 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
danas, tražeći neki info sa https://bitcoin.org/en/bitcoin-paper primjetio sam da nema HR prijevoda, i sjetim se da ga je jedan naš član lokanog foruma preveo Kako možemo taj prijevod staviti na popis sa ostalim prijevodima da bude "službeno" dostupan? Ajde raspitati ću se malo kada ulovim vremena, radio sam neke prijevode za njih preko nekog sajta specijalizarnog za prevođenje. Čak su me stavili i za nekakvog admina da mogu odobrit hrvatske prijevode. To je sve bilo za samu web stranicu koliko znam ali možda je povezano. @cryptotux ako vidiš ovu poruku volio bi čuti tvoje mišljenje kao i dobiti dozvolu da ti/ja ili neko drugi objavi tvoj rad u nepromijenjenom obliku ili ako bude trebalo napraviti neke sitnije modifikacije (nisam pročitao prevedeni dokument pa ne znam koliko je kvalitetno preveden). U slučaju da se slažeš reci pod kojim imenom želiš da ti se napiše zasluga za prijevod. Nemam ništa protiv objavljivanja ili dijeljenja prijevoda u nepromijenjenom obliku ukoliko je zasluga za prijevod prepisana meni, odnosno mom pseudonimu. htio sam ga ja direktno kontaktirati, još sam pregledao dali je kojim slučajem baniran ili šta se već moglo dogoditi, pa sam krenuo pisati post
jer bilo bi lijepo, da pored svih prijevoda se naše i HR prijevod, već kad postoji
Živ i zdrav sam te posjećujem forum svako toliko, ali ne prijavljujem se osim kad idem nešto objaviti. |
|
|
|
Posts: 16
Activity: 16
Merit: 17
Ne mogu da se sjetim da sam dosad vidio nekog člana da ima više merita nego postova i activity ali svaka čast na trudu, samo tako nastavi!
Pogledajte Satoshijev profil, iznenadit ćete se. Uglavnom, hvala vam i ostalim komentatorima na lijepim riječima i savjetima u vezi s prijevodom. Priznajem da sam rijetko na forumu, ali kad jesam nastojim napisati nešto smisleno i kvalitetno kako bih pomogao drugim korisnicima i čitateljima. U svakom slučaju ću nastaviti svoj rad. |
|
|
|
Možda sam licimjer (jer sam prevodim tu na forumu) ali ja apsolutno sve što je moguće čitam na izvornom jeziku (vrijedi samo za engleski na žalost, jer ostale ne razumijem dovoljno). Mrzim prijevode jer se uvijek nešto izgubi, čak i kad su profesionalno odrađeni. Mislim da nisam pročitao ništa na hrvatskom (osim sportskih novosti i nekih udžbenika na faksu) još od srednje škole. A čitam poprilično, uključujući dosta tehničke literature i hrpu Fantasy & Sci Fi knjiga (ako neko ima interesa na tom polju slobodno nek se javi na telegram: @Trofo da popričamo).
Imate pravo što se tiče čitanja izvornih djela i drago mi je da je netko isticao problem gubitka značenja kod prijevoda. Upravo zbog toga bih preporučio onima koji dovoljno dobro razumiju engleski jezik da pročitaju izvornu verziju Satoshijevog rada kako bi shvatili osnovne principe Bitcoina. Međutim, ima onih kojima je engleski slaba strana, pa zato postoje prijevodi. |
|
|
|
Stvarno si se potrudio svaka čast.
Ako ćeš raditi reviziju prijevoda nekoliko natuknicao od mene.
U radovima koji se objavljuju Abstract se prevodi kao Sažetak a References kao Literatura.
Ili ako netko imam volje i znanja bilo bi dobro lektorirati ovaj prijevod.
Od mene ima 5 merita.
Razmislit ću o reviziji prijevoda, pa ću uzeti u obzir vaše prijedloge ako to odlučim učiniti. U svakom slučaju bi bilo dobro ako bi netko koji se razumije u hrvatski jezik i rad Bitcoina lektorirao moj prijevod. |
|
|
|
Zanimljivo mi je bilo kad sam vidio da nitko nije preveo u potpunosti Satoshijev pregledni rad (whitepaper) na hrvatski jezik. Zato sam ja odlučio to učiniti kao hobi u posljednjih nekoliko mjeseci. Budući da je danas deseta obljetnica otkad je Satoshi objavio svoj znameniti rad, mislim da bi bilo najprikladnije danas objaviti svoj kompletan prijevod njegovog rada na hrvatski jezik. Nastojao sam prevesti sve pojmove što sam bolje mogao, ali problematične su riječi poput "nonce" za koje ne postoji hrvatski ekvivalent. Zbog toga sam takve pojmove ostavio u izvornom obliku. Gramatika mi nikad nije bila najjača strana, pa ako slučajno vidite nekakvu grešku, slobodno mi se obratite. Pregledao sam cijeli dokument nekoliko puta, ali još uvijek je moguće da sam propustio neku grešku. Navedeni su SHA-256 hashevi dvaju dokumenata radi provjere. Prvi je izvorni dokument u OpenDocument formatu koji sam preuzeo preko GitHub projekta (wbnns/bitcoinwhitepaper); pomoću njega sam napravio PDF koji je također objavljen. 45f15e3597056694380e95b0c821149fb50015c5f3e302247c26bcbff95f0ca9 - bitcoin_hr.odt b36444d0b5260f8c8cfa2dc5b6b4e4e65326980482db71a215d7c031e01a15f9 - bitcoin_hr.pdf Poveznice (linkovi) na dokumente: http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=88452281597142018811 - bitcoin_hr.odt http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=02999955159840527656 - bitcoin_hr.pdf |
|
|
|
Usually competition works to prevent high fees, except when all route available have high fees which sucks. This will be rare case, but i'm sure this might happen when there aren't many routes and all available nodes offer high fees.
I don't like limiting the fees from protocol either, but IMO this might be necessary.
After reading the discussion about limiting fees based on protocol, I'd side with the majority on not doing so and instead rely on a "laissez-faire" approach, if you will, to ensure routing fees reach a state of equilibrium. Most Lightning clients have autorouting, don't they? From what I've gathered, such clients will choose the cheapest route, so any node with excessive fees will be avoided if possible. |
|
|
|
Definitely. The LN is still being tested currently. Once it is fully released and people start using it, there will be routing fees. Currently it is more like testing how payments in the future will look like  I'll be patient and wait for the Lightning Network to leave beta phase. I think it has some way to go before becoming a user-friendly second-layer solution. |
|
|
|
Just run lncli feereport
If your are not moving the amounts in your channels that should indicate how much you have earned.
But at this time people have channels with subsatoshis or zero fees. I have had my nodes running for 3 months and no one has routed through me (or not that I know of).
If there is a better solution like a line on the logs, please tell me
Checked. All my fee sums are zero. Do you suppose routing fees might increase as larger hubs come into existence? My reasoning is that those who have larger funded channels will be able to service more users, which will lead to them being able to dictate higher routing fees for the sake of convenience (so users don't have to create new channels for larger sums, for instance). |
|
|
|
|
Closest thing I can find to that has something to do with trimming circuits. Not sure what it means, though.
In any case, thank you for taking the time to answer my questions. I'm sure I'll be able to route my way through the Lightning Network (pardon the pun).
|
|
|
|
How can I determine if someone decided to relay through my node? Through incoming connections?
You will see that someone has offered you an HTLC and then you have offered someone else an HTLC. I'm using lnd as my client. What should I look for in my log to determine if such an event has occurred? |
|
|
|
I've been reading up on the Lightning Network, and I read that you can earn routing fees by having users relay LN transactions through your node. What I'd like to know is this: - How can I determine if someone decided to relay through my node? Through incoming connections?
- Are open channels imperative to earning routing fees? If so, how many are optimal?
I'm aware that I might earn only a handful of satoshi, but I'm interested in new experiences and technologies. |
|
|
|
Everyone, as mentioned before about the new final APR, we are proposing the new final APR to be 1.337% as oppose to the originally planned 13.37% in order to keep coin supply in check and improve coin value. We would like to hear from you all as your opinion matters. Polls are open here and on Twitter https://twitter.com/1337CoinUpdates/status/929404710745989124I'd personally vote for the final APR to be 1.337%, provided that it was followed by a significant decrease in circulating supply through, say, burning. I believe that's the only way 1337 can increase in value, since applying only a low interest rate wouldn't affect the price much because the circulating supply would still be too high for the value to appreciate. |
|
|
|
It's been near 2 years since I launched faucetgame.com.
Everyone who posts his faucetgame username in this topic will get 10k satoshi.
Congratulations, sir! FaucetGame's the first site of yours I joined, and I've always had fun gambling there and earning satoshi; I play there under the username betatux. I wish you and your sites many more years of success to come. |
|
|
|
Litebar is just getting hammered by the profit switching pools.
They jump on with 1.5GH and drive the difficulty up, then they switch to something else.
With the difficulty being so high, the smaller pools have to work for 6 to 12 hours just to find one block.
That's 6 to 12 hours (some times more) that the blockchain doesn't move, causing havoc with people trying to move their litebars around.
I'm thinking of adding PoS (proof of stake) to litebar, so when the chain stops the pos transactions will keep the chain going.
A small pos amount like 6% annual should interest (ha-ha) people in keeping their wallets open to stake, but not add to much in cap growth, keeping the price from dropping.
Any body have any comments or suggestions regarding addind PoS, or the 6% annual idea ??
I second the suggestion for adding POS to LiteBar, thus making it a hybrid cryptocurrency like BitBar. Personally, I think 6% is a reasonable annual interest rate. However, the following question arises: What should the minimum stake age be? BitBar has a minimum stake age of 30 days. However, seeing as LiteBar is supposed to be the silver counterpart to BitBar, I feel it should have a lower minimum stake age. Perhaps 7 or 14 days would be suitable as a minimum stake age should POS be added to LiteBar? I'd like to hear some thoughts on that aspect. |
|
|
|
|
Bitrad.io is a brilliant idea, and I enjoy the fact that one can listen to online radio and earn money in the form of BRO, a POS cryptocurrency. The site reminds me of FaucetFM, a defunct Bitcoin faucet that used to pay satoshi for listening to online radio. I've been using Bitrad.io since yesterday and have already been paid a little over 0.4 BRO so far, which is around, what, 2,200 satoshi at the time of writing? Remarkable! I even bought about 100 BRO on Cryptopia to begin staking and support the concept.
I'm looking forward to the new developments behind Bitrad.io and hope it'll succeed. Of all the ICOs I've seen recently, this one is perhaps one of the most practical to me. One concern I've heard from some posters is the future price. As far as I can tell from the announcement, a significant amount of BRO will be burned to reduce the available supply, which should hopefully cause the price to increase in the long run. A price of over 10,000 satoshi or so is probably feasible. As far as demand is concerned, I'm certain there will be some demand for BRO. A majority of people already listens to online radio without being paid a cent, so why wouldn't some want to cash in on Bitrad.io and earn some spare change while doing something they enjoy anyway?
|
|
|
|
You can use Ubuntu : no roaming folder and one specific folder for each wallet.
If you don't want to use Ubuntu, you have to wait safe solutions on Windows : one day... or never (or too late).
I do have a dual boot system including Kubuntu 16.04 LTS and Windows 10, so I think it might be worth a try. Can I simply copy everything in my Roaming folder to a Core client on Linux, then? I have a feeling it might lead to some strange behavior when I try to synchronize and reindex Bitcoin Core, since the most recent blocks won't be accepted as valid. Edit: I decided not to complicate matters and just synchronize the entire blockchain from scratch for the Core client. However, seeing as my Linux hard disk had a little over 30 GB of free space remaining, I had no choice but to enable pruning. Anyway, thank you for replying to my post. I appreciate the help. |
|
|
|
|
Good day,
Could someone give me some advice on how to access the BTC and BCH chains on the same machine? Namely, I currently have BUCash v1.1.0.0 installed and would like to be able to use Bitcoin Core so that I can access the BTC chain. However, I'm concerned that installing Bitcoin Core could overwrite the blockchain data stored by BUCash in the Roaming folder (Windows 10). I'd like to make it clear that I intend to use both chains on a regular basis, so this is why I'm posting this.
I would also like to know if it's possible to configure both clients to share the blockchain data before block 478,558 (all blocks before the hard fork) to save some disk space.
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
