[2: Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)]

I know that I should post it in this thread: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk IV (2022 Q2) [MODERATED] - but because I am still doing investigation to find out the truth and accuracy of the evidence based on sentiment here, so I decided to start this thread before posting it in the right place.


2: Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

• Ezravdb
• JeWay
  

Proof found:


[Archive]


[Archive]

Related Addresses:

Code:

bc1q7acs7fj8eg396kpzs2fkzg9wpqfgtd52hd74xg - Ezravdb
bc1qs3t5lcnx4qgw0n72ta6thnzwqtwws4468hg835 - JeWay

Explanation:
The two addresses were connected because they were caught sending a number of bitcoin received in one of Hhampuz campaigns (Mason Five), Ezravdb send bitcoin to Jeway.

Proof: https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transaction/10b00cde3e1b44870e912bea02f25cd64a21bf3008e43cb693e511fbcd65cb29

Ezravdb & Jeway also cheats another camapaign Hhampuz: [BOUNTY] Monopoly Millionaire MMG | 4 Week $30k Social Media/Sig Bounty! who both join the signature program. On the spreadsheet page, Ezravdb is at number 89 while Jeway is at 74.




Spreadsheet link: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14RrRRR6Bpx3iWvcv71W5Epypuyu0KL_a-S-IBHLlMBw/edit#gid=1913642730

Ezravdb & Jeway also cheats camapaign Hhampuz: [BOUNTY] Mason Five | A Brief History of Tomorrow | 2 Week Signature/Twitter $3k who both join the signature program. On the spreadsheet page, Ezravdb is at number 34 while Jeway is at 22.




Spreadsheet link: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wuivUmF_QRhN7GLlkXMKniWxR25BZBCawEFHqrqh0kM/edit#gid=975084243

Later, Ezravdb & Jeway tried to scam another campaign (Stake.com) by submitting an application. Jeway has already been accepted into the campaign, while Ezravdb seems to have failed.








So, if you and I use this evidence as a compelling reason to tag Ezravdb & Jeway as a cheater, is this an unreasonable error?

Someone may be able to quote my post to show the image. I'm still a newbie so I can't post image. Thanks

I have very basic suspicions about 4 high ranking accounts after watching their activity for a long time in one of the threads on the gambling board.

Here's a list of accounts:

• Republikcoin.com
• Lantind
• bestcoins1
• Davian144

I noticed the posting styles of these 4 accounts had the same thing in common when posting image, and it made me think they were owned by the same person. They are Indonesian users based on the language used in the posting history and if they are alt then they have also abused the merit system based on their merit transaction history.

I need some input and maybe some more valid proof from yours to determine if they are alt or not as every image they upload have have identical serial numbers at the end which is usually just a sequence of screenshot numbers on the same device. This is evidence from their last 5 image posts.

All quotes taken in one thread: Motosport General discussion tread --- Formula1, MotoGP, WTCC, ETCC, DTM.....

^{Image Source: gpnews.ig}

^{Image Source: MotoGp}

^{Image Source: insidemgp}

^{Image Source: insidemgp}

^{Image Source: MotoGp}

^{Image Source: MotoGp}

^{Image Source: MotoGp}

^{Image Source: brake.gp}

^{Image Source: MotoGp}

^{Source: MotoGp}

^{Image Source: MotoGp}

^{Image Source: MotoGp}

^{Source: crashnet_motogp}

^{Image Source: insidemgp}

^{Image Source: insidemgp}

^{Image Source: MotoGp}

Pay attention to the screenshot numbers, very neatly arranged in each account. What is the percentage chance that they are alts in your opinion?

Username: Groundbit
Link profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1002885
Available evidence: Account traders and account farmers
Current activity: Have promotions to full member after earning enough merit.

Groundbit has started many threads to sell and buy bitcointalk accounts consciously. It is not his recent fault but his past fault which may not be caught by the forum police.

Do you think Groundbit deserves to be punished for its misdeeds?