Want to see what happens in a de facto court when you have revoked consent to a de facto jurisdiction? Below are some court videos (they are captioned with audio).

Video #1:

http://www.raymondstclair.com/videos/english-freeman-challenges-authority-in-uk-court/

The interesting thing about the video above is that they issued a default judgment at a time when they weren't even in courtroom. They *purposely* invalidated their judgment because they knew they didn't have jurisdiction. You simply take that to a notary public with affidavits from your witnesses and fill out a statement of protest to invalidate the 'judgment'.

Video #2:

http://www.raymondstclair.com/videos/english-freeman-standing-court-gloucester-part-1/

Notice the word trickery in this video. Placing orders on a man under Common Law can be used to assume a de facto jurisdiction again. (An order is an attempt to contract. Just like how ordering a hamburger from a waitress is contracting with the establishment.) This stuff is very real.

Using conditional offers for every order works wonders.

Another "unlicensed money transmitting" prosecution in the USA:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/28262676/Criminal-Court-Complaint-Michael-Olaf-Schuett-Gambling-Bluetool-Wirecard

Gotta love how they pass statutes that protect big business / banking interests.

http://consumerist.com/2010/05/get-gold-bars-from-abu-dhabi-atm.html

Am I just blind or did NLS drop the Bitcoin to USD exchange rate?

Does this mean that I have to take the Pecunix / BC rate to figure out USD?

*moaning and groaning*

SSK@hLJWaKGvv-ouWLZOoPcfhqRA0an8ZLoPGPKi1GPTC0U,FVWgzCzXk969mg1vXq4pqHIGBZYiJl8LqqukwYfwgBA,AQACAAE/HarryBrowne-0/index.html

(On Freenet)

A lot of information about the common traps people become stuck in, about sovereignty, and about doing business fairly.

A "must read" for anyone who is going to run an exchanger.

Hey all,

I think it would be really neat if someone would approach/email (or whatever) all of the communities using LETS and got them involved in Bitcoin. Perhaps exchanging in/out of LETS could be achieved as well.

There is a lot of real world commerce (as in, not just on the internet) on the LETS system and I think it would benefit both systems to form some sort of alliance.

Hello,

I have had another idea.

It would be very cool to be able to have TOR and I2P seeds. For example: I could run BT within TOR-land on a .onion address. A client could connect their BT to TOR and have it seed from a .onion address and use it as a connected peer. (Likewise for I2P: someone could run a .i2p service that is -- well -- BC).

I might setup a couple of nodes in this fashion and post the tunnels on this forum. I already run a lot of I2P and TOR nodes so adding BC to the mix is quite trivial.

I support the idea of making BC compatible with TOR and I2P to increase the privacy of the system. I mean: why re-invent the wheel? There are thousands of mix network nodes just sitting there that can be used to enhance BC.

Cheers!

Can bitcoin be compiled to run on 64 bit systems yet? -m64 seems to break the compile.

(Not trying to nag or anything).

On a side node: I have noticed that the network is about 3x larger than normal now. I see more nodes!