed#8779:
Anyone else having trouble with the gateway? Is it down? Can't get movies to load
asphyxia#3673: I'll address this in the medium post. I apologize for the delay on this as I've had some things come up in the last 2 days that have kept me unexpectedly occupied. The main reason it's down right now is it'll be going through a migration phase of integrating it into the new web wallet software which is based off a plugin setup. Afix will be implemented as a plugin to the software which requires a few changes from how it currently works. With the new wallet software, metadata will now be stored on the (temporary) blockchain so the entire afix database can be independently re-created by any party. To me this sounds impressive. Development is going on. Testing is going on. Or were you just hoping to have 10x gain within a few months? Man, have a look at the first months of Stratis: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/stratis/#chartsor Ethereum: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/ethereum/#chartsOr Bitcoin, lol: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin/#charts...funny guy... |
|
|
|
Checks last price is almost no change one month.
Maybe in terms of BTC rate. The USD rate is steadily increasing and that means something. For those who don't have enough imagination: it means that people don't dump to get the BTC ride  HODL on! |
|
|
|
Why should I invest here? In my opinion it is not legal, because it is sharing piracy.
I think I will go better and invest in DECENT because DECENT is the legal variant of this here.
You complained before. You don't want to register the DMCA compliance provided by Novus. I'd be pleased to see you finally leave ;-) For reference: https://novusphere.io/home/dmcaI think Yobit is annoyed that Atmos team decided to dump Vidz tokens on their platform with no support, I don't think after the team decided to create Atmos tokens, Vidz tokens d=should be in the market trading on exchanges. It dilute the marketcap of Atmos tokens
Seriously - whuat? |
|
|
|
I don't understand why the price is not thriving, even VIDZ get more and better attention than this. Let's hope things will turn around soon
Those who missed Purevidz could buy into Novus ICO. Wait until others who don't know about Purevidz or Novus yet find out and want their share. At the exchanges there's close to no volume, because nobody wants to sell and nobody wants to buy. That will change once the masses become awarw of this project. There jave been more or less 250 accounts involved in the Novus ICO. Do you think only 250 people are interested in it? Most donvt even know. The development is going on and the funding is enough to pay for the MVP. Let this project go on and watch. We'll find out whether it fails or succeeds. If it's going to succeed you'll recognize a lot of attention ;-) |
|
|
|
. But right now, it's only Asphyxia or whatever his real name is who is the real winner. All the other investors got shafted without lube.  Better burn 7 million VIDZ instead of cashing them out at above 2000 Satoshis. Burn them for a project that requires a lot of efforts. Which is what Asphyxia did. Does this really make sense? Time will tell who the real winners are ;-) |
|
|
|
So as long as novus doesn't have illegal/copyright material on their gateway and they ban/blacklist anyone that does try do funny business on there then they will be safe yeah? If I wanted to upload something not above board then by creating my own gateway I take responsibility away from them? Is that right? Sounds cool as fuck and something that is uber long term.
My understanding is that currently there's a central website and a central database with the meta data aboutthe files. Soon TM - no, I mean soon for real! - there will be a blockchain which carries meta data in transactions and a wallet that can parse the meta data and serve it to a web server. Once that's implemented, both the files and the information about them are decentralized. That web server operator might or might not follow DMCA (or other copyright holder) requests depending on the legal situation of the web server and the operator, respectively. |
|
|
|
Think before you post. Try to add some weight to your comments. So far I see no rebuttal of any of my points raised??. I'll give you time to digest it all and post again with some solid points being made relevant to the subject I am posting on. The fact you do not want to read or can not understand what is written is your own problem and feeling dumber as you mention is your own problem for not putting more effort into pushing your boundaries.
Good advice. I had to quote that for you. Now please prove that you aren't PV. He is the person who is suspected by MANY to be the SAME PERSON that has seemingly scammed people in the previous VIDZ ico. He is now trying to repeat the ICO again whilst MANY PEOPLE believe he is PV. Why is the onus on me? I don't care if his project raises less funding because of people legitimate concerns.
In what way are the concerns legitimate? I only see them repeated over and over. You claim he's PV. Prove it! That's why the onus is on you. If people have second thoughts, they shouldn't invest. Full stop. |
|
|
|
I provided one way for him to illustrate he is not the same person. Show some chat logs... some screen caps etc. There must be a ton of them if the never met in real life and have collaborated on this.
You did provide that way. And in the very same post you said: Although it will not be concrete proof they are different people it will be annoying to have to construct 100000's of words of conversations they had over chat protocols discussing the PV project.
Why do you want to annoy somebody? Where is your proof he's the same person as PV? Ha sock puppet that finds bct and immediately homes in on the PV and novus projects needs me to prove I am not PV.
Makes sense.
When do these people realise you need to less obvious about being a sock puppet.
I am the sock puppet of no one. Wait... you want me to prove it, right? Do you have more in your legendary arsenal? |
|
|
|
With regard it being the same person as PV an MANY are speculating and suggesting ...considering the position he is in right now the onus is not on me to prove he is the same person. It is for him to install confidence by proving he is not the same person.
That's how witch-hunts work. Why don't you prove he's the same person instead? Just because lots of people believe the same, it doesn't turn that belief into reality. I could give you plenty of examples, but I fear that would just open additional cans of worms. Btw. can you please prove that you aren't PV? Oh, that will be hard, because PV is quite anonymous. So how will we ever know that you aren't PV? Do you start to realize where additional problems are? |
|
|
|
These answers didnt made sense tbh.. There should be some kind of calculator to see what is better and what is worse, ofc this depends on the end of the ICO.
you can't imagine it will take long.. Well I was asking the plans of the dev, not a guess. Guessing gets you bankrupt..
the last question I'll explain why its so off.. lets say everybody contributes in the ICO with the same amount..
First round 30% is devided and 10 people contributed.. Means that 30% is devided over 10 people.
Second round only 2 people contribute, now this 20% will be devided over 2 person, which is more then the early investors got for their coins in the first round..
So the ICO is not for early investors beneficial its for people who want the take guesses and hope for the best.. Hence I think this round system with 30% and 20% is wrong and should be changed.. If there are way less people in the second round they will get more coins for less investment, but they were able to wait and sit back for way longer and are not the earliest people who helped the project.
That's how price discovery works. The atmos aren't being sold at a fixed rate, but being distributed amongst ICO participants. Whether you receive the most atmos per invested value by burning VIDZ or investing BTC in round 1 or 2 will only be clear once the rounds are over. A calculator doesn't help here. You need a crystal sphere to foresee what will happen. If you want to have a prediction about the price, you can read this, but I urge you to make up your own mind: In later rounds there will be more information about this project available. Parts of the first product will be ready by then. That means risk of the investment is lower. It can be expected that the price per atmos in round two is higher than in round one, because of the reduce risk. |
|
|
|
yeah, but i dont get how u can not take responsibility just because ppl run their own nodes. just want an explanation
Say you produce kitchen knives. Can you be held responsible if people chop other people instead of vegetables with them? |
|
|
|
Eventually, these people will get tired of their worthless tirades. The truth will drown out the nonsense.
It is only a matter of time.
As a strategy for manipulating people's emotions, screeching accusations and the word scam over and over and over again has a limited amount of usefulness.
Moreover, fighting a battle on two fronts with such a small army will prove to be ineffective. There are supporters here, and supporters in VIDZ. Only a few spammy idiots. This is a war of attrition and we are winning.
~ The Hive ~
The force is strong in the FUDsters. But I fear they are on the dark side of the force. If they manage to shy only a few people away from investing, they will increase their own share. Oh yeah, I'm supposing they want to invest, because I don't really believe they are do-gooders just trying to help others. That's the drawback of this type of ICO. If the shares were sold at a fixed rate that FUD would now make little sense. It would come later, though, as soon as the coins are traded to push the price down and swallow up the dumped coins. As long as there's an incentive to cheat people, it will happen. All you can do is provide information and make people come to their own conclusions. By fighting the FUD I'm shooting myself in the foot, because I will invest in this ICO. I just can't stand that shit. If the price for fighting the FUD is less atmos for me, so be it. |
|
|
|
credibility's already in the gutter....
That rhymes with you, sir, are a FUDer. Back to topic. How does that impact the credibility? Can you please elaborate how finding the private key to that address in aeons (if it even exists) can damage Novus? ./vanitygen -X 71 VidzBurnAddrForTheNovusphere
Difficulty: 164888818503458230623158005923420463190199545920
[425.30 Kkey/s][total 9774848][Prob 0.0%][50% in 8.521553e+33y]
Only 8521553000000000000000000000000000 years on my computer to have 50% probability of finding a privkey! Yay! Don't stop me now I'm having such a good time I'm having a ball Don't stop me now If you wanna have a good time Just give me a call |
|
|
|
well that opens a whole can of worms....
cause that would mean, that these 7 million are not actually "burnt".......
Theoretically there could be a private key. Practically this doesn't matter. You know math? Btw. even if there's a private key (not saying there is!), can you please elaborate how that can damage Novus? |
|
|
|
Does anyone know what it would take to create a working vanity address such as the burn address? I think that would be case closed if they had any clue. lol at some people here  Why don't you just come out and say in in Plain English so we could all understand? Cause from your tone, you are implying that this is bogus..... Short answer: bogus. Explanation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1781895.msg17875650#msg17875650 |
|
|
|
Does anyone know what it would take to create a working vanity address such as the burn address? I think that would be case closed if they had any clue. lol at some people here tl;dr get a quantum computer, if you want to calculate the private key for VidzBurnAddrForTheNovusphereZEZyC in your lifetime. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_computingLongread: As I don't know the code used for VIDZ addresses, I used plain BTC vanitygen. Remarks: - In terms of complexity it shouldn't matter, which vanitygen code you use.
- I couldn't enter the full length of the address. This was not supported. The full length increases the complexity.
- This was run on a slow CPU. But even using GPU mining rigs wouldn't help much.
./vanitygen 1VidzBurnAddrForTheNovusphe
Difficulty: 164888818503458230623158005923420463190199545920
[419.84 Kkey/s][total 3038208][Prob 0.0%][50% in 8.632233e+33y]
50% probability in 8000000000000000000000000000000000 years (I hope I didn't mess up with the zeroes). Increase the computing power by billions and you still have to try longer than the universe exists to have at least 50 percent chance to find a key. The current estimated age of our universe is 13700000000 years, which looks tiny compared to calculating the private key for VidzBurnAddrForTheNovusphereZEZyC 8000000000000000000000000 years to have 50% when running at 419 * 10^9 kkeys/s (computing power increased by factor 1 billion compared to my CPU). Keep in mind that I had to cut "ZEZyC", because it was too long. As I added "1" at the beginning, this reduced the string in total by 4 characters. |
|
|
|
"PV" and "ASPHYXIA" are the same person...
or if they are not, maybe someone should let the proper authorities know once "APSHYXIA" reveals his identity.
YES I BELIVE ALSO THAT IS MAYBE IS SAME PERSON
It's strange that nobody feels the need to prove that kind of allegation whereas the accused shall defend himself/herself. Reminds me of a witch-hunt. |
|
|
|
|
