@Mr Frog: Thank you for sharing!  |
|
|
|
unable to send wtt from cryptonomos to giga watt..
it shows code incorrect code, but i followed the code that sent to me and tried many times..
can anyone help?
My code was not sent to me. Did you get the right code? 1. Go to your giga-watt.com/dashboard 2. Press the circle with the + (get tokens) 3. In the pop up choose cryptonomos 4. copy the UUID Number to the send function in your cryptonomos dashboard and then send 5. try it with one token first |
|
|
|
I'm quite confusing that:
can I start mining without WTT tokens? if that so, only difference is my power cost went up from 0.33 to 0.975?
1. Currently you need tokens. 2. The difference is that token holders pay no rent. |
|
|
|
Yep. : ) Infos we will have. We just don't know if it will be good or bad news. (Meaning we have no idea what hardware has been deployed yesterday. Even if they even really were deployed) We only know some hardware should be online around the 18th. Next deployment should be online around the 26th. And then it is around October 4th. Good Luck all.  The consequence for me is that I currently do not buy any miners. I could, but I won't. I need to see at least one miner working.  |
|
|
|
Yeah, same her. Patience is the key. On the other hand I can understand why they might not be too precise in their answers. On slack their are some guys shouting for reimbursement and cheaper mining because of the delay. And one guy even suggested legal measures against Bitmain From the S9 Bitcointalk threat, September 13th. I ordered an S9 13.5TH on 7/8/17 that was promised to ship between September 10-20.
UPS says it will be delivered in the US Friday, 9/15... Other also already received their S9 from the same Batch. I can understand that some people get nervous with the lack of communication from GW. We have zero news concerning the delivery. I don't know if they received the miner I ordered with them on June 16th who was suppose to arrive at GW at the end of August.Even if I trust GW 100% it is a frustrating situation. Yes, frustrating it is. But as Triangulum postet in #1440: There isn't much activity on their Slack channel. Try their Telegram channel instead. It's much more active. GW CEO, Dave Carlson, said this morning that GW people were putting together info for equipment purchasers and that emails would be sent out to them with some indication as to which POD (or which set of power capacity that comes online) their miners would go into. According to their timeline, POD 1 at Pangborn already passed "Final City inspection prior Launch of the POD" and "UL listing inspection". "Hardware Deployment" is next on 09/16/17, "UL labeling" on 09/17 and "L&I Final Inspection - Occupancy" on 08/18. It seems the issue with BM power supply was resolved. WTT tokens for batch 3 and 4 are delayed for 5-6 weeks still. Hope it helps.So we will hopefully at least get some info soon. |
|
|
|
This price right now ... could be interesting to buy some coins ... Beside this, are they planning to list it on some exchanges? Thanks ... Yes, a listing is planned by year end. But due to numerous delays it might be rather Q1 or Q2 2018. |
|
|
|
These emails are always non binding. You never know to whom you are actually speaking. I'm not a native english speaker, but would you formulate that like this if you work for GW?
It sounds as if the author of the mail does not belong to GW. Maybe a third party managing the email flood for GW? I would have no problem with that. But why not say it out? I'm XXX from company XXXX and were helping GW in the client service......
It was Susie today. Obviously if she can't tell me when they will have the update online, attached to the timeline (apparently) there is no chance she will be able to tell me when my miner will be online. I don't know who is answering exactly or from where. But they don't have and are not able to get precise infos. Not very very helpful. Nice and fast answer if you don't mind the lack of... answer. : ) Fair enough I'll wait until one day I wake up and I have my miners connected, in the real world. And not only when I am sleeping. Yeah, same her. Patience is the key. On the other hand I can understand why they might not be too precise in their answers. On slack their are some guys shouting for reimbursement and cheaper mining because of the delay. And one guy even suggested legal measures against Bitmain |
|
|
|
Oh no doubt I like & trust the concept, company, team, transparency aspect, ... and I am also ok with the delays. Even if they seems huge. The lake of communication is as you said their big problem. I just had an answer from them. Short and with out all the expected answers, as usual. 1- Hello,
Thanks for your message. The timeline you referred to stands. Giga Watt is preparing updates now on construction & the hold up with inspections. Also, the team is putting together information for equipment purchasers right now so you will know which of the facilities your miners will go into. You'll be able to look at our pod deployment schedule (https://giga-watt.com/promo/timeline) and know which of them your miners are scheduled for and will be available soon.Regarding: 'Also, the team is putting together information for equipment purchasers right now so you will know which of the facilities your miners will go into.'right now is cool but When will I have this infos ? Today ? 2- Hi,
No exact time to advise when they'll push out updated info to the timeline. It's a priority they are working on now. These emails are always non binding. You never know to whom you are actually speaking. I'm not a native english speaker, but would you formulate that like this if you work for GW? 2- Hi,
No exact time to advise when they'll push out updated info to the timeline. It's a priority they are working on now. It sounds as if the author of the mail does not belong to GW. Maybe a third party managing the email flood for GW? I would have no problem with that. But why not say it out? I'm XXX from company XXXX and were helping GW in the client service...... |
|
|
|
Any news out of GW today ?
1 Giga Pod completed — 0.75 MW July 15th
2 Giga Pods completed — 2.4 MW August 1st
Expansion of the unit — 0.9 MW August 15th
3 Giga Pods completed — 4.5 MW September 1st
9 Giga Pods completed — 15 MW September 15th
I am not sure I get 100% of the situation here.
We are September 16th and on the GW timeline it says :
PANGBORN
POD 1 & BUILDING A Unfinished
MOSES LAKE
POD 1 & POD 2 Unfinished
So is it the 1 giga + 2 giga Pods + The expansion of the unit. August 15th that we still waiting for ?
Which mean we are 12 Pods behind. Not Started yet. & 4 unfinished Pods.
Concerning the equipments. I will only speak for what I know.
The S9 at time of my purchase (June 16th) was suppose to ship between August 16th and August 21st. On a first pay first ship standard as they like to say on Bitmain Website at the time of the purchase.
Advertised August 28th By GW on their Website.
The L3+ at time of my purchase (June 14th) was suppose to ship between around September 13th and September 18th. Not 100% sure the date were exactly that on the Bitmain Website but at +/- 3 at least days for sure.
Advertised September 20th By GW on their Website.
As for today I have no news 100% confirmed either for the shipping or anything else concerning the miners.
I know we had a letter 15 days ago to justify the release delay of the WTT Tokens Batch 3 & 4 but I would be happy to have more news 15 days after..
Delays can always happen but Damn there is a lot of them here guyz.
I agree with you and in essence we are 12 Pods behind. I am actually ok with the delay. A project of this size always has some hickups. The PSU issue is not there fault, then the final inspection, permission and construction delays it all comes together. Still I'm fine with that. What really makes it frustrating is the non communication policy. I know we have slack, FB, instagram and twitter and all the rest, but the really critical questions are not being answered there. (didn't check telegram yet) With the exception of the official Dave Carlson mail two week's ago I got all my information from second hand. That is a very challenging. |
|
|
|
They actually didn't even change the name. They just turned the W letter upside down and pushed it to the back: WTT = TTM I must admit it, this is already the high art of deception. |
|
|
|
is there any update on releasing the third batch? I can't wait to rent out my WTT token and if I will buy more token to increase my daily profit.
Current value of WTT: $2.20
I expecting that the value would rise up once they released the third batch token.
No update on slack. They are pretty silent on this issue. I am first batch and still waiting for my miners to show up. We will soon enough see whether wtt is under- or overvalued There isn't much activity on their Slack channel. Try their Telegram channel instead. It's much more active. GW CEO, Dave Carlson, said this morning that GW people were putting together info for equipment purchasers and that emails would be sent out to them with some indication as to which POD (or which set of power capacity that comes online) their miners would go into. According to their timeline, POD 1 at Pangborn already passed "Final City inspection prior Launch of the POD" and "UL listing inspection". "Hardware Deployment" is next on 09/16/17, "UL labeling" on 09/17 and "L&I Final Inspection - Occupancy" on 08/18. It seems the issue with BM power supply was resolved. WTT tokens for batch 3 and 4 are delayed for 5-6 weeks still. Hope it helps. Thank you for sharing that information Triangulum. Good to hear that it's going forward. I'll try this telegram thing |
|
|
|
is there any update on releasing the third batch? I can't wait to rent out my WTT token and if I will buy more token to increase my daily profit.
Current value of WTT: $2.20
I expecting that the value would rise up once they released the third batch token.
No update on slack. They are pretty silent on this issue. I am first batch and still waiting for my miners to show up. We will soon enough see whether wtt is under- or overvalued |
|
|
|
https://giga-watt.com/wallets/btcWell, I'm renting out 100 WTT token in the site above (you know!), I've found something odd.  See the screenshot above. I've never withdrawn BTC/ETH/LTC, but it shows "withdraw". I can't understand  I once had multiple credits in one hour and I asked the support, they said it was due to a correction of a prior day. I believe this is also a correction of too much paid out. I also had that on that particular day. |
|
|
|
"While Giga Watt’s initial token sale has ended, there is still time to join the endeavor."
I wonder what that exactly means?
It might be promotion of Cryptonomos. They finished token sale of giga-watt, and now promote themselves for other companies. Yes, possible. But what about batch 5 and 6 with 8.7 MW capacity which they are going to build. Maybe they might have a secondary offering.... Their initial plan was: - September 1, 2017: 3 Giga Pods completed, 4.5 MW - September 15, 2017: 9 Giga Pods completed, 15 MW - October 1, 2017: 3 Giga Pods completed, 4.5 MW - November 15, 2017: 3 Giga Pods completed, 4.2 MW you can see 18 pods here - same qty of circles as on diagrams. But as they sold during ICO less tokens than planned, they will just build less pods. They also mentioned that they won't release more tokens. But who knows. If this project becomes sucessfull, why might change their mind. I actually thought I read somewhere that they will build all pods as planned but unfortunately I can't find that information anymore. If you are right and they build less then hopefully they might not ignore the market if the project becomes sucessfull. I hope the token does not climb too high. |
|
|
|
"While Giga Watt’s initial token sale has ended, there is still time to join the endeavor."
I wonder what that exactly means?
It might be promotion of Cryptonomos. They finished token sale of giga-watt, and now promote themselves for other companies. Yes, possible. But what about batch 5 and 6 with 8.7 MW capacity which they are going to build. Maybe they might have a secondary offering.... |
|
|
|
Price of WTT at etherdelta was dumped significantly today - people trying to fix their earnings. In this case the question of distribution has become more and more sharp.
Really. If you look into big volume sales you will see that real price is around 1.4 USD per token: WTT/ETH WTT ETH 0.004799000 2476.000 11.882 anybody willing to sell?  With all traded prices around 0.0073 - 0.0075 WTT/ETH it almost looks like a typo,  |
|
|
|
For Real, This looks promising !
But how can we trade these tokens ? Can we Purchase them using Credit cards ?
Also, Reserve me the arabic translation if you need it !
Token sale is over. You must wait till the token hits the exchange. Hopefully by year end but with all delays it might be Q1 or Q2 2018. Or try etherdelta. Are you sure, that delay could be 6 month? Why? I thought it shouldn't be so much. They said delay is a few working days. No, I'm not sure. But they said in slack that it might be year end for the token to get listed. And that was before the delay was announced. |
|
|
|
For Real, This looks promising !
But how can we trade these tokens ? Can we Purchase them using Credit cards ?
Also, Reserve me the arabic translation if you need it !
Token sale is over. You must wait till the token hits the exchange. Hopefully by year end but with all delays it might be Q1 or Q2 2018. Or try etherdelta. |
|
|
|
Try to switch back to 4.2. Since no miners got new released tokens the rent should actually be stable till batch 3 is out.
If there is delay in token release, present tokens should be in demand even for 6.45 rent, which is not so. I wonder why? Maybe becouse of nobody lends them and it is just Giga Watt simulation. I wonder does somebody lend tokens? I'm personally lending (renting out) now. But if I try to lend higher than 4.2c, most part of my tokens become free. Like nobody is ready to pay more than 4.2c - which is quite strange, when tokens are in scarcity. >But if I try to lend higher than 4.2c, most part of my tokens become free Same with me  I hope higher rate! Sorry I mean to borrow. What if there are no real people who borrow tokens. Just fake borrowing from Giga Watt. In this case there is nothing strange that system rejects higher rates despite of token scarsity. Nobody borrows tokens. The number of miners you have determines which rate you must pay. The system automatically matches your miners with rent out tokens then. Or if too few tokens are rent out then you must pay full. If you can't rent out at 6.45 it only means that clients with 1-10 miners have more or less their tokens. Currently it's the big guy's which were caught by the policy change and I believe they will get their tokens not until b4. Hm I thought there is already working facility with miners without tokens at all. Yes, pod 1 und 2 are fully deployed. Three is delayed. I only meant that the borrowing of tokens is not an active task which a miner without tokens must perform. It is fully automatic. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
