Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 12:34:03 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / [PRE-ANN] XBTFREELANCER 🌟World's Most Successful Bitcoin Freelancing Platform on: March 04, 2017, 04:58:57 AM
WE PRESENT TO YOU XBTFREELANCER

World's Best Freelancing Website for Bitcoin Industry



XBTFreelancer.com
Employers pay for projects in bitcoin
Freelancers get paid in bitcoin




What is XBTFreelancer.com?

XBT is the currency abbreviation of bitcoin. Bitcoin is a decentralised payment network, bitcoin (small caps) is the digital/crypto currency fuelling the Bitcoin network. On XBTFreelancer.com you can post any job, like a programming job, a translation job or a graphic design job, pay in bitcoin to a freelancer, and have the freelancer do the job earn bitcoin. bitcoin can be exchanged for cash or used for buying on the Internet or in physical stores. Read more below to understand.

Why is it safe to work through XBTFreelancer?

Working on a freelance project using XBTFreelancer is perfectly safe as long as you keep the rules. Make sure you always have a milestone on the project you were awarded as a freelancer. Milestone is essentially an Escrow. Once a milestone exists on the awarded project, it means that the employer had escrowed funds equivalent to the milestone USD value at the time it was created. In case of a dispute the escrow funds will be released to you, providing you provided work done.








OUR AIM :-

To create employment thorugh Bitcoin and to make Employers adopt Bitcoin as an technology for outsourcing jobs .



Going Public


After Years of development with substantial funding and funding from family and friends the Team has decided to go public . Xbtfreelancer is already an established platform for freelancing in the bitcoin industry .
What the team needs know is resources to compete with new upcoming projects which will try to take market share of xbtfreelancer . Thus in this sphere of competition it is important that the platform raises enough funds to compete with its competiton .


XBTFreelancer Overview :-

Monthly Users :- 55,000 Users
Avg. Visit Duration :- 00:05:21
Bounce Rate :- 39.46%

Major Traffic from :- USA , INDIA , RUSSIA
This month we saw Maximum Traffic from Yemen with an increase by 129% in the month of January .







How will the Team Fund the project :-

1) The team will be releasing XBTFreelancer Tokens for trading and the investors will directly buy the token and invest in the token which would be mineable .
2) The team would have to consistently develop the platform and by developing the platform the value of each token would increase .
3) The team would allocate token for bounties
4) The team would own 20% of the total token created which would be used for development .
5) 80% of the token would be mineable and would be mined by miners over a time period of years .



XBTFreelancer in Media :-

NewsBTC

http://www.newsbtc.com/2017/01/29/fiverr-bitcoin-support-no-more/

NewsBTC

http://www.newsbtc.com/2017/02/23/xbtfreelancer-review/

Eastern Daily News

https://easterndaily.com/bitcoins-without-using-money/

Nigeria Today

http://www.nigeriatoday.ng/2017/02/a-closer-look-at-how-and-why-bitcoin-is-traded-p2p-in-russia-and-venezuela/

Coinwelt (Blog)

http://coinwelt.de/2016/06/bitcoins-verdienen-mit-xbtfreelancer/

CriptoNoticias

https://criptonoticias.com/aplicaciones/xbtfreelancer-la-mejor-plataforma-para-conseguir-trabajos-pagados-en-bitcoins/#axzz4aKVL7hMu

Website

https://www.xbtfreelancer.com/

2  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Fastest Blockchain of the world ? on: February 19, 2017, 01:03:31 PM
Hello ,
I would like to know which coin has the fastest blockchain ?
Means fastest number of Block creation + Number of transactions .
3  Other / Meta / Mods are censoring discussion by burying relevant threads in Speculation noise on: December 10, 2014, 10:54:43 PM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=888883.msg9801502#msg9801502

I am about done with this forum. It is clear there is censorship here.
4  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Bitcoin defeating fiat is very unlikely on: December 06, 2014, 12:40:35 AM
The logic:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=884154.msg9753233#msg9753233
5  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / One opportunity no one in Bitcoin universe talks about on: December 04, 2014, 12:56:05 PM
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/12/04/why-central-banks-buy-equities/

There isn't enough liquidity in the Bitcoin asset to accomodate the $200 trillion net worth. Just $10 billion (actually much less because a market cap is greater than the actual cash invested in the asset during an all time high price, since not everyone paid the highest price) caused Bitcoin to have a severe bubble and crash in 2013.

The only way the liquidity can scale orders-of-magnitude faster is decentralized financial derivatives:

https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/White-Paper#financial-derivatives-and-stable-value-currencies

Non-technical n00bs don't understand the technical meaning of "scale", so n00bs please don't waste my time with your nonsense.
6  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Is Bitcoin good enough; there aren't critically important improvements needed? on: December 01, 2014, 09:46:45 PM
This poll is to help me test this conclusion I formed:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=877398.msg9710552#msg9710552


Improvements needed:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=877398.msg9695533#msg9695533

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=877398.msg9704552#msg9704552


Additional logic:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=877398.msg9703042#msg9703042

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=877398.msg9703376#msg9703376

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=877398.msg9704835#msg9704835

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=877398.msg9705960#msg9705960

Edit: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=877398.msg9716154#msg9716154

Edit#2: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=880088.msg9725612#msg9725612 (why cash != Bitcoin)


Apologies for creating another thread. I wanted to get some feedback with voting and I forgot to put a poll on the linked thread.

Please vote honestly. Don't try to make me happy with your vote choice, but please don't vote 'no' out of dislike for me also. We need an objective poll please.

Anyone who has been my supporter, please do not vote. I want to see what the Bitcoin community thinks.
7  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Decentrally mined currency has failed so far on: November 29, 2014, 11:18:42 AM
Edit: "Decentrally mined currency has failed and can't possibly be rescued" original title was corrected.

I identified in April that the powers-that-be (Peter Thiel et al) were taking over Bitcoin. Since then it is become more noticeable with Paypal and soon eBay adopting Bitcoin.

Bitcoin mining and everything else about it can be highly regulated because none of it is anonymous. Even recent research found that 81% of Tor users can be unmasked, as I had long warned was the case. Regulation means any decentralization is just for show and doesn't have any practical protective effect. Some have argued about inability to get consistent regulation across all jurisdictions, and even one country that took a free market stance would provide hope. Any one who believes that, isn't studying the reality of what is happening in the world with G20 pledging cooperation[2], etc.

I have thought deeply (I was AnonyMint) about the possible designs for decentralized consensus, as well the various strategies for anonymity that are plausible.

It is impossible there can be all 3 of true anonymity, fast enough transactions, and truly decentralized mining consensus. I could explain in depth, but I'd rather challenge anyone who thinks they are technically capable, to explain a design that makes it possible. Because over the past year, I've run every possible design through my mind, studied everything I could find from others, and have finally come to this conclusion.

Note I didn't say there couldn't be decentralized adoption, use, or even decentralized mining shares. But the mining pools will be centralized and thus regulated (unless they are anonymous). Note I didn't say there couldn't be anonymity nor fast transactions, but decentralized pools would have to be forsaken (and they don't really exist now, it is just for show).

It might be possible to get anonymity and decentralized mining pools, but this certainly wouldn't be able to support fast transactions nor would it be resistant to a Sybil attack on the number of mining pools.

Some of have argued that there is P2Pool, but how many times do I have to repeat that P2Pool can't be impervious to a share withholding attack[1], thus it can't be a sustainable paradigm.

Conclusion: Bitcoin is not a savior. As I had warned in my first essay on this forum, Bitcoin: The Digital Kill Switch, Bitcoin is part of the push towards electronic money that will be used to control all of us[2].

I have come full circle. The situation is quite hopeless (note I didn't say Bitcoin won't appreciate in value, although I still expect a bottom below or near $200 first), rather I mean hopeless in terms of the idealism of protecting our monetary future. Maybe it is time for me to leave cryptocurrency and go back to writing software applications.

Satoshi's invention of decentralized consensus is useless from a practical standpoint at least for money and sent us on a wild goose chase where we end up with nothing in the end. Sad but true. Cry

[1]https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=339902.msg3719385#msg3719385
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789978.msg9115612#msg9115612
[2]http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/01/25/electric-money-will-eliminate-bank-runs/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2013/12/04/electronic-money-taxes/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2012/06/27/reality-check/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2013/03/17/the-downside-of-electronic-money-what-is-left/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2013/11/17/negative-interest-rates-eliminating-cash-the-summers-solution/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/04/14/the-secret-agenda/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/01/24/electronic-money-coming-everywhere-sooner-than-you-think/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2013/06/18/g8-going-to-hunt-down-all-capital/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/02/07/g20-to-cordinate-to-hunt-down-taxes-worldwide/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2013/09/07/g20-agrees-on-worldwide-access-to-all-information-on-the-wealth-of-the-citizens-for-global-taxation/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/11/16/g20-to-change-status-of-bank-accounts-investments/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/11/16/the-truth-about-g20-banking-directive/
8  Other / Politics & Society / Anonymity: Death of the Stateless Web on: November 19, 2014, 08:58:55 AM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=864659.0
9  Other / Off-topic / Anonymity: Death of the Stateless Web on: November 19, 2014, 08:42:04 AM
    Anonymity: Death of the Stateless Web
    by UnunoctiumTesticles

    To garnish more interest an apt title could have been, “Tor Is Not Anonymous—Web Paradigm Shift Underway”. I am referring to antithesis of the computer science term stateful—not to being without a nation-state.

    Googling “death of the web browser” returns many articles claiming smart phone apps are replacing the web browser1. For example, Facebook’s app provides a more optimized experience than browsing the web site on the phone. However, I posit that more content instances2 are being added to and accessed from the traditional web than are being solely accessed from apps; for example, the posts to blogs and forums. My assumption seems intuitively valid for at least two reasons. Two finger typing blog and forum posts on small screens is highly inefficient and error prone. Secondly, new web content instances are being added much faster than new apps because writing HTML is much easier than programming the Android OS or iOS. Even if there exists an app that facilitates authoring popular categories of stateless content, the data format of that stateless content would become a standard MIME type (whether it was an open standard or reverse-engineered because of the content popularity), that app is a content browser, and web browsers could support the content MIME type.

    The balance will tip in favor of apps because:

    • Android apps are coming to your laptop and PC8.
    • To supplant the web browser because apps can often provide a superior experience. I enumerate some possible improvements provided by apps in The Stateful Web section below.
    • As the demand for anonymity on the web grows, the stateless web browser must be replaced by apps because network anonymity requires high network latency and only apps have the capability to provide a reasonable user experience when there is high network latency.

    Anonymity Requires Latency

    There are two fundamental types of anonymity mix networks: private information retrieval (a.k.a. PIR or “everyone sees everything”) a la Bitmessage and Chaum mixes such as onion routing a la Tor.

    PIR although low latency is not anonymous for any practical internet packet model because it would be impossible to dynamically adjust anonymity set groupings which balanced the traffic between all set members without revealing correlations that destroy the anonymity; also any practical design would not be entirely decentralized. Also PIR requires a high bandwidth burden on the clients since each client must receive all the server responses for all clients in the anonymity set.

    Onion routing is fully decentralized and does not require a high bandwidth burden on the clients. Although it also suffers correlations (intersections) from servers which dynamically exit the network, but if the persistent hidden services are the routing servers (which is not the case in Tor nor I2P) this will be a much less frequent event than the dynamically (constantly changing) balanced groupings required by PIR.

    The following frequent Tor attacks render Tor extremely unreliable, but could be fixed in an improved onion network.

    1. Timing (traffic) analysis3 enabled by the requirement for low latency, thus not inserting random delays in relaying at each routing server. Dummy (a.k.a. cover or padding) traffic is more wasteful, ineffective if not global, thus not a decentralized solution.
    2.Anonymity set is egregiously too few at only 3 hops. Hidden services have 6 hops, but only 3 while initializing the rendezvous relay of the circuit.
    3.Entry, exit, and relay routing servers provide bandwidth for free; thus are likely provided by national security agencies which have the financial incentive to unmask anonymity on a wide-scale.
    4. No DDoS prevention; thus inexpensive4 spamming causes exit node banning, exacerbates the three prior items in this list, and makes hidden services unsuitable for high traffic sites.
    5.Exit nodes are a massive security hole because national security agencies have backdoors to important servers and SSL certificates5―ideally only hidden services should be allowed.
    6.Intersections from servers which exit the network.
    7.Hidden services which are not also routing servers, have an identifiable traffic pattern where many more packets are outgoing than incoming due to the incoming be requests for content.

    Fixing #1 and #2 requires a high latency design. Fixing #2 - #7 requires clients paying per packet for (and to) the hidden services in order to incentivize them to be also the routing servers. If users select only hidden services they are familiar with for routing, this prevents a Sybil attack against the network.

    So a high latency design with pay-per-packet economics can be truly anonymous, but it will require a stateful web at the client provided by apps. Whereas, Tor was designed to work with the existing stateless web employing low latency, exit nodes (instead of exclusively hidden services), and the stateless web browser. As a result, research claims up to 81% of Tor users can be identified3.

    Latency Incompatible With Stateless Content

    Web content—even often when cached to check the current server file timestamp—requires HTTP retrieval from the host server. Network latency delays the user on every click in a stateless web browser, which could be on the order of double-digit seconds per click on a correctly designed, high latency, anonymous network. Even Tor’s slightly increased latency—albeit lower than required for true anonymity—can be maddening tsuris.

    Tor admits latency is a problem for hidden services (with its still tiny anonymity set of only 6 hops) and that solutions will likely come from restructuring the paradigm (“protocol” or “JavaScript hacks”). And Tor admits that supporting the “low latency web” is a “hard problem” that they “still don’t know how to do it correctly”.

    Demand for Anonymity Increasing

    Global police socialist nirvana cometh3 6.

    The 1878 Posse Comitatus Act forbade the use of armed troops on USA soil, but now it is openly violated by the legal switcheroo shell game of reconstituting the “peace officers” (a.k.a. police) so they are now effectively paramilitary. Even in Europe for example Switzerland is increasing gun control (oh grasshopper please understand why a lack of private arms means Putin’s ground forces can run over Europe like a hot knife through warm butter).

    The Stateful Web

    Strategies for minimizing the user’s perceived latency will vary and require client-side programming to be installed as client-side app. For example, a forum would persistently cache posts client-side, keep a persistent server-side record of cached posts for each client, and push new and edited posts to the client when the client is viewing a page which requires the updates.

    Note that latency doesn’t reduce throughput, so clients might be optionally programmed to preload updates and other predictive strategies such as a search engine initiating loading of the top results before the user clicks to view each of them. Rarely updated content (e.g. images, videos) could aggregated by hidden service hub servers which could continuously push7 updates to client caches.

    HTML5’s Offline Web Applications and Web Storage is moving in the direction of the stateful web, but it lacks the interfaces, design, programming, and programming language flexibility of the Android OS which also has a superior security model. Android OS is coming to your laptop and PC8.

    App installation is normally as simple as clicking to confirm that approve of installing the app and the app’s requested permissions. Note most apps in the Android security model don’t need any special permissions at least those developed for the latest Kitkat version.

    The title and content of this epistle is not about the death of all stateless content, rather I think it quite explicitly says death of the Stateless Web. This salient distinction is that per the Unix design principles of least presumptions, orthogonality, and separation-of-concerns, the content and rending model (e.g. HTML) shouldn’t have a monopoly over the transport model (e.g. HTTP). The Web is becoming more general, stateful, and the transport layer is detaching from market dominance by the rendering layer. This creates new opportunities and possibilities.


    1I found interesting data for smart phone penetration by region and country.

    2As opposed to the less meaningful bandwidth consumption comparison.

    3https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onion_routing#Weaknesses
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tor_%28anonymity_network%29#Traffic-analysis_attack
    Research claims 81% of Tor users can be identified.
    Timing analysis in conjunction with compromising the entry guard nodes and DDoS on exit nodes were possible attacks employed in the recent unmasking of hundreds of hidden services by FBI-ICE-Europol.

    4http://blogs.wsj.com/tech-europe/2012/11/05/where-to-rent-a-botnet-for-2-an-hour-or-buy-one-for-700/
    http://www.networkworld.com/article/2168696/malware-cybercrime/black-hat--how-to-create-a-massive-ddos-botnet-using-cheap-online-ads.html

    5http://falkvinge.net/2013/09/12/the-nsa-and-u-s-congress-has-destroyed-ssl-we-must-rebuild-web-security-from-the-ground-up/
    http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/05/net-us-usa-security-snowden-encryption-idUSBRE98413720130905
    http://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2013/12/how-does-nsa-break-ssl.html

    6



    7The onion routing circuit can be reused indefinitely.

    8https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chrome_OS#Support_for_Android_applications
    http://www.zdnet.com/could-an-android-desktop-replace-your-windows-pc-7000024837/
    http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/22665/run-android-on-your-netbook-or-desktop/
    [/list]
    10  Other / Politics & Society / Why Do Americans Hate Android And Love Apple? on: November 18, 2014, 04:33:15 AM
    Quote
    Why Do Americans Hate Android And Love Apple?
    Worldwide, Android rules. But here in the U.S., Android gets derided as a "ghetto" product. And you know what that means, nudge nudge wink wink.
        Dan Lyons
        Jan 29, 2013


    The numbers tell an incredible story. Worldwide, Android has 75% market share in smartphones, versus 15% for Apple, according to IDC. But in the United States the iPhone still rules, accounting for 63% of smartphone sales at Verizon and an amazing 84% of smartphone sales at AT&T.

    In Asia, affluent young buyers are dropping the iPhone and turning to Android devices, particularly those made by Samsung, Reuters reports. One marketing manager in Bangkok says Apple products have become like Louis Vuitton handbags, something that once was considered luxe but now is commonplace.

    But here in the States Android still lags far behind...



    Quote
    If Android is so popular, why are many apps still released for iOS first?
    Google-powered devices are selling like hot cakes, but some developers still find Apple's platform a tastier prospect. Here's why – and how it's changing
        Stuart Dredge   
        theguardian.com, Thursday 15 August 2013 16.30 BST   


    Android is big. Really big. According to research firm Gartner, 79% of all smartphones sold between April and June this year were running Android: 177.9m handsets compared to Apple's 31.9m iPhones.

    Another research firm, IDC, estimates that 62.6% of tablets that shipped to retailers between April and June were running Android: 28.2m devices versus 14.6m iPads.

    Meanwhile, Google says that more than 1.5m new Android devices are being activated every day, it's nearing 1bn activated in total so far, and that by the end of this year that total will include more than 70m Android tablets.

    Big. Yet a lot of apps still come out for Apple's iOS first or even exclusively...



    Apple's "walled garden" and "protect dumb user from doing something unsafe" philosophy is starting to bite their a$$ hard...

    Quote
    An iPhone Lover’s Confession: I Switched To the Nexus 4. Completely.
       Ralf Rottmann - 1/04/13 9:03am

    ...This also is the area where I was most disappointed when Apple introduced iOS 6.

    In fact, I think iOS has reached a point where usability starts to significantly decrease due to the many workarounds that Apple has introduced. All of these just to prevent exposing a paradigm like a file system or allowing apps to securely talk to each others. There is a better way of doing this. Apples knows about it but simply keeps ignoring the issues. One can see the most obvious example when it comes to handling all sorts of files and sharing.

    Let's assume I receive an email with a PDF attachment which I'd like to use in some other apps and maybe post to a social network later.

    On iOS, the user is forced to think around Apple's constraints. There is no easy way to just detach the file from the email and subsequently use it in what ever way I want. Instead, all iOS apps that want to expose some sort of sharing feature, do have to completely take care for it themselves. The result is a fairly inconsistent, unsatisfying user experience.

    On iOS, you might use the somewhat odd "Open in…" feature – in case the developer was so kind to implement it – to first move the file over to Dropbox, which gives you a virtual cloud-based file system. If you're lucky, the other app, from which you want to use the file next, offers Dropbox integration, too, so you can re-download it and start from there. All because Apple denies the necessity of basic cross-app local storage.

    On Android, it's really simple.

    I can detach the file to a local folder and further work with it from there. Leveraging every single app that handles PDF files. In case I receive a bunch of mp3 files, I can do the same. And every app that somehow can handle audio playback, can reuse those mp3 files.

    Another great example: Sharing stuff on social networks. On iOS, I have to rely on the developers again. Flipboard, as one of the better examples, gives me the ability to directly share with Google+, Twitter and Facebook. On my Nexus 4, I have 20+ options. That is, because every app I install can register as a sharing provider. It's a core feature of the Android operating system.

    But it goes even further: On Android, I can change the default handlers for specific file types – much like I'm used to from desktop operating systems.

    If, for example, you're not happy with the stock Photo Gallery application, that shows up whenever an app wants you to pick an image, you can simply install one from over a hundred alternatives and tell Android to use it as its new default. The next time you post a photo with the Facebook app – or have to pick an image from within any other app – your favorite gallery picker shows up instead of Android's own.

    All of this is entirely impossible on iOS today. I've stopped counting how often I felt annoyed because I clicked a link to a location in Mobile Safari and would have loved the Google Maps app to launch. Instead, Apple's own Maps app is hardcoded into the system...

    P.S. I am developing my application exclusively for the Kitkat version of Android, which has 30% market share of Nov. 3, 2014, and projected to exceed 50% within 6 months[1].

    [1] http://www.dailymobile.net/2014/07/09/kitkat-soars-to-market-share-high/
         http://www.mobileburn.com/23438/news/kitkat-rides-to-huge-android-market-share
         https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Android_historical_version_distribution_-_vector.svg
    11  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / [ANN] Official Annoymous on: October 10, 2014, 06:57:32 AM
    Mining starts now. 0% premine. 100% bullshit.

    Note anything you pen in this thread can and will be used against you in an Eew (Eponymous Extravagance Whiskey) tribunal.
    Pages: [1]
    Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!