|
Is it possible to see the collected amount at the first stage of sales? Or will it be announced on the end of sales?
no matter what, your threshold for entering the project is very profitable
|
|
|
|
Very interesting and simultaneously ambiguous. Do restaurant owners want to spend money on it? And influence of visitors to music in the hall may not be good.
Venue owners of course spend money on it, but the great thing here: Signed venues get a cashback % from microtransactions and advertising made. So why should they not use Moozicore and are fully licensed with it, instead of spending a lot of money on companys for playing songs in public. With the cashback, they probably earn more money then spending it. It sounds very attractive to everyone except music performers. I am not dedicated to the topic of copyright and playing music in bars, and I can not understand how licenses will be created. |
|
|
|
|
it is precisely such projects that clearly show the goal and the final product must survive. as practice shows, we need to develop an existing business.
|
|
|
|
Maybe I missed this information. How long does it take for the articles to be audited? Is this going to happen at the end of Bounty campaign?
Correct, audit happens in the end It is not good. You can reject all articles, becose they have same mistakes |
|
|
|
I would like to know the names of exchanges that are willing to work with Moozicore. I believe in the success of the project, and hope that the team has already started searching for such participants for the project.
Hitbtc and latoken is confirmed until now This is good, but many people rely on etherdelta, but I don’t like this option. |
|
|
|
I have seen that the payouts of earned tokens in some of the bounty campaigns are divided into several stages. I'm talking about the other ICO. Will you be able to accrue tokens simultaneously for all participants?
It seems to me that this aspect is not very important. the main thing is that there is no long gap between the stages If it is only about rewards for bounty members, I think this is an important point. I would like to know exactly about all the details of the campaign. It seems to me that the team is well prepared for the qualitative conduct of all the stages of ICO, and this will be done with a positive result for all participants. if everyone receives coins in time, this is good, but the main thing is that the coin is already being traded |
|
|
|
I have seen that the payouts of earned tokens in some of the bounty campaigns are divided into several stages. I'm talking about the other ICO. Will you be able to accrue tokens simultaneously for all participants?
It seems to me that this aspect is not very important. the main thing is that there is no long gap between the stages |
|
|
|
I saw some comments on the Signature campaign. I understand that message quality is important for your project. Other conditions of this category remain unchanged?
The quality of posts should certainly be high, but how will the manager evaluate it? |
|
|
|
I would like to know if there will be a limit on the number of participants in each pool of the Bounty campaign?
Not yet for now, if we think it's enough we have to right to limit it.. so everybody who participate gets definitely a good amount of token  but you are interested to have more participants. Bountyhunters are interested in more coins. and sales of coins do not always depend on the number of participants. It is paradox But it seems to me that still the Bounty campaign helps to spread the information about the project if the content is of high quality. Moderators should follow this quality to get a good result. You're right. The quality of the content determines the effectiveness of the bounty. |
|
|
|
I would like to know if there will be a limit on the number of participants in each pool of the Bounty campaign?
Not yet for now, if we think it's enough we have to right to limit it.. so everybody who participate gets definitely a good amount of token but you are interested to have more participants. Bountyhunters are interested in more coins. and sales of coins do not always depend on the number of participants. It is paradox |
|
|
|
No KYC anymore and no limits, so you can join with more profit and easier rules!
Thanks. It is great opportunity to participate in this good bounty. |
|
|
|
Can I use Russian language for Signature Campaign?
Is there russian thread of bounty and the project? |
|
|
|
I really like the idea of this project for its simplisity. No hard explanations and things u have to read through several times to understand the idea. Thats why im confident project has all the chances to reach hard cap!
I can not say that it is so simple to understand. I have reviewed the information several times, but I have not completely understood it. |
|
|
|
We want to open a new segment - smart contract automation.
I need study information about your project in details. I'm a little confused, what it is. Please, read this message about use cases with smart contracts. I think that many additional features need to be implemented in turn and not all at once. |
|
|
|
Can participants from all countries take part in the bounty or is there a restriction?
I thought that the ban times for participants in some countries had already passed. |
|
|
|
Besides Trezor and Ledger - who else could be considered as competitor for your project?
Well, all the hardware wallets are literally competitors for this project. But I may ensure that device on Linux is much more convenient to use then any hardware wallet that exist now. So it will grab its part of market for sure It will be difficult to mentally separate the Micro-PC from the hardware wallets segment. We want to open a new segment - smart contract automation. I need study information about your project in details. I'm a little confused, what it is. |
|
|
|
Besides Trezor and Ledger - who else could be considered as competitor for your project?
I think that Trezor and Ledger are good competitors, and competition with them must be tough. they are not competitors. at the moment they are much better. not because their code is better, but because they have reputation. you dont have it, which means you are a project that is still a level lower all the same. this is my sober look of a person who has trezor and a ledger bot. I like the criticality of developers to their own project. This means that property owners know what issues need to be addressed. The creators of this project can already use a lot of successful experience of predecessors, as well as to work on their own mistakes and not repeat them. |
|
|
|
If I am active every two weeks, I will not be removed from the campaign? I read that there are some conditions for the activity of the participants.
You can be removed if you not active for more than 3 weeks. Bounty is not too long to miss weeks. Participate or not. There are a lot of reasons, that do not allow to post or just be online. |
|
|
|
Besides Trezor and Ledger - who else could be considered as competitor for your project?
I think that Trezor and Ledger are good competitors, and competition with them must be tough. they are not competitors. at the moment they are much better. not because their code is better, but because they have reputation. you dont have it, which means you are a project that is still a level lower all the same. this is my sober look of a person who has trezor and a ledger bot. But the trezor had no reputation once. It needs to be earned, but it is real. DO NOT be so categorical. |
|
|
|
Besides Trezor and Ledger - who else could be considered as competitor for your project?
I think that Trezor and Ledger are good competitors, and competition with them must be tough. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
