I just wanted to put your attention on a truly hidde ngem I just discoverd : Calamario Network : KMA It's already traded on a major exchange, Kucoin, and 2 others (MEXC and trade.io) and was just listed today on Huobi. https://trade.kucoin.com/trade/KMA-USDTAlready very high volume for a news coin, very low market cap : https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/calamari-network/The team seems very serious about the project, and is very active on twitter. Price today is on sales, it oculd be a very good opportunity to dive IN What's your expectations / thoughts about this project ? Would be glad to read more of you about it.
|
|
|
Can't wait to try the 0.24 with my 3080 lhr What could possibly be the power consumption for a 3080 in solo mining with the new lhr-low-power mode ?
|
|
|
6
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: NBMiner v39.0, GPU Miner for ETH, CFX, RVN, GRIN, BEAM, AE, ERGO, ZIL
|
on: September 30, 2021, 12:07:07 PM
|
I also have the issue of "LHR lock detected wait to unlock", no idea how to fix this.
No actions is needed. Miner will have the best changed done. It is so nice to use 39.5 on Ergo. I have my LHR-cards worked perfectly. I'm able to achieve only 195 mhs on ergo with a 3080 lhr What's the deal for you ?
|
|
|
GMiner v2.68 available for download
v2.68 + detect lock of LHR GPUs, automatically unlock and continue mining + display of miner restart count by watchdog
Ethash fee is 0.65% KAWPOW fee is 1%
Unlock at 70% max ?
|
|
|
GMiner v2.67 available for download
v2.67 + partial LHR cards unlock without additional power consumption + use --lhr 1 to force enable unlock for RTX 3060 V1 + use --lhr_tune1/lhr_tune2 to tune unlock parameters, positive values increase performance, negative values decrease probability of lock + miner requires latest Nvidia drivers(470+), to update Nvidia drivers under Hive OS run "nvidia-driver-update" command in terminal
Ethash fee is 0.65% KAWPOW fee is 1%
How much can we expect without rejects / lock shares with a 3080 lhr ?
|
|
|
9
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: NBMiner v39.0, GPU Miner for ETH, CFX, RVN, GRIN, BEAM, AE, ERGO, ZIL
|
on: September 12, 2021, 09:01:11 PM
|
Just tried with a 3080 lhr, and the miner always say : 'LHR lock detected, wait to unlock" ( on 39.2 only, but I can't get more than 62mhs with a 3080 LHR on 39.1 )
Even with lhr 68, wich is not so aggressive Needs to install NVML library from cuda too ?
Edit : yes it works with library
Anyway, impossible to go above lhr 70...
1- May I ask you how do you install this NVML library please ? 2- I'm a new NBminer (very soon) user. after documenting, If I understood it well, we have to use AfterBurner to undervolt & overclock our gpus, right ? can't do it in NBminer itself ? 3- and it means no lock clock/absolute core clock ? 4- about lock clock, have anyone of you guys tried to use the Nvidia smi commands (to lock core clock) + NBminer ? 5- about how to use api / web monitoring with NBminerr pls, is this ok (in the bat file): --api 127.0.0.1:22333 and in the browser: http://127.0.0.1:22333context: I've just bought a 3080 lhr. usually using trex, for the moment it gives me 54.14mh/s for 168W, 47°gpu/70°vram for 60%rpm. setup: 1030 for lock clock, 1180 for memory clock. I'm going to try NBminer to see how much I can go for mh/s at what cost for Watt, and if mh/s will be stable or not. How can you achieve 54mhs@168W with a LHR and a miner who has no unlock like t-rex ? Edit : okay, works here too Nice
|
|
|
10
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: NBMiner v39.0, GPU Miner for ETH, CFX, RVN, GRIN, BEAM, AE, ERGO, ZIL
|
on: September 09, 2021, 12:53:12 PM
|
|
11
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: NBMiner v39.0, GPU Miner for ETH, CFX, RVN, GRIN, BEAM, AE, ERGO, ZIL
|
on: September 06, 2021, 08:36:41 AM
|
Just tried with a 3080 lhr, and the miner always say : 'LHR lock detected, wait to unlock" ( on 39.2 only, but I can't get more than 62mhs with a 3080 LHR on 39.1 )
Even with lhr 68, wich is not so aggressive Needs to install NVML library from cuda too ?
Edit : yes it works with library
Anyway, impossible to go above lhr 70...
|
|
|
12
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: NBMiner v39.0, GPU Miner for ETH, CFX, RVN, GRIN, BEAM, AE, ERGO, ZIL
|
on: August 31, 2021, 08:52:04 AM
|
Just tried ETH with new v39.1 version, and the miner always crashes at startup with my 3060ti LHR No problem with y non LHR 3070 cards
Any ideas ?
I have the same problem with 3060 cards, both on the latest version of the miner and on the previous one. Restarting the system completely helps, sometimes you have to do it 2 times. Thanks ! Will try
|
|
|
13
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: NBMiner v39.0, GPU Miner for ETH, CFX, RVN, GRIN, BEAM, AE, ERGO, ZIL
|
on: August 25, 2021, 09:11:28 AM
|
Just tried ETH with new v39.1 version, and the miner always crashes at startup with my 3060ti LHR No problem with y non LHR 3070 cards
Any ideas ?
|
|
|
Hi all Here are my results with my 4 3070 trioX :
64.5 mhs@120W : +1600mhz memory
So far no rejects, but I know it's a high memory OC, even if GDDR6 memory does not heat as much as GDDR6X from 3080/3090
Is it safe for mining ? My core temp is at 44 degrees..
But perfCapReason in gpu Z shows : pwr whzn I apply a so high OC And it set it to idle when applying a +1200 mhz
What's the best for perfCapReason ?
|
|
|
What is the next 100x coin that you would like to bet as little as $10 and gain as much as $1000? Don’t tell me there isn’t anything that can make you filthy rich, you just need to look deeper. Do you think DeFi or NFT would be next 100x?
Just wait for the ICP to drop at .70$ so when it breaks its ATH which is 700$ in the next Bull cycle then you will assure a min. of 1000x gains! What kind of bottom can we excpect for ICP ? Seems strill overpriced, even at 28 USD
|
|
|
I just set --lock-cclock to 1000 to my 3080 and 800 to my 3070 I did not improved the consumption, but at least, core clock is now locked fine and stable Still 96mhs@220W for the 3080 and 63 mhs@120W for the 3070 Thanks
|
|
|
If you lower PL to 55% rather than lowering voltage, you'll get same conso no ? I did this with my 3060ti, and I get 63mhs@131W with PL 55%, core -502, mem +1400
mem +1400 very high memory overclocking What do you think is better than 60 megahash and 120 watts of consumption or 63 megahash and 130 watts of consumption? Everyone chooses the optimal ratio himself, but maximum acceleration is not always the best. The card is the trioX version, extremely well cooled, core is 45 degrees max. I know mem could be a lot hotter, but compared to 3080 / 3090 GDDR6X who thermal throttle a lot, I don't suffer of this issues at all with my 3060ti's And lowering the mem to +1000 instead does not lower the power consumption at all. Still 130W
|
|
|
Limit power by using voltage - reduce it until the memory drops to 5000mhz, then bump it back up My 3070s are doing 750mV, -500 core +1450 mem for 63.5MH/s @ 135W atw
If you lower PL to 55% rather than lowering voltage, you'll get same conso no ? I did this with my 3060ti, and I get 63mhs@131W with PL 55%, core -502, mem +1400
|
|
|
T-Rex 0.19.7
* ("ethash", "octopus", "kawpow") Improve stability for 30xx series GPUs * ("ethash") Verify overclock stability after DAG rebuild ("Instability detected" message is printed in case there are issues) * Add "--gpu-report-interval-s" parameter to control hashrate summary report frequency based on the number of share submissions * (API) Add new "pause" command for "control" handler to pause and resume mining * (Watchdog) Display a list of GPUs caused miner restart with "GPU is idle" error
Bug fixes: * ("x21s") "incorrect size of extranonce2" error * (UI) Incorrect GPU index in share submission report when "--pci-indexing" mode is enabled * (API) Miner fails to switch algorithms on the fly for some ""<algo_from>" -> "<algo_to>"" combinations
Completely unreliable for a 7 card 30series rig with medium memory overclocks 3060Ti +800MHz, 3070 +700MHz and +800MHz, 3090 +350MHz... It cannot create the DAG reliably it will hang and crash miner. However if memory overclocks are reduced by 200MHz on each card it will create DAG why is this? It works perfectly with version 0.19.5 and 0.19.4 (these I have tested with these settings). This is absolutely not a stable build for me... It just hangs unless used with an extremely low memory overclock. What power are you using on the 3060Ti? I'm able to run with +1359 MHz on the memory @131W. With +1400 I get 1% incorrect shares I use 60% power. I do not want to run the memory at such inflated values as it will degrade the memory 700 to 800 I have found to be stable in gaming and normal workloads so I am satisfied with this long term performance. However as stated .19.7 is completely unreliable when creating the DAG. Unless memory gets too hot (wich is not the case for gddr6 (non X), you'll not attempt to your memory life, trust me
|
|
|
|