 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4
|
Awww! It was good for a while. Congratulations to the happy couple! So this is how the merit system looks like in practise:
aTriz rewarding Lauda with 50 merit points for a 'shitpost' (not my choice of word, but often used by those type of people) like this:
Half an hour later Lauda answering aTriz with 20 merit points only for opening a simple bounty thread in November:
Klaaas also wanted to get merit with Lauda and gave his all away for only one commercial opening post:
Link:
Does anyone doubt that any member outside the established circle would get tagged red for such merit farming?
This is just one example of what I mean when I write about abuse of the merit system and abuse of the trust system by the established members. And now aTriz is thrown under the bus, lest the mastermind gets burned too. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=135920The merit system is very good but abused by many old members  |
|
|
|
|
Scammers , dont send fund and dont provide your id
|
|
|
|
Lauda Tagged my team members just because they are working with me (they were not even part of that project which has accused(falsely), infact they were not even in my team when I managed that project) but still she tagged them just to damage our services.
The difference being, they knew. Your case is not related to a singular project, and your reference rating properly reflects on that. They knew what? and what they suppose to know already? and yet even a single scam haven't proved on me... just because you took some false referrence and tagged me as a scammer (and forced your sidekicks to do the same ) doesn't make me a scammer. every sensible person who read your feedbacks if open the reference link can realize that is false. the fact is we both are in same situation now... I am sure Atriz remember once I told him.. "if a manager call another manager scammer just because one of his bounty he've managed which turned into scam, then he should wait and see when same will happen with himself".. I believe at an individual Atriz is not a scammer , we both did the same mistake, a bounty manager have no connection with a project's core team. if a project turn into scam the manager would be the first one who get scam from them. and now I see you tagged Atriz also to save yourself... What a "Wet Cat"  you are the only active manager with 15 red trust , say welcome to Atriz to the club . |
|
|
|
As I said, there is clearly some abuse and some hypocrisy around DT members, not that I care since I personally always review any trust rating myself.
Dont say everyone , This is group of haters that keep atack OG even when Og is sleepy . |
|
|
|
|
Well , the scammer have been tagged by his friend.He had no choice , Hope he take this as a lesson.
|
|
|
|
He admitted everything in this thread.
I was wondering how old is he? and why a mod and DT still supported a serial liar ? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2751956.0 No. https://imgur.com/a/pFd3vIt was a marketing strategy and they tried to say they raised so much in just a day or 2. I doubt they raised anymore then 1 BTC. You are ok with ICOs stating false information about how much they have raised to other potential investors... and you would call this a marketing strategy? Ico wasn't a scam, was a fail. They spent more than 1 BTC in marketing and basically had 2 investors and barely anything invested. its been over 2 months and i can not withdraw my btc!!!! i don't want to hear you are working on the feature .. I want to know EXACTLY when you will be making the withdrawal feature function I have asked repeatedly and been told over and over to hold tight, the feature is coming... that is on the few times i have gotten a reply, mostly i am totally ignored if not a scam, why is there no withdrawal? I've refunded you via PM. https://vimeo.com/263096822
|
|
|
|
|
I withdraw more than $29.000 few month ago, never had problem. Do they stolen only USA Citizen?
|
|
|
|
You didn't understand my point.
The topic is all about bounty managers here. They are exposing our email ids through this forum, not the ICOs. Please read my reply above for Hilarious.
I'm not talking anything outside the forum, an ICO company may be selling our contact info after the end of ICO and we can't do anything if they are really doing this.
Can you list down a few examples of that happening actively ? Please link me to a bounty program where a bounty manager is asking for email id's on the forum and not (outside forum such as google spreadsheets) Again you misunderstood me. "Outside the forum" I was referring to the ICO companies who may sell the email database at the end of ICO... It is possible, I don't know if you will agree with me or not. And regarding the bounty managers are exposing our email ids through this forum, they use google spreadsheets for the participants to register and you know it very well. The List of bounty campaigns exposed email ids:Aeternum in all sheets Fiancia in social media sheets On.Live in youtube sheet FroshFeel in signature bounty Baappay in all sheets This is a small list, and are publicly accessible. There is so many of this kind which I've ignored so far. And you may say me lazy because I'm not going to search those again. I haven't kept any record for the list as a proof and campaign managers can change/hide in future. Because my intention is not to argue or fight with anyone here, the reason for creating this topic to create awareness of this issue so that in future bounty managers do keep the email ids private. Although I wouldn't like being treated this way by any campaign manager, I don't think this is a Meta-problem: people volunteer to hand over data in exchange for a bounty, just like they publish their Twitter and Facebook accounts.
I have no doubt most of them use fake accounts anyway, only created to hunt bounties.
I thought meta could be the best board to discuss this issue as I can't think of an appropriate board for the issue to be discussed. Let me know I'll move accordingly. I would like to know which managers decided not to hide the email addresses...
I've pmed 2 or 3 managers maybe to hide the email id column. One of them (EquityBase) responded and hidden accordingly and the FianciaCoin did not respond and neither hidden the email id column. After that I didn't contact anyone for this issue. But I'm thinking to drop a msg in future to every one of them who falls in this issue to hide the column. All those managers are not new , they should know that. |
|
|
|
|
Hilariousanco left Atriz a Positive trust after few days he removed it for some unknow reason , I dont see how Atriz can receive a neg trust from a DT on this forum because most DT members and Mod wear his signature.
|
|
|
|
|
Its really very bad in this thread there's a lot of hypocrisy
|
|
|
|
|
This thread takes alot of time to get 20 M, if this thread was in the altcoin section it will have 100 M views
I see many other threads get 2 or 3 Million views in less than 6 month.
|
|
|
|
I've been feeling that the price jump has been built on FOMO speculation for a while now. I think that the real, solid base is around $6k (roughly following the longer-term linear trend), but I expect speculators to stabilize it if it reaches $10k, at the very least, and then those prices might or might not stabilize.
So IMO $6k and below is "solid", $6k-$10k is semi-solid, and everything above $10k is a house of cards. No idea what'll actually happen in the next few days, though; it's pure speculative madness. In the next hour, I wouldn't be surprised to see a drop to $10k or an increase to $16k.
when all investors back from their vacations on january i think bitcoin will hit $22.000 your prediction was 100% fiable, but we cant forget there was alot of problem , korean ban,indian ban all those actions have immediat effect on bitcoin price. |
|
|
|
|
It seems you talking about people that use the name of Ognasty. But the real OGNASTY is not a scammer and he will never be a scammer,he is the most trusted member on this forum and theymos know that.
Post with your real account so people can see your real face
|
|
|
|
|
The company could be a registered company but it does not have a licence. The biggest error from CA they issue european certificat without verified the company address.
In usa its imposible to get the EV ssl without being a lagal company with a physical address.
|
|
|
|
|
i m sure your inbox is full with msg, then you can lock this thread to avoid signature spammer.
|
|
|
|
|
