Hi.

There is a msg put up on Cryptopia that LUX wallet is in maintenance, waiting for an update from LUXCoin team.
What would be this update they are talking about and how soon approximately do you plan to have this fixed?

thank you.

Is ver 0.7.1 available? I hear people mentioning 0.7.1.

Linux ver links are empty for version 1.22 on top page.

My question was, why *exactly* pool payments cause a large amount of small transactions as compared to payments sent from a wallet?
The article only explains the concept of dust, which I already know.

This is not a real exchange: the only coin it has is GEEKCASH. I (or anyone who writes in PHP) can create an "exchange" like that.

Thanks for your explanation. Can you explain why exactly payment from mining pools cause much dust compared to transactions sent from private wallets? Will it help Cryptopia if miners raise payment threshold on a mining pool?

Not listed on any exchanges, not listed on coinmarketcap, not listed on whattomine.

So?

I doubt it ever existed. You don't give your money away for nothing, it just doesn't happen.

I would like to draw everyone's attention to a problem going on with LUXCoin wallet on Cryptopia. The chain is currently almost 13 hrs behind, deposits are delayed accordingly. This situation has been going on for a few weeks already. Fist, the wallet was in maintenance for almost a week, now the wallet is lagging. What is the problem with this? Cryptopia is the top volume exchange for LUX, why can't Cryptopia people afford to buy a decent SSD drive to sync the chain properly? Why is it even a problem? Current block height on Cryptopia is 446239, whereas actual current block is 446808.

I would still like to emphasize the problem with LUXCoin going on at Cryptopia. Their chain is almost 13 hrs behind. Current LUX block height on Cryptopia is 446239, whereas actual current block is 446808. And they have only 4 LUX nodes listed in their config. I contacted support, they are aware of the problem, but they do nothing to solve it. Taking in consideration the fact that Cryptopia is the top volume exchange for LUX and that many people actually mine LUX for profit, I think this makes a very negative impact on the coin and its reputation in general.

Why can't the LUX devs somehow kick Cryptopia people or offer their help in resolving this matter? It's been going on for a few weeks already. First they put the LUX wallet in maintanance mode for almost a week, then they cannot sync the chain properly. Can we even be sure they are not doing it on purpose? What, they cannot afford a decent SSD drive to run the LUX wallet?

Thanks.

I'm pretty sure there is some story behind this particular wallet with 310 BTC. You don't just give away your money. Do you know a lot of people who give away money to strangers? I don't. Thinking of reasons why someone could do it:

1. He can't use it himself due to some legal issues (has access to internet but no access to banking, for example). I don't believe in this story that he "is at the point where he does not care about larger amounts of money anymore". It's not how it works. Whenever you have more money, you start making more plans to spend it, and you don't consider that lot "a lot" anymore, thus you always want more. Everyone who went, say, from broke to middle class can prove it.
2. He is terminally ill or crippled and does not care.
3. He is doing it to prove someone some point (e.g. I'll burn my money in a fireplace, but I won't pay for your new car)
4. Maybe he's trying to prove the point that money, in fact, ruins your life instead of changing it for the better? What is this reference to charity? Most millionaires actually DO charity. Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, just to name the few. Are they idiots? I think not. )
5. The funds are somehow locked in this wallet and he does not know the solution in full himself
6. He is actually not allowed to touch the funds (as per suggestion in one of previous posts), so he needs someone else to move them
7. The 310 problem has no solution (and it's not even included in the picture), he just took it himself. Now that the 310 BTC is claimed, why is Mr. Pip not disclosing the solution to the 310 BTC wallet? Maybe because it does not exist?
8. Maybe this picture is only a key to a much larger amount of BTC, so he needs help solving the first picture, and he'll try to solve the 2nd picture himself. ))

Would it not make sense to create, say, 10 wallets 31 BTC worth each? To give someone an extra opportunity? Why is it 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 310?

I don't think this could be actually called a "challenge". RSA large number factoring was a real challenge. It provided an incentive to create new algorithms, hardware devices, it attracted people to the problem. But what's the practical use of this "challenge"? Other than guessing someone else's weird riddles? I personally find it humiliating and condescending. I am not a hell of a programmer, but I can easily create a twisted "challenge" most people won't be able to solve, yet with an existing solution. With the amount of computer science knowledge needed to solve this, I'd personally better work on my own miner to live off devfee. At least, I'd be doing something useful.

p.s. I agree with one of the previous posters that this person is probably American. The niceness is probably due to the fact he's not a young person, I think he's in his 60s.

Hi,

what is the payment schedule? I mine GIN with f2pool.com.
Daily payment, what time? please.

thanks

What's going on with Cryptopia LUX wallet? It's under maintenance for 4 days already. It kills the incentive to mine the coin, I think it has negative impact on coin reputation in general. Maybe the devs can step in and help Cryptopia people sort it all out?

And there are no any other LUX exchanges that I know of with decent trade volume.

Hi,

Are there any pools available except leafpool? I can't make their miner run. Another miner gotten off github won't connect to their pool.
Running Ubuntu 16.04 LTS CUDA 9.2.

please

I've yet to see a miner that uses OpenCL with NVidia cards. Everyone uses CUDA with them greens. ))
I just wanted to try it out just to find out if it's worth using this miner with 1060s for eqhash144.

Why is it not running on GTX 980 4gb, still?

It's not working on GTX980 4GB cards either. Same error msg.

Also note, equihash 144 is using less than 2GB RAM. It's the 192 that uses 2+ GBs.

For me only equihash96 is working on NVidia cards under Linux.

For equihash144 I get this msg:

lolMiner is configured to mine Bitcoin Gold(BTG), Equihash 144.5
Setup Miner...
Using device with id 0 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB)
Using device with id 1 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB)
Using device with id 2 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB)
Using device with id 3 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB)
Using device with id 4 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB)
Using device with id 5 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB)
Warning: Your device with id 0 is currently not supported by lolMiner or by the specific algorithm you selected.
Warning: Your device with id 1 is currently not supported by lolMiner or by the specific algorithm you selected.
Warning: Your device with id 2 is currently not supported by lolMiner or by the specific algorithm you selected.
Warning: Your device with id 3 is currently not supported by lolMiner or by the specific algorithm you selected.
Warning: Your device with id 4 is currently not supported by lolMiner or by the specific algorithm you selected.
Warning: Your device with id 5 is currently not supported by lolMiner or by the specific algorithm you selected.

Hi.

I "received" my payment 2hrs ago (amount is 0.00535060 BTC), according to pool stats, however, there is no transaction number shown next to payment as usual, and no payment was actually made. Coins left pool balance as though payment was done. What's the problem?

Hi.

Trying to run under Ubuntu 16.04. I get the err msg:

mkxminer  Device not supported: "Ellesmere"

I have 4x RX580 8GB GPUs. Tried ./example.sh

[19:20:10 - 0 days 00:00:00] Starting mkxminer 3.1.0...
[19:20:11 - 0 days 00:00:01] GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT or GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS environment variable is not set, performance may be worse!
[19:20:11 - 0 days 00:00:01] Connecting to stratum+tls://vtc.suprnova.cc:5676 as WinMKX.test...
[19:20:12 - 0 days 00:00:01] Difficulty set to 32
[19:20:14 - 0 days 00:00:04] Connected!
[19:20:14 - 0 days 00:00:04] clBuildProgram: -11
[19:20:14 - 0 days 00:00:04] Frontend phase failed compilation.
Error: Compilation from LLVMIR binary to IL text failed!
[19:20:14 - 0 days 00:00:04] Device not supported: "Ellesmere". Only AMD GCN devices are supported currently. Please double check that you have AMD videocards.
[19:20:14 - 0 days 00:00:04] clBuildProgram: -11
[19:20:14 - 0 days 00:00:04] Frontend phase failed compilation.
Error: Compilation from LLVMIR binary to IL text failed!
[19:20:14 - 0 days 00:00:04] Device not supported: "Ellesmere". Only AMD GCN devices are supported currently. Please double check that you have AMD videocards.
[19:20:15 - 0 days 00:00:04] clBuildProgram: -11
[19:20:15 - 0 days 00:00:04] Frontend phase failed compilation.
Error: Compilation from LLVMIR binary to IL text failed!
[19:20:15 - 0 days 00:00:04] Device not supported: "Ellesmere". Only AMD GCN devices are supported currently. Please double check that you have AMD videocards.
[19:20:15 - 0 days 00:00:05] clBuildProgram: -11
[19:20:15 - 0 days 00:00:05] Frontend phase failed compilation.
Error: Compilation from LLVMIR binary to IL text failed!
[19:20:15 - 0 days 00:00:05] Device not supported: "Ellesmere". Only AMD GCN devices are supported currently. Please double check that you have AMD videocards.
[19:20:16 - 0 days 00:00:06] --- Detected Platforms ---
[19:20:16 - 0 days 00:00:06] *0 AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing OpenCL 2.0 AMD-APP (2482.3)
[19:20:16 - 0 days 00:00:06] --- Detected GPUs ---
[19:20:16 - 0 days 00:00:06] GPU#0: ?
[19:20:16 - 0 days 00:00:06] GPU#1: ?
[19:20:16 - 0 days 00:00:06] GPU#2: ?
[19:20:16 - 0 days 00:00:06] GPU#3: ?
[19:20:16 - 0 days 00:00:06]
[19:20:16 - 0 days 00:00:06] Press 'q' to exit application

Devs, please fix your website! http://www.geekcash.org leads to some strange page!