Well, mBTC already causes enough confusion. I really hate when sites try to tell me I'm going to get 0,1 mBTC or 12,1 uBTC 

GOG.com is a site dedicated to offering DRM free games, legally from well-known mainstream publishers such as Activision, or Ubisoft; as well as indie developers such as CD Projekt (the guys who made The Witcher game series)
I've created a detailed post on their site feature requests, asking for them to accept Bitcoin, as well as explaining payment services like BitPay and Coinbase:
http://www.gog.com/wishlist/site/the_ability_to_purchase_games_via_bitcoin

If people sign up, and upvote this, we might just see an option for Bitcoin available at GOG.

To help gain support for this, you can place a link to this thread in your signature:
Let's get GOG.com to accept Bitcoin

+6'd and RT'd.

Since you have a 6970, I've heard that this line is faster than the one you're using.


It'd also be nice if you were a little bit more mature when writing your post, and then people will feel more inclined to reply.

Writing in all caps like the title "HELP ME PLEASE ! always failed ..>!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" will irritate most users and cause them to ignore your post.

Read up here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=175891.0

It's a long thread, but it's definitely one of the most informative ones.

"ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64"
It sounds like you're missing 64-bit libraries.

He's been spamming the hell out of Bitcointalk today with phishing links to steal BTC-e logins - and none of the mods have done anything yet. They've deleted a few of his threads after I reported them, but they still haven't banned him.

Looks like the same idea of http://litecointreasure.com/ - just a different approach.
Nevertheless it sounds okay, as long as you aren't stuck at the top 

I'm pretty sure it will, as long as the two haven't been compiled with different versions of leveldb ( This might happen, because I once had a problem with the Litecoin blockchain because the windows installer used a different version of bdb. )

The best way to check is to do it.
As long as you've backed up your wallet.dat you've got nothing to worry about.

Auction closed. We're past 28-04-2013 00:00.

Not really a valid bid, minimum bid was $100, 0.2BTC is only ~$30 right now.

3 more days 

Depending on the authentication method you use on your yubikey... if it's just the super-long password with a click of a button, the sites could steal that password and use it on elsewhere.
Where-as if a site supports the OTP method, you could be perfectly safe to use it on multiple sites.

Wasn't really a big upgrade. It's hosted on a VPS for which I use for a few other projects, and I was running low on space (damn you bitcoin for being so bloated, 10gb+ blockchain =_=), so I had my disks upgraded.

AAAND we're back.
That was a lot faster than I thought.

I apologize for the unplanned maintenance, but we're being upgraded so that we can handle a bit more.


We'll be back up anywhere from a few minutes, to a few hours.

This is not a DDoS or hack, we're simply upgrading the server.

BuyBIT was originally designed to ease the process of registering a domain using Namecoin. It allows for the a to register a domain using either Namecoins or Bitcoins, and then is able to specify either two nameservers, or an IP address for an A record.
Due to lack of use, and general abandonment by myself, I have decided to sell the website on auction, with a starting price of $100 paid in either Bitcoins or Litecoins of equal value (Just to be safe when the price changes)
Anyone who's highly interested in the service can purchase it with a "Buy it NOW" price of $350 (also paid in Bitcoins/Litecoins).
Minimum Increment is $1


I've answered a few possible questions below, so that the buyer can be more informed:

Q: Will I get the domain with it?
A: The service was originally founded with http://buybit.it.cx and I'm happy to part with that domain if the buyer wants it. (although it'd be more professional to buy your own .com/.net)

Q: Do I get the hosting of the site?
A: No. You'll have to find your own hosting, as it's currently hosted on one of my personal VPS's which runs several services.

Q: What about the current users of BuyBIT?
A: If needed, I'll dump the current database for the buyer, and the new buyer can decide what'll happen.

Q: What licence will the code be given under?
A: The code will be given without licensing. It's perfectly allowed for the buyer to open source the code and throw it under the GPL, or instead through it under a non-disclosure licence, locked to their company etc.

Q: What are the requirements for the website code?
A: The website is written in PHP with pretty much all dependencies packaged with the code, the only real dependencies are a Namecoin and Bitcoin original daemon running on the server.

Q: What about the wallets?
A: The wallets used by the server will also be optionally given to the buyer, (although I've drained both wallets of funding) so that users will continue to have their balances, and the domains are also linked to the wallet.

Q: Will any support be given, e.g. feature requests, installation?
A: All support is in my discretion. You'll generally just be given the code+wallets+database, and left to do whatever. I may help in some cases, to configure the site to get it running again on your own server.

Q: When will the auction end?
A: The auction will end on 2013-04-28 at 00:00 UTC-0 OR when somebody purchases it for the "Buy it NOW" price.

tl;dr you get the domain, database, wallet, and code. licence however you feel like. it's PHP, no dependencies. no support other than optional configuration help. ends next week.

Any other questions can be asked in the thread, or via PM.

You should color the percentages similar to dustcoin, >100% = green, <100% = red, 100% = neutral

He's replied to me telling me that he's no longer interested and would be fine with you taking his place at $110
At the current price of $65, that'll be 1.7BTC to the address I've sent you in PM, and then I'll discuss the transfer.

The winner, Stunna has been gone for 2 days now, and hasn't responded to the PM I sent him asking for payment a few days ago. The domain is still in my hands, but if Stunna doesn't re-appear for much longer, I suppose I'll have to take some sort-of action, i.e. re-do the auction, or give to the second highest bidder?