why is scrypt difficulty not converted when poolmining in cgminer then ??

ahhahahhahahahahhhaa

cgminer will not submit anything below that *65536 number. means you need to do *65536 more work then needed when solomining before it even will consider submitting the hashes.

it only means one thing really, write your own miner.

so whats with this liteco.in not found messages at startup ??

i've seen whats happened with liteco.in. very questionable all.

so why has that adress been hardcoded into p2pool ??

it looks very nice :

           *** CudaMiner for nVidia GPUs by Christian Buchner ***
                     This is version 2013-07-13 (alpha)
        based on pooler-cpuminer 2.3.2 (c) 2010 Jeff Garzik, 2012 pooler
               Cuda additions Copyright 2013 Christian Buchner
           My donation address: LKS1WDKGED647msBQfLBHV3Ls8sveGncnm

[2013-07-17 11:52:35] 1 miner threads started, using 'scrypt' algorithm.
[2013-07-17 11:52:42] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 660 Ti with compute capability 3.0
[2013-07-17 11:52:42] GPU #0: interactive: 1, tex-cache: 0 , single-alloc: 1
[2013-07-17 11:52:42] GPU #0: Performing auto-tuning (Patience...)
[2013-07-17 11:53:47] GPU #0:  200.69 khash/s with configuration S98x2
[2013-07-17 11:53:47] GPU #0: using launch configuration S98x2
[2013-07-17 11:53:47] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 660 Ti, 6272 hashes, 0.09 khash/s
[2013-07-17 11:53:47] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 660 Ti, 6272 hashes, 57.34 khash/s
[2013-07-17 11:53:48] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 660 Ti, 119168 hashes, 119.16 khash/s
[2013-07-17 11:53:50] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 660 Ti, 238336 hashes, 120.09 khash/s
[2013-07-17 11:53:52] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 660 Ti, 244608 hashes, 122.30 khash/s
[2013-07-17 11:53:54] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 660 Ti, 244608 hashes, 122.30 khash/s
[2013-07-17 11:53:56] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 660 Ti, 244608 hashes, 120.41 khash/s
[2013-07-17 11:53:58] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 660 Ti, 244608 hashes, 124.24 khash/s
[2013-07-17 11:54:00] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 660 Ti, 250880 hashes, 122.56 khash/s
[2013-07-17 11:54:02] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 660 Ti, 250880 hashes, 126.42 khash/s
[2013-07-17 11:54:04] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 660 Ti, 257152 hashes, 121.90 khash/s
[2013-07-17 11:54:06] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 660 Ti, 244608 hashes, 121.35 khash/s
[2013-07-17 11:54:08] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 660 Ti, 244608 hashes, 121.35 khash/s
[2013-07-17 11:54:10] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 660 Ti, 244608 hashes, 126.24 khash/s
[2013-07-17 11:54:12] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 660 Ti, 257152 hashes, 121.90 khash/s
[2013-07-17 11:54:14] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 660 Ti, 244608 hashes, 123.26 khash/s
[2013-07-17 11:54:16] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 660 Ti, 250880 hashes, 125.43 khash/s
[2013-07-17 11:54:18] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 660 Ti, 250880 hashes, 124.46 khash/s
[2013-07-17 11:54:20] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 660 Ti, 250880 hashes, 121.63 khash/s
[2013-07-17 11:54:29] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 660 Ti, 244608 hashes, 122.30 khash/s

great benchmark number, yet it commes nowhere near when it commes to actual running. How why what and when happend, i no longer get result does not validate as with the previous version but alltogether it is

WAAY slower then the 17/04/2013 version.

NUTS, it used to be around 165 kh/sec. now it just promisses more to return less. i'm boggled.

So all development stopped ?

i'm still wondering why this miner craches any pc i have when first run

graphics card drivers crash on any pc i run this thing on the first time ??

after that it runs without a problem, this makes me feel like something dirty is going on.

is this program trying to install something else asswell ??

last night i had a reboot and it didnt want to reboot complaining about not being uefi compliant, while it most certainly is.

I had to take down the power before it wanted to start again, this tells me someone has been trying to flash something to the graphics bios , or in the least it beca

i have seen enough , nice steal software this p2pool thing.

its to fucking easy to steal other miners money.

the whole setup of p2pool just sucks.

its designed not to make you money or at least as little as possible.

never install python with the windows executable either , its an easy way to hack your pc.

i've watched this p2pool software enough, how many f*** don't like to edit the source files to their liking?


months of p2pool got me 15 ltc, 4 days solos and i allready have a 50ltc block found.


Keep your shitty hacktool.

and how does this relate to the "current payout : x.xxxx LTC" going up (thats my share of TX fees i'm guessing) and when the punishes start => , all that my share had rissen just dissappears to the minimum possible. and the time to share follows likewise, starts to drop and then goes back up to were it was. just not letting me get ahead never, at 1 share or max 2 a day its not worth it

then it is my share that gets punished in effect no ? yes !

its what i am seeing in the console, things go well, the moment my share starts rising problems start , skipping from block, punishing and all that was gained is gone again. The way it looks is plain crap.
variable difficulty just means the pool is never running optimally, except for those at the handles. adjust settings to get more efficiency and the program WILL change things to make it less optimal.

thats what it looks like when running, not much logic to be found.


greetings

This is not designed to get me the best results i can get.

This is designed so some other can get on top of things and profit the most.

I can run @ 130% efficiency continuous, but the program rather sets things so that i end up @ 90% efficiency.

in effect this program works against me, add in all the latencyfuckers and were done.

"Skipping from block"  , thats what i'm gonna do before i put in a ton that will never pay off itself even.



and asking 1.0% for the author ?


decent people wait for it , they dont take it.


care to explain why skipping from block punishes anywhere from 1 to 20 times per skipped block ? wheres the logic in that.

and why are ip's like 54.250.3.112 and 24.214.18.71 having days off continuously requesting shares from my peer ? (u can guess where the latency goes , to the moon and back all day).

sorry to say but the latest releases dont work as well as the 17-04 version.

The card (GTX 660 Ti) does not run as fast AND gives "Result does not validate on CPU" whenever i use a later version then 17-04.

tried all kinds of configs and i will stay with 17-04 version @ 160 kH/s with flags -i 0 -C 2 -m 1 -l 70x4. This same config runs awfull with the new versions.

I'm using win8 64 bit with the Nvidia 314.22 drivers.

Now i am wondering about UEFI systems that have a UEFI graphics BIOS (the windows 8 secure boot thingy), did you take these systems in consideration ??

Or should there be no problem at all with any kind of GPU bioses ?

Greetings


edit: sorry forgot to mention the cards clock speeds : core @ 1058 mem @ 6008 wich are stockspeeds. sometimes goes to corespeed of 1071 thereabout, regulated by nvidiaboost. no oc'ing.
        its an ASUS GTX 660 Ti 2gig standard model DC2

Hmmmn,

tried cudaminner on another clean win8 pc , and it wont run complaining about some msvcp100.dll which is missing. visual c++ 2010 runtimes are installed.

the file is where it should be windows\system32

When i copy the msvcp100.dll to the directory of cudaminer: it still wont start giving me windows error code 0xc000007b.

on a clean pc that is VERY strange in the least

?

Hi,

Just wanted to give my point off view on this distributed computing.

I'm an oldtimer having done years of calculating for BOINC. I had stopped doing this because off the cost for me making others profit from it.

Now this bitcoin thing is getting closer to being fair, but it still is a lottery.

I would like to donate my computing time , but if i'm not getting paid for what it actually is doing i just tend to not bother anymore.

Same with this bitcoin thing. I'd need a real supercomputer at my disposale if i want to make any real cash with it.

Not to be proffiting from it , but just being able to pay the cost of computepower.


The compute time i have "given" away over the past years without even the slightest compensation makes me kinda sick now.

getting 52 kh/s with 6 threads on i7 3770.  8 threads gets 55 kh/s.

with a gtx 660 Ti i now get 155 kh/s , using the flags -l 70x2 -C 1 -m 1 -i 1

these settings give the highest hashrate, determined via the --benchmark flag .

next to that the cpu i7 3770 running minerd with 6 threads (which is the most optimal in combo with the gpu) @ 50 kh/s .

gtx 660 Ti running @ 1058 corespeed, 6008 memspeed, 56°c coretemp, 125W power usage. (triple display)

hasn't crashed yet.

Is there some reason the -C 1 flag should not be used then when it seems to work and does give a speedboost of several kh/s.

No positive results found   

Thx for your work on this.

gtx 660 Ti 152kh/s + i7 3770 50kh/s

averiging 200kh/s

OMG, someone must have used the new supercomputer TITAN to do some mining. 

its not just being logged in, its being active aswell, so just reading through a post can take quite some time while you are not active clicking pages. takes much longer then just 4 hours off being logged in !

thats a shame cause i would have liked to make a post as a suggestion to some problem in a thread outside newbie section.

o well, never mind.

edit: it seems activity is needed about every 4 minutes 

and why not the idea that real money banks have ?

They tend to give you money when you open a bank/savingsaccount, 25 € just for free to start with them.
now that would be a real enticement for getting these coin networks going i think. 

grts

Ok again, my prior attempt just fucked up cause off getting logged out while typing this post. WTF ?


How about mining software you didn't write/configure/compile yourself ??

The possibility off build in hacks could be very high, your hardware mining but not for you.

Someone could capture every succesfull hashfind and send all relevant hash info back to the hacker/minerdeveloper without having it send back to the bitcoin-network.

The hacker can then just inject that correct hashblock back into the bitcoinnetwork and receive the rewards. The network would never know the theft was going on and just pays out to the hacker.

Such network communication could be hidden , the way rootkits work.

Am i getting paranoid enough ?

I like this post, PEOPLE need to BE AWARE.

Grts
 

Hi , lets have a look into this e-coin thingy then  

rules, rules, rules...

can't do without em